Augmented Reduced-Intensity Regimen Does Not Improve Postallogeneic Transplant Outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Charles Craddock, Aimee Jackson, Justin Loke, Shamyla Siddique, Andrea Hodgkinson, John Mason, Georgia Andrew, Sandeep Nagra, Ram Malladi, Andrew Peniket, Maria Gilleece, Rahuman Salim, Eleni Tholouli, Victoria Potter, Charles Crawley, Keith Wheatley, Rachel Protheroe, Paresh Vyas, Ann Hunter, Anne Parker, Keith Wilson, Jiri Pavlu, Jenny Byrne, Richard Dillon, Naeem Khan, Nicholas McCarthy, Sylvie D Freeman, Charles Craddock, Aimee Jackson, Justin Loke, Shamyla Siddique, Andrea Hodgkinson, John Mason, Georgia Andrew, Sandeep Nagra, Ram Malladi, Andrew Peniket, Maria Gilleece, Rahuman Salim, Eleni Tholouli, Victoria Potter, Charles Crawley, Keith Wheatley, Rachel Protheroe, Paresh Vyas, Ann Hunter, Anne Parker, Keith Wilson, Jiri Pavlu, Jenny Byrne, Richard Dillon, Naeem Khan, Nicholas McCarthy, Sylvie D Freeman

Abstract

Purpose: Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens have extended the curative potential of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation to older adults with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplasia (MDS) but are associated with a high risk of disease relapse. Strategies to reduce recurrence are urgently required. Registry data have demonstrated improved outcomes using a sequential transplant regimen, fludarabine/amsacrine/cytarabine-busulphan (FLAMSA-Bu), but the impact of this intensified conditioning regimen has not been studied in randomized trials.

Patients and methods: Two hundred forty-four patients (median age, 59 years) with high-risk AML (n = 164) or MDS (n = 80) were randomly assigned 1:1 to a fludarabine-based RIC regimen or FLAMSA-Bu. Pretransplant measurable residual disease (MRD) was monitored by flow cytometry (MFC-MRD) and correlated with outcome.

Results: There was no difference in 2-year overall survival (hazard ratio 1.05 [85% CI, 0.80 to 1.38] P = .81) or cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) (hazard ratio 0.94 [95%CI, 0.60 to 1.46] P = .81) between the control and FLAMSA-Bu arms. Detectable pretransplant MFC-MRD was associated with an increased CIR (2-year CIR 41.0% v 20.0%, P = .01) in the overall trial cohort with a comparable prognostic impact when measured by an unsupervised analysis approach. There was no evidence of interaction between MRD status and conditioning regimen intensity for relapse or survival. Acquisition of full donor T-cell chimerism at 3 months abrogated the adverse impact of pretransplant MRD on CIR and overall survival.

Conclusion: The intensified RIC conditioning regimen, FLAMSA-Bu, did not improve outcomes in adults transplanted for high-risk AML or MDS regardless of pretransplant MRD status. Our data instead support the exploration of interventions with the ability to accelerate acquisition of full donor T-cell chimerism as a tractable strategy to improve outcomes in patients allografted for AML.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Trial CONSORT diagram. FBA, fludarabine/busulphan/alemtuzumab; FB-ATG, fludarabine/busulphan/antithymocyte globulin; FMA, fludarabine/melphalan/alemtuzumab; FLAMSA-Bu, fludarabine/amsacrine/cytarabine-busulphan.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
(A) OS, (B) EFS, and (C) CIR by conditioning regimen in the intention-to-treat population. 85% CIs are reported for overall survival to align with the type I error rate applied in the sample size calculation (described in the Data Supplement). CIR, cumulative incidence of relapse; EFS, event-free survival; FLAMSA-Bu, fludarabine/amsacrine/cytarabine-busulphan; HR, hazard ratio; OS, overall survival.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
(A) CIR by conventional MFC-MRD status, (B) CIR by conventional MFC-MRD with 0.2% cutoff, (C) CIR by unsupervised (computational) MFC-MRD with 1% cutoff, (D) CIR by unsupervised (computational) combined MFC-MRD test status. Impact of flow cytometric MRD on outcomes of transplanted patients are shown with comparison of results from conventional and unsupervised (computational) analysis approaches. Unsupervised MFC-MRD cutoff is higher than conventional MFC-MRD as the former values summate all quantifiable nonoverlapping abnormal blast subpopulations from an antibody combination, whereas conventional MFC-MRD values are from a single LAIP. UnSup-combined MRD is unsupervised MRD applying criteria of MRD-positive = aberrant blasts in at least two of the three antibody combinations (standard and stem cell) and MRD-negative or equivocal = aberrant blasts in 0-1 of 3 antibody combinations. CIR, Cumulative incidence of relapse; LIAP, leukemia-associated immunophenotype; MFC-MRD, flow cytometric measurable residual disease; UnSup, unsupervised (computational) MRD analysis.
FIG 4.
FIG 4.
(A) OS by month 3 Chimerism with pretransplant MRD status and (B) CIR by month 3 Chimerism with pretransplant MRD status. Outcomes are for transplanted patients who were alive and relapse-free at day + 100. MRD status is by conventional flow MRD. Negative—full, pretransplant MRD-negative and month 3 full donor T-cell chimerism. Positive—full, pretransplant MRD-positive and month 3 full donor T-cell chimerism. Negative—mixed, pretransplant MRD-negative and month 3 mixed donor T-cell chimerism. Positive—mixed, pretransplant MRD-positive and month 3 mixed donor T-cell chimerism. CIR, Cumulative incidence of relapse; MRD, measurable residual disease; OS, overall survival.

References

    1. Jethava YS Sica S Savani B, et al. : Conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants in acute myeloid leukemia. Bone Marrow Transpl 52:1504-1511, 2017
    1. Scott BL Pasquini MC Logan BR, et al. : Myeloablative versus reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. J Clin Oncol 35:1154-1161, 2017
    1. Beelen DW Trenschel R Stelljes M, et al. : Treosulfan or busulfan plus fludarabine as conditioning treatment before allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation for older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (MC-FludT. 14/L): A randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol 7:e28-e39, 2020
    1. Ciurea SO Kongtim P Varma A, et al. : Is there an optimal conditioning for older patients with AML receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation? Blood 135:449-452, 2020
    1. Schmid C Schleuning M Ledderose G, et al. : Sequential regimen of chemotherapy, reduced-intensity conditioning for allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, and prophylactic donor lymphocyte transfusion in high-risk acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. J Clin Oncol 23:5675-5687, 2005
    1. Schmid C Schleuning M Schwerdtfeger R, et al. : Long-term survival in refractory acute myeloid leukemia after sequential treatment with chemotherapy and reduced-intensity conditioning for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood 108:1092-1099, 2006
    1. Malard F Labopin M Stuhler G, et al. : Sequential intensified conditioning regimen allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adult patients with intermediate- or high-risk acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission: A study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl 23:278-284, 2017
    1. Maurillo L Buccisano F Del Principe MI, et al. : Toward optimization of postremission therapy for residual disease-positive patients with acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 26:4944-4951, 2008
    1. Terwijn M van Putten WL Kelder A, et al. : High prognostic impact of flow cytometric minimal residual disease detection in acute myeloid leukemia: Data from the HOVON/SAKK AML 42A study. J Clin Oncol 31:3889-3897, 2013
    1. Freeman SD Hills RK Virgo P, et al. : Measurable residual disease at induction redefines partial response in acute myeloid leukemia and stratifies outcomes in patients at standard risk without NPM1 mutations. J Clin Oncol 36:1486-1497, 2018
    1. Balsat M Renneville A Thomas X, et al. : Postinduction minimal residual disease predicts outcome and benefit from allogeneic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia with NPM1 mutation: A study by the Acute Leukemia French Association Group. J Clin Oncol 35:185-193, 2017
    1. Ivey A Hills RK Simpson MA, et al. : Assessment of minimal residual disease in standard-risk AML. N Engl J Med 374:422-433, 2016
    1. Jongen-Lavrencic M Grob T Hanekamp D, et al. : Molecular minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 378:1189-1199, 2018
    1. Morita K Kantarjian HM Wang F, et al. : Clearance of somatic mutations at remission and the risk of relapse in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 36:1788-1797, 2018
    1. Rucker FG Agrawal M Corbacioglu A, et al. : Measurable residual disease monitoring in acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21)(q22;q22.1): Results from the AML Study Group. Blood 134:1608-1618, 2019
    1. Schuurhuis GJ Heuser M Freeman S, et al. : Minimal/measurable residual disease in AML: A consensus document from the European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party. Blood 131:1275-1291, 2018
    1. Walter RB Buckley SA Pagel JM, et al. : Significance of minimal residual disease before myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for AML in first and second complete remission. Blood 122:1813-1821, 2013
    1. Walter RB Gooley TA Wood BL, et al. : Impact of pretransplantation minimal residual disease, as detected by multiparametric flow cytometry, on outcome of myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 29:1190-1197, 2011
    1. Araki D Wood BL Othus M, et al. : Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia: Time to move toward a minimal residual disease-based definition of complete remission? J Clin Oncol 34:329-336, 2016
    1. Oran B Jorgensen JL Marin D, et al. : Pre-transplantation minimal residual disease with cytogenetic and molecular diagnostic features improves risk stratification in acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 102:110-117, 2017
    1. Anthias C Dignan FL Morilla R, et al. : Pre-transplant MRD predicts outcome following reduced-intensity and myeloablative allogeneic hemopoietic SCT in AML. Bone Marrow Transpl 49:679-683, 2014
    1. Buccisano F Maurillo L Piciocchi A, et al. : Pre-transplant persistence of minimal residual disease does not contraindicate allogeneic stem cell transplantation for adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Bone Marrow Transpl 52:473-475, 2017
    1. Ustun C Courville EL DeFor T, et al. : Myeloablative, but not reduced-intensity, conditioning overcomes the negative effect of flow-cytometric evidence of leukemia in acute myeloid leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl 22:669-675, 2016
    1. Gilleece MH Labopin M Yakoub-Agha I, et al. : Measurable residual disease, conditioning regimen intensity, and age predict outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: A registry analysis of 2292 patients by the Acute Leukemia Working Party European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Am J Hematol 93:1142-1152, 2018
    1. Walter RB Gyurkocza B Storer BE, et al. : Comparison of minimal residual disease as outcome predictor for AML patients in first complete remission undergoing myeloablative or nonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Leukemia 29:137-144, 2015
    1. Getta BM Devlin SM Levine RL, et al. : Multicolor flow cytometry and multigene next-generation sequencing are complementary and highly predictive for relapse in acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl 23:1064-1071, 2017
    1. Buckley SA Wood BL Othus M, et al. : Minimal residual disease prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia: A meta-analysis. Haematologica 102:865-873, 2017
    1. Guolo F Minetto P Clavio M, et al. : Combining flow cytometry and WT1 assessment improves the prognostic value of pre-transplant minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 102:e348-e351, 2017
    1. Dillon R Hills R Freeman S, et al. : Molecular MRD status and outcome after transplantation in NPM1-mutated AML. Blood 135:680-688, 2020
    1. Thol F Gabdoulline R Liebich A, et al. : Measurable residual disease monitoring by NGS before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in AML. Blood 132:1703-1713, 2018
    1. Hourigan CS Dillon LW Gui G, et al. : Impact of conditioning intensity of allogeneic transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia with genomic evidence of residual disease. J Clin Oncol 38:1273-1283, 2020
    1. Grimwade D Hills RK Moorman AV, et al. : Refinement of cytogenetic classification in acute myeloid leukemia: Determination of prognostic significance of rare recurring chromosomal abnormalities among 5876 younger adult patients treated in the United Kingdom Medical Research Council Trials. Blood 116:354-365, 2010
    1. Przepiorka D Weisdorf D Martin P, et al. : 1994 consensus conference on acute GVHD grading. Bone Marrow Transpl 15:825-828, 1995
    1. Shulman HM Sullivan KM Weiden PL, et al. : Chronic graft-versus-host syndrome in man. A long-term clinicopathologic study of 20 Seattle patients. Am J Med 69:204-217, 1980
    1. Rambaldi A Grassi A Masciulli A, et al. : Busulfan plus cyclophosphamide versus busulfan plus fludarabine as a preparative regimen for allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: An open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 16:1525-1536, 2015
    1. Blaise D Tabrizi R Boher JM, et al. : Randomized study of 2 reduced-intensity conditioning strategies for human leukocyte antigen-matched, related allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: Prospective clinical and socioeconomic evaluation. Cancer 119:602-611, 2013
    1. Craddock C Nagra S Peniket A, et al. : Factors predicting long-term survival after T-cell depleted reduced intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 95:989-995, 2010
    1. Craddock C Jilani N Siddique S, et al. : Tolerability and clinical activity of post-transplantation azacitidine in patients allografted for acute myeloid leukemia treated on the RICAZA trial. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl 22:385-390, 2016
    1. de Lima M Oran B Champlin RE, et al. : CC-486 maintenance after stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl 24:2017-2024, 2018
    1. Gao L Zhang Y Wang S, et al. : Effect of rhG-CSF combined with decitabine prophylaxis on relapse of patients with high-risk MRD-negative AML after HSCT: An open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 38:4249-4259, 2020

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj