Assessing the feasibility of interrupting the transmission of soil-transmitted helminths through mass drug administration: The DeWorm3 cluster randomized trial protocol

Kristjana Hrönn Ásbjörnsdóttir, Sitara S Rao Ajjampur, Roy M Anderson, Robin Bailey, Iain Gardiner, Katherine E Halliday, Moudachirou Ibikounle, Khumbo Kalua, Gagandeep Kang, D Timothy J Littlewood, Adrian J F Luty, Arianna Rubin Means, William Oswald, Rachel L Pullan, Rajiv Sarkar, Fabian Schär, Adam Szpiro, James E Truscott, Marleen Werkman, Elodie Yard, Judd L Walson, DeWorm3 Trials Team, Kristjana Hrönn Ásbjörnsdóttir, Sitara S Rao Ajjampur, Roy M Anderson, Robin Bailey, Iain Gardiner, Katherine E Halliday, Moudachirou Ibikounle, Khumbo Kalua, Gagandeep Kang, D Timothy J Littlewood, Adrian J F Luty, Arianna Rubin Means, William Oswald, Rachel L Pullan, Rajiv Sarkar, Fabian Schär, Adam Szpiro, James E Truscott, Marleen Werkman, Elodie Yard, Judd L Walson, DeWorm3 Trials Team

Abstract

Current control strategies for soil-transmitted helminths (STH) emphasize morbidity control through mass drug administration (MDA) targeting preschool- and school-age children, women of childbearing age and adults in certain high-risk occupations such as agricultural laborers or miners. This strategy is effective at reducing morbidity in those treated but, without massive economic development, it is unlikely it will interrupt transmission. MDA will therefore need to continue indefinitely to maintain benefit. Mathematical models suggest that transmission interruption may be achievable through MDA alone, provided that all age groups are targeted with high coverage. The DeWorm3 Project will test the feasibility of interrupting STH transmission using biannual MDA targeting all age groups. Study sites (population ≥80,000) have been identified in Benin, Malawi and India. Each site will be divided into 40 clusters, to be randomized 1:1 to three years of twice-annual community-wide MDA or standard-of-care MDA, typically annual school-based deworming. Community-wide MDA will be delivered door-to-door, while standard-of-care MDA will be delivered according to national guidelines. The primary outcome is transmission interruption of the STH species present at each site, defined as weighted cluster-level prevalence ≤2% by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), 24 months after the final round of MDA. Secondary outcomes include the endline prevalence of STH, overall and by species, and the endline prevalence of STH among children under five as an indicator of incident infections. Secondary analyses will identify cluster-level factors associated with transmission interruption. Prevalence will be assessed using qPCR of stool samples collected from a random sample of cluster residents at baseline, six months after the final round of MDA and 24 months post-MDA. A smaller number of individuals in each cluster will be followed with annual sampling to monitor trends in prevalence and reinfection throughout the trial.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03014167.

Conflict of interest statement

The study is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The funders reviewed but were not involved in final decisions regarding the study design and trial procedures. The funders were not involved in the decision to publish the manuscript and will have no role in data collection, analysis or publication of study results.

Figures

Fig 1. DeWorm3 trial sites and partners.
Fig 1. DeWorm3 trial sites and partners.
Figure created for DeWorm3 using shapefiles from GADM database of Global Administrative Areas 2012, version 2.0 (gadm.org) and ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10 (Redlands, CA).
Fig 2. Schematic of planned data and…
Fig 2. Schematic of planned data and sample collection time points for the DeWorm3 field trials.
Fig 3. Flow chart showing outcome assessment…
Fig 3. Flow chart showing outcome assessment in the DeWorm3 field trials.
Fig 4. Power to detect a difference…
Fig 4. Power to detect a difference in the proportion of clusters achieving transmission interruption (Primary Objective 2) assuming 7% mean prevalence in the targeted clusters (π0), by mean endline prevalence in the intervention clusters (π1), intracluster correlation (ICC) and number of people measured per cluster (m), estimated by simulation.

References

    1. Hotez P., Helminth Infections: Soil-transmitted Helminth Infections and Schistosomiasis, in Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. 2006, World Bank.
    1. Pullan R.L., et al., Global numbers of infection and disease burden of soil transmitted helminth infections in 2010. Parasit Vectors, 2014. 7: p. 37 doi:
    1. WHO, Accelerating Work to Overcome the Global Impact of Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Roadmap for Implementation. 2012, World Health Organization: Geneva
    1. Organization, W.H., Guideline: preventive chemotherapy to control soil-transmitted helminth infections in at-risk population groups 2017, Geneva. 75.
    1. Gabrielli A.F., et al., Preventive chemotherapy in human helminthiasis: theoretical and operational aspects. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg, 2011. 105(12): p. 683–93. doi:
    1. Jia T.W., et al., Soil-transmitted helminth reinfection after drug treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2012. 6(5): p. e1621 doi:
    1. Anderson R., Truscott J., and Hollingsworth T.D., The coverage and frequency of mass drug administration required to eliminate persistent transmission of soil-transmitted helminths. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2014. 369(1645): p. 20130435 doi:
    1. Truscott J.E., et al., Can chemotherapy alone eliminate the transmission of soil transmitted helminths? Parasit Vectors, 2014. 7: p. 266 doi:
    1. Brooker S.J., et al., Global feasibility assessment of interrupting the transmission of soil-transmitted helminths: a statistical modelling study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2015. 15(8): p. 941–950. doi:
    1. Brooker S.J., et al., Global feasibility assessment of interrupting the transmission of soil-transmitted helminths: a statistical modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis, 2015. 15(8): p. 941–50. doi:
    1. Clarke N.E., et al., Differential effect of mass deworming and targeted deworming for soil-transmitted helminth control in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet, 2017. 389(10066): p. 287–297. doi:
    1. Clarke N.E., et al., Investigating the differential impact of school and community-based integrated control programmes for soil-transmitted helminths in Timor-Leste: the (S)WASH-D for Worms pilot study protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud, 2016. 2: p. 69 doi:
    1. Brooker S.J., et al., Interrupting transmission of soil-transmitted helminths: a study protocol for cluster randomised trials evaluating alternative treatment strategies and delivery systems in Kenya. BMJ Open, 2015. 5(10): p. e008950 doi:
    1. WHO, Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis: Progress Report, 2014. Weekly Epidemiological Record, 2015. 90(38): p. 489–504.
    1. Anderson R., et al., Assessing the interruption of the transmission of human helminths with mass drug administration alone: optimizing the design of cluster randomized trials. Parasit Vectors, 2017. 10(1): p. 93 doi:
    1. Truscott J.E., et al., Identifying optimal threshold statistics for elimination of hookworm using a stochastic simulation model. Parasit Vectors, 2017. 10(1): p. 321 doi:
    1. WHO, Coverage Evaluation Surveys for Preventive Chemotherapy: Field guide for Implementation. 2016, World Health Organization.
    1. USAID, Post MDA Survey Design: Monitoring treatment coverage of neglected disease control programs, in A toolkit developed for USAID Neglected Tropical Disease Control Proje. 2009.
    1. Committee, W.H.O.E., Prevention and control of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser, 2002. 912: p. i–vi, 1–57, back cover.
    1. Pilotte N., et al., Improved PCR-Based Detection of Soil Transmitted Helminth Infections Using a Next-Generation Sequencing Approach to Assay Design. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2016. 10(3): p. e0004578 doi:
    1. Richard J. Hayes L.H.M., Cluster Randomised Trials Interdisciplinary Statistics Series, ed. Keiding B.J.T.M. N., Wikle C.K., van der Heijden P. 2009: Chapman & Hall / CRC.
    1. Shuford K.V., Turner H.C., and Anderson R.M., Compliance with anthelmintic treatment in the neglected tropical diseases control programmes: a systematic review. Parasit Vectors, 2016. 9: p. 29 doi:
    1. Farrell S., Truscott J., and Anderson R.M., The importance of patient compliance in repeated rounds of mass drug administration. Parasites and Vectors, 2017. 10:291 doi:
    1. Speich B., et al., Efficacy and reinfection with soil-transmitted helminths 18-weeks post-treatment with albendazole-ivermectin, albendazole-mebendazole, albendazole-oxantel pamoate and mebendazole. Parasit Vectors, 2016. 9(1): p. 123.
    1. Turner H.C., et al., Analysis of the population-level impact of co-administering ivermectin with albendazole or mebendazole for the control and elimination of Trichuris trichiura. Parasite Epidemiol Control, 2016. 1(2): p. 177–187. doi:
    1. Rashwan N., et al., Isothermal Diagnostic Assays for Monitoring Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Necator americanus Associated with Benzimidazole Drug Resistance. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2016. 10(12): p. e0005113 doi:
    1. Furtado L.F., de Paiva Bello A.C., and Rabelo E.M., Benzimidazole resistance in helminths: From problem to diagnosis. Acta Trop, 2016. 162: p. 95–102. doi:
    1. Kaliappan S.P., et al., Prevalence and clustering of soil-transmitted helminth infections in a tribal area in southern India. Trop Med Int Health, 2013. 18(12): p. 1452–62. doi:

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere