Efficacy and Safety of Switching to Dolutegravir/Lamivudine Fixed-Dose 2-Drug Regimen vs Continuing a Tenofovir Alafenamide-Based 3- or 4-Drug Regimen for Maintenance of Virologic Suppression in Adults Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1: Phase 3, Randomized, Noninferiority TANGO Study

Jean van Wyk, Faïza Ajana, Fiona Bisshop, Stéphane De Wit, Olayemi Osiyemi, Joaquín Portilla Sogorb, Jean-Pierre Routy, Christoph Wyen, Mounir Ait-Khaled, Maria Claudia Nascimento, Keith A Pappa, Ruolan Wang, Jonathan Wright, Allan R Tenorio, Brian Wynne, Michael Aboud, Martin J Gartland, Kimberly Y Smith, Jean van Wyk, Faïza Ajana, Fiona Bisshop, Stéphane De Wit, Olayemi Osiyemi, Joaquín Portilla Sogorb, Jean-Pierre Routy, Christoph Wyen, Mounir Ait-Khaled, Maria Claudia Nascimento, Keith A Pappa, Ruolan Wang, Jonathan Wright, Allan R Tenorio, Brian Wynne, Michael Aboud, Martin J Gartland, Kimberly Y Smith

Abstract

Background: The 2-drug regimen dolutegravir (DTG) + lamivudine (3TC) is indicated for treatment-naive adults with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). We present efficacy and safety of switching to DTG/3TC in virologically suppressed individuals.

Methods: TANGO is an open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study that randomized adults (1:1, stratified by baseline third agent class) with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL to switch to once-daily fixed-dose DTG/3TC or remain on a tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)-based regimen. The primary end point was proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL at week 48 (US Food and Drug Administration Snapshot algorithm) in the intention-to-treat-exposed population (4% noninferiority margin).

Results: 743 adults were enrolled; 741 received ≥1 dose of study drug (DTG/3TC, N = 369; TAF-based regimen, N = 372). At week 48, proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL receiving DTG/3TC was 0.3% (1/369) vs 0.5% (2/372) with a TAF-based regimen (adjusted treatment difference [95% confidence interval], -0.3 [-1.2 to .7]), meeting noninferiority criteria. No participants receiving DTG/3TC and 1 receiving a TAF-based regimen met confirmed virologic withdrawal criteria, with no emergent resistance at failure. Drug-related grade ≥2 adverse events and withdrawals due to adverse events occurred in 17 (4.6%) and 13 (3.5%) participants with DTG/3TC and 3 (0.8%) and 2 (0.5%) with a TAF-based regimen, respectively.

Conclusions: DTG/3TC was noninferior in maintaining virologic suppression vs a TAF-based regimen at week 48, with no virologic failure or emergent resistance reported with DTG/3TC, supporting it as a simplification strategy for virologically suppressed people with HIV-1.

Clinical trials registration: NCT03446573.

Keywords: 2-drug regimen; integrase strand transfer inhibitor; nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; simplification; virologic suppression.

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Trial profile. aParticipants could have multiple reasons for ineligibility. bThe most common reasons for not meeting inclusion criteria or meeting exclusion criteria are listed. All other reasons occurred in <1% of participants. cOne participant in the TAF–based regimen group was found to be taking a tenofovir disoproxil fumarate–based regimen at baseline and therefore was excluded from the safety population. dProtocol deviations leading to exclusion from the per-protocol population; participants could have had more than 1 reason. Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; ART, antiretroviral therapy; DTG, dolutegravir; HIV-1, human immunodeficiency virus type 1; 3TC, lamivudine; TAF, tenofovir alafenamide.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
A, Virologic outcomes at week 48 in the intention-to-treat–exposed population by US Food and Drug Administration Snapshot algorithm. B, Adjusted treatment differences. aOne fatal adverse event unrelated to study treatment occurred (homicide). bBased on Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel stratified analysis adjusting for baseline third agent class. Abbreviations: 3TC, lamivudine; AE, adverse event; DTG, dolutegravir; HIV-1, human immunodeficiency virus type 1; TAF, tenofovir alafenamide.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA

Figure 4.

Change from baseline in homeostasis…

Figure 4.

Change from baseline in homeostasis model assessment–insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) in the safety population.…

Figure 4.
Change from baseline in homeostasis model assessment–insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) in the safety population. Geometric mean ratio and 95% confidence interval for postbaseline values based on a loge transformation. Change from baseline was calculated using a repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, baseline third agent class, CD4+ cell count (continuous), age (continuous), sex, race, body mass index (continuous), presence of hypertension, loge-transformed baseline HOMA-IR, treatment-by-visit interaction, and baseline value-by-visit interaction, with visit as the repeated factor. Abbreviations: 3TC, lamivudine; CI, confidence interval; DTG, dolutegravir; TAF, tenofovir alafenamide.

Figure 5.

Change from baseline at week…

Figure 5.

Change from baseline at week 48 in renal biomarkers. a Estimated mean change…

Figure 5.
Change from baseline at week 48 in renal biomarkers. aEstimated mean change from baseline at week 48 in each group calculated from mixed model repeated measures adjusting for treatment, visit, baseline third agent class, CD4+ cell count (continuous), age (continuous), sex, race, body mass index (continuous), presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, baseline biomarker (continuous), treatment-by-visit interaction, and baseline value-by-visit interaction, with visit as the repeated factor. bBased on estimated geometric means ratio of week 48 vs baseline. Based on the same model as plasma/serum markers except adjusting for loge-transformed baseline biomarker (continuous). *P < .001. Abbreviations: 3TC, lamivudine; CKD-EPI, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation; DTG, dolutegravir; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; TAF, tenofovir alafenamide.

Figure 6.

Change from baseline in serum…

Figure 6.

Change from baseline in serum or plasma lipids at week 48. a n…

Figure 6.
Change from baseline in serum or plasma lipids at week 48. an = number of participants with nonmissing fasting lipid data at baseline and week 48, removing those with lipid-modifying agent administered at baseline (lipid data collected after initiation of a lipid-modifying agent were censored and a last observation carried forward method was applied so that the last available fasted, on-treatment lipid value before initiation of a lipid-modifying agent was used). bPercent change from baseline based on adjusted ratio (week 48 to baseline) in each group calculated from a repeated measures model applied to change from baseline in loge-transformed data adjusting for the following: treatment, visit, baseline third agent class, CD4+ cell count (continuous), loge-transformed baseline value (continuous), treatment-by-visit interaction, and baseline value-by-visit interaction, with visit as the repeated factor. *P = .017. **P < .001. Abbreviations: 3TC, lamivudine; DTG, dolutegravir; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; TAF, tenofovir alafenamide.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Change from baseline in homeostasis model assessment–insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) in the safety population. Geometric mean ratio and 95% confidence interval for postbaseline values based on a loge transformation. Change from baseline was calculated using a repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, baseline third agent class, CD4+ cell count (continuous), age (continuous), sex, race, body mass index (continuous), presence of hypertension, loge-transformed baseline HOMA-IR, treatment-by-visit interaction, and baseline value-by-visit interaction, with visit as the repeated factor. Abbreviations: 3TC, lamivudine; CI, confidence interval; DTG, dolutegravir; TAF, tenofovir alafenamide.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Change from baseline at week 48 in renal biomarkers. aEstimated mean change from baseline at week 48 in each group calculated from mixed model repeated measures adjusting for treatment, visit, baseline third agent class, CD4+ cell count (continuous), age (continuous), sex, race, body mass index (continuous), presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, baseline biomarker (continuous), treatment-by-visit interaction, and baseline value-by-visit interaction, with visit as the repeated factor. bBased on estimated geometric means ratio of week 48 vs baseline. Based on the same model as plasma/serum markers except adjusting for loge-transformed baseline biomarker (continuous). *P < .001. Abbreviations: 3TC, lamivudine; CKD-EPI, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation; DTG, dolutegravir; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; TAF, tenofovir alafenamide.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Change from baseline in serum or plasma lipids at week 48. an = number of participants with nonmissing fasting lipid data at baseline and week 48, removing those with lipid-modifying agent administered at baseline (lipid data collected after initiation of a lipid-modifying agent were censored and a last observation carried forward method was applied so that the last available fasted, on-treatment lipid value before initiation of a lipid-modifying agent was used). bPercent change from baseline based on adjusted ratio (week 48 to baseline) in each group calculated from a repeated measures model applied to change from baseline in loge-transformed data adjusting for the following: treatment, visit, baseline third agent class, CD4+ cell count (continuous), loge-transformed baseline value (continuous), treatment-by-visit interaction, and baseline value-by-visit interaction, with visit as the repeated factor. *P = .017. **P < .001. Abbreviations: 3TC, lamivudine; DTG, dolutegravir; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; TAF, tenofovir alafenamide.

References

    1. Trickey A, May MT, Vehreschild J-J, et al. Survival of HIV-positive patients starting antiretroviral therapy between 1996 and 2013: a collaborative analysis of cohort studies. Lancet HIV 2017; 4: e349–56.
    1. Back D. 2-Drug regimens in HIV treatment: pharmacological considerations. Germs 2017; 7:113–4.
    1. Kelly SG, Nyaku AN, Taiwo BO. Two-drug treatment approaches in HIV: finally getting somewhere? Drugs 2016; 76:523–31.
    1. Juluca [package insert]. Research Triangle Park, NC: ViiV Healthcare; 2019.
    1. Llibre JM, Hung CC, Brinson C, et al. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of dolutegravir-rilpivirine for the maintenance of virological suppression in adults with HIV-1: phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority SWORD-1 and SWORD-2 studies. Lancet 2018; 391:839–49.
    1. Dovato [package insert]. Research Triangle Park, NC: ViiV Healthcare; 2019.
    1. Dovato [summary of product characteristics]. Uxbridge, UK: ViiV Healthcare; 2019.
    1. Cahn P, Madero JS, Arribas JR, et al. ; GEMINI Study Team Dolutegravir plus lamivudine versus dolutegravir plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 infection (GEMINI-1 and GEMINI-2): week 48 results from two multicentre, double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trials. Lancet 2019; 393:143–55.
    1. Brenner BG, Wainberg MA. Clinical benefit of dolutegravir in HIV-1 management related to the high genetic barrier to drug resistance. Virus Res 2017; 239:1–9.
    1. Cahn P, Madero JS, Arribas JR, et al. Durable efficacy of dolutegravir plus lamivudine in antiretroviral treatment-naive adults with HIV-1 infection: 96-week results from the GEMINI-1 and GEMINI-2 randomized clinical trials. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2019. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1097/QAI.0000000000002275
    1. Joly V, Burdet C, Landman R, et al. Dolutegravir and lamivudine maintenance therapy in HIV-1 virologically suppressed patients: results of the ANRS 167 trial (LAMIDOL). J Antimicrob Chemother 2018; 74: 739–745.
    1. Taiwo BO, Marconi VC, Berzins B, et al. Dolutegravir plus lamivudine maintains human immunodeficiency virus-1 suppression through week 48 in a pilot randomized trial. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 66:1794–7.
    1. ViiV Healthcare. ViiV study register. 204862-Switch study to evaluate dolutegravir plus lamivudine in virologically suppressed human immunodeficiency virus type 1 positive adults (TANGO). Available at: . Accessed 24 January 2020.
    1. Wensing AM, Calvez V, Günthard HF, et al. 2017 update of the drug resistance mutations in HIV-1. Top Antivir Med 2017; 24: 132–3.
    1. Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services. Division of AIDS (DAIDS) table for grading the severity of adult and pediatric adverse events, corrected version 2.1 Available at: . Accessed 14 August 2019.
    1. Vannappagari V, Ragone L, Henegar C, et al. Prevalence of pretreatment and acquired HIV-1 mutations associated with resistance to lamivudine or rilpivirine: a systematic review. Antivir Ther 2019; 24:393–404.
    1. Trottier B, Lake JE, Logue K, et al. Dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine versus current ART in virally suppressed patients (STRIIVING): a 48-week, randomized, non-inferiority, open-label, phase IIIb study. Antivir Ther 2017; 22:295–305.
    1. Palella FJ Jr, Fisher M, Tebas P, et al. Simplification to rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate from ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor antiretroviral therapy in a randomized trial of HIV-1 RNA-suppressed participants. AIDS 2014; 28:335–44.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services. AIDSinfo. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in adults and adolescents with HIV Updated December 18, 2019. Available at: . Accessed 22 December 2019.
    1. European AIDS Clinical Society. European AIDS Clinical Society Guidelines Version 10.0 Updated November 2019. Available at: . Accessed 22 December 2019.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere