Effects of a monophasic combined oral contraceptive containing nomegestrol acetate and 17β-oestradiol compared with one containing levonorgestrel and ethinylestradiol on haemostasis, lipids and carbohydrate metabolism

Ulla M Ågren, Marjatta Anttila, Kristiina Mäenpää-Liukko, Maija-Liisa Rantala, Hilkka Rautiainen, Werner F Sommer, Ellen Mommers, Ulla M Ågren, Marjatta Anttila, Kristiina Mäenpää-Liukko, Maija-Liisa Rantala, Hilkka Rautiainen, Werner F Sommer, Ellen Mommers

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the effects of a combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing nomegestrol acetate and 17β-oestradiol (NOMAC/E2) on haemostasis, lipids, carbohydrate metabolism, C-reactive protein (CRP) and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) with those of a COC containing levonorgestrel and ethinylestradiol (LNG/EE).

Methods: In a randomised, open-label study, 121 healthy women, 18-50 years of age, were randomly assigned to receive NOMAC/E2 (2.5 mg/1.5 mg) in a 24/4-day regimen (n=60) or LNG/EE (150 μg/30 μg) in a 21/7-day regimen (n=61) for six cycles. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to cycle 6 for all indices.

Results: All parameters were similar at baseline between the two groups. Over six cycles, NOMAC/E2 had less effect on most haemostatic indices than LNG/EE. Lipids were essentially unchanged with NOMAC/E2, whereas with LNG/EE high-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides slightly increased. NOMAC/E2 induced negligible changes in glucose and insulin parameters, in contrast to LNG/EE. A much smaller increase in CRP was observed with NOMAC/E2 than with LNG/EE. NOMAC/E2 was associated with a greater increase in SHBG.

Conclusions: The monophasic COC NOMAC/E2 had less influence on haemostasis, lipids and carbohydrate metabolism than the COC LNG/EE.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Disposition of subjects. NOMAC/E2, nomegestrol acetate/17β-oestradiol; LNG/EE, levonorgestrel/ethinylestradiol.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Box whisker plots for NOMAC/E2 and LNG/EE of relative changes from baseline to end of cycle 6 in selected haemostatic and lipid parameters and SHBG. The edges of the boxes present the 25th and 75th sample percentiles (quartiles). The distance between these sample percentiles is the interquartile range. The vertical line in the box shows the median and the whiskers are drawn up to the smallest and largest value within 1.5-times the interquartile range. NOMAC, nomegestrol acetate/17β-oestradiol; LNG, levonorgestrel/ethinylestradiol; APCsr, activated protein C sensitivity ratio; ETP, endogenous thrombin potential; aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDLC, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SHBG, sex hormone-binding globulin.

References

    1. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. World contraceptive use 2007. Accessed 5 August 2009 from: .
    1. Rosenberg MJ, Meyers A, Roy V. Efficacy cycle control, and side effects of low- and lower-dose oral contraceptives: A randomized trial of 20 micrograms and 35 micrograms estrogen preparations. Contraception. 1999;60:321–9.
    1. Farley TM, Collins J, Schlesselman JJ. Hormonal contraception and risk of cardiovascular disease. An international perspective. Contraception. 1998;57:211–30.
    1. Blackburn RD, Cunkelman JA, Zlidar VM. Oral contraceptives – an update. In Population Reports, Series A, No. 9, 2000.
    1. Szarewski A, Mansour D, Shulman LP. 50 years of'The Pill': Celebrating a golden anniversary. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2010;36:231–8.
    1. Lidegaard Ø, Lokkegaard E, Svendsen AL, Agger C. Hormonal contraception and risk of venous thromboembolism: National follow-up study. BMJ. 2009;339:b2890.
    1. van Hylckama Vlieg A, Helmerhorst FM, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The venous thrombotic risk of oral contraceptives, effects of oestrogen dose and progestogen type: Results of the MEGA case-control study. BMJ. 2009;339:b2921.
    1. Reid RL, Westhoff C, Mansour D, et al. Oral contraceptives and venous thromboembolism consensus opinion from an international workshop held in Berlin, Germany in December 2009. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2010;36:117–22.
    1. Shapiro S, Dinger J. Risk of venous thromboembolism among users of oral contraceptives: A review of two recently published studies. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2010;36:33–8.
    1. Suissa S, Spitzer WO, Rainville B, et al. Recurrent use of newer oral contraceptives and the risk of venous thromboembolism. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:817–21.
    1. Dinger JC, Heinemann LA, Kuhl-Habich D. The safety of a drospirenone-containing oral contraceptive: Final results from the European active surveillance study on oral contraceptives based on 142,475 women-years of observation. Contraception. 2007;75:344–54.
    1. Hoffmann H, Moore C, Zimmermann H, et al. Approaches to the replacement of ethinylestradiol by natural 17beta-estradiol in combined oral contraceptives. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 1998;50:458–64.
    1. Lello S. Nomegestrol acetate: Pharmacology, safety profile and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs. 2010;70:541–59.
    1. Sitruk-Ware R. New progestagens for contraceptive use. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12:169–78.
    1. Duijkers IJ, Klipping C, Grab P, Korver T. Effects of a monophasic combined oral contraceptive containing nomegestrol acetate and 17β-oestradiol on ovarian function in comparison to a monophasic combined oral contraceptive containing drospirenone and ethinylestradiol. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2010;15:314–25.
    1. Christin-Maitre S, Serfary D, Chabbert-Buffet N, et al. Comparison of a 24-day and a 21-day pill regimen for the novel combined oral contraceptive, nomegestrol acetate and 17(3-estradiol (NOMAC/E2): A double- blind, randomized study. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1338–47.
    1. Ågren UM, Anttila M, Mäenpää-Liukko K, et al. Effects of a monophasic combined oral contraceptive containing nomegestrol acetate and 17p∼oestradiol in comparison to one containing levonorgestrel and ethinylestradiol on markers of endocrine function. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2011;16:458–67.
    1. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. Guideline on clinical investigation of steroid contraceptives in women. In EMEA/CPMP/EWP/519/98 Rev 1, 2005.
    1. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18:499–502.
    1. Gerstman BB, Piper JM, Tomita DK, et al. Oral contraceptive estrogen dose and the risk of deep venous thromboembolic disease. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;133:32–7.
    1. Lidegaard Ø, Edström B, Kreiner S. Oral contraceptives and venous thromboembolism: A five-year national case-control study. Contraception. 2002;65:187–96.
    1. Jick H, Jick SS, Gurewich V, et al. Risk of idiopathic cardiovascular death and nonfatal venous thromboembolism in women using oral contraceptives with differing progestagen components. Lancet. 1995;346:1589–93.
    1. Spitzer WO, Lewis MA, Heinemann LA, et al. Third generation oral contraceptives and risk of venous thromboembolic disorders: An international case-control study. Transnational research group on oral contraceptives and the health of young women. BMJ. 1996;312:83–8.
    1. Herings RM, Urquhart J, Leufkens HG. Venous thromboembolism among new users of different oral contraceptives. Lancet. 1999;354:127–8.
    1. Baillargeon JP, McClish DK, Essah PA, Nestler JE. Association between the current use of low-dose oral contraceptives and cardiovascular arterial disease: A meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:3863–70.
    1. Lidegaard Ø, Kreiner S. Contraceptives and cerebral thrombosis: A five-year national case-control study. Contraception. 2002;65:197–205.
    1. Lindberg UB, Crona N, Stigendal L, et al. A comparison between effects of estradiol valerate and low dose ethinyl estradiol on haemostasis parameters. Thromb Haemost. 1989;61:65–9.
    1. Mashchak CA, Lobo RA, Dozono-Takano R, et al. Comparison of pharmacodynamic properties of various estrogen formulations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;144:511–8.
    1. Parke S, Nahum G, Mellinger U, Junge W. Metabolic effects of a new four-phasic oral contraceptive containing estradiol valerate and dienogest. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(4) Suppl:12S–13S.
    1. Gaussem P, Alhenc-Gelas M, Thomas JL, et al. Haemostatic effects of a new combined oral contraceptive, nomegestrol acetate/17beta-estradiol, compared with those of levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol. A double-blind, randomised study. Thromb Haemost. 2011;105:560–7.
    1. Rosing J, Tans G, Nicolaes GA, et al. Oral contraceptives and venous thrombosis: Different sensitivities to activated protein C in women using second- and third-generation oral contraceptives. Br J Haematol. 1997;97:233–8.
    1. Kemmeren JM, Algra A, Meijers JCM, et al. Effect of second- and third-generation oral contraceptives on the protein C system in the absence or presence of the factor V Leiden mutation: A randomized trial. Blood. 2004;103:927–33.
    1. Conard J. Biological coagulation findings in third-generation oral contraceptives. Hum Reprod Update. 1999;5:672–80.
    1. Tans G, Curvers J, Middeldorp S, et al. A randomized cross-over study on the effects of levonorgestrel- and desogestrel-containing oral contraceptives on the anticoagulant pathways. Thromb Haemost. 2000;84:15–21.
    1. de Visser MC, Rosendaal FR, Bertina RM. A reduced sensitivity for activated protein C in the absence of factor V Leiden increases the risk of venous thrombosis. Blood. 1999;93:1271–6.
    1. Tans G, van Hylckama Vlieg A, Thomassen MC, et al. Activated protein C resistance determined with a thrombin generation-based test predicts for venous thrombosis in men and women. Br J Haematol. 2003;122:465–70.
    1. Godsland IF, Winkler U, Lidegaard Ø, Crook D. Occlusive vascular diseases in oral contraceptive users. Epidemiology, pathology and mechanisms. Drugs. 2000;60:721–869.
    1. Godsland IF. Biology: Risk factor modification by OCs and HRT lipids and lipoproteins. Maturitas. 2004;47:299–303.
    1. Sitruk-Ware R. Pharmacology of different progestogens: The special case of drospirenone. Climacteric. 2005;8(Suppl. 3):4–12.
    1. Endrikat J, Klipping C, Cronin M, et al. An open label, comparative study of the effects of a dose-reduced oral contraceptive containing 20 microg ethinyl estradiol and 100 microg levonorgestrel on hemostatic, lipids, and carbohydrate metabolism variables. Contraception. 2002;65:215–21.
    1. Scharnagl H, Petersen G, Nauck M, et al. Double-blind, randomized study comparing the effects of two monophasic oral contraceptives containing ethinylestradiol (20 microg or 30 microg) and levonorgestrel (100 microg or 150 microg) on lipoprotein metabolism. Contraception. 2004;69:105–13.
    1. Skouby SO, Endrikat J, Diisterberg B, et al. A 1-year randomized study to evaluate the effects of a dose reduction in oral contraceptives on lipids and carbohydrate metabolism: 20 microg ethinyl estradiol combined with 100 microg levonorgestrel. Contraception. 2005;71:111–7.
    1. Lopez LM, Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Steroidal contraceptives: Effect on carbohydrate metabolism in women without diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 CD006133.
    1. Brussaard HE, Gevers Leuven JA, Frölich M, et al. Short-term oestrogen replacement therapy improves insulin resistance, lipids and fibrinolysis in postmenopausal women with NIDDM. Diabetologia. 1997;40:843–9.
    1. Brown MD, Korytkowski MT, Zmuda JM, et al. Insulin sensitivity in postmenopausal women: Independent and combined associations with hormone replacement, cardiovascular fitness, and body composition. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:1731–6.
    1. Ryan AS, Nicklas BJ, Berman DM. Hormone replacement therapy, insulin sensitivity, and abdominal obesity in postmenopausal women. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:127–33.
    1. Howard BV, Hsia J, Ouyang P, et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy is associated with atherosclerosis progression in women with abnormal glucose tolerance. Circulation. 2004;110:201–6.
    1. Os I, Os A, Abdelnoor M, et al. Insulin sensitivity in women with coronary heart disease during hormone replacement therapy. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2005;14:137–45.
    1. Bonds DE, Lasser N, Qi L, et al. The effect of conjugated equine oestrogen on diabetes incidence: The women's health initiative randomised trial. Diabetologia. 2006;49:459–68.
    1. Shadoan MK, Kavanagh K, Zhang L, et al. Addition of medroxyprogesterone acetate to conjugated equine estrogens results in insulin resistance in adipose tissue. Metabolism. 2007;56:830–7.
    1. Sitruk-Ware R. Progestins and cardiovascular risk markers. Steroids. 2000;65:651–8.
    1. Cushman M, Arnold AM, Psaty BM, et al. C-reactive protein and the 10-year incidence of coronary heart disease in older men and women: The cardiovascular health study. Circulation. 2005;112:25–31.
    1. van Rooijen M, Hansson LO, Frostegard J, et al. Treatment with combined oral contraceptives induces a rise in serum C-reactive protein in the absence of a general inflammatory response. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4:77–82.
    1. White T, Özel B, Jain JK, Stanczyk FZ. Effects of transdermal and oral contraceptives on estrogen-sensitive hepatic proteins. Contraception. 2006;74:293–6.
    1. Johnson JV, Lowell J, Badger GJ, et al. Effects of oral and transdermal hormonal contraception on vascular risk markers: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;lll:278–84.
    1. Ridker PM, MacFadyen JG, Fonseca FA, et al. Number needed to treat with rosuvastatin to prevent first cardiovascular events and death among men and women with low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein: Justification for the use of statins in prevention: An intervention trial evaluating rosuvastatin (JUPITER) Circ Cardiovasc Qual Out comes. 2009;2:616–23.
    1. Odlind V, Milsom I, Persson I, Victor A. Can changes in sex hormone binding globulin predict the risk of venous thromboembolism with combined oral contraceptive pills? Ada Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81:482–90.
    1. Oral Contraceptive Hemostasis Study Group. The effects of seven monophasic oral contraceptive regimens on hemostatic variables: Conclusions from a large randomized multicenter study. Contraception. 2003;67:173–85.
    1. Kluft C, Endrikat J, Mulder SM, et al. A prospective study on the effects on hemostasis of two oral contraceptives containing drospirenone in combination with either 30 or 20 microg ethinyl estradiol and a reference containing desogestrel and 30 microg ethinyl estradiol. Contraception. 2006;73:336–43.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere