Ideal cardiovascular health is inversely associated with incident cancer: the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities study

Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik, Christina M Shay, Judith G Abramson, Christopher A Friedrich, Jennifer A Nettleton, Anna E Prizment, Aaron R Folsom, Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik, Christina M Shay, Judith G Abramson, Christopher A Friedrich, Jennifer A Nettleton, Anna E Prizment, Aaron R Folsom

Abstract

Background: The American Heart Association (AHA) has defined the concept of ideal cardiovascular health in promotion of the 2020 Strategic Impact Goals. We examined whether adherence to ideal levels of the 7 AHA cardiovascular health metrics was associated with incident cancers in the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities (ARIC) study over 17 to 19 years of follow-up.

Methods and results: After exclusions for missing data and prevalent cancer, 13 253 ARIC participants were included for analysis. Baseline measurements were used to classify participants according to 7 AHA cardiovascular health metrics. Combined cancer incidence (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers) from 1987 to 2006 was captured using cancer registries and hospital surveillance; 2880 incident cancer cases occurred over follow-up. Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios for incident cancer. There was a significant (P trend <0.0001), graded, inverse association between the number of ideal cardiovascular health metrics at baseline and cancer incidence. Participants meeting goals for 6 to 7 ideal health metrics (2.7% of the population) had 51% lower risk of incident cancer than those meeting goals for 0 ideal health metrics. When smoking was removed from the sum of ideal health metrics, the association was attenuated with participants meeting goals for 5 to 6 health metrics having 25% lower cancer risk than those meeting goals for 0 ideal health metrics (P trend =0.03).

Conclusions: Adherence to the 7 ideal health metrics defined in the AHA 2020 goals is associated with lower cancer incidence. The AHA should continue to pursue partnerships with cancer advocacy groups to achieve reductions in chronic disease prevalence.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Survival curves for combined cancer incidence by total number of ideal health metrics, ARIC 1987-2006. Cumulative cancer-free survival according to number of ideal cardiovascular health metrics, ARIC study 1987-2006
Figure 2. Hazard ratios* of combined cancer…
Figure 2. Hazard ratios* of combined cancer according to the number of ideal health behaviors and ideal health factors, ARIC, 1987-2006
*All hazard ratios are adjusted for age, sex, race and ARIC study center. The referent category (farthest left, above) is participants having 0 ideal heath factors (blood pressure, blood sugar, and total cholesterol) and 0 ideal health behaviors (diet, smoking, physical activity and BMI) at baseline. Across all categories of ideal health factors, the hazard ratio for combined cancer incidence in individuals with 3-4 ideal cardiovascular health behaviors compared to those with 0 idea health behaviors was significantly less than 1.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere