Polymyxin B hemoperfusion in endotoxemic septic shock patients without extreme endotoxemia: a post hoc analysis of the EUPHRATES trial

D J Klein, D Foster, P M Walker, S M Bagshaw, H Mekonnen, M Antonelli, D J Klein, D Foster, P M Walker, S M Bagshaw, H Mekonnen, M Antonelli

Abstract

Purpose: The EUPHRATES trial examined the impact of polymyxin B hemoperfusion (PMX) on mortality in patients with septic shock and endotoxemia, defined as EAA ≥ 0.60. No difference was found in 28-day all-cause mortality. However, the trial showed that in some patients with septic shock the burden of endotoxin activity was extreme (EAA ≥ 0.9). In a post hoc analysis, we evaluated the impact of PMX use in patients with septic shock and endotoxin activity measured between 0.6-0.89.

Methods: Post-hoc analysis of the EUPHRATES trial for the 194 patients with EAA ≥ 0.6-0.89 who completed two treatments (PMX or sham). The primary end point was mortality at 28 days adjusted for APACHE II score and baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP). Additional end points included changes in MAP, cumulative vasopressor index (CVI), median EAA reduction, ventilator-free days (VFD), dialysis-free days (DFD) and hospital length of stay. Subpopulations analyzed were site and type of infection and those with norepinephrine dose > 0.1 mcg/kg/min at baseline.

Results: At 28 days, 23 patients of 88 (26.1%) in the PMX group died versus 39 of 106 (36.8%) in the sham group [risk difference 10.7%, OR 0.52, 95% CI (0.27, 0.99), P = 0.047]. When unadjusted for baseline variables, P = 0.11. The 28-day survival time in the PMX group was longer than for the sham group [HR 0.56 (95% CI 0.33, 0.95) P = 0.03]. PMX treatment compared with sham showed greater change in MAP [median (IQR) 8 mmHg (- 0.5, 19.5) vs. 4 mmHg (- 4.0, 11) P = 0.04] and VFD [median (IQR) 20 days (0.5, 23.5) vs. 6 days (0, 20), P = 0.004]. There were no significant differences in other end points. There was a significant difference in mortality in PMX-treated patients with no bacterial growth on culture [PMX, 6/30 (20%) vs. sham, 13/31 (41.9%), P = 0.005]. The median EAA change in the population was - 12.9% (range: increase 49.2%-reduction 86.3%). The mortality in the above median EAA change group was PMX: 6/38 (15.7%) vs. sham 15/49 (30.6%), P = 0.08.

Conclusions: These hypothesis-generating results, based on an exploratory post hoc analysis of the EUPHRATES trial, suggest measurable responses in patients with septic shock and an EAA ≥ 0.6 to 0.89 on changes in mean arterial pressure, ventilator-free days and mortality.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01046669. Funding Spectral Medical Incorporated.

Keywords: Endotoxemia; Endotoxin; Hemoperfusion; Polymyxin B; Precision medicine; Sepsis; Septic shock.

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Klein served as the medical monitor for the sponsor for the EUPHRATES trial and is a consultant to Spectral Medical. Dr. Walker and D. Foster are employees of Spectral Medical. H. Mekonnen is an employee of Amarex Clinical Research LLC, the contract research organization that ran the EUPHRATES trial.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consort diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Time to death within 90 days for PMX versus sham. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the probability of survival to day 90 among 194 per-protocol patients with MODS > 9 and EAA between 0.6 and 0.89, by treatment groups. The 90-day results of Cox proportional hazards adjusted for baseline MAP and APACHE II score are the hazard ratio [0.57, 95% CI (0.35, 0.93), P value = 0.02]. The vertical line represents the 28-day interval. The 28-day adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratio for death in the PMX group compared with the sham group is 0.58 (95% CI, 0.35 to 0.98; P = 0.04). TRT treatment, 25th 25th percentile at 90 days

References

    1. Danner RL, Elin RJ, Hosseini JM, Wesley RA, Reilly JM, Parillo JE. Endotoxemia in human septic shock. Chest. 1991;99(1):169–175. doi: 10.1378/chest.99.1.169.
    1. Angus DC, Birmingham MC, Balk RA, et al. E5 murine monoclonal antiendotoxin antibody in gram-negative sepsis: a randomized controlled trial. E5 Study Investigators. JAMA. 2000;283(13):1723–1730. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.13.1723.
    1. Dellinger RP, Tomayko JF, Angus DC, et al. Efficacy and safety of a phospholipid emulsion (GR270773) in Gram-negative severe sepsis: results of a phase II multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-finding clinical trial. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(11):2929–2938. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b0266c.
    1. Levin M, Quint PA, Goldstein B, et al. Recombinant bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein (rBPI21) as adjunctive treatment for children with severe meningococcal sepsis: a randomised trial. rBPI21 Meningococcal Sepsis Study Group. Lancet. 2000;356(9234):961–967. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02712-4.
    1. McCloskey RV, Straube RC, Sanders C, Smith SM, Smith CR. Treatment of septic shock with human monoclonal antibody HA-1A. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. CHESS Trial Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1994;121(1):1–5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-121-1-199407010-00001.
    1. Opal SM, Laterre PF, Francois B, et al. Effect of eritoran, an antagonist of MD2-TLR4, on mortality in patients with severe sepsis: the ACCESS randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;309(11):1154–1162. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.2194.
    1. Marshall JC, Foster D, Vincent JL, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic implications of endotoxemia in critical illness: results of the MEDIC study. J Infect Dis. 2004;190(3):527–534. doi: 10.1086/422254.
    1. Shoji H. Extracorporeal endotoxin removal for the treatment of sepsis: endotoxin adsorption cartridge (Toraymyxin) Ther Apher Dial. 2003;7(1):108–114. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-0968.2003.00005.x.
    1. Ronco C, Klein DJ. Polymyxin B hemoperfusion: a mechanistic perspective. Crit Care. 2014;9;18(3):309. doi: 10.1186/cc13912.
    1. Cruz DN, Antonelli M, Fumagalli R, et al. Early use of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in abdominal septic shock: the EUPHAS randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009;301(23):2445–2452. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.856.
    1. Payen DM, Guilhot J, Launey Y, et al. Early use of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in patients with septic shock due to peritonitis: a multicenter randomized control trial. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(6):975–984. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3751-z.
    1. Klein DJ, Foster D, Schorr CA, Kazempour K, Walker PM, Dellinger RP. The EUPHRATES trial (Evaluating the use of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in a randomized controlled trial of adults treated for endotoxemia and septic shock): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014;15:218. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-218.
    1. Dellinger RP, Bagshaw SM, Antonelli M, et al. Targeted Polymyxin-B hemoperfusion for the treatment of endotoxemia and septic shock: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (EUPHRATES) JAMA. 2018;20(14):1455–1463. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14618.
    1. Pocock Stuart J, Stone Gregg W. The primary outcome fails—now what? N Engl J Med. 2016;375:861–870. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1510064.
    1. Romaschin AD, Obiezu-Forster CV, Shoji H, Klein DJ. Novel insights into the direct removal of endotoxin by polymyxin B hemoperfusion. Blood Purif. 2017;44(3):193–197. doi: 10.1159/000475982.
    1. Dünser MW, Ruokonen E, Pettilä V, Ulmer H, Torgersen C, Schmittinger CA, Jakob S, Takala J. Association of arterial blood pressure and vasopressor load with septic shock mortality: a post hoc analysis of a multicenter trial. Crit Care. 2009;13(6):R181. doi: 10.1186/cc8167.
    1. Standford Lab—Lab Test Guide. . Accessed 01 May 2018
    1. Moya-Horno I, Viteri S, Karachaliou N, Rosell R. Combination of immunotherapy with targeted therapies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2018 doi: 10.1177/1758834017745012.
    1. Reck M, Rabe KF. Precision diagnosis and treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:849–861. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1703413.
    1. Ferretti G, Ruberto F, Morabito V, Pugliese F. Early management of endotoxemia using the endotoxin activity assay and polymyxin B-based hemoperfusion. Contrib Nephrol. 2010;167:91–101. doi: 10.1159/000315923.
    1. Cutuli SL, Artigas A, Fumagalli R, et al. Polymyxin-B hemoperfusion in septic patients: analysis of a multicenter registry. Ann Intensive Care. 2016;6(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0178-9.
    1. Iwagami M, Yasunaga H, Noiri E, Horiguchi H, Fushimi K, Matsubara T, Yahagi N, Doi K. Potential survival benefit of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in spetic shock patients on continuous renal replacement therapy: a propensity-matched analysis. Blood purif. 2016;42:9-17. doi: 10.1159/000444474.
    1. Zhou F, Peng Z, Murugan R, Kellum JA. Blood purification and mortality in sepsis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(9):2209–2220. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828cf412.
    1. Chang T, Tu YK, Lee CT, Chao A, Huang CH, Wang MJ, Yeh YC. Effects of polymyxin B hemoperfusion on mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: a systemic review, meta-analysis update, and disease severity subgroup meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(8):e858–e864. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002362.
    1. Venkatesh B, Finfer S, Cohen J, et al. Adjunctive glucocorticoid therapy in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:797–808. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1705835.
    1. Suffredini AF. A role for hydrocortisone therapy in septic shock? N Engl J Med. 2018;378:860–861. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1801463.
    1. Srisawat N, Tungsanga S, Lumlertgul N, et al. The effect of polymyxin B hemoperfusion on modulation on human leukocyte antigen DR in severe sepsis patients. Crit Care. 2018;22:279. doi: 10.1186/s3054-018-2077-y.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere