Mindfulness-based stress reduction adapted to pregnant women with psychosocial vulnerabilities-a protocol for a randomized feasibility study in a Danish hospital-based outpatient setting

S Skovbjerg, D Birk, S Bruggisser, A L A Wolf, L Fjorback, S Skovbjerg, D Birk, S Bruggisser, A L A Wolf, L Fjorback

Abstract

Background: This protocol is for a feasibility study of a mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) program adapted for pregnant women with psychosocial vulnerabilities. The rationale for the study is the need for a wider array of evidence-based options to address prenatal mental health care needs in pregnant women. MBSR is a promising mental health intervention but has not yet been adapted for pregnant women with the aim of addressing prenatal mental health. The purpose is thus to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and clinical outcomes of an adapted MBSR program, prenatal MBSR, compared to usual care to inform a randomized controlled trial.

Methods/design: Pregnant women (n = 60) referred to an outpatient clinic at Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Denmark, will be recruited for the study. The design is a single-center feasibility trial, with prenatal MBSR, as an add-on to usual care. The primary outcome is to assess the feasibility of a full-scale randomized controlled trial. The secondary feasibility outcome includes possible effects of the adapted MBSR program estimated by self-report questionnaires measuring stress, anxiety, depression, well-being, decentering, reflective functioning, mindfulness, and compassion. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to prenatal MBSR or usual care.

Discussion: The study is part of the Good Start to Family Life study anchored at Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Denmark. Teaching the skills of mindfulness meditation to a psychosocially vulnerable group of pregnant women could prove a viable and non-pharmacological approach to reduce stress, improve mental health, and provide support in the transition to parenthood. The outcomes of the feasibility study will inform the design of a fully powered randomized controlled trial.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04571190 . Registered on September 30, 2020.

Keywords: MBSR; Mindfulness; Mindfulness-based stress reduction; Pregnancy; Prenatal MBSR; Prenatal mental health; Prenatal mindfulness-based stress reduction.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT 2010 flow diagram

References

    1. Goldberg SB, Tucker RP, Greene PA, Davidson RJ, Wampold BE, Kearney DJ, Simpson TL. Mindfulness-based interventions for psychiatric disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2018;59:52–60. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.10.011.
    1. Kuyken W, Warren FC, Taylor RS, Whalley B, Crane C, Bondolfi G, Hayes R, Huijbers M, Ma H, Schweizer S, Segal Z, Speckens A, Teasdale JD, van Heeringen K, Williams M, Byford S, Byng R, Dalgleish T. Efficacy of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy in prevention of depressive relapse: an individual patient data meta-analysis from randomized trials. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73(6):565–574. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.0076.
    1. Shi Z, MacBeth A. The effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions on maternal perinatal mental health outcomes: a systematic review. Mindfulness (N Y) 2017;8(4):823–847. doi: 10.1007/s12671-016-0673-y.
    1. Pajulo M, Tolvanen M, Karlsson L, Halme-Chowdhury E, Öst C, Luyten P, Mayes L, Karlsson H. The Prenatal Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire: exploring factor structure and construct validity of a new measure in the finn brain birth cohort pilot study. Infant Ment Health J. 2015;36(4):399–414. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21523.
    1. Howard LM, Molyneaux E, Dennis CL, Rochat T, Stein A, Milgrom J. Non-psychotic mental disorders in the perinatal period. Lancet. 2014;384(9956):1775–1788. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61276-9.
    1. Stein A, Pearson RM, Goodman SH, Rapa E, Rahman A, McCallum M, Howard LM, Pariante CM. Effects of perinatal mental disorders on the fetus and child. Lancet. 2014;384(9956):1800–1819. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61277-0.
    1. Pearson RM, Melotti R, Heron J, Joinson C, Stein A, Ramchandani PG, Evans J. Disruption to the development of maternal responsiveness? The impact of prenatal depression on mother-infant interactions. Infant Behav Dev. 2012;35(4):613–626. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2012.07.020.
    1. Arango C, Díaz-Caneja CM, McGorry PD, Rapoport J, Sommer IE, Vorstman JA, et al. Preventive strategies for mental health. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(7):591–604. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30057-9.
    1. Rod NH, Bengtsson J, Budtz-Jørgensen E, Clipet-Jensen C, Taylor-Robinson D, Andersen AN, et al. Trajectories of childhood adversity and mortality in early adulthood: a population-based cohort study. Lancet. 2020;396(10249):489–497. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30621-8.
    1. Siegenthaler E, Munder T, Egger M. Effect of preventive interventions in mentally ill parents on the mental health of the offspring: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012;51(1):8–17.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.10.018.
    1. Vago DR, Silbersweig DA. Self-awareness, self-regulation, and self-transcendence (S-ART): a framework for understanding the neurobiological mechanisms of mindfulness. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6:296. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00296.
    1. Wielgosz J, Goldberg SB, Kral TRA, Dunne JD, Davidson RJ. Mindfulness meditation and psychopathology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019;15(1):285–316. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093423.
    1. Kabat-Zinn J. Lessons from medicine. Mindfulness (N Y). 2020:1–5.
    1. Khoury B, Sharma M, Rush SE, Fournier C. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for healthy individuals: a meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res. 2015;78(6):519–528. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.03.009.
    1. Grossman P, Niemann L, Schmidt S, Walach H. Mindfulness-based stress reduction and health benefits. A meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res. 2004;57(1):35–43. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00573-7.
    1. Crane RS, Brewer J, Feldman C, Kabat-Zinn J, Santorelli S, Williams JM, et al. What defines mindfulness-based programs? The warp and the weft. Psychol Med. 2017;47(6):990–999. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716003317.
    1. Kabatt-Zinn J. Full catastrophe living Piatkus. 2004.
    1. Dhillon A, Sparkes E, Duarte RV. Mindfulness-based interventions during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mindfulness (N Y) 2017;8(6):1421–1437. doi: 10.1007/s12671-017-0726-x.
    1. Lever Taylor B, Cavanagh K, Strauss C. The effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions in the perinatal period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0155720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155720.
    1. Lönnberg G, Jonas W, Unternaehrer E, Bränström R, Nissen E, Niemi M. Effects of a mindfulness based childbirth and parenting program on pregnant women’s perceived stress and risk of perinatal depression-results from a randomized controlled trial. J Affect Disord. 2020;262:133–142. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.10.048.
    1. Sharp C, Fonagy P. The parent’s capacity to treat the child as a psychological agent: constructs, measures and implications for developmental psychopathology. Soc Dev. 2008;17.
    1. Luyten P, Fonagy P. The neurobiology of mentalizing. Personal Disord. 2015;6(4):366–379. doi: 10.1037/per0000117.
    1. Luyten P, Campbell C, Allison E, Fonagy P. The mentalizing approach to psychopathology: state of the art and future directions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2020;16(1):297–325. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-071919-015355.
    1. Zeegers MAJ, Potharst ES, Veringa-Skiba IK, Aktar E, Goris M, Bögels SM, Colonnesi C. Evaluating mindful with your baby/toddler: observational changes in maternal sensitivity, acceptance, mind-mindedness, and dyadic synchrony. Front Psychol. 2019;10:753. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00753.
    1. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(4):385–396. doi: 10.2307/2136404.
    1. Eskildsen A, Dalgaard VL, Nielsen KJ, Andersen JH, Zachariae R, Olsen LR, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Danish consensus version of the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015;41(5):486–490. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3510.
    1. Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1987;150(6):782–786. doi: 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782.
    1. Smith-Nielsen J, Matthey S, Lange T, Væver MS. Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale against both DSM-5 and ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for depression. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1965-7.
    1. Kozinszky Z, Dudas RB. Validation studies of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for the antenatal period. J Affect Disord. 2015;176:95–105. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.01.044.
    1. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33(3):335–343. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U.
    1. Meades R, Ayers S. Anxiety measures validated in perinatal populations: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2011;133(1-2):1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.10.009.
    1. Lee D. The convergent, discriminant, and nomological validity of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) J Affect Disord. 2019;259:136–142. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.036.
    1. Topp CW, Østergaard SD, Søndergaard S, Bech P. The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: a systematic review of the literature. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):167–176. doi: 10.1159/000376585.
    1. Fonagy P, Luyten P, Moulton-Perkins A, Lee YW, Warren F, Howard S, Ghinai R, Fearon P, Lowyck B. Development and validation of a self-report measure of mentalizing: the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0158678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158678.
    1. Fresco DM, Moore MT, van Dulmen MH, Segal ZV, Ma SH, Teasdale JD, et al. Initial psychometric properties of the experiences questionnaire: validation of a self-report measure of decentering. Behav Ther. 2007;38(3):234–246. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2006.08.003.
    1. Baer RA, Smith GT, Lykins E, Button D, Krietemeyer J, Sauer S, Walsh E, Duggan D, Williams JMG. Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment. 2008;15(3):329–342. doi: 10.1177/1073191107313003.
    1. Pommier E, Neff KD, Tóth-Király I. The development and validation of the Compassion Scale. Assessment. 2020;27(1):21–39. doi: 10.1177/1073191119874108.
    1. Billingham SA, Whitehead AL, Julious SA. An audit of sample sizes for pilot and feasibility trials being undertaken in the United Kingdom registered in the United Kingdom Clinical Research Network database. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):104. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-104.
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.
    1. Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, et al. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016;2(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0105-8.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere