- ICH GCP
- Rejestr badań klinicznych w USA
- Badanie kliniczne NCT07598526
Comparative Effects of Mulligan Mobilization With and Without Myofascial Release Technique in Management of Post Traumatic Elbow Stiffness
13 maja 2026 zaktualizowane przez: Maryam Safdar, University of Faisalabad
The Randomize Clinical Trial will involve 30 participants with post traumatic elbow stiffness recruited from Madinah Teaching Hospital and Chiniot General hospital Faisalabad.
Consecutive sampling technique will be used.
Study will include individuals with >30° extension loss and <120° flexion, 50° in both directions for pronation-supination, who are 3-6 weeks post-POP removal from radiograph confirmation of skeletal/bone healing will be insured, who have elbow pain from 3 to 5/10 on NPRS and have fully healed fractures.
Both intra-articular and extra-articular injuries will be accepted.
DASH Score with 45 to 50 points.
Study will exclude pathological or acute fractures, burns, brain trauma, neurological or psychological disorders, history of pre-operative osteoarthritis.
Consent will be taken written and verbal from participants before including into study.
Patients will be allocated with online randomization generator method into 2 groups.
Group A will receive Mulligan Mobilization with Myofascial release technique, while Group B will receive Mulligan Mobilization alone.
Hot pack for 20 minutes before treatment and static stretching after treatment will apply in both groups.
Each stretch is performed 10 repetition with hold duration of 30 sec and rest period 15 sec between each stretch.
Total 3 sessions per week for 4 weeks (12 sessions) on alternative days will be given.
Outcome of study will be elbow pain, elbow range of motion (flexion and extension) and functional disability will be measure by using Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Universal Goniometer and Dash Questionnaire Score respectively.
Data will be investigated by using SPSS version 2023.
Przegląd badań
Status
Jeszcze nie rekrutacja
Warunki
Szczegółowy opis
Elbow stiffness is a disabling condition that interferes in daily living activities after trauma.
The study's goal is to compare the results of Mulligan Mobilization with and without Myofascial Release Technique in management of post traumatic elbow stiffness.
The Randomize Clinical Trial will involve 30 participants with post traumatic elbow stiffness recruited from Madinah Teaching Hospital and Chiniot General hospital Faisalabad.
Consecutive sampling technique will be used.
Study will include individuals with >30° extension loss and <120° flexion, 50° in both directions for pronation-supination, who are 3-6 weeks post-POP removal from radiograph confirmation of skeletal/bone healing will be insured, who have elbow pain from 3 to 5/10 on NPRS and have fully healed fractures.
Both intra-articular and extra-articular injuries will be accepted.
DASH Score with 45 to 50 points.
Study will exclude pathological or acute fractures, burns, brain trauma, neurological or psychological disorders, history of pre-operative osteoarthritis.
Consent will be taken written and verbal from participants before including into study.
Patients will be allocated with online randomization generator method into 2 groups.
Group A will receive Mulligan Mobilization with Myofascial release technique, while Group B will receive Mulligan Mobilization alone.
Hot pack for 20 minutes before treatment and static stretching after treatment will apply in both groups.
Each stretch is performed 10 repetition with hold duration of 30 sec and rest period 15 sec between each stretch.
Total 3 sessions per week for 4 weeks (12 sessions) on alternative days will be given.
Outcome of study will be elbow pain, elbow range of motion (flexion and extension) and functional disability will be measure by using Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Universal Goniometer and Dash Questionnaire Score respectively.
Data will be investigated by using SPSS version 2023.
Typ studiów
Interwencyjne
Zapisy (Szacowany)
30
Faza
- Nie dotyczy
Kontakty i lokalizacje
Ta sekcja zawiera dane kontaktowe osób prowadzących badanie oraz informacje o tym, gdzie badanie jest przeprowadzane.
Kontakt w sprawie studiów
- Nazwa: Maryam Safdar Dr, MS Physical Therapy (MSK)
- Numer telefonu: +92-3217978088
- E-mail: maryamsafdar.DPT@tuf.edu.pk
Kopia zapasowa kontaktu do badania
- Nazwa: Dr Muhammad Ateeb, PhD Public Health
- Numer telefonu: +92-3357333383
- E-mail: mateeb.oric@tuf.edu.pk
Lokalizacje studiów
-
-
Punjab Province
-
Faisalābad, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 38000
- Outdoor Patient Department (OPD) of Madinah Teaching Hospital and Chiniot General Hospital, Faisalabad.
-
-
Kryteria uczestnictwa
Badacze szukają osób, które pasują do określonego opisu, zwanego kryteriami kwalifikacyjnymi. Niektóre przykłady tych kryteriów to ogólny stan zdrowia danej osoby lub wcześniejsze leczenie.
Kryteria kwalifikacji
Wiek uprawniający do nauki
- Dziecko
- Dorosły
Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników
Nie
Opis
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants aged between 17 and 44 years will be included in the study (Sun et al., 2025).
- Both male and female patients experiencing mild to moderate elbow pain (3/10 to 5/10 on NPRS) along with restricted range of motion will be eligible (Zulfqar et al., 2021).
- Subjects having elbow movement limitation of more than 30° in extension, flexion less than 120°, and 50° restriction in both pronation and supination will be included (Masci et al., 2020).
- Participants will be recruited 3 to 6 weeks after POP removal, and radiographic confirmation of bone/skeletal healing will be ensured before inclusion (Morrey et al., 2017).
- Patients with both intra-articular and extra-articular fractures will be considered eligible.
- Individuals with DASH scores ranging from 45 to 50 points will be included.
- Only patients willing to participate in the study will be enrolled.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a history of previous surgical excision will be excluded from the study (Zheng et al., 2018).
- Participants presenting with pathological fractures will not be included (Zulfqar et al., 2021).
- Patients in the acute stage of fracture will be excluded from participation (Zulfqar et al., 2021).
- Individuals with metabolic or malignant conditions causing elbow stiffness, such as gout or osteosarcoma, will not be eligible (Fusaro et al., 2014).
- Patients with elbow fractures associated with a history of metal implants will be excluded (Zheng et al., 2018).
- Individuals who have already received physiotherapy treatment or medication for the condition will not be included.
- Patients diagnosed with psychological illnesses that may interfere with following instructions will be excluded.
- Participants with brain trauma or referred neurological symptoms, including numbness, dizziness, or hyperesthesia, will not be considered (Fusaro et al., 2014).
- Patients with structural or postural abnormalities involving the shoulder or wrist will be excluded.
- Individuals with open skin wounds or burn injuries around the affected area will not be included.
- Patients with a pre-operative history of arthritis will also be excluded from the study.
Plan studiów
Ta sekcja zawiera szczegółowe informacje na temat planu badania, w tym sposób zaprojektowania badania i jego pomiary.
Jak projektuje się badanie?
Szczegóły projektu
- Główny cel: Leczenie
- Przydział: Randomizowane
- Model interwencyjny: Przydział równoległy
- Maskowanie: Pojedynczy
Broń i interwencje
Grupa uczestników / Arm |
Interwencja / Leczenie |
|---|---|
|
Eksperymentalny: Group A (Mulligan Mobilization with Myofascial Release Technique)
Participants in Group A will receive a structured treatment program including Mulligan mobilization along with myofascial release techniques aimed at reducing pain, improving functional disability, and enhancing elbow range of motion.
Each session will last 40-45 minutes and will be administered three times per week for four weeks.
|
The patient will be positioned supine at the edge of the table with the shoulder abducted to 90°, elbow flexed, and forearm supinated.
The therapist will stabilize the distal humerus and use a belt around the pelvis while applying a sustained glide through the forearm.
Active elbow flexion/extension will be performed with gentle, pain-free overpressure at end range.
The technique will be repeated 6-10 times for 1-3 sets with 15-second rest intervals.
Myofascial release will be applied with the patient supine, elbow slightly flexed and forearm pronated.
The therapist will treat from lateral epicondyle to wrist extensors while the patient performs small elbow movements.
Both groups will receive a hot pack application for 20 minutes as a baseline treatment prior to the intervention, followed by static stretching after the session.
Each stretch will be performed for 10 repetitions, with a 30-second hold and a 15-second rest interval between stretches.
|
|
Aktywny komparator: Group B (Mulligan Mobilization alone)
Participants in Group B will be treated with Mulligan Mobilization alone to help reduce pain and improve elbow range of motion.
The intervention will be delivered in 40-45 minute sessions, three times per week, for four consecutive weeks.
|
The patient will be positioned supine at the edge of the table with the shoulder abducted to 90°, elbow flexed, and forearm supinated.
The therapist will stabilize the distal humerus and use a belt around the pelvis while applying a sustained glide through the forearm.
Active elbow flexion/extension will be performed with gentle, pain-free overpressure at end range.
The technique will be repeated 6-10 times for 1-3 sets with 15-second rest intervals.
Both groups will receive a hot pack application for 20 minutes as a baseline treatment prior to the intervention, followed by static stretching after the session.
Each stretch will be performed for 10 repetitions, with a 30-second hold and a 15-second rest interval between stretches.
|
Co mierzy badanie?
Podstawowe miary wyniku
Miara wyniku |
Opis środka |
Ramy czasowe |
|---|---|---|
|
Elbow pain
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and week 4
|
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is an 11-point scale used to assess pain intensity.
The scale ranges from 0, indicating no pain, to 10, representing the worst imaginable pain.
It is considered a reliable and valid tool for evaluating changes in pain severity over time
|
Baseline and week 4
|
|
Elbow range of motion
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and week 4
|
The universal goniometer is a reliable and effective instrument commonly used to assess elbow joint range of motion
|
Baseline and week 4
|
Miary wyników drugorzędnych
Miara wyniku |
Opis środka |
Ramy czasowe |
|---|---|---|
|
Functional disability
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and Week 4
|
The DASH questionnaire is designed to evaluate upper limb function and related symptoms.
It assesses the level of difficulty an individual experiences while performing daily activities involving the arm, shoulder, and hand due to pain, weakness, or movement limitations.
The questionnaire contains 30 items, and scores range from 0 (no disability) to 100 (maximum disability), with higher scores indicating greater functional impairment
|
Baseline and Week 4
|
Współpracownicy i badacze
Tutaj znajdziesz osoby i organizacje zaangażowane w to badanie.
Sponsor
Śledczy
- Główny śledczy: Dr Maryam Safdar, The University of Faisalabad
Publikacje i pomocne linki
Osoba odpowiedzialna za wprowadzenie informacji o badaniu dobrowolnie udostępnia te publikacje. Mogą one dotyczyć wszystkiego, co jest związane z badaniem.
Publikacje ogólne
- Pourahmadi MR, Mohsenifar H, Dariush M, Aftabi A, Amiri A. Effectiveness of mobilization with movement (Mulligan concept techniques) on low back pain: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2018 Oct;32(10):1289-1298. doi: 10.1177/0269215518778321. Epub 2018 May 30.
- Kain J, Martorello L, Swanson E, Sego S. Comparison of an indirect tri-planar myofascial release (MFR) technique and a hot pack for increasing range of motion. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2011 Jan;15(1):63-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2009.12.002. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
- Masci G, Cazzato G, Milano G, Ciolli G, Malerba G, Perisano C, Greco T, Osvaldo P, Maccauro G, Liuzza F. The stiff elbow: Current concepts. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2020 Jun 25;12(Suppl 1):8661. doi: 10.4081/or.2020.8661. eCollection 2020 Jun 29.
- Zhang D, Nazarian A, Rodriguez EK. Post-traumatic elbow stiffness: Pathogenesis and current treatments. Shoulder Elbow. 2020 Feb;12(1):38-45. doi: 10.1177/1758573218793903. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
- Sevik Kacmaz K, Unver B. Immediate Effects of Mulligan Mobilization on Elbow Proprioception in Healthy Individuals: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Single-Blind Study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2023 Jan;46(1):59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
- Birinci T, Razak Ozdincler A, Altun S, Kural C. A structured exercise programme combined with proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching or static stretching in posttraumatic stiffness of the elbow: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2019 Feb;33(2):241-252. doi: 10.1177/0269215518802886. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
- van Rijn SF, Zwerus EL, Koenraadt KL, Jacobs WC, van den Bekerom MP, Eygendaal D. The reliability and validity of goniometric elbow measurements in adults: A systematic review of the literature. Shoulder Elbow. 2018 Oct;10(4):274-284. doi: 10.1177/1758573218774326. Epub 2018 Jun 3.
- Zheng W, Liu J, Song J, Fan C. Risk factors for development of severe post-traumatic elbow stiffness. Int Orthop. 2018 Mar;42(3):595-600. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3657-1. Epub 2017 Oct 7.
- Young I, Dunning J, Mourad F, Escaloni J, Bliton P, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C. Clinimetric analysis of the numeric pain rating scale, patient-rated tennis elbow evaluation, and tennis elbow function scale in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy. Physiother Theory Pract. 2025 Aug;41(8):1712-1720. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2025.2450090. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
- Sun Z, Li J, van Riet R, Ho PC, Hildebrand KA, Puah KL, Shih JT, Li Z, Chanlalit C, Kekatpure AL, Zhang K, Liu S, Gong M, Huang F, Yan H, Mi J, Lu J, Zha Y, Xiang Z, Xiang M, Li F, Jiang S, Liu W, Zhong B, Ding J, Ruan H, Ouyang Y, Wang W, Yu S, Chen S, Qian Y, Xu Y, Hu Y, Xu J, Jiang X, Jeon IH, Fan C. Clinical guideline on the open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness in adult patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2026 Mar;35(3):811-825. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.07.015. Epub 2025 Aug 25.
- Ling SK, Lui TH, Faan YS, Lui PW, Ngai WK. Post-traumatic elbow rotational stiffness. Shoulder Elbow. 2014 Apr;6(2):119-23. doi: 10.1177/1758573214524935. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
- He X, Fen Q, Yang J, Lei Y, Heng L, Zhang K. Risk Factors of Elbow Stiffness After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of the Terrible Triad of the Elbow Joint. Orthop Surg. 2021 Apr;13(2):530-536. doi: 10.1111/os.12879. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
- Fusaro I, Orsini S, Stignani Kantar S, Sforza T, Benedetti MG, Bettelli G, Rotini R. Elbow rehabilitation in traumatic pathology. Musculoskelet Surg. 2014 Apr;98 Suppl 1:95-102. doi: 10.1007/s12306-014-0328-x. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
- Fan M, Xu F, Fei C, Liu Y, Yang Z, Song Z. Post-traumatic elbow stiffness: etiology, risk factors and current treatments. Front Surg. 2025 Aug 26;12:1643326. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1643326. eCollection 2025.
- Akhtar A, Hughes B, Watts AC. The post-traumatic stiff elbow: A review. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 May 19;19:125-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.05.006. eCollection 2021 Aug.
Daty zapisu na studia
Daty te śledzą postęp w przesyłaniu rekordów badań i podsumowań wyników do ClinicalTrials.gov. Zapisy badań i zgłoszone wyniki są przeglądane przez National Library of Medicine (NLM), aby upewnić się, że spełniają określone standardy kontroli jakości, zanim zostaną opublikowane na publicznej stronie internetowej.
Główne daty studiów
Rozpoczęcie studiów (Szacowany)
20 maja 2026
Zakończenie podstawowe (Szacowany)
20 września 2026
Ukończenie studiów (Szacowany)
20 września 2026
Daty rejestracji na studia
Pierwszy przesłany
13 maja 2026
Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości
13 maja 2026
Pierwszy wysłany (Rzeczywisty)
20 maja 2026
Aktualizacje rekordów badań
Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)
20 maja 2026
Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości
13 maja 2026
Ostatnia weryfikacja
1 maja 2026
Więcej informacji
Terminy związane z tym badaniem
Słowa kluczowe
Dodatkowe istotne warunki MeSH
Inne numery identyfikacyjne badania
- TUF/EIRB/179/26
Plan dla danych uczestnika indywidualnego (IPD)
Planujesz udostępniać dane poszczególnych uczestników (IPD)?
NIE
Informacje o lekach i urządzeniach, dokumenty badawcze
Bada produkt leczniczy regulowany przez amerykańską FDA
Nie
Bada produkt urządzenia regulowany przez amerykańską FDA
Nie
Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .
Badania kliniczne na Ból łokcia
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaRekrutacyjnyPasellofemoral Pain, PFPTurcja (Türkiye)
-
Pamukkale UniversityJeszcze nie rekrutacjaPasellofemoral Pain, PFPTurcja (Türkiye)
-
Beijing Sport UniversityZakończony
-
Beijing Sport UniversityJeszcze nie rekrutacjaPasellofemoral Pain, PFP
-
Beijing Sport UniversityJeszcze nie rekrutacja
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)ZakończonyZespół bólu rzepkowo-udowego | Ból rzepkowo-udowy (PFPS) | Ból rzepkowo-udowy | Pasellofemoral Pain, PFPStany Zjednoczone
-
Cardiff Metropolitan UniversityZakończonyPasellofemoral Pain, PFPZjednoczone Królestwo
-
Ankara Medipol UniversityGazi UniversityZakończony
-
King Abdulaziz UniversityJeszcze nie rekrutacjaSubiektywny ból i dyskomfort | Poziomy lęku u dzieci | Zachowanie dzieci | Zmiany fizjologiczne (Tętno) | Obejective Pain and Discomfort | Zadowolenie uczestników i rodziców | Preferencje przyszłościowe osób badanych i rodzicówArabia Saudyjska
-
Tianjin University of SportJeszcze nie rekrutacja