Effectiveness of dienogest in improving quality of life in Asian women with endometriosis (ENVISIOeN): interim results from a prospective cohort study under real-life clinical practice

Kitirat Techatraisak, Andon Hestiantoro, Soon Ruey, Maria Jesusa Banal-Silao, Mee-Ran Kim, Seok Ju Seong, Syarief Thaufik, Christiane Ahlers, So Young Shin, Byung Seok Lee, Kitirat Techatraisak, Andon Hestiantoro, Soon Ruey, Maria Jesusa Banal-Silao, Mee-Ran Kim, Seok Ju Seong, Syarief Thaufik, Christiane Ahlers, So Young Shin, Byung Seok Lee

Abstract

Background: Dienogest has been shown to substantially improve endometriosis-associated symptoms such as debilitating chronic pelvic pain, and in turn, health-related quality of life (HRQoL). To date, there is no data on patient-reported outcomes reflecting the real-world practice in Asia where endometriosis is a relevant health, social and economic burden. This non-interventional, multi-center, prospective study aims to investigate the influence of dienogest on HRQoL.

Methods: Asian women received dienogest (2 mg/daily) and were followed for 24 months. The effectiveness of dienogest to improve HRQoL and endometriosis-associated pelvic pain (EAPP) was assessed by patient-reported outcomes. HRQoL, especially the "pain" domain as primary endpoint, was evaluated with the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) questionnaire. The numeric rating scale served to determine changes in the severity of EAPP. Within the presented interim analysis (data cut-off: 2017-11-27), the mean changes in EHP-30 and EAPP scores from baseline to 6 months upon availability of the data were evaluated. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and bleeding profiles were documented.

Results: Dienogest therapy decreased EHP-30 scores in all assessed domains (score 0-100, lower scores indicate better HRQoL). Primarily, the "pain" domain was improved in 78.4% of patients. EAPP was reduced (score 0-10, lower scores reflect less pain), highlighted by a mean reduction of the pain score by - 4.5 points. Patients with a higher EAPP score at baseline had an increased response to dienogest (- 6.2 points mean change) compared to patients with low baseline EAPP severity (- 1.4 points mean change). Both surgically and clinically diagnosed patients described comparable pain reduction, as well as women with or without prior treatment. Drug-related TEAEs were documented for 31.5% of patients, with amenorrhoea (5.9%) and metrorrhagia (5.1%) being the most common events. The bleeding pattern was changed upon dienogest, characterized by decreased normal bleeding (84.2 to 28.8%) and increased amenorrhea (3.2 to 42.9%) at 6 months.

Conclusion: The data indicate an amelioration of HRQoL and EAPP upon dienogest therapy. No new safety signals were observed. Therefore, its use as first-line therapy for long-term management of debilitating and chronic endometriosis-associated pain represents an interesting option that remains to be further investigated.

Trial registration: Name of registry: Clinical Trials Clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT02425462 Registration date: 2015-04-24. Registration timing: prospective.

Keywords: Asian women; Clinical diagnosis; Endometriosis; Health-related quality of life; Pain.

Conflict of interest statement

CA is a current employee of Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany and SS is a former employee of Bayer AG. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Assessment of (%) quality of life changes in EHP-30 core domains at 6 months (n = 444). Positive change indicates deterioration. Negative change indicates improvement
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Evaluation of changes (%) in endometriosis-associated pelvic pain (EAPP) at 6 months (n = 434) according to EAPP baseline severity (a) and type of diagnosis (b). The changes have been assessed by numeric rating scale in a 4-week recall period. Positive change indicates deterioration. Negative change indicates improvement. *Change was not evaluable for four patients due to missing baseline severity of EAPP for three patients and one lost to follow-up
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Changes (%) in the bleeding pattern from baseline to 6-months (6 mo.) visits. The bleeding patterns were defined as follows: 1) Normal bleeding: Regular bleeding with normal flow and duration. 2) Irregular bleeding cycle: Bleeding cycle less than 21 days or more than 35 days. 3) Amenorrhea: No menstruation during last 90 days. 4) Intermenstrual spotting / bleeding: Irregular episodes of bleeding, often light and short, occurring between otherwise fairly normal menstrual periods. Normal bleeding decreased from 84.2% at baseline to 28.8% after 6 months. Irregular bleeding cycle increased from 7.6 to 10.2%, amenorrhea from 3.2 to 42.9%, intermenstrual bleeding/spotting from 2.3 to 15.1%.

References

    1. Kennedy S, Bergqvist A, Chapron C, D'Hooghe T, Dunselman G, Greb R, et al. ESHRE guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(10):2698–2704. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei135.
    1. Gerlinger C, Faustmann T, Hassall JJ, Seitz C. Treatment of endometriosis in different ethnic populations: a meta-analysis of two clinical trials. BMC Womens Health. 2012;12:9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-12-9.
    1. Arumugam K, Templeton AA. Endometriosis and race. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;32(2):164–165. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1992.tb01932.x.
    1. Yamamoto A, Johnstone EB, Bloom MS, Huddleston HG, Fujimoto VY. A higher prevalence of endometriosis among Asian women does not contribute to poorer IVF outcomes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34(6):765–774. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-0919-1.
    1. Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Poindexter AN., 3rd Epidemiology of endometriosis among parous women. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85(6):983–992. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00074-2.
    1. Dunselman GA, Vermeulen N, Becker C, Calhaz-Jorge C, D'Hooghe T, De Bie B, et al. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(3):400–412. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det457.
    1. Johnson NP, Hummelshoj L. Consensus on current management of endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(6):1552–1568. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det050.
    1. Hirsch M, Begum MR, Paniz E, Barker C, Davis CJ, Duffy J. Diagnosis and management of endometriosis: a systematic review of international and national guidelines. BJOG. 2018;125(5):556–564. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14838.
    1. Dai Y, Li X, Shi J, Leng J. A review of the risk factors, genetics and treatment of endometriosis in Chinese women: a comparative update. Reprod Health. 2018;15(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0506-7.
    1. Schindler AE. Dienogest in long-term treatment of endometriosis. Int J Women's Health. 2011;3:175–184. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S5633.
    1. Guo SW. Recurrence of endometriosis and its control. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15(4):441–461. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmp007.
    1. Cheong Y, Tay P, Luk F, Gan HC, Li TC, Cooke I. Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis: how often do we need to re-operate? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;28(1):82–85. doi: 10.1080/01443610701811761.
    1. Luciano DE, Luciano AA. Management of endometriosis-related pain: an update. Womens Health (Lond) 2011;7(5):585–590. doi: 10.2217/WHE.11.62.
    1. Kohler G, Faustmann TA, Gerlinger C, Seitz C, Mueck AO. A dose-ranging study to determine the efficacy and safety of 1, 2, and 4mg of dienogest daily for endometriosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;108(1):21–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.08.020.
    1. Strowitzki T, Faustmann T, Gerlinger C, Schumacher U, Ahlers C, Seitz C. Safety and tolerability of dienogest in endometriosis: pooled analysis from the European clinical study program. Int J Women's Health. 2015;7:393–401. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S77202.
    1. Strowitzki T, Faustmann T, Gerlinger C, Seitz C. Dienogest in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain: a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;151(2):193–198. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.04.002.
    1. Jones G, Jenkinson C, Kennedy S. Evaluating the responsiveness of the endometriosis health profile questionnaire: the EHP-30. Qual Life Res. 2004;13(3):705–713. doi: 10.1023/B:.
    1. Jones G, Jenkinson C, Taylor N, Mills A, Kennedy S. Measuring quality of life in women with endometriosis: tests of data quality, score reliability, response rate and scaling assumptions of the endometriosis health profile questionnaire. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(10):2686–2693. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del231.
    1. Jones G, Kennedy S, Barnard A, Wong J, Jenkinson C. Development of an endometriosis quality-of-life instrument: the endometriosis health Profile-30. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(2):258–264.
    1. Vercellini P, Somigliana E, Consonni D, Frattaruolo MP, De Giorgi O, Fedele L. Surgical versus medical treatment for endometriosis-associated severe deep dyspareunia: I. effect on pain during intercourse and patient satisfaction. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(12):3450–3459. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des313.
    1. Bernuit D, Ebert AD, Halis G, Strothmann A, Gerlinger C, Geppert K, et al. Female perspectives on endometriosis: findings from the uterine bleeding and pain women’s research study. J Endometriosis. 2011;3(2):73–85. doi: 10.5301/JE.2011.8525.
    1. Lang J, Yu Q, Zhang S, Li H, Gude K, von Ludwig C, et al. Dienogest for treatment of endometriosis in Chinese women: a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind phase 3 study. J Women’s Health (Larchmt) 2018;27(2):148–155. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6399.
    1. Johnson NP, Hummelshoj L, Adamson GD, Keckstein J, Taylor HS, Abrao MS, et al. World endometriosis society consensus on the classification of endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(2):315–324. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew293.
    1. Petraglia F, Hornung D, Seitz C, Faustmann T, Gerlinger C, Luisi S, et al. Reduced pelvic pain in women with endometriosis: efficacy of long-term dienogest treatment. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;285(1):167–173. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-1941-7.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere