Sweet taste receptor expressed in pancreatic beta-cells activates the calcium and cyclic AMP signaling systems and stimulates insulin secretion

Yuko Nakagawa, Masahiro Nagasawa, Satoko Yamada, Akemi Hara, Hideo Mogami, Viacheslav O Nikolaev, Martin J Lohse, Noriatsu Shigemura, Yuzo Ninomiya, Itaru Kojima, Yuko Nakagawa, Masahiro Nagasawa, Satoko Yamada, Akemi Hara, Hideo Mogami, Viacheslav O Nikolaev, Martin J Lohse, Noriatsu Shigemura, Yuzo Ninomiya, Itaru Kojima

Abstract

Background: Sweet taste receptor is expressed in the taste buds and enteroendocrine cells acting as a sugar sensor. We investigated the expression and function of the sweet taste receptor in MIN6 cells and mouse islets.

Methodology/principal findings: The expression of the sweet taste receptor was determined by RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. Changes in cytoplasmic Ca(2+) ([Ca(2+)](c)) and cAMP ([cAMP](c)) were monitored in MIN6 cells using fura-2 and Epac1-camps. Activation of protein kinase C was monitored by measuring translocation of MARCKS-GFP. Insulin was measured by radioimmunoassay. mRNA for T1R2, T1R3, and gustducin was expressed in MIN6 cells. In these cells, artificial sweeteners such as sucralose, succharin, and acesulfame-K increased insulin secretion and augmented secretion induced by glucose. Sucralose increased biphasic increase in [Ca(2+)](c). The second sustained phase was blocked by removal of extracellular calcium and addition of nifedipine. An inhibitor of inositol(1, 4, 5)-trisphophate receptor, 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate, blocked both phases of [Ca(2+)](c) response. The effect of sucralose on [Ca(2+)](c) was inhibited by gurmarin, an inhibitor of the sweet taste receptor, but not affected by a G(q) inhibitor. Sucralose also induced sustained elevation of [cAMP](c), which was only partially inhibited by removal of extracellular calcium and nifedipine. Finally, mouse islets expressed T1R2 and T1R3, and artificial sweeteners stimulated insulin secretion.

Conclusions: Sweet taste receptor is expressed in beta-cells, and activation of this receptor induces insulin secretion by Ca(2+) and cAMP-dependent mechanisms.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Expression of the sweet taste…
Figure 1. Expression of the sweet taste receptor in MIN6 cells.
(A) Expression of mRNA for T1R2, T1R3 and α subunit of gustducin (Gαgust) in MIN6 cells was measured by RT-PCR. MM: molecular markers. The result is a representative of three experiments. (B) MIN6 cells were stained by anti-T1R2 (a) and anti-T1R3 (b) antibodies.
Figure 2. Effect of artificial sweeteners on…
Figure 2. Effect of artificial sweeteners on insulin secretion in MIN6 cells.
(A) MIN6 cells were incubated for 60 min with or without 50 mM saccharin, 50 mM sucralose or 50 mM acesulfame-K in the presence of 3 or 25 mM glucose, and insulin secretion was measured. Values are expressed as means±S.E. for four experiments. *: P

Figure 3. Effect of sucralose on [Ca…

Figure 3. Effect of sucralose on [Ca 2+ ] c and [cAMP] c in MIN6…

(A) MIN6 cells…

Figure 3. Effect of sucralose on [Ca2+]c and [cAMP]c in MIN6 cells.
(A) MIN6 cells expressing Epac1-camps were loaded with fura-2, and changes in [Ca2+]c (○) and [cAMP]c (•) were monitored. Cells were stimulated by 50 mM sucralose. Note that 50 mM mannitol did not affect [Ca2+]c or [cAMP]c indicating that the effect of sucralose was not simply due to changes in osmolarity. (B) Dose-response relationship for the effect of sucralose. Cells were stimulated with various concentrations of sucralose, and the area under the curve (AUC) for [Ca2+]c and [cAMP]c was calculated. Values are the mean±S.E. for five experiments. (C) Epac1-camps-expressing cells loaded with fura-2 were stimulated with 25 mM glucose, and changes in [Ca2+]c (○) and [cAMP]c (•) were monitored. (D) Cells were stimulated with 50 µM carbachol and changes in [Ca2+]c (○) and [cAMP]c (•) were monitored.

Figure 4. Involvement of the sweet taste…

Figure 4. Involvement of the sweet taste receptor in the action of sucralose.

(A): Epac1-camps-expressing…

Figure 4. Involvement of the sweet taste receptor in the action of sucralose.
(A): Epac1-camps-expressing MIN6 cells loaded with fura-2 were incubated with (○) or without (•) 3 µg/ml gurmarin for 10 min and then stimulated with 50 mM sucralose. Changes in [Ca2+]c were monitored. (B) Quantitative analysis of the effect of gurmarin. Cells were stimulated by 50 mM sucralose in the presence and absence of gurmarin and the AUC was calculated. Values are the mean±S.E. for four experiments. *: p<0.05 vs none. (C) Epac1-camps-expressing MIN6 cells loaded with fura-2 were preincubated with 10 µM YM254890 for 10 min and then stimulated with 50 mM sucralose in the presence of YM254890. Changes in [Ca2+]c (○) and [cAMP]c (•) were monitored. (D) Epac1-camps-expressing MIN6 cells loaded with fura-2 were preincubated with YM254890 for 10 min and then stimulated with 50 µM carbachol in the presence (○) and absence (•) of YM254890.

Figure 5. Role of calcium entry in…

Figure 5. Role of calcium entry in the action of sucralose on [Ca 2+ ]…

(A) Epac1-camps-expressing…

Figure 5. Role of calcium entry in the action of sucralose on [Ca2+]c.
(A) Epac1-camps-expressing MIN6 cells loaded with fura-2 were stimulated by 50 mM sucralose in calcium-free HBSS, and changes in [Ca2+]c (○) and [cAMP]c (•) were monitored. (B) Epac1-camps-expressing MIN6 cells loaded with fura-2 were stimulated by 50 mM sucralose in the presence of 1 µM nifedipine. (C) Epac1-camps-expressing MIN6 cells loaded with fura-2 were incubated in Na-free HBSS and stimulated with 50 mM sucralose and changes in [Ca2+]c (○) and [cAMP]c (•) were measured. (D) Epac1-camps-expressing MIN6 cells loaded with fura-2 were stimulated with 50 mM sucralose in the presence of 200 µM 2APB and changes in [Ca2+]c (○) and [cAMP]c (•) were measured. (E) Quantitative analysis of the above data. *: P<0.05. (F) Expression of TRPM channels in MIN6 cells. Expression of various types of TRPM channels was measured by RT-PCR using mRNA obtained from MIN6 cells. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 stand for TRPM1, TRPM2, TRPM3, TRPM4, TRPM5, TRPM6, TRPM7, TRPM8, respectively.

Figure 6. Effect of sucralose on PKC…

Figure 6. Effect of sucralose on PKC activation.

(A) MIN6 cells expressing MARCKS-GFP were loaded…

Figure 6. Effect of sucralose on PKC activation.
(A) MIN6 cells expressing MARCKS-GFP were loaded with fura-2. Cells were stimulated with 50 mM sucralose and changes in [Ca2+]c (○) and the amount of MARCKS-GFP in cytosol (•) were monitored. (B) MIN6 cells expressing MARCKS-GFP were loaded with fura-2. Cells were then incubated in Ca2+-free HBSS and stimulated with 50 mM sucralose and changes in [Ca2+]c (○) and amount of MARCKS-GFP in cytosol (•) were measured.

Figure 7. Expression of the sweet receptor…

Figure 7. Expression of the sweet receptor in islets.

(A) Expression of mRNA in Mouse…

Figure 7. Expression of the sweet receptor in islets.
(A) Expression of mRNA in Mouse Islets. mRNA was extracted from mouse islets and the expression of T1R2, T1R3, and Gαgust was measured by RT-PCR. (B) Comparison of the Expression of T1Rs and Gustducin in Islets and MIN6 cells. mRNA levels for T1R2 (a), T1R3 (b) and Gαgust (c) were measured by quantitative PCR in islets and MIN6 cells and expressed as relative to β actin. (C) Expression of T1R3 in Islets. Pancreatic slices were stained with anti-T1R3 (a) and anti-insulin (b) antibodies. c: merge. (D) Effects of Artificial Sweeteners on Insulin secretion from Islets. Islets were incubated for 60 min with various concentrations of sucralose in the presence of 2.8 and 20 mM glucose. Values are the mean±S.E. for four experiments. *: p<0.05 vs control.
All figures (7)
Figure 3. Effect of sucralose on [Ca…
Figure 3. Effect of sucralose on [Ca2+]c and [cAMP]c in MIN6 cells.
(A) MIN6 cells expressing Epac1-camps were loaded with fura-2, and changes in [Ca2+]c (○) and [cAMP]c (•) were monitored. Cells were stimulated by 50 mM sucralose. Note that 50 mM mannitol did not affect [Ca2+]c or [cAMP]c indicating that the effect of sucralose was not simply due to changes in osmolarity. (B) Dose-response relationship for the effect of sucralose. Cells were stimulated with various concentrations of sucralose, and the area under the curve (AUC) for [Ca2+]c and [cAMP]c was calculated. Values are the mean±S.E. for five experiments. (C) Epac1-camps-expressing cells loaded with fura-2 were stimulated with 25 mM glucose, and changes in [Ca2+]c (○) and [cAMP]c (•) were monitored. (D) Cells were stimulated with 50 µM carbachol and changes in [Ca2+]c (○) and [cAMP]c (•) were monitored.
Figure 4. Involvement of the sweet taste…
Figure 4. Involvement of the sweet taste receptor in the action of sucralose.
(A): Epac1-camps-expressing MIN6 cells loaded with fura-2 were incubated with (○) or without (•) 3 µg/ml gurmarin for 10 min and then stimulated with 50 mM sucralose. Changes in [Ca2+]c were monitored. (B) Quantitative analysis of the effect of gurmarin. Cells were stimulated by 50 mM sucralose in the presence and absence of gurmarin and the AUC was calculated. Values are the mean±S.E. for four experiments. *: p<0.05 vs none. (C) Epac1-camps-expressing MIN6 cells loaded with fura-2 were preincubated with 10 µM YM254890 for 10 min and then stimulated with 50 mM sucralose in the presence of YM254890. Changes in [Ca2+]c (○) and [cAMP]c (•) were monitored. (D) Epac1-camps-expressing MIN6 cells loaded with fura-2 were preincubated with YM254890 for 10 min and then stimulated with 50 µM carbachol in the presence (○) and absence (•) of YM254890.
Figure 5. Role of calcium entry in…
Figure 5. Role of calcium entry in the action of sucralose on [Ca2+]c.
(A) Epac1-camps-expressing MIN6 cells loaded with fura-2 were stimulated by 50 mM sucralose in calcium-free HBSS, and changes in [Ca2+]c (○) and [cAMP]c (•) were monitored. (B) Epac1-camps-expressing MIN6 cells loaded with fura-2 were stimulated by 50 mM sucralose in the presence of 1 µM nifedipine. (C) Epac1-camps-expressing MIN6 cells loaded with fura-2 were incubated in Na-free HBSS and stimulated with 50 mM sucralose and changes in [Ca2+]c (○) and [cAMP]c (•) were measured. (D) Epac1-camps-expressing MIN6 cells loaded with fura-2 were stimulated with 50 mM sucralose in the presence of 200 µM 2APB and changes in [Ca2+]c (○) and [cAMP]c (•) were measured. (E) Quantitative analysis of the above data. *: P<0.05. (F) Expression of TRPM channels in MIN6 cells. Expression of various types of TRPM channels was measured by RT-PCR using mRNA obtained from MIN6 cells. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 stand for TRPM1, TRPM2, TRPM3, TRPM4, TRPM5, TRPM6, TRPM7, TRPM8, respectively.
Figure 6. Effect of sucralose on PKC…
Figure 6. Effect of sucralose on PKC activation.
(A) MIN6 cells expressing MARCKS-GFP were loaded with fura-2. Cells were stimulated with 50 mM sucralose and changes in [Ca2+]c (○) and the amount of MARCKS-GFP in cytosol (•) were monitored. (B) MIN6 cells expressing MARCKS-GFP were loaded with fura-2. Cells were then incubated in Ca2+-free HBSS and stimulated with 50 mM sucralose and changes in [Ca2+]c (○) and amount of MARCKS-GFP in cytosol (•) were measured.
Figure 7. Expression of the sweet receptor…
Figure 7. Expression of the sweet receptor in islets.
(A) Expression of mRNA in Mouse Islets. mRNA was extracted from mouse islets and the expression of T1R2, T1R3, and Gαgust was measured by RT-PCR. (B) Comparison of the Expression of T1Rs and Gustducin in Islets and MIN6 cells. mRNA levels for T1R2 (a), T1R3 (b) and Gαgust (c) were measured by quantitative PCR in islets and MIN6 cells and expressed as relative to β actin. (C) Expression of T1R3 in Islets. Pancreatic slices were stained with anti-T1R3 (a) and anti-insulin (b) antibodies. c: merge. (D) Effects of Artificial Sweeteners on Insulin secretion from Islets. Islets were incubated for 60 min with various concentrations of sucralose in the presence of 2.8 and 20 mM glucose. Values are the mean±S.E. for four experiments. *: p<0.05 vs control.

References

    1. Nelson G, Hoon MA, Chandrashekar J, Zhang Y, Ryba NJP, et al. Mammalian sweet taste receptors. Cell. 2001;106:381–390.
    1. Li X, Staszewski L, Xu H, Durick K, Zoller M, et al. Human receptors for sweet and umani taste. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:4692–4696.
    1. Zhao GQ, Zhang Y, Hoon MA, Chadrashekar J, Erlenbach I, et al. The receptors for mammalian sweet and umani taste. Cell. 2003;115:255–266.
    1. Nie y, Vigues S, Hobbs JR, Conn GL, Munger SD. Distinct contributions of T1R2 and T1R3 taste receptor subunits to the detection of sweet stimuli. Curr Biol. 2006;15:1948–1952.
    1. Linderman B. Receptors and transduction in taste. Nature. 2002;413:219–225.
    1. Margolskee BF. Molecular mechanism of bitter and sweet taste transduction. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:1–4.
    1. Dyer J, Salmon KSH, Zibrik L, Shirazi-Beechey SP. Expression of sweet taste receptors of the T1R family in the intestinal tract and enteroendocrine cells. Biochem Soc Trans. 2005;33:302–305.
    1. Margolskee RF, Dyer J, Kokrashvili Z, Salmon KH, Ilegems E, et al. T1R3 and gustducin in gut sense sugars to regulate expression of Na+-glucose cotransporter 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;104:15075–15080.
    1. Teitelman G. Cellular and molecular analysis of pancreatic islet cell lineage and differentiation. Rec Prog Hor Res. 2001;47:259–295.
    1. Schinhoff SE, Giel-Moloney M, Leiter AB. Development and differentiation of gut endocrine cells. Endocrinology. 2004;145:2639–2644.
    1. Matschinsky FM. A lesson metabolic regulation of inspired by the glucokinase glucose sensor paradigm. Diabetes. 1996;5:223–241.
    1. Shigemura N, Nakao K, Yasuo T, Murata Y, Yasumatsu K, et al. Gurmarin sensitivity of sweet taste response is associated with co-expression patters of T1r2, T1r3 and gustducin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;367:356–363.
    1. Takasaki J, Saito T, Taniguchi M, Kawasaki T, Moritani T, et al. A novel Gq/11-selective inhibitor. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:47438–47445.
    1. Murayama T, Kanji T, Nakade S, Kanno T, Mikoshiba K. 2APB, 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate, a membrane-penetrable modulator of Ins (1, 4, 5) P3-induced Ca2+ release. J Biochem. 1997;122:498–505.
    1. Talavera K, Yasumatsu K, Voets T, Droogmans G, Shigemura N, et al. Heart activation of TRPM5 underlies thermal sensitivity of sweet taste. Nature. 2005;438:1022–1025.
    1. Zhang H, Nagasawa M, Yamada S, Mogami H, Suzuki Y, et al. Bimodal role of conventional protein kinase C in insulin secretion from rat pancreatic islets. J Physiol. 2004;61:133–148.
    1. Reimann F, Habib AM, Tolhurat G, Parker HE, Rogers GJ, et al. Glucose sensing in L cells: a primary cell study. Cell Metab. 2008;8:532–539.
    1. Malaisse WJ, Vanonderbergen A, Louchami K, Jijakli H, Malaisse-Lagae F. Effects of artificial sweeteners on insulin release and cationic fluxes in rat pancreatic islets. Cell Signal. 1998;10:727–733.
    1. Straub SG, Mulvaney-Musa J, Yajima H, Weiland GA, Sharp GWG. Stimulation of insulin secretion by denatonium, one of the most bitter-tasting substances known. Diabetes. 2003;52:356–364.
    1. Cheng H, Beck A, Launay P, Gross SA, Stokes AJ, et al. TRPM4 controls insulin secretion in pancreatic β-cells. Cell Calcium. 2007;41:51–61.
    1. Togashi K, Hara Y, Tominaga T, Higashi T, Konishi Y, et al. TRPV2 activation by cyclic ADP-ribose at body temperature is involved in insulin secretion. EMBO J. 2006;25:1804–1815.
    1. Mezitis NHE, Qudduos A, Maggio CA, Allison DB, Koch P, et al. Glycemic effect of a single high oral dose of the novel sweetener sucralose in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1996;19:1004–1005.
    1. Grots VL, Henry RR, McGill JB, Prince MJ, Shamoon H, et al. Lack of effect of sucralose on glucose homeostasis in subjects with type 2 diabetes. J Am Diab Assoc. 2003;103:1607–1612.
    1. Miyazaki J, Araki K, Yamato E, Ikegami H, Asano T, et al. Establishment of a pancreatic β cell line that retains glucose-inducible insulin secretion. Endocrinology. 1990;127:126–132.
    1. Nikolaev VO, Bünemann M, Hein L, Hannawacker A, Lohse MJ. Novel single chain cAMP sensors for receptor-mediated signal propagation. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:37215–37218.
    1. Suzuki Y, Zhang H, Saito N, Kojima I, Urano T, et al. GLP-1 activate protein kinase C though Ca2+-dependent activation of phospholipase C in insulin-secretion cells. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:28499–28507.
    1. Gryhkiewicz G, Poenie M, Tsien RY. A new generation of Ca2+ indicators with improved fluorescence properties. J Biol Chem. 1985;260:3440–3450.
    1. Hara A, Kabeya Y, Kojima I, Yamashina S. A rat pancreatic islet is formed by unification of multiple endocrine cell clusters. Dev Dynam. 2007;236:3451–3458.
    1. Feihan F, Zhang Y, Kang Y, Wang Q, Gaisano HY, et al. The neuronal Ca2+ sensor protein visinin-like protein-1 is expressed in pancreatic islets and regulates insulin secretion. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:21942–21953.
    1. Goto M, Maki T, Koizumi T, Satomi S, Manaco AP. A improved method for isolation of mouse pancreatic islet. Transplantation. 1985;40:437–438.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere