Mediators of ertugliflozin effects on heart failure and kidney outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Matthew W Segar, Ahmed A Kolkailah, Robert Frederich, Annpey Pong, Christopher P Cannon, Francesco Cosentino, Samuel Dagogo-Jack, Darren K McGuire, Richard E Pratley, Chih-Chin Liu, Mario Maldonado, Jie Liu, Nilo B Cater, Ambarish Pandey, David Z I Cherney, Matthew W Segar, Ahmed A Kolkailah, Robert Frederich, Annpey Pong, Christopher P Cannon, Francesco Cosentino, Samuel Dagogo-Jack, Darren K McGuire, Richard E Pratley, Chih-Chin Liu, Mario Maldonado, Jie Liu, Nilo B Cater, Ambarish Pandey, David Z I Cherney

Abstract

Aims: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been shown to reduce the risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) and composite kidney outcomes, but the mediators underlying these benefits are unknown.

Materials and methods: Among participants from VERTIS CV, a trial of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease randomized to ertugliflozin versus placebo, Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate the percentage mediation of ertugliflozin efficacy on the first HHF and kidney composite outcome in 26 potential mediators. Time-dependent approaches were used to evaluate associations between early (change from baseline to the first post-baseline measurement) and average (weighted average of change from baseline using all post-baseline measurements) changes in covariates with clinical outcomes.

Results: For the HHF analyses, early changes in four biomarkers (haemoglobin, haematocrit, serum albumin and urate) and average changes in seven biomarkers (early biomarkers + weight, chloride and serum protein) were identified as fulfilling the criteria as mediators of ertugliflozin effects on the risk of HHF. Similar results were observed for the composite kidney outcome, with early changes in four biomarkers (glycated haemoglobin, haemoglobin, haematocrit and urate), and average changes in five biomarkers [early biomarkers (not glycated haemoglobin) + weight, serum albumin] mediating the effects of ertugliflozin on the kidney outcome.

Conclusions: In these analyses from the VERTIS CV trial, markers of volume status and haemoconcentration and/or haematopoiesis were the strongest mediators of the effect of ertugliflozin on reducing risk of HHF and composite kidney outcomes in the early and average change periods.

Gov identifier: NCT01986881.

Keywords: Ertugliflozin; SGLT2 inhibitor; VERTIS CV; hospitalization for heart failure; kidney outcomes; mediation analyses; type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Conflict of interest statement

MWS and AAK declare that they have no competing interests. CPC has received research grants from Amgen, Better Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Merck, Novo Nordisk and Pfizer, as well as fees from Aegerion/Amryt, Alnylam, Amarin, Amgen, Applied Therapeutics, Ascendia, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Lexicon, Merck, Pfizer, Rhoshan and Sanofi; and serves on Data and Safety Monitoring Boards for the Veteran's Administration, Applied Therapeutics, and Novo Nordisk. FC has received research grants from the Swedish Research Council, Swedish Heart & Lung Foundation, and King Gustav V and Queen Victoria Foundation; and has received consulting fees from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Novo Nordisk and Pfizer Inc. SD‐J has led clinical trials for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim and Novo Nordisk Inc.; has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Merck & Co., Inc. and Sanofi; and has equity interests in Jana Care Inc. and Aerami Therapeutics. DKM has received consulting fees from Afimmune, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Esperion, Lexicon, Lilly USA, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Metavant, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer Inc. and Sanofi US; has received honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim; has received payment for expert testimony from Kirkland & Ellis on behalf of Boehringer Ingelheim; and has participated on data safety monitoring boards/advisory boards for CSL Behring, AbbVie, Eidos, Otsuka, Arena and Akebia. REP has received grants (directed to his institution) from Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Janssen, Metavention, Novo Nordisk, Poxel SA and Sanofi; has received consulting fees (directed to his institution) from AstraZeneca, Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated, Glytec LLC, Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Janssen, Merck & Co., Inc., Mundipharma, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer Inc., Sanofi, Scohia Pharma Inc. and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries; and has received support for attending meetings/travel (directed to his institution or to the travel provider) from AstraZeneca, Glytec LLC, Merck & Co., Inc., Mundipharma, Novo Nordisk and Pfizer Inc. Am.P. has served on the advisory board of Roche Diagnostics and has received research support from the Texas Health Resources Clinical Scholarship, the Gilead Sciences Research Scholar Program, the National Institute of Aging GEMSSTAR Grant (1R03AG067960‐01) and Applied Therapeutics. DZIC has received honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim‐Lilly, Merck, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Mitsubishi‐Tanabe, AbbVie, Janssen, Bayer, Prometic, BMS, Maze, Gilead, CSL‐Behring, Otsuka, Novartis, Yeungene, Lexicon and Novo‐Nordisk, and has received operational funding for clinical trials from Boehringer Ingelheim‐Lilly, Merck, Janssen, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, CSL‐Behring, and Novo‐Nordisk. RF and NBC are employees and shareholders of Pfizer Inc. JL, CL and AnP are employees of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Kenilworth, NJ, USA), and may own stock and/or stock options in Merck & Co., Inc. MM is an employee of MSD Limited, London, UK, who owns stock in Merck & Co., Inc.

© 2022 Pfizer Inc. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Percentage of mediation by biomarkers on hospitalization for heart failure. HR (95% CI) for the unweighted prespecified HHF. †First change from baseline measurement. ‡Weighted average of change from baseline from all post‐baseline measurements. Mediators in blue were associated with decreases in placebo‐adjusted changes from baseline with ertugliflozin; mediators in red were associated with increases in placebo‐adjusted changes from baseline. ALT, alanine aminotransferase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL‐C, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; HHF, hospitalization for heart failure; HR, hazard ratio; SBP, systolic blood pressure; UACR, urine albumin‐to‐creatinine ratio
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Percentage of mediation by biomarkers on a prespecified exploratory kidney composite outcome. HR (95% CI) for the unweighted prespecified exploratory kidney composite outcome comprising sustained 40% decrease from baseline in estimated glomerular filtration rate, chronic kidney replacement therapy, or kidney death was 0.66 (0.50‐0.88). †First change from baseline measurement. ‡Weighted average of change from baseline from all post‐baseline measurements. Mediators in blue were associated with decreases in placebo‐adjusted changes from baseline with ertugliflozin; mediators in red were associated with increases in placebo‐adjusted changes from baseline. HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; HDL‐C, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; HR, hazard ratio; RBC, red blood cell; SBP, systolic blood pressure
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Criteria for mediation and possible mediators for effect of ertugliflozin on HHF and composite renal outcomes. Adapted from Li et al. Copyright © 2020 with permission from Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation. ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; HDL‐C, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; HHF, hospitalization for heart failure; LDL‐C, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; RBC, red blood cell; SBP, systolic blood pressure; UACR, urine albumin‐to‐creatinine ratio

References

    1. Cavender MA, Steg PG, Smith SC Jr, et al. Impact of diabetes mellitus on hospitalization for heart failure, cardiovascular events, and death: outcomes at 4 years from the reduction of Atherothrombosis for continued health (REACH) registry. Circulation. 2015;132(10):923‐931.
    1. Khan MAB, Hashim MJ, King JK, Govender RD, Mustafa H, Al KJ. Epidemiology of type 2 diabetes ‐ global burden of disease and forecasted trends. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2020;10(1):107‐111.
    1. Virani SS, Alonso A, Benjamin EJ, et al. Heart disease and stroke Statistics‐2020 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;141(9):e139‐e596.
    1. Rawshani A, Rawshani A, Franzen S, et al. Risk factors, mortality, and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(7):633‐644.
    1. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2117‐2128.
    1. Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, et al. Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and renal events in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(7):644‐657.
    1. Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP, et al. Dapagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(4):347‐357.
    1. Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J, et al. Cardiovascular and renal outcomes with empagliflozin in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(15):1413‐1424.
    1. McMurray JJV, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE, et al. Dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(21):1995‐2008.
    1. Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, et al. Empagliflozin in heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(16):1451‐1461.
    1. American Diabetes Association . Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: standards of medical care in diabetes—2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(Supplement 1):S111‐S124.
    1. Cosentino F, Grant PJ, Aboyans V, et al. 2019 ESC guidelines on diabetes, pre‐diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD: the task force for diabetes, pre‐diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Eur Heart J. 2019;41(2):255‐323.
    1. Heerspink HJL, Stefánsson BV, Correa‐Rotter R, et al. Dapagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(15):1436‐1446.
    1. Perkovic V, Jardine MJ, Neal B, et al. Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(24):2295‐2306.
    1. Cannon CP, Pratley R, Dagogo‐Jack S, et al. Cardiovascular outcomes with ertugliflozin in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(15):1425‐1435.
    1. Cherney DZI, Charbonnel B, Cosentino F, et al. Effects of ertugliflozin on kidney composite outcomes, renal function and albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: an analysis from the randomised VERTIS CV trial. Diabetologia. 2021;64(6):1256‐1267.
    1. McGuire DK, Shih WJ, Cosentino F, et al. Association of SGLT2 inhibitors with cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta‐analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6(2):148‐158.
    1. Neuen BL, Young T, Heerspink HJL, et al. SGLT2 inhibitors for the prevention of kidney failure in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(11):845‐854.
    1. Inzucchi SE, Zinman B, Fitchett D, et al. How does empagliflozin reduce cardiovascular mortality? Insights from a mediation analysis of the EMPA‐REG OUTCOME trial. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(2):356‐363.
    1. Li J, Woodward M, Perkovic V, et al. Mediators of the effects of canagliflozin on heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes. JACC Heart Fail. 2020;8(1):57‐66.
    1. Li J, Neal B, Perkovic V, et al. Mediators of the effects of canagliflozin on kidney protection in patients with type 2 diabetes. Kidney Int. 2020;98(3):769‐777.
    1. Cannon CP, McGuire DK, Pratley R, et al. Design and baseline characteristics of the eValuation of ERTugliflozin effIcacy and Safety CardioVascular outcomes trial (VERTIS‐CV). Am Heart J. 2018;206:11‐23.
    1. Cherney DZI, Dagogo‐Jack S, McGuire DK, et al. Kidney outcomes using a sustained ≥40% decline in eGFR: a meta‐analysis of SGLT2 inhibitor trials. Clin Cardiol. 2021;44(8):1139‐1143.
    1. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of diet in renal disease study group. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(6):461‐470.
    1. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173‐1182.
    1. Hafeman DM. “Proportion explained”: a causal interpretation for standard measures of indirect effect? Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170(11):1443‐1448.
    1. Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, Zannad F. Effects of sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for the treatment of patients with heart failure: proposal of a novel mechanism of action. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(9):1025‐1029.
    1. Lambers Heerspink HJ, de Zeeuw D, Wie L, Leslie B, List J. Dapagliflozin a glucose‐regulating drug with diuretic properties in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15(9):853‐862.
    1. Sano M, Goto S. Possible mechanism of hematocrit elevation by sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and associated beneficial renal and cardiovascular effects. Circulation. 2019;139(17):1985‐1987.
    1. Aberle J, Menzen M, Schmid SM, et al. Dapagliflozin effects on haematocrit, red blood cell count and reticulocytes in insulin‐treated patients with type 2 diabetes. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):22396.
    1. Lawler PR, Liu H, Frankfurter C, et al. Changes in cardiovascular biomarkers associated with the sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor ertugliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(3):e45‐e47.
    1. El Iskandarani M, El Kurdi B, Murtaza G, Paul TK, Refaat MM. Prognostic role of albumin level in heart failure: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(10):e24785.
    1. Gopal DM, Kalogeropoulos AP, Georgiopoulou VV, et al. Serum albumin concentration and heart failure risk the health, aging, and body composition study. Am Heart J. 2010;160(2):279‐285.
    1. Garcia‐Ropero A, Vargas‐Delgado AP, Santos‐Gallego CG, Badimon JJ. Inhibition of sodium glucose cotransporters improves cardiac performance. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(13):3289.
    1. Croteau D, Luptak I, Chambers JM, et al. Effects of sodium‐glucose linked transporter 2 inhibition with Ertugliflozin on mitochondrial function, energetics, and metabolic gene expression in the presence and absence of diabetes mellitus in mice. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10(13):e019995.
    1. Neuen BL, Oshima M, Perkovic V, et al. Effects of canagliflozin on serum potassium in people with diabetes and chronic kidney disease: the CREDENCE trial. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(48):4891‐4901.
    1. Bhole V, Krishnan E. Gout and the heart. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2014;40(1):125‐143.
    1. Huang H, Huang B, Li Y, et al. Uric acid and risk of heart failure: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014;16(1):15‐24.
    1. Borghi C, Cosentino ER, Rinaldi ER, Cicero AF. Uricaemia and ejection fraction in elderly heart failure outpatients. Eur J Clin Invest. 2014;44(6):573‐578.
    1. Muiesan ML, Agabiti‐Rosei C, Paini A, Salvetti M. Uric acid and cardiovascular disease: an update. Eur Cardiol. 2016;11(1):54‐59.
    1. Givertz MM, Anstrom KJ, Redfield MM, et al. Effects of xanthine oxidase inhibition in hyperuricemic heart failure patients: the xanthine oxidase inhibition for hyperuricemic heart failure patients (EXACT‐HF) study. Circulation. 2015;131(20):1763‐1771.
    1. Chang YH, Lei CC, Lin KC, Chang DM, Hsieh CH, Lee YJ. Serum uric acid level as an indicator for CKD regression and progression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus‐a 4.6‐year cohort study. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016;32(6):557‐564.
    1. Badve SV, Pascoe EM, Tiku A, et al. Effects of allopurinol on the progression of chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(26):2504‐2513.
    1. Doria A, Galecki AT, Spino C, et al. Serum urate lowering with allopurinol and kidney function in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(26):2493‐2503.
    1. Navaneethan SD, Yehnert H, Moustarah F, Schreiber MJ, Schauer PR, Beddhu S. Weight loss interventions in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4(10):1565‐1574.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj