Characterizing the application of transcranial direct current stimulation in human pharyngeal motor cortex

Samantha Jefferson, Satish Mistry, Salil Singh, John Rothwell, Shaheen Hamdy, Samantha Jefferson, Satish Mistry, Salil Singh, John Rothwell, Shaheen Hamdy

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a novel intervention that can modulate brain excitability in health and disease; however, little is known about its effects on bilaterally innervated systems such as pharyngeal motor cortex. Here, we assess the effects of differing doses of tDCS on the physiology of healthy human pharyngeal motor cortex as a prelude to designing a therapeutic intervention in dysphagic patients. Healthy subjects (n = 17) underwent seven regimens of tDCS (anodal 10 min 1 mA, cathodal 10 min 1 mA, anodal 10 min 1.5 mA, cathodal 10 min 1.5 mA, anodal 20 min 1 mA, cathodal 20 min 1 mA, Sham) on separate days, in a double blind randomized order. Bihemispheric motor evoked potential (MEP) responses to single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as well as intracortical facilitation (ICF) and inhibition (ICI) were recorded using a swallowed pharyngeal catheter before and up to 60 min following the tDCS. Compared with sham, both 10 min 1.5 mA and 20 min 1 mA anodal stimulation induced increases in cortical excitability in the stimulated hemisphere (+44 +/- 17% and +59 +/- 16%, respectively; P < 0.005) whereas only 10 min 1.5 mA cathodal stimulation induced inhibition (-26 +/- 4%, P = 0.02). There were neither contralateral hemisphere changes nor any evidence for ICI or ICF in driving the ipsilateral effects. In conclusion, anodal tDCS can alter pharyngeal motor cortex excitability in an intensity-dependent manner, with little evidence for transcallosal spread. Anodal stimulation may therefore provide a useful means of stimulating pharyngeal cortex and promoting recovery in dysphagic patients.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Schematic demonstrating the principles of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) including the placement of electrodes for anodal tDCS (A) and cathodal tDCS (B) of left hemisphere motor cortex.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Percentage change (means ± SE) in pharyngeal motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes in response to single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the stimulated hemisphere (A) and the unstimulated hemisphere (B), following either anodal (triangles), cathodal (squares), or sham (diamonds) tDCS given for 10 min at 1 mA tDCS. There were no significant changes from baseline.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Overlaid traces of pharyngeal MEPs from the stimulated hemisphere of 1 subject, showing typical responses to 3 different tDCS paradigms [sham (C), anodal (A), and cathodal (B)]. Note the changes in amplitude following anodal and cathodal stimulation, which are not seen with sham stimulation alone.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Percentage (means ± SE) change from baseline of stimulated hemisphere pharyngeal motor cortex excitability following anodal (A) or cathodal (B) tDCS for 20 min at 1 mA (squares), 10 min at 1.5 mA (triangles), or sham stimulation (cross). Significant changes in excitability are seen following 10 min 1.5 mA, 20 min 1 mA anodal, and 10 min 1.5 mA cathodal stimulation with repeated-measures ANOVA; *t-test P < 0.05 compared with baseline, **t-tests P < 0.05 compared with both baseline and sham.

References

    1. Amassian VE, Maccabee PJ. Transcranial magnetic stimulation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, p. 1620–1623, 2006
    1. Antal A, Kincses TZ, Nitsche MA, Bartfai O, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human primary visual cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation: direct electrophysiological evidence. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45: 702–707, 2004
    1. Boggio PS, Nunes A, Rigonatti SP, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F. Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation are associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. Restor Neurol Neurosci 25: 123–129, 2007
    1. Boros K, Poreisz C, Munchau A, Paulus W, Nitsche MA. Premotor transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) affects primary motor excitability in humans. Eur J Neurosci 27: 1292–1300, 2008
    1. Celnik P, Paik NJ, Vandermeeren Y, Dimyan M, Cohen LG. Effects of combined peripheral nerve stimulation and brain polarization on performance of a motor sequence task after chronic stroke. Stroke 40: 1764–1771, 2009
    1. Edwards DJ, Krebs HI, Rykman A, Zipse J, Thickbroom GW, Mastaglia FL, Pascual-Leone A, Volpe BT. Raised corticomotor excitability of M1 forearm area following anodal tDCS is sustained during robotic wrist therapy in chronic stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci 27: 199–207, 2009
    1. Fraser C, Power M, Hamdy S, Rothwell J, Hobday D, Hollander I, Tyrell P, Hobson A, Williams S, Thompson D. Driving plasticity in human adult motor cortex is associated with improved motor function after brain injury. Neuron 34: 831–840, 2002
    1. Fraser C, Rothwell J, Power M, Hobson A, Thompson D, Hamdy S. Differential changes in human pharyngoesophageal motor excitability induced by swallowing, pharyngeal stimulation, and anesthesia. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 285: G137–G144, 2003
    1. Fregni F, Boggio P, Mansur C, Wagner T, Ferreira M, Lima M, Rigonatti S, Marcolin M, Freedman S, Nitsche M, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neuroreport 16: 1551–1555, 2005
    1. Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 117: 845–850, 2006
    1. Gow D, Rothwell J, Hobson A, Thompson D, Hamdy S. Induction of long-term plasticity in human swallowing motor cortex following repetitive cortical stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 115: 1044–1051, 2004
    1. Hamdy S, Aziz Q, Rothwell JC, Crone R, Hughes D, Tallis RC, Thompson DG. Explaining oropharyngeal dysphagia after unilateral hemispheric stroke. Lancet 350: 686–692, 1997
    1. Hamdy S, Aziz Q, Rothwell JC, Power M, Singh KD, Nicholson DA, Tallis RC, Thompson DG. Recovery of swallowing after dysphagic stroke relates to functional reorganization in the intact motor cortex. Gastroenterology 115: 1104–1112, 1998
    1. Hamdy S, Rothwell JC, Aziz Q, Thompson DG. Organization and reorganization of human swallowing motor cortex: implications for recovery after stroke. Clin Sci (Lond) 99: 151–157, 2000
    1. Hesse S, Werner C, Schonhardt EM, Bardeleben A, Jenrich W, Kirker SG. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: a pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci 25: 9–15, 2007
    1. Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P, Floel A, Wu WH, Gerloff C, Cohen LG. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain 128: 490–499, 2005
    1. Hummel FC, Voller B, Celnik P, Floel A, Giraux P, Gerloff C, Cohen LG. Effects of brain polarization on reaction times and pinch force in chronic stroke. BMC Neurosci 7: 73, 2006
    1. Jang SH, Ahn SH, Byun WM, Kim CS, Lee MY, Kwon YH. The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the cortical activation by motor task in the human brain: an fMRI study. Neurosci Lett 460: 117–120, 2009
    1. Jefferson S, Mistry S, Michou E, Singh S, Rothwell JC, Hamdy S. Reversal of a virtual lesion in human pharyngeal motor cortex by high frequency contra-lesional brain stimulation. Gastroenterology 137: 841–849, 2009
    1. Jeffery D, Norton J, Roy F, Gorassini M. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the excitability of the leg motor cortex. Exp Brain Res 182: 281–287, 2007
    1. Khedr EM, Abo-Elfetoh N, Rothwell JC. Treatment of post-stroke dysphagia with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Acta Neurol Scand 119: 155–161, 2009
    1. Kwon YH, Ko MH, Ahn SH, Kim YH, Song JC, Lee CH, Chang MC, Jang SH. Primary motor cortex activation by transcranial direct current stimulation in the human brain. Neurosci Lett 435: 56–59, 2008
    1. Lang N, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Rothwell JC, Lemon RN. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortex on corticospinal and transcallosal excitability. Exp Brain Res 156: 439–443, 2004
    1. Lang N, Siebner HR, Ward NS, Lee L, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Rothwell JC, Lemon RN, Frackowiak RS. How does transcranial DC stimulation of the primary motor cortex alter regional neuronal activity in the human brain? Eur J Neurosci 22: 495–504, 2005
    1. Mansur CG, Fregni F, Boggio P, Riberto M, Gallucci-Neto J, Santos CM, Wagner T, Rigonatti SP, Marcolin MA, Pascual-Leone A. A sham stimulation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neurology 64: 1802–1804, 2005
    1. Mistry S, Verin E, Singh S, Jefferson S, Rothwell JC, Thompson DG, Hamdy S. Unilateral suppression of pharyngeal motor cortex to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals functional asymmetry in the hemispheric projections to human swallowing. J Physiol 585: 525–538, 2007
    1. Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Antal A, Tergau F, Paulus W. Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 114: 2220–2222; author reply 2222–2223, 2003
    1. Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Schlitterlau A, Henschke U, Fricke K, Frommann K, Lang N, Henning S, Paulus W, Tergau F. GABAergic modulation of DC stimulation-induced motor cortex excitability shifts in humans. Eur J Neurosci 19: 2720–2726, 2004
    1. Nitsche MA, Nitsche MS, Klein CC, Tergau F, Rothwell JC, Paulus W. Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 114: 600–604, 2003
    1. Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol 527: 633–639, 2000
    1. Nitsche MA, Roth A, Kuo MF, Fischer AK, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Tergau F, Paulus W. Timing-dependent modulation of associative plasticity by general network excitability in the human motor cortex. J Neurosci 27: 3807–3812, 2007
    1. Nitsche MA, Seeber A, Frommann K, Klein CC, Rochford C, Nitsche MS, Fricke K, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Antal A, Paulus W, Tergau F. Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Physiol 568: 291–303, 2005
    1. Nitsche MAMD, Paulus WMD. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology 57: 1899–1901, 2001
    1. Poreisz C, Boros K, Antal A, Paulus W. Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients. Brain Res Bull 72: 208–214, 2007
    1. Rothwell JC. Techniques and mechanisms of action of transcranial stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Neurosci Methods 74: 113–122, 1997
    1. Siebner HR, Lang N, Rizzo V, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Lemon RN, Rothwell JC. Preconditioning of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex. J Neurosci 24: 3379–3385, 2004
    1. Singh S, Mistry S, Jefferson S, Davies K, Rothwell J, Williams S, Hamdy S. A magnetic resonance spectroscopy study of brain glutamate in a model of plasticity in human pharyngeal motor cortex. Gastroenterology 136: 417–424, 2009
    1. Smithard DG, O'Neill PA, Park C, Morris J, Wyatt R, England R, Martin DF. Complications and outcome after acute stroke: does dysphagia matter? Stroke 27: 1200–1204, 1996
    1. Stagg CJ, Best JG, Stephenson MC, O'Shea J, Wylezinska M, Kincses ZT, Morris PG, Matthews PM, Johansen-Berg H. Polarity-sensitive modulation of cortical neurotransmitters by transcranial stimulation. J Neurosci 29: 5202–5206, 2009
    1. Verin E, Leroi AM. Poststroke dysphagia rehabilitation by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a noncontrolled pilot study. Dysphagia 24: 204–210, 2009
    1. Vines BW, Nair DG, Schlaug G. Contralateral and ipsilateral motor effects after transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroreport 17: 671–674, 2006

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere