Anesthetic management and associated complications of peroral endoscopic myotomy: A case series

Yuuki Nishihara, Takuya Yoshida, Mayu Ooi, Norihiko Obata, Shinichiro Izuta, Satoshi Mizobuchi, Yuuki Nishihara, Takuya Yoshida, Mayu Ooi, Norihiko Obata, Shinichiro Izuta, Satoshi Mizobuchi

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the anesthetic management of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and its associated complications.

Methods: This study was a single-center, retrospective, observational study comprising a case series of all patients who underwent POEM in our hospital from April 2015 to November 2016. We collected data regarding patient characteristics, anesthetic methods, surgical factors, and complications using an electronic chart.

Results: There were 86 patients who underwent POEM in our hospital during the study period. Preoperatively, patients were maintained on a low residue diet for 48 h prior to the procedure. They were fasted of solids for 24 h before surgery. There was one case of aspiration (1.2%). During POEM, patients were positioned supine with the upper abdomen covered by a clear drape so that pneumoperitoneum could be timeously identified. In three cases, the peak airway pressure exceeded 35 cmH2O during volume controlled ventilation with tidal volumes of 6-8 mL/kg and subsequent impairment of ventilation. These cases had been diagnosed with spastic esophageal disorders (SEDs) and the length of the muscular incision on the esophageal side was longer than normal.

Conclusion: In the anesthetic management of POEM, it is important to prevent aspiration during induction of anesthesia and to identify and treat complications associated with CO2 insufflation.

Keywords: Anesthetic management; Peroral endoscopic myotomy; Ventilatory impairment.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

References

    1. Moonen A, Boeckxstaens G. Current diagnosis and management of achalasia. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;48:484–490.
    1. O’Neill OM, Johnston BT, Coleman HG. Achalasia: a review of clinical diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:5806–5812.
    1. Patti MG, Andolfi C, Bowers SP, Soper NJ. POEM vs Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy and Fundoplication: Which Is Now the Gold Standard for Treatment of Achalasia? J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21:207–214.
    1. Marano L, Pallabazzer G, Solito B, Santi S, Pigazzi A, De Luca R, Biondo FG, Spaziani A, Longaroni M, Di Martino N, et al. Surgery or Peroral Esophageal Myotomy for Achalasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e3001.
    1. Talukdar R, Inoue H, Nageshwar Reddy D. Efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in the treatment of achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:3030–3046.
    1. Patel K, Abbassi-Ghadi N, Markar S, Kumar S, Jethwa P, Zaninotto G. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of esophageal achalasia: systematic review and pooled analysis. Dis Esophagus. 2016;29:807–819.
    1. Friedrich K, Scholl SG, Beck S, Gotthardt D, Stremmel W, Rex DK; bng-Study-Group, Sieg A. Respiratory complications in outpatient endoscopy with endoscopist-directed sedation. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2014;23:255–259.
    1. Okada T, Izuta S, Mizobuchi S. A case of ventilatory impairment during per-oral endoscopic myotomy under general anesthesia. J Anaesth Clinical Reports. 2018
    1. Löser B, Werner YB, Punke MA, Saugel B, Haas S, Reuter DA, Mann O, Duprée A, Schachschal G, Rösch T, et al. Anesthetic considerations for patients with esophageal achalasia undergoing peroral endoscopic myotomy: a retrospective case series review. Can J Anaesth. 2017;64:480–488.
    1. Jayan N, Jacob JS, Mathew M, Mukkada RJ. Anesthesia for peroral endoscopic myotomy: A retrospective case series. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2016;32:379–381.
    1. Goudra B, Singh PM, Gouda G, Sinha AC. Peroral endoscopic myotomy-initial experience with anesthetic management of 24 procedures and systematic review. Anesth Essays Res. 2016;10:297–300.
    1. Yang D, Pannu D, Zhang Q, White JD, Draganov PV. Evaluation of anesthesia management, feasibility and efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia performed in the endoscopy unit. Endosc Int Open. 2015;3:E289–E295.
    1. Tanaka E, Murata H, Minami H, Sumikawa K. Anesthetic management of peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: a retrospective case series. J Anesth. 2014;28:456–459.
    1. Turan A, Wo J, Kasuya Y, Govinda R, Akça O, Dalton JE, Sessler DI, Rauch S. Effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol on lower esophageal sphincter and gastroesophageal pressure gradient in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2010;112:19–24.
    1. de Leon A, Thörn SE, Wattwil M. High-resolution solid-state manometry of the upper and lower esophageal sphincters during anesthesia induction: a comparison between obese and non-obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:149–153.
    1. Wang X, Tan Y, Zhang J, Liu D. Risk factors for gas-related complications of peroral endoscopic myotomy in achalasia. Neth J Med. 2015;73:76–81.
    1. Ren Z, Zhong Y, Zhou P, Xu M, Cai M, Li L, Shi Q, Yao L. Perioperative management and treatment for complications during and after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia (EA) (data from 119 cases) Surg Endosc. 2012;26:3267–3272.
    1. Werner YB, von Renteln D, Noder T, Schachschal G, Denzer UW, Groth S, Nast JF, Kersten JF, Petzoldt M, Adam G, et al. Early adverse events of per-oral endoscopic myotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:708–718.e2.
    1. Yang S, Zeng MS, Zhang ZY, Zhang HL, Liang L, Zhang XW. Pneumomediastinum and pneumoperitoneum on computed tomography after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): postoperative changes or complications? Acta Radiol. 2015;56:1216–1221.
    1. Khan MA, Kumbhari V, Ngamruengphong S, Ismail A, Chen YI, Chavez YH, Bukhari M, Nollan R, Ismail MK, Onimaru M, et al. Is POEM the Answer for Management of Spastic Esophageal Disorders? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2017;62:35–44.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere