Elective surgical removal of migrated intrauterine contraceptive devices from within the peritoneal cavity: a comparison between open and laparoscopic removal

Frances R Mosley, Navneel Shahi, Mohamed A Kurer, Frances R Mosley, Navneel Shahi, Mohamed A Kurer

Abstract

Background: Intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCDs) comprise the most popular form of reversible contraception. Uterine perforation is a rare but potentially serious complication associated with their use. We examined all reported cases of elective surgical removal of peritoneally migrated IUCDs, to compare laparoscopic and open approaches, and to identify beneficial surgical techniques.

Database: MEDLINE and Embase were searched using the following medical subject heading terms: (IUCD or IUD or IUS or intrauterine device or intrauterine devices, copper or intrauterine devices, medicated) AND (migrated or displaced or foreign-body migration or intrauterine device migration) AND (peritoneal or peritoneal cavity). The Cochrane Library was searched using the terms IUCD, IUD, IUS, and intrauterine device. Additional studies were identified by manually searching the reference lists of the studies found through database search. Studies were included irrespective of language or publication type.

Discussion: We identified 129 cases, reported in 30 studies. In the majority of cases (93.0% [120/129]), surgery was attempted laparoscopically; however 22.5% (27/120) of surgeries were converted to open operations, giving an overall rate of open surgery of 27.9% (36/129). This systematic review supports the use of laparoscopic surgery for elective removal of migrated IUCDs from the peritoneal cavity. With complications rarely reported, it is also likely the procedure could be undertaken in an outpatient setting. The use of intraoperative adjuncts (ie, cystoscopy) and the rate of conversion to open surgery are influenced by the site of the IUCD. Therefore, accurate preoperative localization of the device is advised.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow chart of the systematic review process.

References

    1. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division World Contraceptive Use 2009. 2009. (POP/DB/CP/Rev2009)
    1. Sivin I, Batár I. State-of-the-art of non-hormonal methods of contraception: III. Intrauterine devices. Eur J Contracept. 2010;15(2):96–112
    1. Broso PR, Buffetti G. The IUD and uterine perforation. Minerva Ginecol. 1994;46(9):505–509
    1. Brar R, Doddi S, Ramasamy A, Sinha P. A forgotten migrated intrauterine contraceptive device is not always innocent: a case report. Case Rep Med. 2010.
    1. Bitterman A, Lefel O, Segev Y, Lavie O. Laparoscopic removal of an intrauterine device following colon perforation. JSLS. 2010;14(3):456–458
    1. Roberts J, Ledger W. Operative removal of intraperitoneal intra-uterine contraceptive devices—a reappraisal. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;112:863–865
    1. Olartecoechea B, Aub M, Garca Manero M. Migrated intrauterine device removal with laparoscopy in a pregnant woman. Gynecol Surg. 2009;6:S46
    1. Balci O, Mahmoud AS, Capar M, Colakoglu MC. Diagnosis and management of intra-abdominal, mislocated intrauterine devices. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;281(6):1019–1022
    1. Mahmoud MS, Merhi ZO. Computed tomography-assisted laparoscopic removal of intraabdominally migrated levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;281(4):627–630
    1. Gupta I, Sawhney H, Mahajan U. Laparoscopic removal of translocated intrauterine contraceptive devices. Aust NZJ Obstet Gynaecol. 1989;29:352–355
    1. World Health Organisation (WHO) Mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of intrauterine devices. Report of a WHO Scientific Group. WHO Technical Report Series. 1987;753:1–91
    1. Adoni A, Ben Chetrit A. The management of intrauterine devices following uterine perforation. Contraception. 1991;43(1):77–81
    1. Brooks PG, Berci G, Lawrence A, Slipyan P, Wade ME. Removal of intra-abdominal intrauterine contraceptive devices through a peritoneoscope with the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy to aid localization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;113(1):104–106
    1. Demir SC, Cetin MT, Ucunsak IF, Atay Y, Toksoz L, Kadayifci O. Removal of intra-abdominal intrauterine device by laparoscopy. Eur J Contracep Reprod Health Care. 2002;7(1):20–23
    1. Eke N, Okpani AO. Extrauterine translocated contraceptive device: a presentation of five cases and revisit of the enigmatic issues of iatrogenic perforation and migration. Afr J Reprod Health. 2003;7(3):117–123
    1. Haimov-Kochman R, Doviner V, Amsalem H, Prus D, Adoni A, Lavy Y. Intraperitoneal levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device following uterine perforation: the role of progestins in adhesion formation. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(5):990–993
    1. Heinberg E, McCoy T, Pasic R. The perforated intrauterine device: endoscopic retrieval. JSLS. 2008;12:97–100
    1. Koetsauvang S. Laparascopic removal of a perforated copper-T IUD. A case report. Contraception. 1973;7(4):327–332
    1. Markovitch O, Klein Z, Gidoni Y, Holzinger M, Beyth Y. Extrauterine mislocated IUD: is surgical removal mandatory? Contraception. 2002;66(2):105–108
    1. Miranda L, Settembre A, Capasso P, Cuccurullo D, Pisaniello D, Corcione F. Laparoscopic removal of an intraperitoneal translocated intrauterine contraceptive device. Eur J Contracep Reprod Health Care. 2003;8(2):122–125
    1. Mülayim B, Mülayim S, Celik NY. A lost intrauterine device. Guess where we found it and how it happened? Eur J Contracep Reprod Health Care. 2006;11(1):47–49
    1. Ozgun MT, Batukan C, Serin IS, Ozcelik B, Basbug M, Dolanbay M. Surgical management of intra-abdominal mislocated intrauterine devices. Contraception. 2007;75(2):96–100
    1. Sun C-C, Chang C-C, Yu M-H. Far-migrated intra-abdominal intrauterine device with abdominal pain. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;47(2):244–246
    1. Robinson R. Copper intrauterine devices in the abdomen. Br J Med. 1978;2:1068–1071
    1. Ikechebelu JI, Mbamara SU. Laparoscopic retrieval of perforated intrauterine device. Niger J Clin Pract. 2008;11(4):394–395
    1. Osborne J, Bennett M. Removal of intrabdominal intra-uterine device. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1978;85:868–871
    1. Pont M, Lantheaume S. Efficacite d'un sterilet au levonorgestrel migre en intra-abdominal. A propos d'un cas et revue de la litterature. [Abdominal migration of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device. Case report and review of the literature]. J Gynécol Obstét Biol Reprod. 2009;38(2):179–181
    1. Ferchiou M, Zhioua F, Hasnaoui M, Sghaier S, Jedoui A, Meriah S. Traitement coelio-chirurgical du sterilet intraperitoneal. [Laparoscopic surgery of an intraperitoneal intrauterine device.] Rev Fr Gynécol Obstét. 1995;90(10):409–411
    1. Hepp H. Zum problem des “verlorenen” intrauterinpessars. [The problem of the lost intrauterine contraceptive device.] Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1977;37(8):653–659
    1. Dunn J, Zerbe M, Bloomquist J, Ellerkman R, Bent A. Ectopic IUD complicating pregnancy: a case report. J Reprod Med. 2002;47:57–59
    1. Virkud AM, Shah SK. Laparoscopic retrieval of transmigrated IUDS (report of 3 cases). J Postgrad Med. 1989;35(2):116–117
    1. Siegler AM. Removal of ectopic intrauterine contraceptive devices aided by laparoscopy. A report of 3 cases and a review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1973;115(2):158–162
    1. Ratten GJ. Removal of an intraperitoneal intrauterine device under laparoscopic control. Med J Aust. 1971;2(21):1077–1078
    1. Tuncay Y, Tuncay E, Guzin K, Ozturk D, Omurcan C, Yucel N. Transuterine migration as a complication of intrauterine contraceptive devices: Six case reports. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2004;9(3):194–200
    1. Malik P, Jameela B, Hameed F. Asymptomatic long standing iatrogenic abdominal foreign body - A rarity. JK Pract. 1999;6(2):150
    1. Landowski P, Cristalli B, Levardon M, de Joliniere J. Adhesion lysis and removal of an intraperitoneal contraceptive device by celioscopy. Rev Fr Gynécol Obstét . 1990;85(11):623–625

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj