A 16-yr Follow-up of the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer

Jonas Hugosson, Monique J Roobol, Marianne Månsson, Teuvo L J Tammela, Marco Zappa, Vera Nelen, Maciej Kwiatkowski, Marcos Lujan, Sigrid V Carlsson, Kirsi M Talala, Hans Lilja, Louis J Denis, Franz Recker, Alvaro Paez, Donella Puliti, Arnauld Villers, Xavier Rebillard, Tuomas P Kilpeläinen, Ulf H Stenman, Rebecka Arnsrud Godtman, Karin Stinesen Kollberg, Sue M Moss, Paula Kujala, Kimmo Taari, Andreas Huber, Theodorus van der Kwast, Eveline A Heijnsdijk, Chris Bangma, Harry J De Koning, Fritz H Schröder, Anssi Auvinen, ERSPC investigators, Jonas Hugosson, Monique J Roobol, Marianne Månsson, Teuvo L J Tammela, Marco Zappa, Vera Nelen, Maciej Kwiatkowski, Marcos Lujan, Sigrid V Carlsson, Kirsi M Talala, Hans Lilja, Louis J Denis, Franz Recker, Alvaro Paez, Donella Puliti, Arnauld Villers, Xavier Rebillard, Tuomas P Kilpeläinen, Ulf H Stenman, Rebecka Arnsrud Godtman, Karin Stinesen Kollberg, Sue M Moss, Paula Kujala, Kimmo Taari, Andreas Huber, Theodorus van der Kwast, Eveline A Heijnsdijk, Chris Bangma, Harry J De Koning, Fritz H Schröder, Anssi Auvinen, ERSPC investigators

Abstract

Background: The European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) has previously demonstrated that prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening decreases prostate cancer (PCa) mortality.

Objective: To determine whether PSA screening decreases PCa mortality for up to 16yr and to assess results following adjustment for nonparticipation and the number of screening rounds attended.

Design, setting, and participants: This multicentre population-based randomised screening trial was conducted in eight European countries. Report includes 182160 men, followed up until 2014 (maximum of 16yr), with a predefined core age group of 162389 men (55-69yr), selected from population registry.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The outcome was PCa mortality, also assessed with adjustment for nonparticipation and the number of screening rounds attended.

Results and limitations: The rate ratio of PCa mortality was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.89, p<0.001) at 16yr. The difference in absolute PCa mortality increased from 0.14% at 13yr to 0.18% at 16yr. The number of men needed to be invited for screening to prevent one PCa death was 570 at 16yr compared with 742 at 13yr. The number needed to diagnose was reduced to 18 from 26 at 13yr. Men with PCa detected during the first round had a higher prevalence of PSA >20ng/ml (9.9% compared with 4.1% in the second round, p<0.001) and higher PCa mortality (hazard ratio=1.86, p<0.001) than those detected subsequently.

Conclusions: Findings corroborate earlier results that PSA screening significantly reduces PCa mortality, showing larger absolute benefit with longer follow-up and a reduction in excess incidence. Repeated screening may be important to reduce PCa mortality on a population level.

Patient summary: In this report, we looked at the outcomes from prostate cancer in a large European population. We found that repeated screening reduces the risk of dying from prostate cancer.

Keywords: Mortality; Prostate cancer; Prostate-specific antigen; Screening.

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Figures

Figure 1:. Trial profile (core age group).
Figure 1:. Trial profile (core age group).
GS=Gleason score. M1=evidence of metastases on imaging or PSA >100 ng/mL. PSA=prostate-specific antigen. *Missing=missing T stage or GS, not M1 or PSA 100 might occur, any T stage, or GS.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Prostate cancer incidence estimated by the Nelson-Aalen and competing risk approach respectively (a and c), and prostate cancer specific mortality estimated by the Nelson-Aalen and competing risk approach respectively (b and d).
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Prostate cancer specific survival in those detected during screening round 1 and those detected during repeated screening.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere