Intimate partner violence (IPV): The validity of an IPV screening instrument utilized among pregnant women in Tanzania and Vietnam

Vibeke Rasch, Toan Ngo Van, Hanh Thi Thuy Nguyen, Rachel Manongi, Declare Mushi, Dan W Meyrowitsch, Tine Gammeltoft, Chun Sen Wu, Vibeke Rasch, Toan Ngo Van, Hanh Thi Thuy Nguyen, Rachel Manongi, Declare Mushi, Dan W Meyrowitsch, Tine Gammeltoft, Chun Sen Wu

Abstract

Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global problem that affects one-third of all women. The present study aims to develop and determine the validity of a screening instrument for the detection of IPV in pregnant women in Tanzania and Vietnam and to determine the minimum number of questions needed to identify IPV.

Method: An IPV screening instrument based on eight questions was tested on 1,116 Tanzanian and 1,309 Vietnamese women who attended antenatal care before 24 gestational weeks. The women were re-interviewed during their 30th-34th gestational week where the World Health Organization (WHO) IPV questionnaire was used as the gold standard. In all, 255 combinations of eight different questions were first tested on the Tanzanian study population where sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were calculated. In the evaluation of the performance of the question combinations, different IPV types and the frequency of abusive acts were considered. The question combinations that performed best in Tanzania were subsequently evaluated in the Vietnamese study population.

Results: In Tanzania, a combination of three selected questions including one question on emotional IPV, one on physical IPV and one on sexual IPV was found to be most effective in identifying women who are exposed to at least one type of IPV during pregnancy (sensitivity = .80; specificity = .74). The performance of the identified combination was slightly less effective in Vietnam (sensitivity = .74; specificity = .68). Focusing on different IPV types, the best performance was found for exposure to physical IPV in both Tanzania (sensitivity = .93; specificity = .70) and Vietnam (sensitivity = .96; specificity = .55). In both countries, the sensitivity increased with the frequency of abuse whereas the specificity decreased.

Conclusion: By asking pregnant women three simple questions we were able to identify women who were exposed to IPV during pregnancy in two different countries. The question combination performed best in assessing physical IPV where it identified 93% and 96% of Vietnamese and Tanzanian women, respectively, who were exposed to physical IPV.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Screening questions.
Fig 1. Screening questions.
Fig 2. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy according…
Fig 2. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy according to selected items 134 in Tanzania.
Fig 3. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy according…
Fig 3. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy according to selected items 134 in Vietnam.

References

    1. Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HA, Ellsberg M, Heise L, Watts CH. Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. Lancet. 2006;368(9543):1260–9. doi:
    1. WHO. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva, Switzerland: 2013.
    1. Sigalla GN, Mushi D, Meyrowitsch DW, Manongi R, Rogathi JJ, Gammeltoft T, et al. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and its association with preterm birth and low birth weight in Tanzania: A prospective cohort study. PloS one.12(2):e0172540 doi:
    1. Hoang TN, Van TN, Gammeltoft T, Meyrowitsch DW, Nguyen Thi Thuy H, Rasch V. Association between Intimate Partner Violence during Pregnancy and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Vietnam: A Prospective Cohort Study. PloS one. 2016;11(9):e0162844 doi:
    1. Donovan BM, Spracklen CN, Schweizer ML, Ryckman KK, Saftlas AF. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and the risk for adverse infant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bjog. 2016;123(8):1289–99. doi:
    1. Cherniak D, Grant L, Mason R, Moore B, Pellizzari R. Intimate Partner Violence Consensus Statement—SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines. 2005
    1. WHO. Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women: WHO clinical and policy guidelines. Geneva, Switzerland: 2013.
    1. WHO. WHO Multi-country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence against Women. Geneva, Switzerland: 2005.
    1. Basile KC, Hertz MF, Back SE. Intimate Partner Violence and Sexual Violence Victimization Assessment Instruments for Use in Healthcare Settings: Version 1. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2007.
    1. Rabin RF, Jennings JM, Campbell JC, Bair-Merritt MH. Intimate partner violence screening tools: a systematic review. American journal of preventive medicine. 2009;36(5):439–45. e4 doi:
    1. Tiet QQ, Finney JW, Moos RH. Screening psychiatric patients for illicit drug use disorders and problems. Clinical psychology review. 2008;28(4):578–91. doi:
    1. Arkins B, Begley C, Higgins A. Measures for screening for intimate partner violence: a systematic review. Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing. 2016;23(3–4):217–35. doi:
    1. O’Doherty L, Hegarty K, Ramsay J, Davidson LL, Feder G, Taft A. Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2015;7:Cd007007.
    1. Sprague S, Slobogean GP, Spurr H, McKay P, Scott T, Arseneau E, et al. A Scoping Review of Intimate Partner Violence Screening Programs for Health Care Professionals. PloS one. 2016;11(12):e0168502 doi:
    1. UNICEF. UNICEF Data: Monitoring the Stiuation of Children and Women29 August 2016. .
    1. Straus MA, Douglas EM. A short form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and typologies for severity and mutuality. Violence and victims. 2004;19(5):507–20.
    1. H T, T R, F J. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Second ed: Springer; 2009.
    1. Kraanen FL, Vedel E, Scholing A, Emmelkamp PM. Screening on perpetration and victimization of intimate partner violence (IPV): two studies on the validity of an IPV screening instrument in patients in substance abuse treatment. PloS one. 2013;8(5):e63681 doi:
    1. Watts C, Heise L, Elisberg M, Garcia-Moreno C. Putting Women First: Ethical and safety recommendations for research on domestic violence. WHO; Geneva: 2001.
    1. Shamu S, Abrahams N, Temmerman M, Musekiwa A, Zarowsky C. A systematic review of African studies on intimate partner violence against pregnant women: prevalence and risk factors. PloS one. 2011;6(3):e17591 doi:
    1. Waltermaurer E. Measuring intimate partner violence (IPV): you may only get what you ask for. J Interpers Violence. 2005;20(4):501–6. doi:
    1. Roelens K, Verstraelen H, Van Egmond K, Temmerman M. Disclosure and health-seeking behaviour following intimate partner violence before and during pregnancy in Flanders, Belgium: a survey surveillance study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;137(1):37–42. doi:
    1. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. af London: Chapman & Hall; 1995.
    1. Garcia-Moreno C, Hegarty K, d’Oliveira AF, Koziol-McLain J, Colombini M, Feder G. The health-systems response to violence against women. Lancet. 2015;385(9977):1567–79. doi:
    1. O’Campo P, Kirst M, Tsamis C, Chambers C, Ahmad F. Implementing successful intimate partner violence screening programs in health care settings: evidence generated from a realist-informed systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(6):855–66. doi:
    1. Kirst M, Zhang YJ, Young A, Marshall A, O’Campo P, Ahmad F. Referral to health and social services for intimate partner violence in health care settings: a realist scoping review. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2012;13(4):198–208. doi:
    1. Hussain N, Sprague S, Madden K, Hussain FN, Pindiprolu B, Bhandari M. A comparison of the types of screening tool administration methods used for the detection of intimate partner violence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2015;16(1):60–9. doi:
    1. Baldessarini RJ, Finklestein S, Arana GW. The predictive power of diagnostic tests and the effect of prevalence of illness. Archives of general psychiatry. 1983;40(5):569–73.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

3
Subskrybuj