Diacetylmorphine versus methadone for the treatment of opioid addiction

Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes, Suzanne Brissette, David C Marsh, Pierre Lauzon, Daphne Guh, Aslam Anis, Martin T Schechter, Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes, Suzanne Brissette, David C Marsh, Pierre Lauzon, Daphne Guh, Aslam Anis, Martin T Schechter

Abstract

Background: Studies in Europe have suggested that injectable diacetylmorphine, the active ingredient in heroin, can be an effective adjunctive treatment for chronic, relapsing opioid dependence.

Methods: In an open-label, phase 3, randomized, controlled trial in Canada, we compared injectable diacetylmorphine with oral methadone maintenance therapy in patients with opioid dependence that was refractory to treatment. Long-term users of injectable heroin who had not benefited from at least two previous attempts at treatment for addiction (including at least one methadone treatment) were randomly assigned to receive methadone (111 patients) or diacetylmorphine (115 patients). The primary outcomes, assessed at 12 months, were retention in addiction treatment or drug-free status and a reduction in illicit-drug use or other illegal activity according to the European Addiction Severity Index.

Results: The primary outcomes were determined in 95.2% of the participants. On the basis of an intention-to-treat analysis, the rate of retention in addiction treatment in the diacetylmorphine group was 87.8%, as compared with 54.1% in the methadone group (rate ratio for retention, 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35 to 1.95; P<0.001). The reduction in rates of illicit-drug use or other illegal activity was 67.0% in the diacetylmorphine group and 47.7% in the methadone group (rate ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.77; P=0.004). The most common serious adverse events associated with diacetylmorphine injections were overdoses (in 10 patients) and seizures (in 6 patients).

Conclusions: Injectable diacetylmorphine was more effective than oral methadone. Because of a risk of overdoses and seizures, diacetylmorphine maintenance therapy should be delivered in settings where prompt medical intervention is available. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00175357.)

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Brissette reports receiving consulting and lecture fees from Schering-Plough. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

2009 Massachusetts Medical Society

Figures

Figure 1. Randomization, Treatment, and Outcomes
Figure 1. Randomization, Treatment, and Outcomes
Behaviors that led to discontinuation of treatment were attempts to take the drug out of the clinic, threats, or intimidation. NAOMI denotes North American Opiate Medication Initiative.
Figure 2. Number of Days of Illicit-Drug…
Figure 2. Number of Days of Illicit-Drug Use in the Previous Month, According to Treatment Assignment
The numbers of days of illicit heroin use (Panel A) and cocaine use (Panel B) are shown. The I bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj