Real world effectiveness of warfarin among ischemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation: observational analysis from Patient-Centered Research into Outcomes Stroke Patients Prefer and Effectiveness Research (PROSPER) study

Ying Xian, Jingjing Wu, Emily C O'Brien, Gregg C Fonarow, DaiWai M Olson, Lee H Schwamm, Deepak L Bhatt, Eric E Smith, Robert E Suter, Deidre Hannah, Brianna Lindholm, Lesley Maisch, Melissa A Greiner, Barbara L Lytle, Michael J Pencina, Eric D Peterson, Adrian F Hernandez, Ying Xian, Jingjing Wu, Emily C O'Brien, Gregg C Fonarow, DaiWai M Olson, Lee H Schwamm, Deepak L Bhatt, Eric E Smith, Robert E Suter, Deidre Hannah, Brianna Lindholm, Lesley Maisch, Melissa A Greiner, Barbara L Lytle, Michael J Pencina, Eric D Peterson, Adrian F Hernandez

Abstract

Objective: To examine the association between warfarin treatment and longitudinal outcomes after ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation in community practice.

Design: Observational study.

Setting: Hospitals (n = 1487) participating in the Get With The Guidelines (GWTG)-Stroke program in the United States, from 2009 to 2011.

Participants: 12,552 warfarin naive atrial fibrillation patients admitted to hospital for ischemic stroke and treated with warfarin compared with no oral anticoagulant at discharge, linked to Medicare claims for longitudinal outcomes.

Main outcome measures: Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and home time, a patient centered outcomes measure defined as the total number of days free from institutional care after discharge. A propensity score inverse probability weighting method was used to account for all differences in observed characteristics between treatment groups.

Results: Among 12,552 survivors of stroke, 11,039 (88%) were treated with warfarin at discharge. Warfarin treated patients were slightly younger and less likely to have a history of previous stroke or coronary artery disease but had similar severity of stroke as measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Relative to those not treated, patients treated with warfarin had more days at home (as opposed to institutional care) during the two years after discharge (adjusted home time difference 47.6 days, 99% confidence interval 26.9 to 68.2). Patients discharged on warfarin treatment also had a reduced risk of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio 0.87, 99% confidence interval 0.78 to 0.98), all cause mortality (0.72, 0.63 to 0.84), and recurrent ischemic stroke (0.63, 0.48 to 0.83). These differences were consistent among clinically relevant subgroups by age, sex, stroke severity, and history of previous coronary artery disease and stroke.

Conclusions: Among ischemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation, warfarin treatment was associated with improved long term clinical outcomes and more days at home. Clinical trial registration Clinical trials NCT02146274.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare: support by PCORI for the submitted work. YX reports research funding to Duke Clinical Research Institute from the American Heart Association, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and Genentech. GCF serves as a member of the Get With The Guidelines (GWTG) Steering Committee; receives research support from the National Institutes of Health and PCORI; and is an employee of the University of California, which holds a patent on retriever devices for stroke. LHS is the principal investigator of an investigator initiated study of extended window intravenous thrombolysis funded by the National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01282242), for which Genentech provides alteplase free of charge to Massachusetts General Hospital as well as supplemental per patient payments to participating sites; he also serves as chair of the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association GWTG Stroke Clinical Work Group, as a stroke systems consultant to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, and as a scientific consultant regarding trial design and conduct to Lundbeck (international steering committee, DIAS3, 4 trial) and Penumbra (data and safety monitoring committee, Separator 3D trial). DLB serves on advisory boards for Cardax, Elsevier Practice Update Cardiology, Medscape Cardiology, and Regado Biosciences; on the Board of Directors of Boston VA Research Institute and Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care; is chair of the American Heart Association GWTG Steering Committee; serves on data monitoring committees for Duke Clinical Research Institute, Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Mayo Clinic, and Population Health Research Institute; has received honorariums from the American College of Cardiology (senior associate editor, clinical trials and news, acc.org), Belvoir Publications (editor in chief, Harvard Heart Letter), Duke Clinical Research Institute (clinical trial steering committees), Harvard Clinical Research Institute (clinical trial steering committee), HMP Communications (editor in chief, Journal of Invasive Cardiology), Journal of the American College of Cardiology (associate editor; section editor, pharmacology), Population Health Research Institute (clinical trial steering committee), Slack Publications (chief medical editor, cardiology today’s intervention), WebMD (CME steering committees); is deputy editor of Clinical Cardiology; has received research funding from Amarin, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Ethicon, Forest Laboratories, Ischemix, Medtronic, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, and The Medicines Company; and has conducted unfunded research for FlowCo, PLx Pharma, and Takeda. EES serves as a member of the GWTG Steering Committee. RES is employed as the vice president of quality and HIT by the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association, which receives grant funding from multiple pharmaceutical and other sources. EDP has received research grants from Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sanofi-Aventis, and Merck-Schering Plough partnership; and serves as principal investigator of the data analytic center for the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association’s GWTG program. AFH has received research grants from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, and Portola Pharmaceuticals and honorariums from Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, and Novartis.

© Xian et al 2015.

Figures

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4793981/bin/xiay026464.f1_default.jpg
Fig 1 Study population from initial cohort, through exclusions, to final population. CMS=Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; GWTG-Stroke=Get With The Guidelines-Stroke; NIHSS=National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4793981/bin/xiay026464.f2_default.jpg
Fig 2 Cumulative incidences for major adverse cardiovascular event during two year follow-up for patients receiving warfarin versus no oral anticoagulant
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4793981/bin/xiay026464.f3_default.jpg
Fig 3 Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) and home time according to warfarin treatment at discharge, overall and in clinically relevant subgroups. CAD=coronary artery disease; MI=myocardial infarction; NIHSS=National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; TIA=transient ischemic attack

References

    1. World Health Organization. Global burden of stroke. In: The atlas of heart disease and stroke. WHO, 2004 (available at ).
    1. Goldstein LB, Bushnell CD, Adams RJ, et al. Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2011;42:517-84.
    1. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke 1991;22:983-8.
    1. Hylek EM, Go AS, Chang Y, et al. Effect of intensity of oral anticoagulation on stroke severity and mortality in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1019-26.
    1. EAFT (European Atrial Fibrillation Trial) Study Group. Secondary prevention in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke. Lancet 1993;342:1255-62.
    1. Adjusted-dose warfarin versus low-intensity, fixed-dose warfarin plus aspirin for high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation III randomised clinical trial. Lancet 1996;348:633-8.
    1. Petersen P, Boysen G, Godtfredsen J, et al. Placebo-controlled, randomised trial of warfarin and aspirin for prevention of thromboembolic complications in chronic atrial fibrillation: the Copenhagen AFASAK study. Lancet 1989;1:175-9.
    1. Ezekowitz MD, Bridgers SL, James KE, et al. Warfarin in the prevention of stroke associated with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1406-12.
    1. The Boston Area Anticoagulation Trial for Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. The effect of low-dose warfarin on the risk of stroke in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 1990;323:1505-11.
    1. Connolly SJ, Laupacis A, Gent M, et al. Canadian Atrial Fibrillation Anticoagulation (CAFA) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;18:349-55.
    1. Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, et al. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2010;31:2369-429.
    1. Andersen KK, Olsen TS. Reduced poststroke mortality in patients with stroke and atrial fibrillation treated with anticoagulants: results from a Danish quality-control registry of 22 179 patients with ischemic stroke. Stroke 2007;38:259-63.
    1. Weimar C, Benemann J, Katsarava Z, et al. Adherence and quality of oral anticoagulation in cerebrovascular disease patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Neurol 2008;60:142-8.
    1. Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2014;45:2160-236.
    1. O’Brien EC, Xian Y, Fonarow GC, et al. Clinical commentary on “Certain uncertainty: life after stroke from the patient’s perspective”. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2014;7:970.
    1. Hannah D, Lindholm B, Maisch L. Certain uncertainty: life after stroke from the patient’s perspective. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2014;7:968-9.
    1. Xian Y, O’Brien EC, Fonarow GC, et al. Patient-Centered Research into Outcomes Stroke Patients Prefer and Effectiveness Research (PROSPER): implementing the patient-driven research paradigm to aid decision making in stroke care. Am Heart J 2015;170:36-45.e11.
    1. Fonarow GC, Reeves MJ, Smith EE, et al. Characteristics, performance measures, and in-hospital outcomes of the first one million stroke and transient ischemic attack admissions in Get With The Guidelines-Stroke. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010;3:291-302.
    1. Schwamm LH, Fonarow GC, Reeves MJ, et al. Get With the Guidelines-Stroke is associated with sustained improvement in care for patients hospitalized with acute stroke or transient ischemic attack. Circulation 2009;119:107-15.
    1. Xian Y, Fonarow GC, Reeves MJ, et al. Data quality in the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-Stroke): results from a national data validation audit. Am Heart J 2012;163:392-8.e1.
    1. Hammill BG, Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, et al. Linking inpatient clinical registry data to Medicare claims data using indirect identifiers. Am Heart J 2009;157:995-1000.
    1. Reeves MJ, Fonarow GC, Smith EE, et al. Representativeness of the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Registry: comparison of patient and hospital characteristics among Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized with ischemic stroke. Stroke 2012;43:44-9.
    1. Ray WA. Evaluating medication effects outside of clinical trials: new-user designs. Am J Epidemiol 2003;158:915-20.
    1. Fonarow GC, Pan W, Saver JL, et al. Comparison of 30-day mortality models for profiling hospital performance in acute ischemic stroke with vs without adjustment for stroke severity. JAMA 2012;308:257-64.
    1. Smith EE, Shobha N, Dai D, et al. Risk score for in-hospital ischemic stroke mortality derived and validated within the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Program. Circulation 2010;122:1496-504.
    1. Quinn TJ, Dawson J, Lees JS, et al. Time spent at home poststroke: “home-time” a meaningful and robust outcome measure for stroke trials. Stroke 2008;39:231-3.
    1. Elixhauser A, McCarthy EM. Clinical classifications for health policy research, version 2: Hospital inpatient statistics. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP 3) research note 1. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, 1996. [AHCPR publication No 96-0017.]
    1. Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, et al. An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2013;44:2064-89.
    1. Lichtman JH, Jones SB, Wang Y, et al. Outcomes after ischemic stroke for hospitals with and without Joint Commission-certified primary stroke centers. Neurology 2011;76:1976-82.
    1. Wahl PM, Rodgers K, Schneeweiss S, et al. Validation of claims-based diagnostic and procedure codes for cardiovascular and gastrointestinal serious adverse events in a commercially-insured population. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2010;19:596-603.
    1. Austin PC. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med 2009;28:3083-107.
    1. Curtis LH, Hammill BG, Eisenstein EL, et al. Using inverse probability-weighted estimators in comparative effectiveness analyses with observational databases. Med Care 2007;45:S103-7.
    1. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983;70:41-55.
    1. Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI. Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med 2007;146:857-67.
    1. Bushnell CD, Zimmer LO, Pan W, et al. Persistence with stroke prevention medications 3 months after hospitalization. Arch Neurol 2010;67:1456-63.
    1. McAlister FA. The end of the risk-treatment paradox? A rising tide lifts all boats. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:1766-7.
    1. Bungard TJ, Ghali WA, McAlister FA, et al. Physicians’ perceptions of the benefits and risks of warfarin for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. CMAJ 2001;165:301-2.
    1. Mishra NK, Shuaib A, Lyden P, et al. Home time is extended in patients with ischemic stroke who receive thrombolytic therapy: a validation study of home time as an outcome measure. Stroke 2011;42:1046-50.
    1. Graham DJ, Reichman ME, Wernecke M, et al. Cardiovascular, bleeding, and mortality risks in elderly Medicare patients treated with dabigatran or warfarin for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2015;131:157-64.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj