Medium-sized posterior fragments in AO Weber-B fractures, does open reduction and fixation improve outcome? the POSTFIX-trial protocol, a multicenter randomized clinical trial

Sander Verhage, Peer van der Zwaal, Maarten Bronkhorst, Huub van der Meulen, Sanne Kleinveld, Sven Meylaerts, Steven Rhemrev, Pieta Krijnen, Inger Schipper, Jochem Hoogendoorn, Sander Verhage, Peer van der Zwaal, Maarten Bronkhorst, Huub van der Meulen, Sanne Kleinveld, Sven Meylaerts, Steven Rhemrev, Pieta Krijnen, Inger Schipper, Jochem Hoogendoorn

Abstract

Background: Guidelines for treatment of the posterior fracture fragment in trimalleolar fractures are scarce and show varying advices. Did the increasing size of the posterior fragment seem to relate to worse outcome in the past, nowadays this has changed to the amount of dislocation of the posterior fragment post-operatively. Despite many retrospective cohort studies and some prospective cohort studies, no consistent guideline could be derived from the current literature.

Methods: The POSTFIX-study is designed as a multicenter randomized clinical trial to analyse the effects of anatomical reduction and fixation of the posterior fragment in AO 44-B3 fractures with medium-sized posterior fragment. A total of 84 patients will be included and online allocated to either anatomical reduction and fixation of the posterior fragment via the posterolateral approach (n = 42) or no fixation of the posterior fragment (n = 42). The concomitant fractured medial and lateral malleoli are treated according to the AO-principles. Functionality of the ankle as measured by the AAOS-questionnaire (American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons) 1 year post-operatively was set as primary outcome. Main secondary outcome measures are the AAOS-questionnaire 5 years postoperatively and osteoarthritis as measured on plain radiographs 1 year and 5 years post-operatively. The Olerud and Molander score, the AOFAS-score, the VAS-pain, the Euroqol-5D and Range of Motion by physical examination will also be evaluated during the follow-up period.

Discussion: The POSTFIX-trial is the first high quality multicenter randomized clinical trial worldwide to analyse the effects of anatomical fixation of the posterior fragment in trimalleolar fractures. New guidelines on anatomical reduction and fixation of the posterior fragment can in future be based on the results of this trial.

Trial registration: This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with reference number: NCT02596529 . Registered 3 November 2015, retrospectively registered.

Keywords: Ankle fracture; Posterior fragment fixation; Posterior malleolar fracture; Posterolateral approach; Trimalleolar fracture.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow-chart of inclusion and randomisation

References

    1. Irwin TA, Lien J, Kadakia AR. Posterior malleolus fracture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22(2):67.
    1. Odak S, Ahluwalia R, Unnikrishnan P, Hennessey M, Platt S. Management of the posterior malleolar fractures: a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;55(1):140–5.
    1. Jaskulka RA, Ittner G, Schedl R. Fractures of the posterior tibial margin: their role in the prognosis of malleolar fractures. J Trauma. 1989;29(11):1565–1570. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198911000-00018.
    1. De Vries JS, Wijgman AJ, Sierevelt IN, Schaap GR. Long-term results of ankle fractures with a posterior malleolar fragment. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2005;44(3):211–217. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2005.02.002.
    1. Langenhuijsen JF, Heetveld MJ, Ultee JM, Steller EP, Butzelaar RM. Results of ankle fractures with involvement of the posterior tibial margin. J Trauma. 2002;53(1):55–60. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200207000-00012.
    1. Broos PL, Bisschop AP. Operative treatment of ankle fractures in adults: correlation between types of fracture and final results. Injury. 1991;22(5):403–406. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(91)90106-O.
    1. Drijfhout van Hooff CC, Verhage SM, Hoogendoorn JM. Influence of fragment size and postoperative joint congruency on long-term outcome of posterior malleolar fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(6):673–678. doi: 10.1177/1071100715570895.
    1. Xu HL, Li X, Zhang DY, Fu ZG, Wang TB, Zhang PX, Jiang BG, Shen HL, Wang G, Wang GL, Wu XB. A retrospective study of posterior malleolus fractures. Int Orthop. 2012;36(9):1929–1936. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1591-9.
    1. Macko VW, Matthews LS, Zwirkoski P, Goldstein SA. The joint-contact area of the ankle. The contribution of the posterior malleolus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73(3):347–351. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199173030-00005.
    1. Hartford JM, Gorczyca JT, McNamara JL, Mayor MB. Tibiotalar contact area. Contribution of posterior malleolus and deltoid ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;320:182–187.
    1. Harper MC. Posterior instability of the talus: an anatomic evaluation. Foot Ankle. 1989;10(1):36–39. doi: 10.1177/107110078901000107.
    1. Harper MC, Hardin G. Posterior malleolar fractures of the ankle associated with external rotation-abduction injuries. Results with and without internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70(9):1348–1356. doi: 10.2106/00004623-198870090-00012.
    1. Harper MC. Talar shift. The stabilizing role of the medial, lateral, and posterior ankle structures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;257:177–183.
    1. Raasch WG, Larkin JJ, Draganich LF. Assessment of the posterior malleolus as a restraint to posterior subluxation of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74(8):1201–1206. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199274080-00010.
    1. Vrahas M, Fu F, Veenis B. Intraarticular contact stresses with simulated ankle malunions. J Orthop Trauma. 1994;8(2):159–166. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199404000-00014.
    1. Fitzpatrick DC, Otto JK, McKinley TO, Marsh JL, Brown TD. Kinematic and contact stress analysis of posterior malleolus fractures of the ankle. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(5):271–278. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200405000-00002.
    1. P Barbosa, F Bonnaire, K Kojima. AO foundation. . 2013.
    1. Talbot M, Steenblock TR, Cole PA. Posterolateral approach for open reduction and internal fixation of trimalleolar ankle fractures. Can J Surg. 2005;48(6):487–490.
    1. Tornetta P, 3rd, Ricci W, Nork S, Collinge C, Steen B. The posterolateral approach to the tibia for displaced posterior malleolar injuries. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25(2):123–126. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181e47d29.
    1. Miller AN, Carroll EA, Parker RJ, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. Posterior malleolar stabilization of syndesmotic injuries is equivalent to screw fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(4):1129–1135. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1111-4.
    1. Gardner MJ, Brodsky A, Briggs SM, Nielson JH, Lorich DG. Fixation of posterior malleolus fractures provides greater syndesmotic stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;447:165–171. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000203489.21206.a9.
    1. Forberger J, Sabandal PV, Dietrich M, Gralla J, Lattmann T, Platz A. Posterolateral approach to the displaced posterior malleolus: functional outcome and local morbidity. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(4):309–314. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2009.0309.
    1. Verhage SM, Boot F, Schipper IB, Hoogendoorn JM. Open reduction and internal fixation of posterior malleolar fractures using the posterolaterale approach. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(6):812–7.
    1. Donken CCMA, Al-Khateeb H, Verhofstad MHJ, van Laarhoven CJHM. Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating ankle fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012, Issue 8.
    1. Meijer DT, de Muinck Keizer RJ, Doornberg JN, Sierevelt IN, Stufkens SA, Kerkhoffs GM, van Dijk CN. Ankle platform study collaborative—science of variation group. Diagnostic accuracy of 2-dimensional computed tomography for articular involvement and fracture pattern of posterior malleolar fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(1):75–82. doi: 10.1177/1071100715603999.
    1. Meijer DT, Doornberg JN, Sierevelt IN, Mallee WH, van Dijk CN, Kerkhoffs GM, Stufkens SA. AnklePlatform study collaborative — science of variation group; ankle platform study collaborative — science of variation group. Guesstimation of posterior malleolar fractures on lateral plain radiographs. Injury. 2015;46(10):2024–2029. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.07.019.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere