Peer advisers compared with specialist health professionals in delivering a training programme on self-management to people with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial

A K Baksi, M Al-Mrayat, D Hogan, E Whittingstall, P Wilson, J Wex, A K Baksi, M Al-Mrayat, D Hogan, E Whittingstall, P Wilson, J Wex

Abstract

Aims: To assess the effectiveness and acceptability of peer advisers in diabetes in delivering a programme of training on self-management for people with diabetes.

Methods: Adults with diabetes were randomly allocated to an education programme delivered either by trained peer advisers or by specialist health professionals. The primary outcome measure was change in knowledge tested before and at the conclusion of the four courses, each consisting of six sessions. Glycated haemoglobin and Diabetes Care Profile were assessed at baseline and at 6 months. Sessional and end-of-course evaluation responses were analysed, as was the attendance record.

Results: Eighty-three patients were randomized. Of these, 14 failed to attend and two were excluded. Knowledge scores improved significantly in both groups, but there was no difference between the groups for any of the knowledge domains. No difference was noted in the Diabetes Care Profiles or in glycated haemoglobin. The attendance record was similar in both groups. In the post-sessional evaluations, both groups scored highly, with the health professionals significantly more so. The post-course questionnaire exploring patients' understanding and confidence in self-management of specific aspects of diabetes care revealed no difference between the groups.

Conclusions: Trained patients are as effective in imparting knowledge to their peers as specialist health professionals. Both are also acceptable to patients as trainers. However, lay tutors require to be given appropriate training, specific to the education programme they would be expected to deliver.

References

    1. NICE . Technology Appraisal Guidance 60: Guidance on the Use of Patient-Education Models for Diabetes. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence; 2003. April.
    1. Department of Health . National Service Framework for Diabetes. London: Department of Health; 2001.
    1. Lorig K, Lubeck D, Kraines RG, Seleznick M, Holman HR. Outcomes of self-help education for patients with arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1985;28:680–685.
    1. Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, Brown BW, Bandura A, Ritter P, et al. Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. Med Care. 1999;37:5–14.
    1. Department of Health . The Expert Patient. London: Department of Health; 2001.
    1. Bury M, Newbould J, Taylor D. A Rapid Review of the Current State of Knowledge Regarding Lay-Led Self-Management of Chronic Illness. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2005.
    1. Griffiths C, Foster G, Eldridge S, Taylor S. How effective are expert patient (lay-led) education programmes for chronic disease? Br Med J. 2007;334:1254–1256.
    1. Barlow JH, Turner AP, Wright CC. A randomized controlled study of the Arthritis Self-management Programme in the UK. Health Educ Res. 2000;15:665–680.
    1. Dongbo F, Hua F, McGowan P, Yi-e S, Lizhen Z, Huiqin Y, et al. Implementation and quantitative evaluation of chronic disease self-management programme in Shanghau, China: randomized controlled trial. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81:174–182.
    1. Barlow JH, Wright CC, Turner AP, Bancroft V. A 12-month follow-up study of self-management training for people with chronic disease: are changes maintained over time? Br J Health Psychol. 2005;10:589–599.
    1. Griffiths C, Motlib J, Azad A, Ramsay J, Eldridge S, Feder G, et al. Randomised controlled trial of a lay-led self-management programme for Bangladeshi patients with chronic disease. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55:831–837.
    1. Kennedy A, Reeves D, Bower P, Lee V, Middleton E, Richardson G, et al. The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a national lay-led self-care support programme for patients with long-term conditions: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61:254–261.
    1. Newman S, Steed L, Mulligan K. Self-management interventions for chronic illness. Lancet. 2004;364:1523–1537.
    1. Lorig K, Feigenbaum P, Regan C, Ung E, Chestain RL, Holman HR. A comparison of lay-taught and professional-taught arthritis self-management courses. J Rheumtol. 1986;13:763–767.
    1. Cohen JL, Santer SV, de Vellis RF, deVellis BM. Evaluation of arthritis self-management courses led by lay persons and by professionals. Arthritis Rheum. 1986;29:388–393.
    1. Baksi AK, Al-Mrayat M, Hogan D, Thomas Z, Whittingstall E, Wilson P. Training programme for peer advisors in diabetes—are they the expert patients in diabetes? Pract Diabetes Int. 2005;22:119–124.
    1. Department of Health. Diabetes UK . Structured Patient Education in Diabetes—Report from the Patient Education Working Party. London: Department of Health and Diabetes UK; 2005.
    1. Graf Pad Software QuickCalcs online calculators for Scientists, 2002–2005. Available at Last accessed 1 May 2006.
    1. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. AACE diabetes guidelines, knowledge evaluation forms. Endocr Pract. 2002;8:71–77.
    1. Michigan Diabetes Research and Training Centre. Survey instruments. 2002. Available at Last accessed 1 May 2006.
    1. Fitzgerald JT, Davis WK, Connell CM, Hess GE, Funnell MM, Hiss RG. Development and validation of the diabetes care profile. Eval Health Prof. 1996;19:209–231.
    1. Anderson RM, Fitzgerald JT, Wisdom K, Davis WK, Hiss RG. A comparison of global vs. disease-specific quality-of-life measures with patients having non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:299–305.
    1. Deakin T, McShane CE, Cade JE, Williams RDRR. Group based training for self-management strategies in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;2 article no.: CD003417.
    1. Sigurdarottir AK, Jonsdottir H, Benediktsson Outcomes of educational interventions in Type 2 diabetes: WEKA data-mining analysis. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;67:21–31.
    1. Norris SL, Choudhury FM, Van hot K, Horsley T, Brownstein JN, Zhang X, et al. Effectiveness of community health workers in the care of persons with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2006;23:544–556.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere