A randomised controlled trial to compare methods of milk expression after preterm delivery

E Jones, P W Dimmock, S A Spencer, E Jones, P W Dimmock, S A Spencer

Abstract

Objectives: Primary: to compare sequential and simultaneous breast pumping on volume of milk expressed and its fat content. Secondary: to measure the effect of breast massage on milk volume and fat content.

Design: Sequential randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Neonatal intensive care unit, North Staffordshire Hospital NHS Trust.

Subjects: Data on 36 women were analysed; 19 women used simultaneous pumping and 17 used sequential pumping.

Interventions: Women were randomly allocated to use either simultaneous (both breasts simultaneously) or sequential (one breast then the other) milk expression. Stratification was used to ensure that the groups were balanced for parity and gestation. A crossover design was used for massage, with patients acting as their own controls. Women were randomly allocated to receive either massage or non-massage first.

Main outcome measures: Volume of milk expressed per expression and its fat content (estimated by the creamatocrit method).

Results: Milk yield per expression was: sequential pumping with no massage, 51.32 g (95% confidence interval (CI) 56.57 to 46.07); sequential pumping with massage, 78.71 g (95% CI 85.19 to 72.24); simultaneous pumping with no massage, 87.69 g (95% CI 96.80 to 78.57); simultaneous pumping with massage, 125.08 g (95% CI 140.43 to 109.74). The fat concentration in the milk was not affected by the increase in volume achieved by the interventions.

Conclusions: The results are unequivocal and show that simultaneous pumping is more effective at producing milk than sequential pumping and that breast massage has an additive effect, improving milk production in both groups. As frequent and efficient milk removal is essential for continued production of milk, mothers of preterm infants wishing to express milk for their sick babies should be taught these techniques.

References

    1. Prog Food Nutr Sci. 1990;14(1):1-43
    1. Pediatrics. 1988 Jun;81(6):815-20
    1. Endocr Regul. 1993 Dec;27(4):181-92
    1. J Hum Lact. 1994 Dec;10(4):237-43
    1. J Hum Lact. 1996 Sep;12(3):193-9
    1. J Hum Lact. 1999 Sep;15(3):209-16
    1. Pract Midwife. 2000 Jan;3(1):12-5
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1980 Apr;33(4):811-5
    1. Pediatrics. 1980 Oct;66(4):626-8
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Jan 10;282(6258):99-100
    1. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1982 Jul;71(4):661-2
    1. Lancet. 1984 Nov 17;2(8412):1111-3
    1. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1985 Jul;74(4):495-9
    1. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1986 Mar-Apr;5(2):242-7
    1. Neuroendocrinology. 1986;43(6):679-85
    1. Lancet. 1987 May 9;1(8541):1092-3
    1. Pediatrics. 1992 Mar;89(3):437-40

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere