The Copenhagen Actinic Keratosis Study (COAKS). A decentralised clinical trial to evaluate tolerability, safety and efficacy of daily field-directed topical treatment with cytosolic phospholipase A2 inhibitor, AVX001, in participants with actinic keratosis: protocol for a randomised controlled phase I/IIa trial

Vinzent Kevin Ortner, Berit Johansen, Kim Kilov, Alejandro Castillo Mondragón, Tore Duvold, Jesper Kihl, Felicity J Ashcroft, Astrid J Feuerherm, Charlotte Pind Laugesen, Maiken Lise Marcker Espersen, Ionela Manole, Ari Pall Isberg, Anders Daniel Andersen, Elin Rakvaag, John R Zibert, Merete Haedersdal, Vinzent Kevin Ortner, Berit Johansen, Kim Kilov, Alejandro Castillo Mondragón, Tore Duvold, Jesper Kihl, Felicity J Ashcroft, Astrid J Feuerherm, Charlotte Pind Laugesen, Maiken Lise Marcker Espersen, Ionela Manole, Ari Pall Isberg, Anders Daniel Andersen, Elin Rakvaag, John R Zibert, Merete Haedersdal

Abstract

Introduction: Actinic keratosis (AK) is the most common precancerous skin condition caused by long-term UV exposure. Given the high recurrence rate of 15%-53%, identifying safe and effective treatment options is warranted. AVX001, a cytosolic phospholipase A2α (cPLA2α) enzyme inhibitor, is a novel anti-inflammatory drug for field-directed, self-administered, topical therapy of AK.

Methods and analysis: This study is a single-centre, randomised, vehicle-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group hybrid clinical trial in adults with multiple AK lesions Olsen grade 1 or 2. The hybrid design combines decentralised participant tasks and assessments with conventional in-clinic visits. Recruitment using targeted advertising on social media and eligibility prescreening are conducted via the Studies&Me online recruitment platform. Participants (n=60) are randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment arms: AVX001 gel 1%, AVX001 gel 3% or vehicle gel. The trial consists of a 4-week treatment period with daily field-directed topical application of the gel and an 8-week follow-up period. Participants attend in-clinic visits at baseline, week 4 and week 12. The remote participant trial tasks include questionnaires and upload of smartphone-obtained photos of the treated skin area using a study-specific web-based app. Both remote and in-clinic assessments of safety and efficacy will be performed. The primary objective is to evaluate the local tolerability of daily application of AVX001 gel (1% or 3%) compared with vehicle gel. Secondary objectives include safety, efficacy, dose-response efficacy relationship, treatment satisfaction and cosmetic outcome. Exploratory objectives include evaluations of tolerability and efficacy assessed by dermatologists using smartphone photos uploaded by participants, comparisons of in-clinic and remote assessments and assessment of AK-related skin changes by non-invasive optical imaging.

Ethics and dissemination: Approved by the Ethics Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (H-21018064) and the Danish Medicines Agency (2021032485). Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

Trial registration numbers: 2021-000934-32; NCT05164393.

Keywords: adult dermatology; adverse events; clinical trials; dermatological tumours; dermatology; protocols & guidelines.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: ADA, KK, ACM, CPL, JRZ, API, MLME and ER were employed at Studies&Me for the present work, a clinical research organisation that has been contracted by Coegin Pharma to conduct the present study; TD is the CEO of the sponsor company Coegin Pharma; TD, BJ, AJF and FJA are shareholders and stock option holders of Coegin Pharma; BJ, AJF and FJA have received consulting fees from Coegin Pharma with patents planned; JK is a board member at Coegin Pharma and has received consulting fees from Coegin Pharma; IM has received consulting fees from Studies&Me; VKO has been employed at LEO Pharma AB and has received research grants from Innovation Fund Denmark; MH has received research grants from Studies&Me, LEO Pharma, Lutronic, Mirai Medical and Venus Concept and equipment from Cherry Imaging, Cynosure, Lutronic, Venus Concept, Perfaction Technologies, MiraDry Sientra and Mirai Medical; MH has delivered lectures/teaching for Galderma Nordic.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of trial design. q.d., one time per day; SAi, remote study APP interactions; V, visit; w, week.

References

    1. Costa C, Scalvenzi M, Ayala F, et al. . How to treat actinic keratosis? An update. J Dermatol Case Rep 2015;9:29–35. 10.3315/jdcr.2015.1199
    1. Hashim PW, Chen T, Rigel D, et al. . Actinic keratosis: current therapies and insights into new treatments. J Drugs Dermatol 2019;18:s161–6.
    1. Gupta AK, Paquet M, Villanueva E, et al. . Interventions for actinic keratoses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;12:CD004415. 10.1002/14651858.CD004415.pub2
    1. Soyer HP, Prow TW, Jemec GBE. Actinic Keratosis. In: Karger AG, ed. Current problems in dermatology. 46, 2014.
    1. Flohil SC, van der Leest RJT, Dowlatshahi EA, et al. . Prevalence of actinic keratosis and its risk factors in the general population: the Rotterdam study. J Invest Dermatol 2013;133:1971–8. 10.1038/jid.2013.134
    1. Werner RN, Sammain A, Erdmann R, et al. . The natural history of actinic keratosis: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol 2013;169:502–18. 10.1111/bjd.12420
    1. Dréno B, Amici JM, Basset‐Seguin N, et al. . Management of actinic keratosis: a practical report and treatment algorithm from AKT eam TM expert clinicians. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2014;28:1141–9. 10.1111/jdv.12434
    1. Lozzi F, Lanna C, Mazzeo M, et al. . Investigational drugs currently in phase II clinical trials for actinic keratosis. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2019;28:629–42. 10.1080/13543784.2019.1636030
    1. Feuerherm AJ, Dennis EA, Johansen B. Cytosolic group IVA phospholipase A2 inhibitors, AVX001 and AVX002, ameliorate collagen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2019;21:29. 10.1186/s13075-018-1794-6
    1. Ashcroft FJ, Mahammad N, Midtun Flatekvål H, et al. . cPLA2α Enzyme Inhibition Attenuates Inflammation and Keratinocyte Proliferation. Biomolecules 2020;10:E1402. 10.3390/biom10101402
    1. Omland SH, Habicht A, Damsbo P, et al. . A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation first-in-man study (phase 0) to assess the safety and efficacy of topical cytosolic phospholipase A2 inhibitor, AVX001, in patients with mild to moderate plaque psoriasis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2017;31:1161–7. 10.1111/jdv.14128
    1. Pfammatter AF, Mitsos A, Wang S, et al. . Evaluating and improving recruitment and retention in an mHealth clinical trial: an example of iterating methods during a trial. Mhealth 2017;3:49. 10.21037/mhealth.2017.09.02
    1. Ali Z, Zibert JR, Thomsen SF. Virtual clinical trials: perspectives in dermatology. Dermatology 2020;236:375–82. 10.1159/000506418
    1. Lane TS, Armin J, Gordon JS. Online recruitment methods for web-based and mobile health studies: a review of the literature. J Med Internet Res 2015;17:e183. 10.2196/jmir.4359
    1. Ali Z, Anderson K, Chiriac A, et al. . High adherence and low dropout rate in a virtual clinical study of atopic dermatitis through Weekly reward-based personalized genetic lifestyle reports. PLoS One 2020;15:e0235500. 10.1371/journal.pone.0235500
    1. Ali Z, Chiriac A, Bjerre-Christensen T, et al. . Mild to moderate atopic dermatitis severity can be reliably assessed using smartphone-photographs taken by the patient at home: a validation study. Skin Res Technol 2022;28:336–41. 10.1111/srt.13136
    1. Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol 1988;124:869–71. 10.1001/archderm.1988.01670060015008
    1. Grada A, Feldman SR, Bragazzi NL, et al. . Patient‐reported outcomes of topical therapies in actinic keratosis: a systematic review. Dermatol Ther 2021;34:e14833. 10.1111/dth.14833
    1. Rosen R, Marmur E, Anderson L, et al. . A new, objective, quantitative scale for measuring local skin responses following topical actinic keratosis therapy with ingenol mebutate. Dermatol Ther 2014;4:207–19. 10.1007/s13555-014-0059-9
    1. Reinhold U, Dirschka T, Ostendorf R, et al. . A randomized, double-blind, phase III, multicentre study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BF-200 ALA (Ameluz(®)) vs. placebo in the field-directed treatment of mild-to-moderate actinic keratosis with photodynamic therapy (PDT) when using the BF-RhodoLED(®) lamp. Br J Dermatol 2016;175:696–705. 10.1111/bjd.14498
    1. Olsen EA, Lisa Abernethy M, Kulp-Shorten C, et al. . A double-blind, vehicle-controlled study evaluating masoprocol cream in the treatment of actinic keratoses on the head and neck. J Am Acad Dermatol 1991;24:738–43. 10.1016/0190-9622(91)70113-G
    1. Dréno B, Cerio R, Dirschka T, et al. . A novel actinic keratosis field assessment scale for grading actinic keratosis disease severity. Acta Derm Venereol 2017;97:1108–13. 10.2340/00015555-2710
    1. EMA . ICH E6 (R2) Good clinical practice [Internet]. European Medicines Agency, 2018. Available:

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere