Prospective RandOmised Trial of Emergency Cardiac Computerised Tomography (PROTECCT)

Waqar Aziz, Holly Morgan, Ozan M Demir, Aish Sinha, Tiago Rua, Ronak Rajani, Ai-Lee Chang, Eric Woo, Sze Mun Mak, Giulia Benedetti, Adriana Villa, Rebecca Preston, Roshan Navin, Kevin O'Kane, Laura Hunter, Tevfik Ismail, Gerry Carr-White, Nick Beckley-Hoelscher, Janet Peacock, Michael Marber, Reza Razavi, Divaka Perera, Waqar Aziz, Holly Morgan, Ozan M Demir, Aish Sinha, Tiago Rua, Ronak Rajani, Ai-Lee Chang, Eric Woo, Sze Mun Mak, Giulia Benedetti, Adriana Villa, Rebecca Preston, Roshan Navin, Kevin O'Kane, Laura Hunter, Tevfik Ismail, Gerry Carr-White, Nick Beckley-Hoelscher, Janet Peacock, Michael Marber, Reza Razavi, Divaka Perera

Abstract

Objective: Many patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) concentrations between rule-in and rule-out thresholds and hence need serial testing, which is time consuming. The Prospective RandOmised Trial of Emergency Cardiac Computerised Tomography (PROTECCT) assessed the utility of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in patients with suspected ACS, non-ischaemic ECG and intermediate initial hs-cTn concentration.

Methods: Patients were randomised to CCTA-guided management versus standard of care (SOC). The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included cost of in-hospital stay and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 12 months of follow-up. Data are mean (SD); for LOS harmonic means, IQRs are shown.

Results: 250 (aged 55 (14) years, 25% women) patients were randomised. Harmonic mean (IQR) LOS was 7.53 (6.0-9.6) hours in the CCTA arm and 8.14 (6.3-9.8) hours in the SOC arm (p=0.13). Inpatient cost was £1285 (£2216) and £1108 (£3573), respectively, p=0.68. LOS was shorter in the CCTA group in patients with <25% stenosis, compared with SOC; 6.6 (5.6-7.8) hours vs 7.5 (6.1-9.4) hours, respectively; p=0.021. More referrals for cardiology outpatient clinic review and cardiac CT-related outpatient referrals occurred in the SOC arm (p=0.01). 12-month MACE rates were similar between the two arms (7 (5.6%) in the CCTA arm and 8 (6.5%) in the SOC arm-log-rank p=0.78).

Conclusions: CCTA did not lead to reduced hospital LOS or cost, largely because these outcomes were influenced by the detection of ≥25% grade stenosis in a proportion of patients.

Trial registration number: NCT03583320.

Keywords: acute coronary syndrome; chest pain; computed tomography angiography; coronary artery disease.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of recruitment, randomisation and follow-up of participants. CAD, coronary artery disease; CCTA, coronary CT angiography; hs-cTnT, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T; SOC, standard of care.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Trial overview. CAD, coronary artery disease; CCTA, coronary CT angiography; FU, follow-up; hs-cTnT, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T; MACE, major adverse cardiac event; OP, outpatient.

References

    1. Goodacre S, Cross E, Arnold J, et al. . The health care burden of acute chest pain. Heart 2005;91:229–30. 10.1136/hrt.2003.027599
    1. Collet J-P, Thiele H, Barbato E, et al. . 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2021;42:1289–367. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575
    1. Marjot J, Kaier TE, Henderson K, et al. . A single centre prospective cohort study addressing the effect of a rule-in/rule-out troponin algorithm on routine clinical practice. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2019;8:404–11. 10.1177/2048872617746850
    1. Pickering JW, Greenslade JH, Cullen L, et al. . Validation of presentation and 3 h high-sensitivity troponin to rule-in and rule-out acute myocardial infarction. Heart 2016;102:1270–8. 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308505
    1. Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Christ M, et al. . Multicenter evaluation of a 0-Hour/1-Hour algorithm in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. Ann Emerg Med 2016;68:76–87. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.11.013
    1. Mokhtari A, Borna C, Gilje P, et al. . A 1-h Combination Algorithm Allows Fast Rule-Out and Rule-In of Major Adverse Cardiac Events. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67:1531–40. 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.059
    1. Jaeger C, Wildi K, Twerenbold R, et al. . One-hour rule-in and rule-out of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I. Am Heart J 2016;171:92–102. 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.07.022
    1. Goldstein JA, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, et al. . A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:863–71. 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.064
    1. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. . Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter accuracy (assessment by coronary computed tomographic angiography of individuals undergoing invasive coronary angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1724–32. 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.031
    1. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al. . Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 2008;359:2324–36. 10.1056/NEJMoa0806576
    1. Meijboom WB, Meijs MFL, Schuijf JD, et al. . Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:2135–44. 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.058
    1. Hoffmann U, Bamberg F, Chae CU, et al. . Coronary computed tomography angiography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain: the ROMICAT (rule out myocardial infarction using computer assisted tomography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:1642–50. 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.052
    1. Goldstein JA, Chinnaiyan KM, Abidov A, et al. . The CT-STAT (coronary computed tomographic angiography for systematic triage of acute chest pain patients to treatment) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:1414–22. 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.068
    1. Hoffmann U, Truong QA, Schoenfeld DA, et al. . Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain. N Engl J Med 2012;367:299–308. 10.1056/NEJMoa1201161
    1. Litt HI, Gatsonis C, Snyder B, et al. . Ct angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1393–403. 10.1056/NEJMoa1201163
    1. Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, et al. . 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain: Executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American heart association joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation 2021;144:Cir0000000000001030. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001030
    1. Dedic A, Lubbers MM, Schaap J, et al. . Coronary CT angiography for suspected ACS in the era of high-sensitivity troponins: randomized multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67:16–26. 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.045
    1. Gray AJ, Roobottom C, Smith JE, et al. . Early computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2021;374:n2106. 10.1136/bmj.n2106
    1. Abbara S, Blanke P, Maroules CD, et al. . SCCT guidelines for the performance and acquisition of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of cardiovascular computed tomography guidelines Committee: endorsed by the North American Society for cardiovascular imaging (NASCI). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2016;10:435–49. 10.1016/j.jcct.2016.10.002
    1. Hoffmann U, Truong QA, Schoenfeld DA, et al. . Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain. N Engl J Med 2012;367:299–308. 10.1056/NEJMoa1201161
    1. Aziz W, Claridge S, Ntalas I, et al. . Emerging role of cardiac computed tomography in heart failure. ESC Heart Fail 2019;6:909–20. 10.1002/ehf2.12479
    1. Chan KH, Chawantanpipat C, Gattorna T, et al. . The relationship between coronary stenosis severity and compression type coronary artery movement in acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2010;159:584–92. 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.12.036
    1. Kofoed KF, Engstrøm T, Sigvardsen PE, et al. . Prognostic Value of Coronary CT Angiography in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;77:1044–52. 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.037
    1. Mahmoudi M, Harden S, Abid N, et al. . Troponin-positive chest pain with unobstructed coronary arteries: definitive differential diagnosis using cardiac MRI. Br J Radiol 2012;85:e461–6. 10.1259/bjr/90663866

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere