Genotype-guided versus traditional clinical dosing of warfarin in patients of Asian ancestry: a randomized controlled trial
Nicholas L Syn, Andrea Li-Ann Wong, Soo-Chin Lee, Hock-Luen Teoh, James Wei Luen Yip, Raymond Cs Seet, Wee Tiong Yeo, William Kristanto, Ping-Chong Bee, L M Poon, Patrick Marban, Tuck Seng Wu, Michael D Winther, Liam R Brunham, Richie Soong, Bee-Choo Tai, Boon-Cher Goh, Nicholas L Syn, Andrea Li-Ann Wong, Soo-Chin Lee, Hock-Luen Teoh, James Wei Luen Yip, Raymond Cs Seet, Wee Tiong Yeo, William Kristanto, Ping-Chong Bee, L M Poon, Patrick Marban, Tuck Seng Wu, Michael D Winther, Liam R Brunham, Richie Soong, Bee-Choo Tai, Boon-Cher Goh
Abstract
Background: Genotype-guided warfarin dosing has been shown in some randomized trials to improve anticoagulation outcomes in individuals of European ancestry, yet its utility in Asian patients remains unresolved.
Methods: An open-label, non-inferiority, 1:1 randomized trial was conducted at three academic hospitals in South East Asia, involving 322 ethnically diverse patients newly indicated for warfarin (NCT00700895). Clinical follow-up was 90 days. The primary efficacy measure was the number of dose titrations within the first 2 weeks of therapy, with a mean non-inferiority margin of 0.5 over the first 14 days of therapy.
Results: Among 322 randomized patients, 269 were evaluable for the primary endpoint. Compared with traditional dosing, the genotype-guided group required fewer dose titrations during the first 2 weeks (1.77 vs. 2.93, difference -1.16, 90% CI -1.48 to -0.84, P < 0.001 for both non-inferiority and superiority). The percentage of time within the therapeutic range over 3 months and median time to stable international normalized ratio (INR) did not differ between the genotype-guided and traditional dosing groups. The frequency of dose titrations (incidence rate ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.86, P = 0.001), but not frequency of INR measurements, was lower at 1, 2, and 3 months in the genotype-guided group. The proportions of patients who experienced minor or major bleeding, recurrent venous thromboembolism, or out-of-range INR did not differ between both arms. For predicting maintenance doses, the pharmacogenetic algorithm achieved an R2 = 42.4% (P < 0.001) and mean percentage error of -7.4%.
Conclusions: Among Asian adults commencing warfarin therapy, a pharmacogenetic algorithm meets criteria for both non-inferiority and superiority in reducing dose titrations compared with a traditional dosing approach, and performs well in prediction of actual maintenance doses. These findings imply that clinicians may consider applying a pharmacogenetic algorithm to personalize initial warfarin dosages in Asian patients.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00700895 . Registered on June 19, 2008.
Keywords: Anticoagulants; Anticoagulation; CYP2C9; Cytochrome P450; Pharmacogenetics; Pharmacogenomics; Polymorphism; Precision medicine; VKORC1; Warfarin.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participateThe ethics review committees at participating centers approved the study protocol (Additional file 1). The study was conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines, and patients provided written informed consent prior to enrollment. All serious adverse events were reported to the Domain Specific Review Board and the Medical Clinical Research Committee, Ministry of Health in accordance with published guidelines. The study is registered at Consent for publication
Obtained as part of informed consent taking.
Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s NoteSpringer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
References
- Passman R. Time in therapeutic range in warfarin-treated patients: is very good good enough? JAMA. 2016;316:872. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.10402.
- Pokorney SD, Simon DN, Thomas L, Gersh BJ, Hylek EM, Piccini JP, et al. Stability of international normalized ratios in patients taking long-term warfarin therapy. JAMA. 2016;316:661. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.9356.
- Jonas DE, McLeod HL. Genetic and clinical factors relating to warfarin dosing. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2009;30:375–386. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2009.05.001.
- Johnson JA, Cavallari LH. Warfarin pharmacogenetics. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2015;25:33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2014.09.001.
- Syn NL-X, Yong W-P, Lee S-C, Goh B-C. Genetic factors affecting drug disposition in Asian cancer patients. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2015;11:1879–1892. doi: 10.1517/17425255.2015.1108964.
- Kimmel SE, French B, Kasner SE, Johnson JA, Anderson JL, Gage BF, et al. A pharmacogenetic versus a clinical algorithm for warfarin dosing. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:2283–2293. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310669.
- Pirmohamed M, Burnside G, Eriksson N, Jorgensen AL, Toh CH, Nicholson T, et al. A randomized trial of genotype-guided dosing of warfarin. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:2294–2303. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1311386.
- Anderson JL, Horne BD, Stevens SM, Woller SC, Samuelson KM, Mansfield JW, et al. A randomized and clinical effectiveness trial comparing two pharmacogenetic algorithms and standard care for individualizing warfarin dosing (CoumaGen-II) Circulation. 2012;125:1997–2005. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.070920.
- Brensinger CM, Kimmel SE. Genetic warfarin dosing tables versus algorithms. JACC. 2011;57:612–618. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.08.643.
- Anderson JL, Horne BD, Stevens SM, Grove AS, Barton S, Nicholas ZP, et al. Randomized trial of genotype-guided versus standard warfarin dosing in patients initiating oral anticoagulation. Circulation. 2007;116:2563–2570. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.737312.
- Stergiopoulos K, Brown DL. Genotype-guided vs clinical dosing of warfarin and its analogues. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:1330. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2368.
- Dahal K, Sharma SP, Fung E, Lee J, Moore JH, Unterborn JN, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of genotype-guided vs standard dosing of warfarin. Chest. 2015;148:701–710. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-2947.
- Gage BF, Bass AR, Lin H, Woller SC, Stevens SM, Al-Hammadi N, et al. Effect of genotype-guided warfarin dosing on clinical events and anticoagulation control among patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty. JAMA. 2017;318:1115. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11469.
- Limdi NA, Brown TM, Yan Q, Thigpen JL, Shendre A, Liu N, et al. Race influences warfarin dose changes associated with genetic factors. Blood. 2015;126:539–545. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-02-627042.
- Lee S-C, Ng S-S, Oldenburg J, Chong P-Y, Rost S, Guo J-Y, et al. Interethnic variability of warfarin maintenance requirement is explained by VKORC1 genotype in an Asian population. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006;79:197–205. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2005.11.006.
- Tham L-S, Goh B-C, Nafziger A, Guo J-Y, Wang L-Z, Soong R, et al. A warfarin-dosing model in Asians that uses single-nucleotide polymorphisms in vitamin K epoxide reductase complex and cytochrome P450 2C9. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006;80:346–355. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2006.06.009.
- Rosendaal FR, Cannegieter SC, Van Der Meer FJM, Briet E. A method to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy. Thromb Haemost. 1993;69:236–239.
- Levine M, Gent M, Hirsh J, Leclerc J, Anderson D, Weitz J, et al. A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin administered primarily at home with unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital for proximal deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:677–681. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199603143341101.
- Kovacs MJ, Rodger M, Anderson DR, Morrow B, Kells G, Kovacs J, et al. Comparison of 10-mg and 5-mg warfarin initiation nomograms together with low-molecular-weight heparin for outpatient treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:714–719. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-9-200305060-00007.
- Kubo K, Ohara M, Tachikawa M, Cavallari LH, Lee MTM, Wen MS, et al. Population differences in S-warfarin pharmacokinetics among African Americans, Asians and whites: their influence on pharmacogenetic dosing algorithms. Pharmacogenomics J. 2017;17(6):494–500. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2016.57.
- Gage BF, Eby C, Milligan PE, Banet GA, Duncan JR, McLeod HL. Use of pharmacogenetics and clinical factors to predict the maintenance dose of warfarin. Thromb Haemost. 2003;91:87–94.
- Sconce EA, Khan TI, Wynne HA, Avery P, Monkhouse L, King BP, et al. The impact of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genetic polymorphism and patient characteristics upon warfarin dose requirements: proposal for a new dosing regimen. Blood. 2005;106:2329–2333. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-03-1108.
- International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium. Klein TE, Altman RB, Eriksson N, Gage BF, Kimmel SE, Lee MT, Limdi NA, Page D, Roden DM, Wagner MJ, JJ CMD. Estimation of the warfarin dose with clinical and pharmacogenetic data. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:753–764. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0809329.
- Lenzini P, Wadelius M, Kimmel SE, Anderson JL. Integration of genetic, clinical, and INR data to refine warfarin dosing. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;87:572–578. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2010.13.
- Avery PJ, Jorgensen A, Hamberg AK, Wadelius M, Pirmohamed M, Kamali F. A proposal for an individualized pharmacogenetics-based warfarin initiation dose regimen for patients commencing anticoagulation therapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011;90:701–706. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.186.
- Voora D, Eby C, Linder MW, Milligan PE, Bukaveckas BL, McLeod HL, et al. Prospective dosing of warfarin based on cytochrome P-450 2C9 genotype. Thromb Haemost. 2005;93:700–705.
- Hamberg a-K, Dahl M-L, Barban M, Scordo MG, Wadelius M, Pengo V, et al. A PK-PD model for predicting the impact of age, CYP2C9, and VKORC1 genotype on individualization of warfarin therapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007;81:529–538. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100084.
- Hamberg a-K, Wadelius M, Lindh JD, Dahl ML, Padrini R, Deloukas P, et al. A pharmacometric model describing the relationship between warfarin dose and INR response with respect to variations in CYP2C9, VKORC1, and age. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;87:727–734. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2010.37.
- Syn NL-X, Lee S-C, Brunham LR, Goh B-C. Pharmacogenetic versus clinical dosing of warfarin in individuals of Chinese and African-American ancestry: assessment using data simulation. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2015;25:491–500. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000165.
Source: PubMed