How best to assess quality of life in informal carers of people with dementia; A systematic review of existing outcome measures

Johanne Dow, Jonah Robinson, Shannon Robalino, Tracy Finch, Elaine McColl, Louise Robinson, Johanne Dow, Jonah Robinson, Shannon Robalino, Tracy Finch, Elaine McColl, Louise Robinson

Abstract

Background: In the UK, there are currently 800 000 people living with dementia. This number is expected to double in the next 20 years. Two-thirds of people with dementia live in the community supported by informal carers. Caring for a person with dementia has adverse effects on psychological, physical, social wellbeing and quality of life. The measurement of quality of life of carers of people with dementia is increasingly of interest to health and social care practitioners and commissioners, policymakers, and carers themselves. However, there is lack of consensus on the most suitable instrument(s) for undertaking this.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature using COSMIN methodology. Searching of electronic databases (Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science), reference list and citation searching of key papers was undertaken. COSMIN methodology was used to simultaneously extract data from and assess methodological quality of included studies, and make a recommendation for the instrument with the most high quality evidence for its measurement properties.

Results: Ten instruments were suitable for inclusion in this review. The Carer well-being and support questionnaire (CWS) has the best quality evidence for the greatest number of measurement of properties. The Caregiver Well-Being Scale is also worthy of consideration. There is not presently a measure which could be recommended for use in economic evaluations, however the Impact of Alzheimer's Disease on the Caregiver questionnaire (IADCQ) could potentially be used following further investigation of its measurement properties in a representative population.

Conclusion: The CWS is the most appropriate instrument to recommend for the assessment of quality of life in informal carers of people with dementia at present. All instruments included in this review would benefit from more rigorous evaluation of their measurement properties.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Results of literature search.
Fig 1. Results of literature search.

References

    1. Prince M, Wimo A, Guerchet M, Ali GC, Wu YT, Prina M. Alzheimer’s Disease International. World Alzheimer Report 2015: The Global Impact of Dementia: an Analysis of Prevalence, Incidence, Cost and Trend. 2016.
    1. Prince MJ. World Alzheimer Report 2015: the global impact of dementia: an analysis of prevalence, incidence, cost and trends: Alzheimer's Disease International; 2015.
    1. Alzheimer's Society. Dementia UK: update. Kings College of London, London School of Economics; 2014.
    1. World Health Organisation, Alzheimer's Disease International. Dementia: a Public Health Priority: World Health Organisation; 2012 [Available from: .
    1. Brodaty H, Hadzi-pavlovic D. Psychosocial Effects on Carers of Living with Persons with Dementia. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1990;24(3):351–61. doi:
    1. Royal College of General Practitioners. Carers support: Royal College of General Practitioners; 2018 [Available from: .
    1. Pinquart M, Sörensen S. Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging. 2003;18(2):250–67.
    1. Schulz R, Martire LM. Family Caregiving of Persons With Dementia: Prevalence, Health Effects, and Support Strategies. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004;12(3):240–9.
    1. Bremer P, Cabrera E, Leino-Kilpi H, Lethin C, Saks K, Sutcliffe C, et al. Informal dementia care: Consequences for caregivers' health and health care use in 8 European countries. Health Policy. 2015;119(11):1459–71. doi:
    1. Thomas GPA, Saunders CL, Roland MO, Paddison CAM. Informal carers’ health-related quality of life and patient experience in primary care: evidence from 195,364 carers in England responding to a national survey. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16:62 doi:
    1. Dickinson C, Dow J, Gibson G, Hayes L, Robalino S, Robinson L. Psychosocial intervention for carers of people with dementia: What components are most effective and when? A systematic review of systematic reviews. Int Psychogeriatr. 2016;29(1):31–43. doi:
    1. Gaugler JE, Jutkowitz E, Shippee TP, Brasure M. Consistency of dementia caregiver intervention classification: an evidence-based synthesis. Int Psychogeriatr. 2016;29(1):19–30. doi:
    1. Brodaty H. Meaning and measurement of caregiver outcomes. Int Psychogeriatr. 2007;19(03):363–81.
    1. Moniz-Cook E, Vernooij-Dassen M, Woods R, Verhey F, Chattat R, Vugt Md, et al. A European consensus on outcome measures for psychosocial intervention research in dementia care. Aging and Mental Health. 2008;12(1):14–29. doi:
    1. Bowling A, Rowe G, Adams S, Sands P, Samsi K, Crane M, et al. Quality of life in dementia: a systematically conducted narrative review of dementia-specific measurement scales. Aging & mental health. 2015;19(1):13–31.
    1. Langenhoff BS, Krabbe PF, Wobbes T, Ruers TJ. Quality of life as an outcome measure in surgical oncology. Br J Surg. 2001;88.
    1. World Health Organisation. WHOQOL: measuring quality of life. 1997.
    1. Brazier J, Jones N, Kind P. Testing the validity of the Euroqol and comparing it with the SF-36 health survey questionnaire. Quality of Life Research. 1993;2(3):169–80.
    1. Ware JE. Sherbourne CD The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30.
    1. Arons AM, Scholzel-Dorenbos CJ, Olde Rikkert MG, Krabbe PF. A Simple and Practical Index to Measure Dementia-Related Quality of Life. Value in Health. 2016;19(1):60–5. doi:
    1. Al-Janabi H, Flynn TN, Coast J. Estimation of a Preference-Based Carer Experience Scale. Medical Decision Making. 2011;31(3):458–68. doi:
    1. Scholzel-Dorenbos CJM, Arons AMM, Wammes JJG, Rikkert MGMO, Krabbe PFM. Validation study of the prototype of a disease-specific index measure for health-related quality of life in dementia. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2012;10.
    1. Smith SC, Lamping DL, Banerjee S, Harwood R, Foley B, Smith P, et al. Measurement of health-related quality of life for people with dementia: development of a new instrument (DEMQOL) and an evaluation of current methodology. Health Technology Assessment. 2005;9(10):1-+.
    1. Webster L, Groskreutz D, Grinbergs-Saull A, Howard R, O’Brien JT, Mountain G, et al. Core outcome measures for interventions to prevent or slow the progress of dementia for people living with mild to moderate dementia: Systematic review and consensus recommendations. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(6):e0179521 doi:
    1. Page TE, Farina N, Brown A, Daley S, Bowling A, Basset T, et al. Instruments measuring the disease-specific quality of life of family carers of people with neurodegenerative diseases: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2017;7(3).
    1. Vickrey BG, Hays RD, Maines ML, Vassar SD, Fitten J, Strickland T. Development and preliminary evaluation of a quality of life measure targeted at dementia caregivers. Health & Quality of Life Outcomes. 2009;7:56.
    1. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Quality of life research. 2010;19(4):539–49. doi:
    1. De Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurement in medicine: a practical guide: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
    1. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. COSMIN checklist manual. Amsterdam: University Medical Center; 2012.
    1. World Health Organization. WHOQOL: measuring quality of life 1997 [
    1. Machnicki G, Allegri RF, Ranalli CG, Serrano CM, Dillon C, Wyrwich KW, et al. Validity and reliability of the SF-36 administered to caregivers of patients with alzheimer's disease: evidence from a south american sample. Dementia & Geriatric Cognitive Disorders. 2009;28(3):206–12.
    1. Brouwer WBF, van Exel NJA, van Gorp B, Redekop WK. The CarerQol instrument: A new instrument to measure care-related quality of life of informal caregivers for use in economic evaluations. Quality of Life Research. 2006;15(6):1005–21. doi:
    1. Terwee CB, Jansma EP, Riphagen II, de Vet HCW. Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Quality of Life Research. 2009;18(8):1115–23. doi:
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Prisma G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS medicine. 2009;6(7):e1000097 doi:
    1. Rand SE, Malley JN, Netten AP, Forder JE. Factor structure and construct validity of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers (ASCOT-Carer). Quality of Life Research. 2015;24(11):2601–14. doi:
    1. Roud H, Keeling S, Sainsbury R. Using the COPE assessment tool with informal carers of people with dementia in New Zealand. New Zealand Medical Journal. 2006;119(1237):U2053
    1. Balducci C, Mnich E, McKee KJ, Lamura G, Beckmann A, Krevers B, et al. Negative impact and positive value in caregiving: Validation of the COPE Index in a six-country sample of carers. The Gerontologist. 2008;48(3):276–86.
    1. McKee KJ, Philp I, Lamura G, Prouskas C, Öberg B, Krevers B, et al. The COPE index–a first stage assessment of negative impact, positive value and quality of support of caregiving in informal carers of older people. Aging & Mental Health. 2003;7(1):39–52.
    1. Mohide EA, Torrance GW, Streiner DL, Pringle DM, Gilbert R. Measuring the wellbeing of family caregivers using the time trade-off technique. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1988;41(5):475–82.
    1. Quirk A, Smith S, Hamilton S, Lamping D, Lelliott P, Stahl D, et al. Development of the carer well-being and support (CWS) questionnaire. Mental Health Review Journal. 2012;17(3):128–38.
    1. Cole JC, Ito D, Chen YJ, Cheng R, Bolognese J, Li-McLeod J. Impact of Alzheimer's Disease on Caregiver Questionnaire: internal consistency, convergent validity, and test-retest reliability of a new measure for assessing caregiver burden. Health & Quality of Life Outcomes. 2014;12:114.
    1. Logsdon RG, Gibbons LE, McCurry SM, Teri L. Quality of life in Alzheimer's disease: patient and caregiver reports. Journal of Mental Health and Aging. 1999;5:21–32.
    1. Novelli MMPC, Nitrini R, Caramelli P. Validation of the Brazilian version of the quality of life scale for patients with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers (QOL-AD). Aging & Mental Health. 2010;14(5):624–31.
    1. Novelli M, Dal Rovere HH, Nitrini R, Caramelli P. Cross-cultural adaptation of the quality of life assessment scale on Alzheimer disease. Arquivos De Neuro-Psiquiatria. 2005;63(2A):201–6.
    1. Schofield HL, Murphy B, Herrman HE, Bloch S, Singh B. Family caregiving: Measurement of emotional well-being and Various aspects of the caregiving role. Psychological Medicine. 1997;27(3):647–57.
    1. Tebb S. An aid to empowerment: a caregiver well-being scale. Health & Social Work. 1995;20(2):87–92.
    1. Rubio DM, Berg-Weger M, Tebb SS. Assessing the validity and reliability of well-being and stress in family caregivers. Social Work Research. 1999;23(1):54–64.
    1. Rubio DM, Berg-Weger M, Tebb SS, Lee ES, Rauch S. Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social Work Research. 2003;27(2):94–104.
    1. Tebb SS, Berg-Weger M, Rubio DM. The Caregiver Well-Being Scale: Developing a Short-Form Rapid Assessment Instrument. Health & Social Work. 2013;38(4):222–30.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere