Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of azilsartan medoxomil with or without chlorthalidone during and after 8 months of treatment for hypertension

Mark S Kipnes, Alison Handley, Eric Lloyd, Bruce Barger, Andrew Roberts, Mark S Kipnes, Alison Handley, Eric Lloyd, Bruce Barger, Andrew Roberts

Abstract

A phase 3, 26-week, open-label, titrate-to-target study (n=418) assessed the safety of azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M) alone and with chlorthalidone (CLD), followed by a 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled reversal phase with change in clinic diastolic blood pressure (DBP) as the primary endpoint. Target blood pressure (BP) was <140/90 mm Hg (<130/80 mm Hg with diabetes/chronic kidney disease). AZL-M was initiated at 40 mg once a day (QD), force-titrated to 80 mg at week 4. CLD 25 mg QD could be added (weeks 8-22), if required, to reach target, followed by additional antihypertensives from week 12. At the end of the open-label phase, mean change in systolic BP (SBP)/DBP from baseline was -23/-16 mm Hg. The most common adverse events, irrespective of treatment, were dizziness (8.9%) and headache (7.2%). Serious AEs were reported in eight patients (1.9%). Consecutive creatinine elevations ≥50% with values exceeding the upper limit of normal (ULN) were reported in nine (2.2%) patients. All returned to below the 50% threshold; most also returned to below the ULN after drug discontinuation. Mean DBP was maintained through the reversal phase in patients receiving AZL-M, but increased with placebo (difference: -7.8 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval, -9.8 to -5.8; P<.001). AZL-M alone or with CLD showed good long-term safety and stable BP improvements in a titrate-to-target approach. BP improvements caused by AZL-M therapy were safely reversible upon AZL-M withdrawal.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00696384.

© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design for the open‐label phase and double‐blind reversal phase. AZL‐M indicates azilsartan medoxomil; QD, once daily; CLD, chlorthalidone.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean trough clinic sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (A) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) (B) by study visit (open‐label phase; last observation carried forward). Note that the individual data lines do not represent randomized groups and are in a single cohort, but are presented separately according to treatment received for clarity. AZL‐M indicates azilsartan medoxomil; CLD, chlorthalidone. Data are expressed as mean±standard deviation. The dashed line at week 8 represents the first visit at which patients could additionally have received CLD.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean trough clinic sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (A) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) (B) by study visit (double‐blind reversal phase; last observation carried forward). AZL‐M indicates azilsartan medoxomil; CLD, chlorthalidone. Data are expressed as mean±standard deviation.

References

    1. Arbor Pharmaceuticals, LLC. Edarbi (azilsartan medoxomil) Tablets. U.S. Prescribing Information. Arbor Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Atlanta, GA, USA. Jul 2004. . Accessed October 13, 2014.
    1. Takeda Pharma A/S. Edarbi (azilsartan medoxomil) Tablets. Summary of Product Characteristics . Takeda Pharma A/S, Taastrup, Denmark. Oct 2014. . Accessed October 13, 2014.
    1. Zaiken K, Cheng JW. Azilsartan medoxomil: a new angiotensin receptor blocker. Clin Ther. 2011;33:1577–1589.
    1. De Caterina AR, Harper AR, Cuculi F. Critical evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of azilsartan. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2012;8:299–305.
    1. Kurtz TW, Kajiya T. Differential pharmacology and benefit/risk of azilsartan compared to other sartans. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2012;8:133–143.
    1. Bakris GL, Sica D, Weber M, et al. The comparative effects of azilsartan medoxomil and olmesartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011;13:81–88.
    1. Sica D, White WB, Weber MA, et al. Comparison of the novel angiotensin II receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil vs valsartan by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011;13:467–472.
    1. White WB, Weber MA, Sica D, et al. Effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil versus olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension. Hypertension. 2011;57:413–420.
    1. Turnbull F, Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration . Effects of different blood‐pressure‐lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events: results of prospectively‐designed overviews of randomised trials. Lancet. 2003;362:1527–1535.
    1. Gradman AH. Rationale for triple‐combination therapy for management of high blood pressure. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2010;12:869–878.
    1. Gradman AH, Basile JN, Carter BL, et al. Combination therapy in hypertension. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2010;4:90–98.
    1. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206–1252.
    1. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, et al. 2007 ESH‐ESC practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension J Hypertens. 2007;25:1751–1762.
    1. Weir MR, Bakris GL. Combination therapy with renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone receptor blockers for hypertension: how far have we come? J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008;10:146–152.
    1. Sood N, Reinhart KM, Baker WL. Combination therapy for the management of hypertension: a review of the evidence. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2010;67:885–894.
    1. Bakris GL, Sica D, White WB, et al. Antihypertensive efficacy of hydrochlorothiazide vs chlorthalidone combined with azilsartan medoxomil. Am J Med. 2012;125:1229.e1–1229.e10
    1. Sica D, Bakris GL, White WB, et al. Blood pressure‐lowering efficacy of the fixed‐dose combination of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone: a factorial study. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012;14:284–292.
    1. Arbor Pharmaceuticals, LLC. Edarbyclor (azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone) Tablets. U.S. Prescribing Information . Arbor Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Atlanta, GA, USA. July 2014. . Accessed November 21, 2014.
    1. Cushman WC, Bakris GL, White WB, et al. Azilsartan medoxomil plus chlorthalidone reduces blood pressure more effectively than olmesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide in stage 2 systolic hypertension. Hypertension. 2012;60:310–318.
    1. Flack JM, Sica DA, Bakris G, et al. Management of high blood pressure in Blacks: an update of the International Society on Hypertension in Blacks consensus statement. Hypertension. 2010;56:780–800.
    1. White WB, Weber MA, Sica D, et al. Effects of azilsartan medoxomil vs olmesartan, valsartan on ambulatory and clinic BP in hypertensive black patients [abstract]. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012;14(suppl 1):11.
    1. Neal RC, Ferdinand KC, Ycas J, Miller E. Relationship of ethnic origin, gender, and age to blood creatine kinase levels. Am J Med. 2009;122:73–78.
    1. Bakris GL, Weir MR. Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor‐associated elevations in serum creatinine: is this a cause for concern? Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:685–693.
    1. Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) . K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines on hypertension and antihypertensive agents in chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;5(suppl 1):S1–S290.
    1. Hirsch S, Hirsch J, Bhatt U, Rovin BH. Tolerating increases in the serum creatinine following aggressive treatment of chronic kidney disease, hypertension and proteinuria: pre‐renal success. Am J Nephrol. 2012;36:430–437.
    1. Ruggenenti P, Remuzzi G. Dealing with renin‐angiotensin inhibitors, don't mind serum creatinine. Am J Nephrol. 2012;36:427–429.
    1. Mangrum AJ, Bakris GL. Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in chronic renal disease: safety issues. Semin Nephrol. 2004;24:168–175.
    1. Thorp ML, Ditmer DG, Nash MK, et al. A study of the prevalence of significant increases in serum creatinine following angiotension‐converting enzyme inhibitor administration. J Hum Hypertens. 2005;19:389–392.
    1. Palmer BF. Metabolic complications associated with use of diuretics. Semin Nephrol. 2011;31:542–552.
    1. Sica DA, Carter B, Cushman W, Hamm L. Thiazide and loop diuretics. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011;13:639–643.
    1. SHEP Cooperative Research Group. Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension: final results of the systolic hypertension in the elderly program (SHEP). JAMA. 1991;265:3255–3264.
    1. ALLHAT Officers Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group . Major outcomes in high‐risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: the Antihypertensive and Lipid‐Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA. 2002;288:2981–2997.
    1. Kountz DS, Goldman A, Mikhail J, Ezer M. Chlorthalidone: the forgotten diuretic. Postgrad Med. 2012;124:60–66.
    1. Shuster JE, Bleske BE, Dorsch MP. Clinical utility of azilsartan‐chlorthalidone fixed combination in the management of hypertension. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2012;8:381–387.
    1. Cheng JW. Azilsartan/chlorthalidone combination therapy for blood pressure control. Integr Blood Press Control. 2013;6:39–48.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere