Online diabetes self-management program: a randomized study

Kate Lorig, Philip L Ritter, Diana D Laurent, Kathryn Plant, Maurice Green, Valarie Blue Bird Jernigan, Siobhan Case, Kate Lorig, Philip L Ritter, Diana D Laurent, Kathryn Plant, Maurice Green, Valarie Blue Bird Jernigan, Siobhan Case

Abstract

Objective: We hypothesized that people with type 2 diabetes in an online diabetes self-management program, compared with usual-care control subjects, would 1) demonstrate reduced A1C at 6 and 18 months, 2) have fewer symptoms, 3) demonstrate increased exercise, and 4) have improved self-efficacy and patient activation. In addition, participants randomized to listserve reinforcement would have better 18-month outcomes than participants receiving no reinforcement.

Research design and methods: A total of 761 participants were randomized to 1) the program, 2) the program with e-mail reinforcement, or 3) were usual-care control subjects (no treatment). This sample included 110 American Indians/Alaska Natives (AI/ANs). Analyses of covariance models were used at the 6- and 18-month follow-up to compare groups.

Results: At 6 months, A1C, patient activation, and self-efficacy were improved for program participants compared with usual care control subjects (P < 0.05). There were no changes in other health or behavioral indicators. The AI/AN program participants demonstrated improvements in health distress and activity limitation compared with usual-care control subjects. The subgroup with initial A1C >7% demonstrated stronger improvement in A1C (P = 0.01). At 18 months, self-efficacy and patient activation were improved for program participants. A1C was not measured. Reinforcement showed no improvement.

Conclusions: An online diabetes self-management program is acceptable for people with type 2 diabetes. Although the results were mixed they suggest 1) that the program may have beneficial effects in reducing A1C, 2) AI/AN populations can be engaged in and benefit from online interventions, and 3) our follow-up reinforcement appeared to have no value.

References

    1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. National Diabetes Statistics fact sheet: general information and national estimates on diabetes in the United States, 2005. Washington, DC, Govt. Printing Office; [NIH publ. no. 06-3892]
    1. Lorig K, Ritter PL, Villa FJ, Armas J: Community-based peer-led diabetes self-management: a randomized trial. Diabetes Educ 2009;35:641–51
    1. Lorig K, Ritter PL, Villa F, Piette JD: Spanish diabetes self-management with and without automated telephone reinforcement: two randomized trials. Diabetes Care 200831:408–414
    1. Deakin T, McShane CE, Cade JE, Williams RDRR: Group based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;18:CD003417
    1. Jackson CL, Bolen S, Brancati FL, Batts-Turner ML, Gary TL: A systematic review of interactive computer-assisted technology in diabetes care: interactive information technology in diabetes care. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:105–10
    1. Glasgow RE, Boles SM, McKay HG, Feil EG, Barrera M, Jr: The D-Net diabetes self-management program: long-term implementation, outcomes, and generalization results. Prev Med 2003;36:410–9
    1. Glasgow RE, Nutting PA, King DK, Nelson CC, Cutter G, Gaglio B, Rahm AK, Whitesides H, Amthauer H: A practical randomized trial to improve diabetes care. J Gen Intern Med 2004;19:1167–74
    1. Glasgow RE, Nutting PA, Toobert DJ, King DK, Strycker LA, Jex M, O'Neill C, Whitesides H, Merenich J: Effects of a brief computer-assisted diabetes self-management intervention on dietary, biological and quality-of-life outcomes. Chronic Illn;2:27–38
    1. Wangberg SC: An Internet-based diabetes self-care intervention tailored to self-efficacy. Health Educ Res 2008;23:170–9
    1. Gerber BS, Solomon MC, Shaffer TL, Quinn MT, Lipton RB: Evaluation of an Internet diabetes self-management training program for adolescents and young adults. Diabetes Tech Ther 2007;9:60–67
    1. Lorig K, Holman H, Sobel D, Laurent D, Gonzalez V, Minor M: Living a Healthy Life With Chronic Conditions. 3rd ed. Boulder, Colorado; Bull Publishing, 2006.
    1. Jerrigan VJ: The Native American Diabetes Self-Management Program. PHD thesis. Berkeley, California, University of California Berkeley, School of Public Health, unpublished
    1. Tyrrell SP, Bui TL, Maggiore JA: Hemoglobin A1c Detection System: A Technical Bulletin Describing the Performance Characteristics of Capillary Blood Collected on Filter Paper for Determination of Hemoglobin A1c. Chicago, BIOSAFE Laboratories, Bulletin 4018, Rev. 99037, 2006.
    1. Jernigan VBB, Lorig K: The Internet Diabetes Self-Management Workshop for American Indians and Alaska Natives. Health Promotion Practice, In press
    1. Bandura A: Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977;84:191–215
    1. Miedema K: Standardization of HbA1c and optimal range of monitoring. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2005;65(Suppl. 240):61–72
    1. Stewart AL, Ware JE: Measuring Functioning and Well Being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach. Durham, NC, Duke University Press, 1992.
    1. Lorig K, Stewart A, Ritter P, González V, Laurent D, Lynch J: Outcome Measures for Health Education and Other Health Care Interventions. Thousand Oaks CA, Sage Publications, 1996.
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL: The PHQ-9: a new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiatr Ann 2002;35:509–521
    1. Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, Tusler M: Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res 2005;40:1918–30
    1. Ritter PL, Kaymaz H, Stewart A, Sobel DS, Lorig KR: Self-reports of health care utilization compared to provider records. J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54:136–141
    1. Case S, Jernigan V, Gardner A, Ritter PL, Heaney CA, Lorig KR: Content and frequency of writing on diabetes bulletin boards: does race make a difference? J Med Internet Res 2009;11:e22

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere