Teleconsultation for preoperative evaluation during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A technical and medical feasibility study

Jan Wienhold, Lucas Mösch, Rolf Rossaint, Ilka Kemper, Matthias Derwall, Michael Czaplik, Andreas Follmann, Jan Wienhold, Lucas Mösch, Rolf Rossaint, Ilka Kemper, Matthias Derwall, Michael Czaplik, Andreas Follmann

Abstract

Background: During the surge in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections in early 2020, many medical organisations began developing strategies for implementing teleconsultation to maintain medical services during lockdown and to limit physical contact. Therefore, we developed a teleconsultation preoperative evaluation platform to replace on-site preoperative meetings.

Objective: This study assessed the feasibility of a teleconsultation for preoperative evaluation and procedure-associated adverse events.

Design: Implementation study.

Setting: A tertiary care university hospital in Germany from April 2020 to October 2020.

Patients: One hundred and eleven patients scheduled for elective surgery.

Intervention: Patients were assigned to receive teleconsultation for preoperative evaluation and to complete a subsequent survey.

Main outcome measures: Primary endpoints were medical and technical feasibility, user satisfaction and time savings.

Results: For 100 out of 111 patients, telepreoperative consultations allowed for adequate perioperative risk assessment, patient education and also for effective collection of legal signatures. For six patients (5.4%), consultations could not be started because of technical issues, whereas for five patients (4.8%), clearance for surgery could not be granted because of medical reasons. A clear majority of anaesthetists (93.7%) rated the telepreoperative evaluations as equivalent to on-site meetings. The majority of the patients considered teleconsultation for preoperative evaluation as convenient as an on-site meeting (98.2%) and would choose a teleconsultation again (97.9%). Median travel time saved by patients was 60 min (Q1 40, Q3 80). We registered one adverse event: we detected atrial fibrillation in one patient only immediately prior to surgery.

Conclusion: Telepreoperative evaluations are medically and technically feasible, yielding high satisfaction rates on both sides. However, regarding patient safety, not every patient is equally well suited. Overall, implementation of teleconsultation for preoperative evaluation into clinical routine could help maintain medical care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Trial registration: NCT04518514, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The tele-anaesthesia workplace in the hospital enables access to the hospital information system (a), software support for preoperative evaluation (b), and documentation of the patient's medical history and performed education on a touch screen (c)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Visualisation of the process for telemedical information and risk assessment of a patient within the framework of our study
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Results of the questionnaire filled out by participating anaesthetists
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Results of the questionnaire filled out by participating patients

References

    1. Follmann A, Ohligs M, Hochhausen N, et al. . Technical support by smart glasses during a mass casualty incident: a randomized controlled simulation trial on technically assisted triage and telemedical app use in disaster medicine. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e11939.
    1. Czaplik M, Bergrath S, Rossaint R, et al. . Employment of telemedicine in emergency medicine. Clinical requirement analysis, system development and first test results. Methods Inf Med 2014; 53:99–107.
    1. Bergrath S, Czaplik M, Rossaint R, et al. . Implementation phase of a multicentre prehospital telemedicine system to support paramedics: feasibility and possible limitations. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2013; 21:54.
    1. Marx GDM, Czaplik M, Balzer F, et al. . Telemedicine in the four pillars of anaesthesiology - Position paper of The German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) and German Society of Telemedicine (DG Telemed). Anästh Intensiv Med 2019; 60:191–207.
    1. De Hert S, Imberger G, Carlisle J, et al. . Preoperative evaluation of the adult patient undergoing noncardiac surgery: guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28:684–722.
    1. Apfelbaum JL, Connis RT, et al. . Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters. Practice advisory for preanesthesia evaluation: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation. Anesthesiology 2012; 116:522–538.
    1. Eser A. Westerhäll L. Functions and requirements of informed consent in German law and practice. Patient's rights: informed consent, access and equality. Bern, Switzerland: Nerenius & Santérus Publishers; 1994. 235–253.
    1. Kieninger M, Eissnert C, Seitz M, et al. . Analyse und Möglichkeiten der Optimierung von Prämedikationsgesprächen an einem Universitätsklinikum. Der Anaesthesist 2018; 67:93–108.
    1. Wong DT, Kamming D, Salenieks ME, et al. . Preadmission anesthesia consultation using telemedicine technology: a pilot study. Anesthesiology 2004; 100:1605–1607.
    1. Mullen-Fortino M, Rising KL, Duckworth J, et al. . Presurgical assessment using telemedicine technology: impact on efficiency, effectiveness, and patient experience of care. Telemed J E Health 2019; 25:137–142.
    1. Kamdar NV, Huverserian A, Jalilian L, et al. . Development, implementation, and evaluation of a telemedicine preoperative evaluation initiative at a major academic medical center. Anesth Analg 2020; 131:1647–1656.
    1. American College of Surgeons ASoA, Association of periOperative Registered Nurses, American Hospital Association. Joint Statement Roadmap for Resuming Elective Surgery after COVID-19 Pandemic. In, 2020. Available at: . (Accessed 26 February 2021)
    1. Pinnock H, Barwick M, Carpenter CR, et al. . StaRI Group. Standards for reporting implementation studies (StaRI) statement. BMJ 2017; 356:i6795.
    1. De Hert S, Staender S, Fritsch G, et al. . Preoperative evaluation of adults undergoing elective noncardiac surgery: updated guideline from the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2018; 35:407–465.
    1. Viechtbauer W, Smits L, Kotz D, et al. . A simple formula for the calculation of sample size in pilot studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2015; 68:1375–1379.
    1. Phillips MB, Bendel RE, Crook JE, Diehl NN. Global health implications of preanesthesia medical examination for ophthalmic surgery. Anesthesiology 2013; 118:1038–1045.
    1. Applegate RL, 2nd, Gildea B, Patchin R, et al. . Telemedicine preanesthesia evaluation: a randomized pilot trial. Telemed J E Health 2013; 19:211–216.
    1. Jlala HA, French JL, Foxall GL, et al. . Effect of preoperative multimedia information on perioperative anxiety in patients undergoing procedures under regional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2010; 104:369–374.
    1. Vogel H, Schaaf W, Jacob M. Video-assisted patient education in anesthesia: how do medical users assess the procedure? Anaesthesist 2018; 67:829–836.
    1. Lee A, Chui PT, Gin T. Educating patients about anesthesia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials of media-based interventions. Anesth Analg 2003; 96:1424–1431.
    1. Roth-Isigkeit A, Ocklitz E, Brückner S, et al. . Development and evaluation of a video program for presentation prior to elective cardiac surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002; 46:415–423.
    1. Hollander JE, Carr BG. Virtually perfect? Telemedicine for covid-19. N Engl J Med 2020; 382:1679–1681.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere