Ambiguous relation between physical workload and low back pain: a twin control study

J Hartvigsen, K O Kyvik, C Leboeuf-Yde, S Lings, L Bakketeig, J Hartvigsen, K O Kyvik, C Leboeuf-Yde, S Lings, L Bakketeig

Abstract

Aims: To examine the association between self reported physical workload and low back pain (LBP) in younger twins. To investigate whether genetic factors interact with physical workload in relation to LBP.

Methods: A twin control study was performed within a population based twin register using 1910 complete monozygotic (MZ) and same sexed dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs aged 25-42 and discordant for LBP. LBP in the affected twins was divided into two groups: "LBP for </=30 days during the past year", and "LBP for >30 days during the past year". Physical workload was divided into four categories: "sitting", "sitting/walking", "light physical", and "heavy physical". Data were analysed in a matched design using conditional logistic regression. MZ and DZ twins were analysed separately and together in order to determine possible genetic influences in relation to physical workload and LBP.

Results: Statistically significant graded relations were found for increasing workload and LBP of longer duration but not for LBP of shorter duration (</=30 days during the past year). In both LBP groups the "sitting" and "sitting/walking" groups were not statistically different. MZ and DZ twins did not differ significantly with respect to LBP in the various workload groups.

Conclusions: There is evidence for a dose-response relation between physical workload and LBP of longer duration. Attention to clinically relevant subgroups based on duration, for example, is necessary in epidemiological studies dealing with LBP. Physical workload might be more important than genetic factors in LBP.

References

    1. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1996 Dec;22(6):401-3
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Apr 15;22(8):877-81
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Apr 15;24(8):779-83; discussion 783-4
    1. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999 Jun;25(3):246-54
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Jul 15;23(14):1588-94; discussion 1595
    1. Pain. 2000 Jan;84(1):95-103
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1978 Mar;107(3):245-56
    1. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999 Oct;25(5):387-403
    1. Scand J Public Health. 2000 Sep;28(3):230-9
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Nov;15(11):1228-30
    1. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1995 Dec;21(6):401-3
    1. Scand J Public Health. 1999 Jun;27(2):148-51
    1. Lancet. 1993 Apr 17;341(8851):1008-9
    1. BMJ. 1995 Oct 7;311(7010):913-7
    1. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1996 Aug;22(4):251-9
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Feb;42(2):366-72
    1. BMJ. 1995 Feb 18;310(6977):432-6
    1. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma). 1991;40(1):83-90
    1. Epidemiology. 1998 Mar;9(2):189-92
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Jul 1;21(13):1518-25; discussion 1525-6
    1. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Mar 13;160(5):661-6
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984 Apr;9(3):280-6
    1. Lancet. 1994 Jan 29;343(8892):260-3
    1. Int J Epidemiol. 1995 Jun;24(3):589-96
    1. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001 Jan;24(1):63-6
    1. Appl Ergon. 1987 Sep;18(3):233-7
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Sep 15;23(18):1992-6
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Nov;77(11):1662-70

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere