The influence of health literacy on colorectal cancer screening knowledge, beliefs and behavior

Neeraja B Peterson, Kathleen A Dwyer, Shelagh A Mulvaney, Mary S Dietrich, Russell L Rothman, Neeraja B Peterson, Kathleen A Dwyer, Shelagh A Mulvaney, Mary S Dietrich, Russell L Rothman

Abstract

Objective: To determine if health literacy is associated with knowledge of colorectal cancer (CRC) and CRC screening tests, with perceived benefits and barriers to CRC screening, with perceived risk of CRC, with reported self-efficacy for completing CRC screening and with receipt of CRC tests.

Methods: A convenience sample of 99 subjects completed a health literacy assessment, the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) and a structured interview.

Results: Limited or inadequate health literacy was significantly associated with less knowledge about CRC and CRC screening and with more reported barriers to completing fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and colonoscopy in multivariate analysis. Health literacy was not associated with perceived benefits or reported self-efficacy for completing FOBT or colonoscopy, with perceived risk of developing CRC or with completing CRC tests. However, our small sample size limited our power to detect differences.

Conclusions: Patients with limited health literacy have less knowledge about CRC and CRC screening and report more barriers to completing FOBT and colonoscopy. Interventions to improve CRC screening should consider the health literacy of patients, especially when addressing barriers to screening. Future studies are needed to better define the role of health literacy in CRC screening.

References

    1. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Aug;21(8):818-22
    1. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Nov;20(11):1071-2
    1. Fam Med. 1993 Jun;25(6):391-5
    1. Prev Med. 2003 Jan;36(1):85-91
    1. Am J Prev Med. 2005 Jun;28(5):439-46
    1. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Aug;21(8):829-34
    1. Am J Prev Med. 2000 Oct;19(3):149-54
    1. JAMA. 2004 Oct 13;292(14):1711-6
    1. Cancer Causes Control. 2006 Mar;17(2):147-51
    1. Fam Med. 1991 Aug;23(6):433-5
    1. Am J Public Health. 2001 Aug;91(8):1264-72
    1. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jul 16;137(2):129-31
    1. J Health Commun. 2005 Oct-Nov;10(7):651-63
    1. Prev Med. 2002 Sep;35(3):209-18
    1. Am J Prev Med. 2001 Aug;21(2):132-7
    1. J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Dec;19(12):1228-39
    1. Cancer. 2004 May 15;100(10):2093-103
    1. BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Mar 30;8:16
    1. Cancer Invest. 2001;19(2):193-200
    1. J Natl Med Assoc. 2003 Sep;95(9):806-12
    1. J Occup Environ Med. 2003 Aug;45(8):891-8
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Oct 1;89(19):1406-22
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 May;186(5):938-43
    1. Cancer. 2003 Mar 15;97(6):1528-40
    1. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006 Jan-Feb;56(1):11-25; quiz 49-50
    1. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006 Mar 24;55(11):308-11
    1. J Med Screen. 2000;7(2):99-104
    1. Am J Prev Med. 2005 Nov;29(4):375-6
    1. Am J Prev Med. 2002 Jul;23(1):28-35
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 1;22(13):2617-22
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Apr 7;85(7):566-70
    1. Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Apr;3(2):A50
    1. Gastroenterology. 2003 Feb;124(2):544-60

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere