Association of Patient Priorities-Aligned Decision-Making With Patient Outcomes and Ambulatory Health Care Burden Among Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Mary E Tinetti, Aanand D Naik, Lilian Dindo, Darce M Costello, Jessica Esterson, Mary Geda, Jonathan Rosen, Kizzy Hernandez-Bigos, Cynthia Daisy Smith, Gregory M Ouellet, Gina Kang, Yungah Lee, Caroline Blaum, Mary E Tinetti, Aanand D Naik, Lilian Dindo, Darce M Costello, Jessica Esterson, Mary Geda, Jonathan Rosen, Kizzy Hernandez-Bigos, Cynthia Daisy Smith, Gregory M Ouellet, Gina Kang, Yungah Lee, Caroline Blaum

Abstract

Importance: Health care may be burdensome and of uncertain benefit for older adults with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs). Aligning health care with an individual's health priorities may improve outcomes and reduce burden.

Objective: To evaluate whether patient priorities care (PPC) is associated with a perception of more goal-directed and less burdensome care compared with usual care (UC).

Design, setting, and participants: Nonrandomized clinical trial with propensity adjustment conducted at 1 PPC and 1 UC site of a Connecticut multisite primary care practice that provides care to almost 15% of the state's residents. Participants included 163 adults aged 65 years or older who had 3 or more chronic conditions cared for by 10 primary care practitioners (PCPs) trained in PPC and 203 similar patients who received UC from 7 PCPs not trained in PPC. Participant enrollment occurred between February 1, 2017, and March 31, 2018; follow-up extended for up to 9 months (ended September 30, 2018).

Interventions: Patient priorities care, an approach to decision-making that includes patients' identifying their health priorities (ie, specific health outcome goals and health care preferences) and clinicians aligning their decision-making to achieve these health priorities.

Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcomes included change in patients' Older Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (O-PACIC), CollaboRATE, and Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ) scores; electronic health record documentation of decision-making based on patients' health priorities; medications and self-management tasks added or stopped; and diagnostic tests, referrals, and procedures ordered or avoided.

Results: Of the 366 patients, 235 (64.2%) were female and 350 (95.6%) were white. Compared with the UC group, the PPC group was older (mean [SD] age, 74.7 [6.6] vs 77.6 [7.6] years) and had lower physical and mental health scores. At follow-up, PPC participants reported a 5-point greater decrease in TBQ score than those who received UC (ß [SE], -5.0 [2.04]; P = .01) using a weighted regression model with inverse probability of PCP assignment weights; no differences were seen in O-PACIC or CollaboRATE scores. Health priorities-based decisions were mentioned in clinical visit notes for 108 of 163 (66.3%) PPC vs 0 of 203 (0%) UC participants. Compared with UC patients, PPC patients were more likely to have medications stopped (weighted comparison, 52.0% vs 33.8%; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.05; 95% CI, 1.43-2.95) and less likely to have self-management tasks (57.5% vs 62.1%; AOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41-0.84) and diagnostic tests (80.8% vs 86.4%; AOR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.12-0.40) ordered.

Conclusions and relevance: This study's findings suggest that patient priorities care may be associated with reduced treatment burden and unwanted health care. Care aligned with patients' priorities may be feasible and effective for older adults with MCCs.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03600389.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Smith reported receiving grants from Yale University, that her husband is employed by Merck & Co, and that she and her husband jointly own stock and stock options in Merck & Co. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.. STROBE Patient Flow Diagram
Figure 1.. STROBE Patient Flow Diagram
Patients from both the patient priorities care (PPC) and usual care (UC) sites were prescreened using administrative data based on the eligibility criteria listed in the Methods section. Primary care clinicians at the PPC site decided which of the prescreened patients they would invite to participate. The UC site did not include the step of recruitment. Therefore, all potentially eligible participants were recruited from the UC site. Usual care clinicians did not review their prescreened patients; thus, all UC patients who met the administrative data screen were assumed to be eligible.
Figure 2.. Steps in Patient Priorities Care
Figure 2.. Steps in Patient Priorities Care
aMember of the health care team who helps patients identify their health priorities. bHealth outcome goals are the health and life outcomes that patients desire from their health care. Health care preferences refers to the health care activities (eg, medications, self-management tasks, health care visits, testing, and procedures) that patients find helpful and doable or bothersome, unhelpful, or unwanted. Health priorities refers to the specific, actionable, and reliable health outcome goals that are consistent with their health care preferences.

References

    1. Chevarley FM. Expenditures by Number of Treated Chronic Conditions, Race/Ethnicity, and Age, 2012. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality; 2015. Statistical Brief No. 485. . Accessed February 21, 2019.
    1. American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on the Care of Older Adults with Multimorbidity Guiding Principles for the Care of Older Adults With Multimorbidity: an approach for clinicians. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(10):E1-E25. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04188.x
    1. Uhlig K, Leff B, Kent D, et al. . A framework for crafting clinical practice guidelines that are relevant to the care and management of people with multimorbidity. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(4):670-679. doi:10.1007/s11606-013-2659-y
    1. Zulman DM, Sussman JB, Chen X, Cigolle CT, Blaum CS, Hayward RA. Examining the evidence: a systematic review of the inclusion and analysis of older adults in randomized controlled trials. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(7):783-790. doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1629-x
    1. Berry SD, Ngo L, Samelson EJ, Kiel DP. Competing risk of death: an important consideration in studies of older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(4):783-787. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02767.x
    1. Fitzgerald SP, Bean NG. An analysis of the interactions between individual comorbidities and their treatments—implications for guidelines and polypharmacy. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010;11(7):475-484. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2010.05.008
    1. O’Hare AM, Hotchkiss JR, Kurella Tamura M, et al. . Interpreting treatment effects from clinical trials in the context of real-world risk information: end-stage renal disease prevention in older adults. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(3):391-397. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13328
    1. Fried TR, Tinetti ME, Iannone L, O’Leary JR, Towle V, Van Ness PH. Health outcome prioritization as a tool for decision making among older persons with multiple chronic conditions. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(20):1854-1856. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.424
    1. Montori VM, Brito JP, Murad MH. The optimal practice of evidence-based medicine: incorporating patient preferences in practice guidelines. JAMA. 2013;310(23):2503-2504. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281422
    1. Bayliss EA, Bonds DE, Boyd CM, et al. . Understanding the context of health for persons with multiple chronic conditions: moving from what is the matter to what matters. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(3):260-269. doi:10.1370/afm.1643
    1. Tran VT, Harrington M, Montori VM, Barnes C, Wicks P, Ravaud P. Adaptation and validation of the Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ) in English using an internet platform. BMC Med. 2014;12:109. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-12-109
    1. Boyd CM, Wolff JL, Giovannetti E, et al. . Healthcare task difficulty among older adults with multimorbidity. Med Care. 2014;52(suppl 3):S118-S125. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182a977da
    1. Weiss JW, Boyd CM. Managing complexity in older patients with CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12(4):559-561. doi:10.2215/CJN.02340317
    1. Jowsey T, Yen L, Matthews P. Time spent on health related activities associated with chronic illness: a scoping literature review. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):1044. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-1044
    1. Institute of Medicine (IOM) Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001:3.
    1. Naik AD. On the road to patient centeredness. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(3):218-219. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1229
    1. Childers JW, Back AL, Tulsky JA, Arnold RM. REMAP: a framework for goals of care conversations. J Oncol Pract. 2017;13(10):e844-e850. doi:10.1200/JOP.2016.018796
    1. Austin CA, Mohottige D, Sudore RL, Smith AK, Hanson LC. Tools to promote shared decision making in serious Illness: a systematic review. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(7):1213-1221. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1679
    1. Sudore RL, Knight SJ, McMahan RD, et al. . A novel website to prepare diverse older adults for decision making and advance care planning: a pilot study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014;47(4):674-686. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.05.023
    1. Bernacki RE, Block SD; American College of Physicians High Value Care Task Force . Communication about serious illness care goals: a review and synthesis of best practices. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(12):1994-2003. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5271
    1. Tinetti ME, Esterson J, Ferris R, Posner P, Blaum CS. Patient priority–directed decision making and care for older adults with multiple chronic conditions. Clin Geriatr Med. 2016;32(2):261-275. doi:10.1016/j.cger.2016.01.012
    1. Ferris R, Blaum C, Kiwak E, et al. . Perspectives of patients, clinicians, and health system leaders on changes needed to improve the health care and outcomes of older adults with multiple chronic conditions. J Aging Health. 2018;30(5):778-799. doi:10.1177/0898264317691166
    1. Naik AD, Dindo LN, Van Liew JR, et al. . Development of a clinically feasible process for identifying individual health priorities. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(10):1872-1879. doi:10.1111/jgs.15437
    1. Blaum CS, Rosen J, Naik AD, et al. . Feasibility of implementing patient priorities care for older adults with multiple chronic conditions. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(10):2009-2016. doi:10.1111/jgs.15465
    1. Tinetti M, Dindo L, Smith CD, et al. . Challenges and strategies in patients’ health priorities-aligned decision-making for older adults with multiple chronic conditions. PLoS One. 2019;14(6):e0218249. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0218249
    1. Boyd C, Smith CD, Masoudi F, et al. . Decision making for older adults with multiple chronic conditions: executive summary of action steps for the AGS Guiding Principles on the Care of Older Adults With Multimorbidity. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67(4):665-673. doi:10.1111/jgs.15809
    1. Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012;50(3):217-226. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812
    1. Handley MA, Lyles CR, McCulloch C, Cattamanchi A. Selecting and improving quasi-experimental designs in effectiveness and implementation research. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018;39:5-25. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014128
    1. Casalino LP, Chen MA, Staub CT, et al. . Large independent primary care medical groups. Ann Fam Med. 2016;14(1):16-25. doi:10.1370/afm.1890
    1. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) Tapestry segmentation. . Accessed October 8, 2016.
    1. Patient Priorities Care website home page. . Accessed August 30, 2019.
    1. Cramm JM, Nieboer AP. Development and validation of the Older Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (O-PACIC) scale after hospitalization. Soc Indic Res. 2014;116(3):959-969. doi:10.1007/s11205-013-0314-y
    1. Forcino RC, Barr PJ, O’Malley AJ, et al. . Using CollaboRATE, a brief patient-reported measure of shared decision making: results from three clinical settings in the United States. Health Expect. 2018;21(1):82-89. doi:10.1111/hex.12588
    1. Hays RD, Bjorner JB, Revicki DA, Spritzer KL, Cella D. Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) global items. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(7):873-880. doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9496-9
    1. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. . The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695-699. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
    1. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70(1):41-55. doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
    1. Austin PC, Stuart EA. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Stat Med. 2015;34(28):3661-3679. doi:10.1002/sim.6607
    1. Rubin DB. Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: application to the tobacco litigation. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2001;(3-4):169-188. doi:10.1023/A:1020363010465
    1. Stuart EA. Matching methods for causal inference: a review and a look forward. Stat Sci. 2010;25(1):1-21. doi:10.1214/09-STS313
    1. Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399-424. doi:10.1080/00273171.2011.568786
    1. Rubin DB. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 1987. doi:10.1002/9780470316696
    1. Rogosa DR, Brandt D, Zimowski M. A growth curve approach to the measurement of change. Psychol Bull. 1982;92(3):726-748. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.92.3.726
    1. Rubin DB, Thomas N. Combining propensity score matching with additional adjustments for prognostic covariates. J Am Stat Assoc. 2000;95(450):573-585. doi:10.1080/01621459.2000.10474233
    1. Hartgerink JM, Cramm JM, Bakker TJ, Mackenbach JP, Nieboer AP. The importance of older patients’ experiences with care delivery for their quality of life after hospitalization. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):311. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0982-1
    1. Deininger KM, Hirsch JD, Graveline A, et al. . Relationship between patient-perceived treatment burden and health-related quality of life in heart transplant recipients [abstract]. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018;37(4)(special issue)(suppl):S351. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2018.01.899
    1. O’Malley AJ, Zaslavsky AM, Elliott MN, Zaborski L, Cleary PD. Case-mix adjustment of the CAHPS Hospital Survey. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6, pt 2):2162-2181. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00470.x
    1. Szanton SL, Alfonso YN, Leff B, et al. . Medicaid cost savings of a preventive home visit program for disabled older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(3):614-620. doi:10.1111/jgs.15143
    1. Naik AD, Martin LA, Moye J, Karel MJ. Health values and treatment goals of older, multimorbid adults facing life-threatening illness. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(3):625-631. doi:10.1111/jgs.14027
    1. Naik AD, Palmer N, Petersen NJ, et al. . Comparative effectiveness of goal setting in diabetes mellitus group clinics: randomized clinical trial. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(5):453-459. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.70
    1. Coulter A, Entwistle VA, Eccles A, Ryan S, Shepperd S, Perera R. Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(3):CD010523. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010523.pub2
    1. Rockwood K, Stadnyk K, Carver D, et al. . A clinimetric evaluation of specialized geriatric care for rural dwelling, frail older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(9):1080-1085. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04783.x
    1. Toto PE, Skidmore ER, Terhorst L, Rosen J, Weiner DK. Goal attainment scaling (GAS) in geriatric primary care: a feasibility study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015;60(1):16-21. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2014.10.022
    1. MacKenzie MA, Smith-Howell E, Bomba PA, Meghani SH. Respecting choices and related models of advance care planning: a systematic review of published evidence. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018;35(6):897-907. doi:10.1177/1049909117745789
    1. Smith SM, Wallace E, O’Dowd T, Fortin M. Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;3:CD006560. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006560.pub3
    1. Salisbury C, Man M-S, Bower P, et al. . Management of multimorbidity using a patient-centred care model: a pragmatic cluster-randomised trial of the 3D approach. Lancet. 2018;392(10141):41-50. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31308-4
    1. Scott IA, Hilmer SN, Reeve E, et al. . Reducing inappropriate polypharmacy: the process of deprescribing. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(5):827-834. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0324
    1. Green AR, Tung M, Segal JB. Older adults’ perceptions of the causes and consequences of healthcare overuse: a qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(6):892-897. doi:10.1007/s11606-017-4264-y
    1. Chi WC, Wolff J, Greer R, Dy S. Multimorbidity and decision-making preferences among older adults. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(6):546-551. doi:10.1370/afm.2106
    1. Naik AD, McCullough LB. Health intuitions inform patient-centered care. Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(6):1-3. doi:10.1080/15265161.2014.915650
    1. Tinetti ME, Naik AD, Dodson JA. Moving from disease-centered to patient goals–directed care for patients with multiple chronic conditions: patient value-based care. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1(1):9-10. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2015.0248

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere