Enhancing neural markers of attention in children with ADHD using a digital therapeutic

Courtney L Gallen, Joaquin A Anguera, Molly R Gerdes, Alexander J Simon, Elena Cañadas, Elysa J Marco, Courtney L Gallen, Joaquin A Anguera, Molly R Gerdes, Alexander J Simon, Elena Cañadas, Elysa J Marco

Abstract

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental condition characterized by diminished attentional control. Critically, these difficulties are related to negative consequences in real-life functioning both during development and into adulthood. There is now growing evidence that modulating the underlying neural circuits related to attention can improve behavior and brain function in children with ADHD. We have previously shown that game-based digital therapeutics targeting a key neural marker of attention-midline frontal theta (MFT)-yield positive effects on attentional control in several populations. However, the effects of such digital therapeutics in children with ADHD and no other comorbidities has not been yet examined. To address this gap, we assessed a sample of 25 children with ADHD (8-12 years old) on neural, behavioral, and clinical metrics of attention before and after a 4-week at-home intervention on an iPad targeting MFT circuitry. We found that children showed enhancements on a neural measure of attention (MFT power), as well as on objective behavioral measures of attention and parent reports of clinical ADHD symptoms. Importantly, we observed relationships between the neural and behavioral cognitive improvements, demonstrating that those children who showed the largest intervention-related neural gains were also those that improved the most on the behavioral tasks indexing attention. These findings provide support for using targeted, digital therapeutics to enhance multiple features of attentional control in children with ADHD. Study registration: ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT03844269) https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03844269.

Conflict of interest statement

JAA was paid as a consultant by Cortica to assist with study development, EEG equipment setup, neural and behavioral analysis, and manuscript preparation. EJM, MG, BC are employees of Cortica. EC is employed by Akili Interactive Labs, may own stock options, and is a patent holder (WO/2018/027080) for Processor Implemented Systems and Methods for Measuring Cognitive Abilities. Funding for this study was sponsored by Akili Interactive Labs.

Figures

Fig 1. CONSORT flow diagram.
Fig 1. CONSORT flow diagram.
Fig 2. Changes in primary outcome metrics:…
Fig 2. Changes in primary outcome metrics: Neural markers of attention.
a Time course of midline frontal theta (MFT) pre- and post-intervention at each 40 ms time bin during the perceptual discrimination task, where 0 ms represents stimulus onset. Solid lines represent the mean and shaded areas represent 95% bootstrapped confidence intervals (1000 bootstrap iterations). b Intervention-related improvements in MFT at early, peak, and late 120 ms composite windows, also illustrated through topographic heat maps with the 6 electrodes of interest highlighted with a dotted bounding box. Data are presented as mean ± 95% bootstrapped confidence intervals (1000 bootstrap iterations), and circles represent individual participants. P-values represent repeated-measures ANOVAs comparing pre- and post-intervention MFT at each composite window.
Fig 3. Changes in exploratory outcome metrics:…
Fig 3. Changes in exploratory outcome metrics: Behavioral and parent-report measures of attention.
Intervention-related changes in objective behavioral and parent-report measures of attention, specifically a response time (RT) on the perceptual discrimination task, b tau on the sustained attention task, and c points on the Vanderbilt inattention subscale (parent-report). Data are presented as mean ± 95% bootstrapped confidence intervals (1000 bootstrap iterations), and circles represent individual participants. d Pearson correlations between midline frontal theta (MFT) improvements at each composite window and the behavioral and parent-report improvements.

References

    1. Danielson ML, Bitsko RH, Ghandour RM, Holbrook JR, Kogan MD, Blumberg SJ. Prevalence of Parent-Reported ADHD Diagnosis and Associated Treatment Among U.S. Children and Adolescents, 2016. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychology. 2018;47: 1–14. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2017.1417860
    1. Bavelier D, Green CS. Enhancing Attentional Control: Lessons from Action Video Games. Neuron. 2019;104: 147–163. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.09.031
    1. Mishra J, Gazzaley A. Harnessing the neuroplastic potential of the human brain & the future of cognitive rehabilitation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2014;8: 218. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00218
    1. Anguera JA, Gazzaley A. Video games, cognitive exercises, and the enhancement of cognitive abilities. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. 2015;4: 160–165. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.06.002
    1. Willcutt EG, Nigg JT, Pennington BF, Solanto MV, Rohde LA, Tannock R, et al.. Validity of DSM–IV Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptom Dimensions and Subtypes. J Abnorm Psychol. 2012;121: 991–1010. doi: 10.1037/a0027347
    1. Rabiner DL, Godwin J, Dodge KA. Predicting Academic Achievement and Attainment: The Contribution of Early Academic Skills, Attention Difficulties, and Social Competence. School Psychol Rev. 2016;45: 250–267. doi: 10.17105/spr45-2.250-267
    1. Connors LL, Connolly J, Toplak ME. Self-Reported Inattention in Early Adolescence in a Community Sample. J Atten Disord. 2012;16: 60–70. doi: 10.1177/1087054710379734
    1. Subcommittee on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, Steering Committee on Quality Improvement and Management. ADHD: Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents. 2011.
    1. Pelham WE, Fabiano GA. Evidence-Based Psychosocial Treatments for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychology. 2008;37: 184–214. doi: 10.1080/15374410701818681
    1. Pliszka SR. Pharmacologic Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Efficacy, Safety and Mechanisms of Action. Neuropsychol Rev. 2007;17: 61–72. doi: 10.1007/s11065-006-9017-3
    1. Bussing R, Zima BT, Gary FA, Garvan CW. Barriers to detection, help-seeking, and service use for children with ADHD symptoms. J Behav Heal Serv Res. 2003;30: 176–189. doi: 10.1007/bf02289806
    1. Owens PL, Hoagwood K, Horwitz SM, Leaf PJ, Poduska JM, Kellam SG, et al.. Barriers to Children’s Mental Health Services. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002;41: 731–738. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200206000-00013
    1. Peng P, Miller AC. Does attention training work? A selective meta-analysis to explore the effects of attention training and moderators. Learn Individ Differ. 2016;45: 77–87. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.012
    1. Cavanagh JF, Frank MJ. Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014;18: 414–421. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.012
    1. Clayton MS, Yeung N, Kadosh RC. The roles of cortical oscillations in sustained attention. Trends Cogn Sci. 2015;19: 188–195. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.02.004
    1. Paszkiel S. Analysis and Classification of EEG Signals for Brain–Computer Interfaces. Stud Comput Intell. 2019; 3–9. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-30581-9_2
    1. Anguera JA, Boccanfuso J, Rintoul JL, Al-Hashimi O, Faraji F, Janowich J, et al.. Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults. Nature. 2013;501: 97–101. doi: 10.1038/nature12486
    1. Anguera JA, Brandes-Aitken AN, Antovich AD, Rolle CE, Desai SS, Marco EJ. A pilot study to determine the feasibility of enhancing cognitive abilities in children with sensory processing dysfunction. PLoS ONE. 2017;12. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172616
    1. Wolraich ML, Lambert W, Doffing MA, Bickman L, Simmons T, Worley K. Psychometric Properties of the Vanderbilt ADHD Diagnostic Parent Rating Scale in a Referred Population. J Pediatr Psychol. 2003;28: 559–568. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsg046
    1. Kollins SH, DeLoss DJ, Cañadas E, Lutz J, Findling RL, Keefe RSE, et al.. A novel digital intervention for actively reducing severity of paediatric ADHD (STARS-ADHD): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Digital Health. 2020;2: e168–e178. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30017-0
    1. Castellanos FX, Proal E. Large-scale brain systems in ADHD: beyond the prefrontal–striatal model. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012;16: 17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.007
    1. Pfeiffer B, Daly BP, Nicholls EG, Gullo DF. Assessing Sensory Processing Problems in Children With and Without Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Phys Occup Ther Pedi. 2014;35: 1–12. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2014.904471
    1. Lane SJ, Reynolds S, Thacker L. Sensory Over-Responsivity and ADHD: Differentiating Using Electrodermal Responses, Cortisol, and Anxiety. Frontiers Integr Neurosci. 2010;4: 8. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2010.00008
    1. Parush S, Sohmer H, Steinberg A, Kaitz M. Somatosensory function in boys with ADHD and tactile defensiveness. Physiol Behav. 2007;90: 553–558. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.11.004
    1. Duncan L, Georgiades K, Wang L, Lieshout RJV, MacMillan HL, Ferro MA, et al.. Psychometric Evaluation of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID). Psychol Assessment. 2018;30: 916–928. doi: 10.1037/pas0000541
    1. Rubinson M, Horowitz I, Naim-Feil J, Gothelf D, Levit-Binnun N, Moses E. Effects of methylphenidate on the ERP amplitude in youth with ADHD: A double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over EEG study. Plos One. 2019;14: e0217383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217383
    1. Baijot S, Cevallos C, Zarka D, Leroy A, Slama H, Colin C, et al.. EEG Dynamics of a Go/Nogo Task in Children with ADHD. Brain Sci. 2017;7: 167. doi: 10.3390/brainsci7120167
    1. Kóbor A, Takács Á, Bryce D, Szűcs D, Honbolygó F, Nagy P, et al.. Children With ADHD Show Impairments in Multiple Stages of Information Processing in a Stroop Task: An ERP Study. Dev Neuropsychol. 2015;40: 329–347. doi: 10.1080/87565641.2015.1086770
    1. Strandburg RJ, Marsh JT, Brown WS, Asarnow RF, Higa J, Harper R, et al.. Continuous-processing-related event-related potentials in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiat. 1996;40: 964–980. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(95)00545-5
    1. Greenberg LM, Waldmant ID. Developmental normative data on the Test of Variables of Attention (TOVATM). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 1993;34: 1019–1030. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1993.tb01105.x
    1. Heathcote A, Popiel SJ, Mewhort DJK. Analysis of Response Time Distributions: An Example Using the Stroop Task. Psychol Bull. 1991;109: 340–347. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.340
    1. Leth-Steensen C, Elbaz ZK, Douglas VI. Mean response times, variability, and skew in the responding of ADHD children: a response time distributional approach. Acta Psychol. 2000;104: 167–190. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(00)00019-6
    1. Henríquez-Henríquez MP, Billeke P, Henríquez H, Zamorano FJ, Rothhammer F, Aboitiz F. Intra-Individual Response Variability Assessed by Ex-Gaussian Analysis may be a New Endophenotype for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Frontiers Psychiatry. 2015;5: 197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00197
    1. Hervey AS, Epstein JN, Curry JF, Tonev S, Arnold LE, Conners CK, et al.. Reaction Time Distribution Analysis of Neuropsychological Performance in an ADHD Sample. Child Neuropsychol. 2007;12: 125–140. doi: 10.1080/09297040500499081
    1. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 1977; 179–213. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-179060-8.50011-6
    1. Ziegler DA, Simon AJ, Gallen CL, Skinner S, Janowich JR, Volponi JJ, et al.. Closed-loop digital meditation improves sustained attention in young adults. Nature Human Behaviour. 2019;3: 1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0525-y
    1. Cohen MX, Cavanagh JF. Single-Trial Regression Elucidates the Role of Prefrontal Theta Oscillations in Response Conflict. Front Psychol. 2011;2: 30. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00030
    1. Enriquez-Geppert S, Huster RJ, Scharfenort R, Mokom ZN, Zimmermann J, Herrmann CS. Modulation of frontal-midline theta by neurofeedback. Biol Psychol. 2014;95: 59–69. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.02.019
    1. Enriquez-Geppert S, Huster RJ, Figge C, Herrmann CS. Self-regulation of frontal-midline theta facilitates memory updating and mental set shifting. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014;8: 420. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00420
    1. Hsu WY, Zanto TP, van Schouwenburg MR, Gazzaley A. Enhancement of multitasking performance and neural oscillations by transcranial alternating current stimulation. PLoS ONE. 2017;12: e0178579–17. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178579
    1. Wang S, Yang C, Liu Y, Shao Z, Jackson T. Early and late stage processing abnormalities in autism spectrum disorders: An ERP study. Plos One. 2017;12: e0178542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178542
    1. Luck SJ, Hillyard SA, Mouloua M, Woldorff MG, Clark VP, Hawkins HL. Effects of Spatial Cuing on Luminance Detectability: Psychophysical and Electrophysiological Evidence for Early Selection. J Exp Psychology Hum Percept Perform. 1994;20: 887–904. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.20.4.887
    1. Hillyard SA, Anllo-Vento L. Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. Proc National Acad Sci. 1998;95: 781–787. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.3.781
    1. Jurigova BG, Gerdes MR, Anguera JA, Marco EJ. Sustained benefits of cognitive training in children with inattention, three-year follow-up. Plos One. 2021;16: e0246449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246449
    1. Anguera JA, Schachtner J, Simon AJ, Volponi J, Javed S, Gallen CL, et al.. Long-term maintenance of multitasking abilities following video game training in older adults. Neurobiol Aging. 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.02.023

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj