Minimal clinically important difference of the EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 for worsening peripheral neuropathy in patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy
Fiona Yeo, Chiu Chin Ng, Kiley W J Loh, Alex Molassiotis, Hui Lin Cheng, Joseph S K Au, Kwun To Leung, Yu Chung Li, Kam-Hung Wong, Lorna Suen, Choi Wan Chan, Janelle Yorke, Carole Farrell, Aishwarya Bandla, Emily Ang, Violeta Lopez, Raghav Sundar, Alexandre Chan, Fiona Yeo, Chiu Chin Ng, Kiley W J Loh, Alex Molassiotis, Hui Lin Cheng, Joseph S K Au, Kwun To Leung, Yu Chung Li, Kam-Hung Wong, Lorna Suen, Choi Wan Chan, Janelle Yorke, Carole Farrell, Aishwarya Bandla, Emily Ang, Violeta Lopez, Raghav Sundar, Alexandre Chan
Abstract
Context/objectives: This is the first study to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-CIPN twenty-item scale (EORTC QLQ-CIPN20), a validated instrument designed to elicit cancer patients' experience of symptoms and functional limitations related to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.
Methods: Cancer patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy completed EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity [FACT/GOG-NTX] at baseline, second cycle of chemotherapy (T2, n = 287), and 12 months after chemotherapy (T3, n = 191). Anchor-based approach used the validated FACT/GOG-NTX neurotoxicity (Ntx) subscale to identify optimal MCID cutoff for deterioration. Distribution-based approach used one-third standard deviation (SD), half SD, and one standard error of measurement of the total EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 score.
Results: There was a moderate correlation between the change scores of the Ntx subscale and sensory and motor subscales of QLQ-CIPN20 (T2: r = - 0.722, p < 0.001 and r = - 0.518, p < 0.001, respectively; T3: r = - 0.699; p < 0.001 and r = - 0.523, p < 0.001, respectively). The correlation between the change scores of the Ntx subscale and the QLQ-CIPN20 autonomic subscale was poor (T2: r = - 0.354, p < 0.001; T3: r = 0.286, p < 0.001). Based on the MCID derived using distribution-based method, the MCID for the QLQ-CIPN20 sensory subscale was 2.5-5.9 (6.9% to 16.4% of the subdomain score) and for motor subscale was 2.6-5.0 (8.1%-15.6% of the subdomain score).
Conclusion: The MCID for the EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 established using distribution-based approaches was 2.5-5.9 for the sensory subscale and 2.6-5.0 for the motor subscale. When noted in assessments even with small change in scores, clinicians can be alerted for appropriate intervention.
Keywords: Cancer; EORTC QLQ-CIPN20; FACT/GOG-NTX; Minimal clinically important difference; Peripheral neuropathy.
References
- Ann Oncol. 2013 Feb;24(2):454-62
- Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 May;13(5):319-25
- J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;61(2):102-9
- Cartilage. 2018 Sep 15;:1947603518799839
- Support Care Cancer. 2014 Aug;22(8):2281-95
- J Clin Epidemiol. 1999 Sep;52(9):861-73
- Cancer Control. 2018 Jan-Mar;25(1):1073274818756608
- Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003 Nov-Dec;13(6):741-8
- Front Mol Neurosci. 2017 May 31;10:174
- J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jul;67(7):811-20
- Oncology (Williston Park). 2016 Nov 15;30(11):1020-9
- Cancer Sci. 2016 Oct;107(10):1453-1457
- Eur J Cancer. 2005 May;41(8):1135-9
- Control Clin Trials. 1989 Dec;10(4):407-15
- Cancer Nurs. 2019 May/Jun;42(3):179-189
- J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2007 Sep;12(3):210-5
- J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Mar;55(3):992-997.e2
- F1000Res. 2016 Jun 22;5:null
- Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Nov;18(5):419-23
- BMC Cancer. 2019 Feb 8;19(1):132
- Nursing. 2017 Feb;47(2):67-68
- BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 01;5(10):e007953
- Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2015;2015:501-6
- Qual Life Res. 2017 Feb;26(2):245-257
- Ann Oncol. 2011 Sep;22(9):2107-12
- J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 May;53(5):459-68
- Support Care Cancer. 2017 Nov;25(11):3485-3493
- J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002 Dec;24(6):547-61
- Cancer. 2007 Jul 1;110(1):196-202
- Support Care Cancer. 2019 Jul;27(7):2599-2608
- Eval Health Prof. 2005 Jun;28(2):172-91
- Semin Oncol. 2006 Feb;33(1):15-49
- Cancer Treat Rev. 2014 Aug;40(7):872-82
- Qual Life Res. 2013 Dec;22(10):2787-99
- Brain Behav. 2015 Jul;5(7):e00354
- Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007 Mar-Apr;17(2):387-93
- Cancer Manag Res. 2014 Mar 19;6:135-47
Source: PubMed