Tourniquet-Free Hand Surgery Using the One-per-Mil Tumescent Technique

Theddeus O H Prasetyono, Theddeus O H Prasetyono

Abstract

Background: A pneumatic tourniquet is generally used to achieve a bloodless operation field in hand surgery. However, this has changed with tumescent solution-based wide-awake surgery. This study is a preliminary prospective case series study to elaborate the formula and indications of the tumescent technique in hand surgery without a tourniquet.

Methods: Seven patients (age range, 4 months to 37 years) underwent hand or upper extremity surgery for conditions such as nerve palsy, electric burn defect, fingertip injury, contracture, constriction ring syndrome, or acrosyndactyly. A "one-per-mil" tumescent solution (epinephrine 1:1,000,000+20 mg lidocaine/50 mL saline) was used to create a bloodless operating field without a tourniquet. Observation was performed to document the amount of solution injected, the operation field clarity, and the postoperative pain.

Results: The "one per mil" epinephrine solution showed an effective hemostatic effect. The tumescent technique resulted in an almost bloodless operation field in the tendon and in the constriction ring syndrome surgeries, minimal bleeding in the flap and contracture release surgeries, and acceptable bleeding in acrosyndactyly surgery. The amount of solution injected ranged from 5.3 to 60 mL. No patient expressed significant postoperative pain. Flap surgeries showed mixed results. One flap was lost, while the others survived.

Conclusions: Epinephrine 1:1,000,000 in saline solution is a potential replacement for a tourniquet in hand surgery. Further studies are needed to delineate its safety for flap survival.

Keywords: Epinephrine; Lidocaine; Upper extremity.

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Injection to a burn hand contracture in a child In case 3, a 12-month-old baby presented with four-finger flexion contracture due to a burn. Injection of the tumescent solution was performed, reaching a total of 5.3 mL, to create a clear operation field without a tourniquet.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A totally bloodless operation in an arm of a baby In case 4, as shown in Fig. 2, (A) a totally bloodless operation field was successfully made using 17 mL of "one-per-mil" tumescent solution during 140 minutes of constriction release. (B) The results after constriction release postoperative day 12.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A totally bloodless operation in an arm of a baby In case 4, a 4-month-old male presented with a circumferential constriction ring in his left proximal upper arm. In this case, we determined that it would be almost impossible to set the tourniquet without hindering the operation.

References

    1. Lalonde DH, Lalonde JF. Discussion. Do not use epinephrine in digital blocks: myth or truth? Part II. A retrospective review of 1111 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:2035–2036.
    1. Lalonde DH. "Hole-in-one" local anesthesia for wide-awake carpal tunnel surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1642–1644.
    1. Higgins A, Lalonde DH, Bell M, et al. Avoiding flexor tendon repair rupture with intraoperative total active movement examination. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:941–945.
    1. Bezuhly M, Sparkes GL, Higgins A, et al. Immediate thumb extension following extensor indicis proprius-to-extensor pollicis longus tendon transfer using the wide-awake approach. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:1507–1512.
    1. Denkler K. Dupuytren's fasciectomies in 60 consecutive digits using lidocaine with epinephrine and no tourniquet. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:802–810.
    1. Wilhelmi BJ, Blackwell SJ, Miller JH, et al. Do not use epinephrine in digital blocks: myth or truth? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:393–397.
    1. Chowdhry S, Seidenstricker L, Cooney DS, et al. Do not use epinephrine in digital blocks: myth or truth? Part II. A retrospective review of 1111 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:2031–2034.
    1. Lalonde D, Bell M, Benoit P, et al. A multicenter prospective study of 3,110 consecutive cases of elective epinephrine use in the fingers and hand: the Dalhousie Project clinical phase. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30:1061–1067.
    1. Lalonde DH. An evidence-based approach to flexor tendon laceration repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:885–890.
    1. Ohnhaus EE, Adler R. Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale. Pain. 1975;1:379–384.
    1. Merkel SI, Voepel-Lewis T, Shayevitz JR, et al. The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatr Nurs. 1997;23:293–297.
    1. Luk KD, Pun WK. Unrecognised compartment syndrome in a patient with tourniquet palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987;69:97–99.
    1. Hirvensalo E, Tuominen H, Lapinsuo M, et al. Compartment syndrome of the lower limb caused by a tourniquet: a report of two cases. J Orthop Trauma. 1992;6:469–472.
    1. Knüttgen D, Reifenrath W, Autze W, et al. Massive rigor and compartment syndrome after tourniquet in a patient with suspected malignant hyperthermia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1999;43:239–240.
    1. Dove AF, Clifford RP. Ischaemia after use of finger tourniquet. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982;284:1162–1163.
    1. Karabağli Y, Kose AA, Cetin C. Toe necrosis due to a neglected tourniquet. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:2036–2037.
    1. Selvan D, Harle D, Fischer J. Beware of finger tourniquets: a case report and update by the National Patient Safety Agency. Acta Orthop Belg. 2011;77:15–17.
    1. Durrant C, Townley WA, Ramkumar S, et al. Forgotten digital tourniquet: salvage of an ischaemic finger by application of medicinal leeches. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006;88:462–464.
    1. Avci G, Akan M, Yildirim S, et al. Digital neurovascular compression due to a forgotten tourniquet. Hand Surg. 2003;8:133–136.
    1. Hou SM, Liu TK. Salvage of tourniquet-induced thumb necrosis by a modified wraparound procedure. J Trauma. 1987;27:803–805.
    1. Lalonde DH. Reconstruction of the hand with wide awake surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2011;38:761–769.
    1. Fitzcharles-Bowe C, Denkler K, Lalonde D. Finger injection with high-dose (1:1,000) epinephrine: Does it cause finger necrosis and should it be treated? Hand (N Y) 2007;2:5–11.
    1. Thomson CJ, Lalonde DH, Denkler KA, et al. A critical look at the evidence for and against elective epinephrine use in the finger. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:260–266.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere