Is the standard SF-12 health survey valid and equivalent for a Chinese population?
Cindy L K Lam, Eileen Y Y Tse, Barbara Gandek, Cindy L K Lam, Eileen Y Y Tse, Barbara Gandek
Abstract
Introduction: Chinese is the world's largest ethnic group but few health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures have been tested on them. The aim of this study was to determine if the standard SF-12 was valid and equivalent for a Chinese population.
Methods: The SF-36 data of 2410 Chinese adults randomly selected from the general population of Hong Kong (HK) were analysed. The Chinese (HK) specific SF-12 items and scoring algorithm were derived from the HK Chinese population data by multiple regressions. The SF-36 PCS and MCS scores were used as criteria to assess the content and criterion validity of the SF-12. The standard and Chinese (HK) specific SF-12 PCS and MCS scores were compared for equivalence.
Results: The standard SF-12 explained 82% and 89% of the variance of the SF-36 PCS and MCS scores, respectively, and the effect size differences between the standard SF-36 and SF-12 scores were less than 0.3. Six of the Chinese (HK) specific SF-12 items were different from those of the standard SF-12, but the effect size differences between the Chinese (HK) specific and standard SF-12 scores were mostly less than 0.3.
Conclusions: The standard SF-12 was valid and equivalent for the Chinese, which would enable more Chinese to be included in clinical trials that measure HRQoL.
References
- J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1139-47
- J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Dec;46(12):1417-32
- Qual Life Res. 2002 Aug;11(5):495-503
- Qual Life Res. 2001;10 (2):175-88
- J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1189-202
- J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1171-8
- Med Care. 1989 Mar;27(3 Suppl):S178-89
- Qual Life Res. 1998 May;7(4):323-35
- Soc Sci Med. 1999 Feb;48(4):473-87
- Qual Life Res. 1999;8(1-2):1-8
- Qual Life Res. 2002 Mar;11(2):135-44
- Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33
- Med Care. 2001 Oct;39(10):1039-47
- Med Care. 1999 May;37(5):469-78
- J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):953-9
- Soc Sci Med. 2002 Nov;55(9):1635-46
Source: PubMed