Effect of TENS Versus Placebo on Walking Capacity in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Carlo Ammendolia, Pierre Côté, Y Raja Rampersaud, Danielle Southerst, Brian Budgell, Claire Bombardier, Gillian Hawker, Carlo Ammendolia, Pierre Côté, Y Raja Rampersaud, Danielle Southerst, Brian Budgell, Claire Bombardier, Gillian Hawker

Abstract

Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a growing health problem and a leading cause of disability and loss of independence in older adults. It is usually caused by age-related degenerative narrowing of the spinal canals leading to compression and ischemia of the spinal nerves and symptoms of neurogenic claudication. Limited walking ability is the dominant functional impairment caused by LSS. Animal studies suggest increased blood flow to the spinal nerves and spinal cord with superficial paraspinal electrical stimulation. The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of paraspinal transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) applied while walking on walking ability in patients with LSS.

Methods/design: We propose to conduct a 2-arm double-blinded (participant and assessor) randomized controlled trial. We will recruit individuals who have limited walking ability due to degenerative LSS from hospital specialists, community physicians, and chiropractors located in the city of Toronto, Canada. Eligible consenting participants will be randomly assigned to either paraspinal TENS or placebo paraspinal TENS applied while walking. The primary outcome will be walking distance measured during a single self-paced walking test. We will calculate the differences in proportions among participants in both groups who achieve at least a 30% improvement in walking distance from baseline using Pearson χ (2) test with 95% confidence intervals.

Discussion: Effective nonoperative interventions for LSS are unknown. Interventions that can improve blood flow to the spinal nerves while walking may increase walking ability in this population. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation is a low-cost intervention that may have the potential to achieve this objective. To our knowledge, this study will be the first clinical trial to assess the effects of TENS on walking ability of patients with LSS.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02592642.

Keywords: Clinical protocol; Intermittent claudication; Randomized controlled trial; Spinal stenosis; Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation; Walking.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Process of recruitment, randomization, and outcomes assessment. TENS, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Inclusion and exclusion criteria. CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Measures collected at baseline.

References

    1. Takahashi K, Kagechika K, Takino T, Matsui T, Miyazaki T, Shima I. Changes in epidural pressure during walking in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1995;20(24):2746–2749.
    1. Fanuele JC, Birkmeyer NJ, Abdu WA, Tosteson TD, Weinstein JN. The impact of spinal problems on the health status of patients: have we underestimated the effect? Spine. 2000;25(12):1509–1514.
    1. Katz JN, Dalgas M, Stucki G, Katz NP, Bayley J, Fossel AH. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Diagnostic value of the history and physical examination. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38(9):1236–1241.
    1. Winter CC, Brandes M, Muller C, Schubert T, Ringling M, Hillmann A. Walking ability during daily life in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or the hip and lumbar spinal stenosis: a cross sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:233.
    1. Suri P, Rainville J, Kalichman L, Katz JN. Does this older adult with lower extremity pain have the clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis? JAMA. 2010;304(23):2628–2636.
    1. Kobayashi S. Pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of intermittent claudication in patients with lumbar canal stenosis. World J Orthop. 2014;5(2):134–145.
    1. Kobayashi S, Suzuki Y, Meir A, Al-Khudairi N, Nakane T, Hayakawa K. Circulatory dynamics of the cauda equina in lumbar canal stenosis using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Spine J. 2015;15(10):2132–2141.
    1. Chung SS, Lee CS, Kim SH, Chung MW, Ahn JM. Effect of low back posture on the morphology of the spinal canal. Skelet Radiol. 2000;29(4):217–223.
    1. Kanno H, Ozawa H, Koizumi Y, Morozumi N, Aizawa T, Kusakabe T. Dynamic change of dural sac cross-sectional area in axial loaded magnetic resonance imaging correlates with the severity of clinical symptoms in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Spine. 2012;37(3):207–213.
    1. Takahashi K, Miyazaki T, Takino T, Matsui T, Tomita K. Epidural pressure measurements. Relationship between epidural pressure and posture in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1995;20(6):650–653.
    1. Budgell BS, Sovak G, Soave D. TENS augments blood flow in somatotopically linked spinal cord segments and mitigates compressive ischemia. Spinal Cord. 2014;52(10):744–748.
    1. Takahashi K, Nomura S, Tomita K, Matsumoto T. Effects of peripheral nerve stimulation on blood flow of the spinal cord and the nerve root. Spine. 1988;13:1278–1283.
    1. Woolf CJ. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and the reaction to experimental pain in human subjects. Pain. 1979;7(2):115–127.
    1. Foster NE, Baxter F, Walsh DM, Baxter GD, Allen JM. Manipulation of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation variables has no effect on two models of experimental pain in humans. Clin J Pain. 1996;12(4):301–310.
    1. Walsh DM, Liggett C, Baxter D, Allen JM. A double-blind investigation of the hypoalgesic effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation upon experimentally induced ischaemic pain. Pain. 1995;61(1):39–45.
    1. Seenan C, Roche PA, Tan CW, Mercer T. Modification of experimental, lower limb ischemic pain with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Clin J Pain. 2012;28(8):693–699.
    1. Roche PA, Tan H.-Y., Stanton WR. Modification of induced ischaemic pain by placebo electrotherapy. Physiother Theory Pract. 2002;18:131–139.
    1. Kumon M, Tani T, Ikeuchi M, Kida K, Takemasa R, Nakajima N, Kiyasu K, Tadokoro N, Taniguchi S. Influence of tibial trancutaneous repetitive electrical nerve stimulation on neurogenic claudication and F-wave in lumbar spinal stenosis. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46(10):1046–1049.
    1. Ammendolia C, Côté P, Rampersaud YR, Southerst D, Budgell B, Bombardier C, Hawker G. [Internet] National Library of Medicine (US); Bethesda (MD): 2015. The evaluation of four non-operative treatments for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. [Cited December 15, 2015. Available from: NLM Identifier: NCT02592642]
    1. Tomkins-Lane CC, Battie MC. Validity and reproducibility of self-report measures of walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 2010;35(23):2097–2102.
    1. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Pieper CF, Leveille SG, Markides KS, Ostir GV, Studenski S, Berkman LF, Wallace RB. Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55(4):M221–M231.
    1. Elashoff J. 2007. nQuery Advisor. Version 70 user's guide. 7.0 user's guide ed. Los Angeles, CA USA.
    1. Rakel B, Cooper N, Adams HJ, Messer BR, Frey Law LA, Dannen DR. A new transient sham TENS device allows for investigator blinding while delivering a true placebo treatment. J Pain. 2010;11(3):230–238.
    1. Tomkins CC, Battie MC, Rogers T, Jiang H, Petersen S. A criterion measure of walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis and its comparison with a treadmill protocol. Spine. 2009;34(22):2444–2449.
    1. Rainville J, Childs LA, Pena EB, Suri P, Limke JC, Jouve C. Quantification of walking ability in subjects with neurogenic claudication from lumbar spinal stenosis—a comparative study. Spine J. 2012;12(2):101–109.
    1. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):155–159.
    1. Diggle P. Press OU; New York: 2009. Analysis of longitudinal data.
    1. Ishimoto Y, Yoshimura N, Muraki S, Yamada H, Nagata K, Hashizume H, Takiguchi N, Minamide A, Oka H, Kawaguchi H, Nakamura K, Akune T, Yoshida M. Prevalence of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis and its association with physical performance in a population-based cohort in Japan: the Wakayama Spine Study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20(10):1103–1108.
    1. Ortman JM, Velkoff VA, Hogan H. U.S. Census Bureau; Washington, DC: 2014. An aging nation: the older population in the United States, current population reports, p 25-1140.
    1. Kalichman L, Cole R, Kim DH, Li L, Suri P, Guermazi A. Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study. Spine J. 2009;9(7):545–550.
    1. Chen E, Tong KB, Laouri M. Surgical treatment patterns among Medicare beneficiaries newly diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J. 2010;10(7):588–594.
    1. Ammendolia C, Stuber K, de Bruin LK, Furlan AD, Kennedy CA, Rampersaud YR. Nonoperative treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication: a systematic review. Spine. 2012;37(10):E609–E616.
    1. Tran de QH, Duong S, Finlayson RJ. Lumbar spinal stenosis: a brief review of the nonsurgical management. Can J Anaesth. 2010;57(7):694–703.
    1. May S, Comer C. Is surgery more effective than non-surgical treatment for spinal stenosis, and which non-surgical treatment is more effective? A systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2013;99(1):12–20.
    1. Ammendolia C, Stuber KJ, Rok E, Rampersaud R, Kennedy CA, Pennick V, Steenstra IA, de Bruin LK, Furlan AD. Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;8

Source: PubMed

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

3
Subskrybuj