Ta strona została przetłumaczona automatycznie i dokładność tłumaczenia nie jest gwarantowana. Proszę odnieść się do angielska wersja za tekst źródłowy.

Contactless Ultrasound Data Acquisition in Emergency Departments to Discriminate the Origin of Dyspnea and Chest Pain (PAnDA-One)

15 czerwca 2026 zaktualizowane przez: Austral Diagnostics

Prospective Study for Data Acquisition in Emergency Departments to Develop a Discrimination Algorithm for the Origin of Dyspnea and Chest Pain Using the ADx-One Medical Device

PAnDA-One is a prospective, multicenter, interventional study (10 centers, France) aimed at developing and validating a diagnostic support algorithm based on the ADx-One medical device, which non-invasively acquires thoracic vibrations using airborne ultrasound.

The study will enroll 2,500 patients presenting to the emergency department with acute dyspnea or non-traumatic chest pain, divided into a development cohort (N = 1,500) and an independent test cohort (N = 1,000). The deep learning algorithm will be trained to discriminate cardiovascular from non-cardiovascular origins of symptoms, and its performance will be assessed by AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity against a final diagnosis established by an expert adjudication committee.

Patient management will not be modified by study participation.

Przegląd badań

Szczegółowy opis

Acute dyspnea is a common reason for emergency department (ED) presentation, accounting for 7 to 12% of all consultations (Mockel et al., 2013). More than half of these patients are over 65 years of age - a population whose respiratory system is particularly vulnerable due to parenchymal degeneration and age-related decline in ventilatory and immune function (Boisguérin et Mauro, 2017). In the ED, the leading causes of acute dyspnea are acute heart failure, respiratory tract infections, exacerbations of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and pulmonary embolism (Ray et al., 2006). These episodes frequently lead to hospitalization and carry substantial mortality - reaching 10% in acute heart failure, for instance (Freund et al., 2020) - as well as a marked loss of autonomy, whether driven by the respiratory impairment itself or by the deconditioning that follows prolonged hospital stays.

Non-traumatic chest pain is another major reason for ED presentation, accounting for 5-10% of all visits, and shares with dyspnea the requirement for rapid etiological triage between life-threatening cardiovascular causes - acute coronary syndrome, pulmonary embolism, acute aortic syndrome, pericarditis, pneumothorax - and benign musculoskeletal or functional causes. Despite the ECG, high-sensitivity troponin and validated clinical scores, missed acute coronary syndrome at ED discharge has been reported in approximately 2% of patients (Pope et al., 2000), and the widespread use of "rule-out" strategies drives substantial use of coronary CTA and CT pulmonary angiography, with associated radiation exposure, costs and observation admissions. Diagnostic uncertainty is particularly pronounced in younger adults and in women, in whom the pretest probability of acute coronary syndrome is lower but pulmonary embolism, pneumothorax and pericarditis carry a non-negligible relative weight. Furthermore, several studies continue to highlight the increased use of irradiative imaging studies, with no clinical benefit in terms of diagnostic and prognostic (Roussel et al., 2023).

At present, the etiological work-up of acute dyspnea and chest pain relies on the combination of clinical examination, laboratory testing, and chest radiography (Olson et Davis, 2020; Miró et al., 2025). This strategy has well-documented limitations in the ED, particularly in older patients:

  • Clinical examination lacks discriminative power. Signs and symptoms are rarely disease-specific, and they may be blunted - or altogether absent - in the elderly (Metlay, Kapoor et Fine, 1997; Lien et al., 2002).
  • Chest radiography is often suboptimal. Films are frequently acquired with the patient supine, stooped, or unable to hold a full inspiration; the underlying parenchymal changes of ageing further compromise interpretation, and the radiographic signs themselves are notoriously nonspecific (Mueller-Lenke et al., 2006; Hawkins et al., 2009; Self et al., 2013).
  • Interpretation is poorly reproducible, and the initial ED diagnosis proves incorrect in nearly one third of cases (Hopstaken et al., 2004; Claessens et al., 2015).

ADx-One is an airborne ultrasound device which relies on Surface Motion Camera technology.

The ADx-One device is based on the non-invasive acquisition of minute chest surface movements induced by cardiopulmonary activity (~100 µm), using airborne ultrasound. These vibrations, resulting from mechanical interactions between the heart, lungs, and chest wall, constitute a physical signature that integrates multiple pathophysiological determinants (Shirkovskiy et al., 2018).

In particular, any modification in intrathoracic composition or mechanical properties-whether due to the presence of fluid (congestion, effusion), solid tissue changes (consolidation, atelectasis), or abnormal air presence (pneumothorax)-is likely to alter these vibratory signatures.

The overall purpose of this clinical investigation is to collect ADx-One acquisition data in emergency department patients in order to develop and evaluate on distinct cohorts a diagnostic support algorithm intended to assist discrimination of the origin of acute cardiopulmonary symptoms.

Typ studiów

Obserwacyjny

Zapisy (Szacowany)

2500

Kontakty i lokalizacje

Ta sekcja zawiera dane kontaktowe osób prowadzących badanie oraz informacje o tym, gdzie badanie jest przeprowadzane.

Kontakt w sprawie studiów

Lokalizacje studiów

      • Paris, Francja, 75013
        • La Pitié-Salpêtrière

Kryteria uczestnictwa

Badacze szukają osób, które pasują do określonego opisu, zwanego kryteriami kwalifikacyjnymi. Niektóre przykłady tych kryteriów to ogólny stan zdrowia danej osoby lub wcześniejsze leczenie.

Kryteria kwalifikacji

Wiek uprawniający do nauki

  • Dorosły
  • Starszy dorosły

Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników

Nie

Metoda próbkowania

Próbka prawdopodobieństwa

Badana populacja

Patients presenting to the emergency department for one or more of the following symptoms of less than 14 days' duration: acute non-traumatic dyspnea, or recent worsening of chronic dyspnea, or non-traumatic chest pain.

Opis

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presentation to the emergency department for one or more of the following symptoms of less than 14 days' duration: acute non-traumatic dyspnea, or recent worsening of chronic dyspnea, or non-traumatic chest pain.
  • Patient able to sit on a chair or on the edge of the bed
  • Affiliation to national health insurance
  • Able to receive study information, understand the study, and provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Immediate need for life-saving intervention or clinical instability incompatible with study procedures.

    • Shock or severe hemodynamic instability, for example systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg for at least 30 minutes or associated signs of hypoperfusion.
    • Altered mental status or any condition preventing provision of valid informed consent.
    • Known cognitive impairment preventing informed consent.
    • Transfer to another care site before the ADx-One acquisition can be performed.
    • Known pregnancy
    • Minor, legally protected adult, or person deprived of liberty.
    • Participation in another interventional clinical study judged incompatible with this study.

Plan studiów

Ta sekcja zawiera szczegółowe informacje na temat planu badania, w tym sposób zaprojektowania badania i jego pomiary.

Jak projektuje się badanie?

Szczegóły projektu

Kohorty i interwencje

Grupa / Kohorta
Interwencja / Leczenie
training cohort
All patients will follow the same intervention but data from this cohort will only be used for training the algorithm.
Patients from both cohorts will follow their usual routine, except for stepping in front of the machine so that one or two images of their chest and back can be taken.
Test Cohort
All patients will follow the same intervention but data from this cohort will only be used for testing the algorithm.
Patients from both cohorts will follow their usual routine, except for stepping in front of the machine so that one or two images of their chest and back can be taken.

Co mierzy badanie?

Podstawowe miary wyniku

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Number of correct assignations for cardiovascular involvement by the algorithm trained on labeled data.
Ramy czasowe: Within the first hour after ED admission.
Diagnostic performance for distinguishing cardiovascular from non-cardiovascular involvement, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios, and AUROC.
Within the first hour after ED admission.

Miary wyników drugorzędnych

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Number of correct assignations for acute heart failure with pulmonary edema by the algorithm.
Ramy czasowe: Within the first hour after ED admission.
Diagnostic performance for the diagnosis of acute heart failure with pulmonary edema, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios, and AUROC
Within the first hour after ED admission.
Number of correct assignations for COPD exacerbation by the algorithm.
Ramy czasowe: Within the first hour after ED admission.
Diagnostic performance for the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios, and AUROC.
Within the first hour after ED admission.
Number of correct assignations by the algorithm for lower respiratory tract infection, defined as alveolar or interstitial involvement from an infectious cause.
Ramy czasowe: Within the first hour after ED admission.
Diagnostic performance for the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infection, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios, and AUROC.
Within the first hour after ED admission.
Number of correct assignations by the algorithm for absence of pulmonary and cardiovascular involvement.
Ramy czasowe: Within the first hour after ED admission.
Diagnostic performance for the diagnosis of absence of both pulmonary and cardiovascular involvement, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios, and AUROC.
Within the first hour after ED admission.

Inne miary wyników

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Number of correct assignations by the algorithm for pulmonary involvement, either isolated or combined with cardiovascular involvement.
Ramy czasowe: Within the first hour after ED admission.
Diagnostic performance for distinguishing pulmonary from non-pulmonary involvement, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios, and AUROC. Pulmonary involvement is defined as any diagnosis of pulmonary or parenchymal lesion or bronchial involvement, including (but not limited to): upper respiratory tract infection, lower respiratory tract infection, exacerbation of obstructive ventilatory disorder such as asthma or COPD.
Within the first hour after ED admission.
Number of correct assignations by the algorithm for lung interstitial syndrome.
Ramy czasowe: Within the first hour after ED admission.
Diagnostic performance for the diagnosis of interstitial syndrome, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios, and AUROC.
Within the first hour after ED admission.
Number of correct assignations by the algorithm for detecting an impaired left ventricular ejection fraction.
Ramy czasowe: Within the first hour after ED admission.
Diagnostic performance for the diagnosis of a left ventricular ejection fraction < 55% at cardiac echography at any point in the month before or after the inclusion, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios, and AUROC.
Within the first hour after ED admission.
Number of correct assignations by the algorithm for pulmonary embolism.
Ramy czasowe: Within the first hour after ED admission.
Diagnostic performance for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, diagnosed either at computed tomography pulmonary angiogram or V/Q scan, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios, and AUROC.
Within the first hour after ED admission.
Number of correct assignations by the algorithm for upper respiratory tract infection.
Ramy czasowe: Within the first hour after ED admission.
Diagnostic performance for the diagnosis of upper respiratory tract infection, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios, and AUROC.
Within the first hour after ED admission.
Number of correct assignations by the algorithm for atelectasis.
Ramy czasowe: Within the first hour after ED admission.
Diagnostic performance for the diagnosis of atelectasis, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios, and AUROC.
Within the first hour after ED admission.
Number of correct assignations by the algorithm for alveolar syndrome.
Ramy czasowe: Within the first hour after ED admission.
Diagnostic performance for the diagnosis of alveolar syndrome, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios, and AUROC.
Within the first hour after ED admission.
Number of correct assignations by the algorithm for pleural effusion.
Ramy czasowe: Within the first hour after ED admission.
Diagnostic performance for the diagnosis of pleural effusion, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios, and AUROC.
Within the first hour after ED admission.
Number of correct assignations by the algorithm for pneumothorax.
Ramy czasowe: Within the first hour after ED admission.
Diagnostic performance for the diagnosis of pneumothorax, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios, and AUROC
Within the first hour after ED admission.

Współpracownicy i badacze

Tutaj znajdziesz osoby i organizacje zaangażowane w to badanie.

Śledczy

  • Główny śledczy: Yonathan Freund, Professor, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Daty zapisu na studia

Daty te śledzą postęp w przesyłaniu rekordów badań i podsumowań wyników do ClinicalTrials.gov. Zapisy badań i zgłoszone wyniki są przeglądane przez National Library of Medicine (NLM), aby upewnić się, że spełniają określone standardy kontroli jakości, zanim zostaną opublikowane na publicznej stronie internetowej.

Główne daty studiów

Rozpoczęcie studiów (Szacowany)

1 września 2026

Zakończenie podstawowe (Szacowany)

1 maja 2027

Ukończenie studiów (Szacowany)

1 maja 2027

Daty rejestracji na studia

Pierwszy przesłany

10 czerwca 2026

Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości

15 czerwca 2026

Pierwszy wysłany (Rzeczywisty)

17 czerwca 2026

Aktualizacje rekordów badań

Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)

17 czerwca 2026

Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości

15 czerwca 2026

Ostatnia weryfikacja

1 czerwca 2026

Więcej informacji

Terminy związane z tym badaniem

Plan dla danych uczestnika indywidualnego (IPD)

Planujesz udostępniać dane poszczególnych uczestników (IPD)?

NIEZDECYDOWANY

Opis planu IPD

Need to check this internally, also on IP.

Informacje o lekach i urządzeniach, dokumenty badawcze

Bada produkt leczniczy regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Bada produkt urządzenia regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .

Badania kliniczne na Ból w klatce piersiowej

Subskrybuj