Antiplaque effect of essential oils and 0.2% chlorhexidine on an in situ model of oral biofilm growth: a randomised clinical trial

Víctor Quintas, Isabel Prada-López, Nikolaos Donos, David Suárez-Quintanilla, Inmaculada Tomás, Víctor Quintas, Isabel Prada-López, Nikolaos Donos, David Suárez-Quintanilla, Inmaculada Tomás

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the in situ antiplaque effect after 4 days of using of 2 commercial antimicrobial agents in short term on undisturbed plaque-like biofilm.

Trial design and participants: An observer-masked, crossover randomised clinical trial on 15 oral and systemically healthy volunteers between 20-30 years who were randomly and sequentially allocated in the same group which performed 3 interventions in different randomised sequences.

Intervention: The participants wore an appliance in 3 different rinsing periods doing mouthwashes twice a day (1/0/1) with essential oils, 0.2% chlorhexidine or sterile water (negative control). At the end of each 4-day mouthwash period, samples were removed from the appliance. Posteriorly, after bacterial vital staining, samples were analysed using a Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope.

Main outcome measures: Bacterial vitality, thickness and covering grade by the biofilm after 4 days of applying each of the mouthwashes.

Results: The essential oils and the 0.2% chlorhexidine were significantly more effective than the sterile water at reducing bacterial vitality, thickness and covering grade by the biofilm. No significant differences were found between the 0.2% chlorhexidine and the essential oils at reducing the bacterial vitality (13.2% vs. 14.7%). However, the 0.2% chlorhexidine showed more reduction than the essential oils in thickness (6.5 μm vs. 10.0 μm; p<0.05) and covering grade by the biofilm (20.0% vs. 54.3%; p<0.001).

Conclusion: The essential oils and 0.2% chlorhexidine showed a high antiplaque effect. Although the 0.2% chlorhexidine showed better results with regard to reducing the thickness and covering grade by the biofilm, both antiseptics showed a high and similar antibacterial activity.

Clinical relevance: Daily essential oils or 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwashes are effective when reducing dental plaque formation in the short term. Although 0.2% chlorhexidine continues to be the "gold standard" in terms of antiplaque effect, essential oils could be considered a reliable alternative.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02124655.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Flow diagram of the study…
Fig 1. Flow diagram of the study with enrollment, allocation, follow-up and analysis of participants.
Fig 2. Scheme of the sequence of…
Fig 2. Scheme of the sequence of protocols followed by the volunteers.
Fig 3. Scheme of the divisions of…
Fig 3. Scheme of the divisions of the PL-Biofilm in layers.
1-Outer layer; 2-Middle layer; 3-Inner layer. *PL-Biofilm. **Glass disk (substrate).
Fig 4. On the left, lateral projections…
Fig 4. On the left, lateral projections of the brightest point (X-Z) from images stacked in Y plane from the three rinsing cycles, presenting their respective mean thickness.
On the right, maximum projections of the brightest point (X-Y) from images stacked in Z plane. 4D-WATER = 4-day period during which rinses with 20 mL of sterile water are done twice a day; 4D-EO = 4-day period during which rinses with 20 mL of essential oils are done twice a day; 4D-0.2% CHX = 4-day period during which rinses with 10 mL of 0.2% chlorhexidine are done twice a day.
Fig 5. Bacterial vitality in percentages.
Fig 5. Bacterial vitality in percentages.
Total and different layers in each rinsing cycle. 4D-WATER = 4-day period during which rinses with 20 mL of sterile water are done twice a day; 4D-EO = 4-day period during which rinses with 20 mL of essential oils are done twice a day; 4D-0.2% CHX = 4-day period during which rinses with 10 mL of 0.2% chlorhexidine are done twice a day. Layer 1 = outer layer; Layer 2 = middle layer; Layer 3 = inner layer.
Fig 6. Scheme of the area occupied…
Fig 6. Scheme of the area occupied by the PL-Biofilm after the different rinsing cycles.
Presentation of the obtained cyphers. 4D-WATER = 4-day period during which rinses with 20 mL of sterile water are done twice a day; 4D-EO = 4-day period during which rinses with 20 mL of essential oils are done twice a day; 4D-0.2% CHX = 4-day period during which rinses with 10 mL of 0.2% chlorhexidine are done twice a day.

References

    1. Loe H, Theilade E, Jensen SB (1965) Experimental Gingivitis in Man. J Periodontol 36: 177–187.
    1. Tatakis DN, Trombelli L (2004) Modulation of clinical expression of plaque-induced gingivitis. I. Background review and rationale. J Clin Periodontol 31: 229–238.
    1. Rodrigues JA, dos Santos PA, Garcia PP, Corona SA, Loffredo LC (2003) Evaluation of motivation methods used to obtain appropriate oral hygiene levels in schoolchildren. Int J Dent Hyg 1: 227–232.
    1. Demke R (2012) Plaque inhibition: the science and application of oral rinses. Dent Today 31: 96–101; quiz 101, 195.
    1. Van Strydonck DA, Slot DE, Van der Velden U, Van der Weijden F (2012) Effect of a chlorhexidine mouthrinse on plaque, gingival inflammation and staining in gingivitis patients: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 39: 1042–1055. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01883.x
    1. Wu CD, Savitt ED (2002) Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of over-the-counter oral hygiene products for the reduction and control of plaque and gingivitis. Periodontol 2000 28: 91–105.
    1. Charles CH, Mostler KM, Bartels LL, Mankodi SM (2004) Comparative antiplaque and antigingivitis effectiveness of a chlorhexidine and an essential oil mouthrinse: 6-month clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 31: 878–884.
    1. Sharma N, Charles CH, Lynch MC, Qaqish J, McGuire JA, et al. (2004) Adjunctive benefit of an essential oil-containing mouthrinse in reducing plaque and gingivitis in patients who brush and floss regularly: a six-month study. J Am Dent Assoc 135: 496–504.
    1. Fine DH, Furgang D, Barnett ML (2001) Comparative antimicrobial activities of antiseptic mouthrinses against isogenic planktonic and biofilm forms of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. J Clin Periodontol 28: 697–700.
    1. Auschill TM, Hein N, Hellwig E, Follo M, Sculean A, et al. (2005) Effect of two antimicrobial agents on early in situ biofilm formation. J Clin Periodontol 32: 147–152.
    1. Wood SR, Kirkham J, Marsh PD, Shore RC, Nattress B, et al. (2000) Architecture of intact natural human plaque biofilms studied by confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Dent Res 79: 21–27.
    1. Beyth N, Yudovin-Farber I, Perez-Davidi M, Domb AJ, Weiss EI (2010) Polyethyleneimine nanoparticles incorporated into resin composite cause cell death and trigger biofilm stress in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 22038–22043. 10.1073/pnas.1010341107
    1. García-Caballero L, Quintas V, Prada-López I, Seoane J, Donos N, et al. (2013) Chlorhexidine Substantivity on Salivary Flora and Plaque-Like Biofilm: An In Situ Model. PLoS One 8: e83522 10.1371/journal.pone.0083522
    1. Quintas V, Prada-López I, Prados-Frutos J, Tomas I (2014) In situ antimicrobial activity on oral biofilm: essential oils vs. 0.2% chlorhexidine. Clin Oral Investig. (In press).
    1. Riep BG, Bernimoulin JP, Barnett ML (1999) Comparative antiplaque effectiveness of an essential oil and an amine fluoride/stannous fluoride mouthrinse. J Clin Periodontol 26: 164–168.
    1. Arweiler NB, Boehnke N, Sculean A, Hellwig E, Auschill TM (2006) Differences in efficacy of two commercial 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthrinse solutions: a 4-day plaque re-growth study. J Clin Periodontol 33: 334–339.
    1. Rosin M, Welk A, Kocher T, Majic-Todt A, Kramer A, et al. (2002) The effect of a polyhexamethylene biguanide mouthrinse compared to an essential oil rinse and a chlorhexidine rinse on bacterial counts and 4-day plaque regrowth. J Clin Periodontol 29: 392–399.
    1. Pizzo G, La Cara M, Licata ME, Pizzo I, D’Angelo M (2008) The effects of an essential oil and an amine fluoride/stannous fluoride mouthrinse on supragingival plaque regrowth. J Periodontol 79: 1177–1183. 10.1902/jop.2008.070583
    1. Singh A, Daing A, Dixit J (2013) The effect of herbal, essential oil and chlorhexidine mouthrinse on de novo plaque formation. Int J Dent Hyg 11: 48–52. 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2012.00556.x
    1. Dige I, Nilsson H, Kilian M, Nyvad B (2007) In situ identification of streptococci and other bacteria in initial dental biofilm by confocal laser scanning microscopy and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Eur J Oral Sci 115: 459–467.
    1. Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, DeBeer D, Caldwell D, Korber D, et al. (1994) Biofilms, the customized microniche. J Bacteriol 176: 2137–2142.
    1. Donlan RM, Costerton JW (2002) Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 15: 167–193.
    1. Hahnel S, Rosentritt M, Burgers R, Handel G (2008) Surface properties and in vitro Streptococcus mutans adhesion to dental resin polymers. J Mater Sci Mater Med 19: 2619–2627. 10.1007/s10856-007-3352-7
    1. Netuschil L, Reich E, Unteregger G, Sculean A, Brecx M (1998) A pilot study of confocal laser scanning microscopy for the assessment of undisturbed dental plaque vitality and topography. Arch Oral Biol 43: 277–285.
    1. Auschill TM, Arweiler NB, Netuschil L, Brecx M, Reich E, et al. (2001) Spatial distribution of vital and dead microorganisms in dental biofilms. Arch Oral Biol 46: 471–476.
    1. Hope CK, Wilson M (2006) Biofilm structure and cell vitality in a laboratory model of subgingival plaque. J Microbiol Methods 66: 390–398.
    1. Korber DR, Lawrence JR, Hendry MJ, Caldwell DE (1993) Analysis of spatial variability within mot+ and mot- Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilms using representative elements. Biofouling 7: 339–358.
    1. Arweiler NB, Lenz R, Sculean A, Al-Ahmad A, Hellwig E, et al. (2008) Effect of food preservatives on in situ biofilm formation. Clin Oral Investig 12: 203–208. 10.1007/s00784-008-0188-6
    1. Gu H, Fan D, Gao J, Zou W, Peng Z, et al. (2012) Effect of ZnCl2 on plaque growth and biofilm vitality. Arch Oral Biol 57: 369–375. 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.10.001
    1. Tawakoli PN, Al-Ahmad A, Hoth-Hannig W, Hannig M, Hannig C (2013) Comparison of different live/dead stainings for detection and quantification of adherent microorganisms in the initial oral biofilm. Clin Oral Investig 17: 841–850. 10.1007/s00784-012-0792-3
    1. Pan P, Barnett ML, Coelho J, Brogdon C, Finnegan MB (2000) Determination of the in situ bactericidal activity of an essential oil mouthrinse using a vital stain method. J Clin Periodontol 27: 256–261.
    1. WHO (1997) Oral health surveys, Basic methods. In: Organization WH, editor. 4th ed Geneva.
    1. Arweiler NB, Hellwig E, Sculean A, Hein N, Auschill TM (2004) Individual vitality pattern of in situ dental biofilms at different locations in the oral cavity. Caries Res 38: 442–447.
    1. Tomás I, Henderson B, Diz Dios P, Donos N (2010) In vivo oral biofilm analysis by confocal laser scanning microscopy: methodological approaches In: A M-V, editor. Microscopy Science, technology, applications and education. Badajoz (Spain): Formatex; pp. 597–606.
    1. Dallal GE. Available: . Accessed 2014 February 5. 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.04.012
    1. Tomás I, García-Caballero L, Cousido MC, Limeres J, Álvarez M, et al. (2009) Evaluation of chlorhexidine substantivity on salivary flora by epifluorescence microscopy. Oral Dis 15: 428–433. 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01570.x
    1. Roberts SK, Bass C, Brading M, Lappin-Scott H, Stoodley P (1999) Biofilm formation and structure; What’s new? In: Newman HN WM, editor. Dental plaque revisited-oral biofilms in health and disease. Cardiff: BioLine; pp. 1–36.
    1. Moran J, Addy M, Kohut B, Hovliaras CA, Newcombe RG (1994) Efficacy of mouthrinses in inhibiting the development of supragingival plaque over a 4-day period of no oral hygiene. J Periodontol 65: 904–907.
    1. Jentsch H, Hombach A, Beetke E, Jonas L (2002) Quantitative transmission electron microscopic study of dental plaque—an in vivo study with different mouthrinses. Ultrastruct Pathol 26: 309–313.
    1. Aas JA, Paster BJ, Stokes LN, Olsen I, Dewhirst FE (2005) Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. J Clin Microbiol 43: 5721–5732.
    1. Hannig C, Follo M, Hellwig E, Al-Ahmad A (2010) Visualization of adherent micro-organisms using different techniques. J Med Microbiol 59: 1–7. 10.1099/jmm.0.015420-0
    1. Decker EM (2001) The ability of direct fluorescence-based, two-colour assays to detect different physiological states of oral streptococci. Lett Appl Microbiol 33: 188–192.
    1. Pizzo G, Compilato D, Di Liberto B, Pizzo I, Campisi G (2013) Effects of two essential oil mouthrinses on 4-day supragingival plaque regrowth: a randomized cross-over study. Am J Dent 26: 156–160.
    1. Tomás I, García-Caballero L, López-Álvar E, Suárez M, Diz P, et al. (2013) In Situ Chlorhexidine Substantivity on Saliva and Plaque-Like Biofilm: Influence of Circadian Rhythm. J Periodontol 84: 1662–1672. 10.1902/jop.2013.120475
    1. Jentsch H, Mozaffari E, Jonas L (2013) Scanning electron microscopy of growing dental plaque: a quantitative study with different mouth rinses. Ultrastruct Pathol 37: 233–240. 10.3109/01913123.2013.763882
    1. Koo H, Nino de Guzman P, Schobel BD, Vacca Smith AV, Bowen WH (2006) Influence of cranberry juice on glucan-mediated processes involved in Streptococcus mutans biofilm development. Caries Res 40: 20–27.
    1. Pratten J, Barnett P, Wilson M (1998) Composition and susceptibility to chlorhexidine of multispecies biofilms of oral bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 3515–3519.
    1. Al-Ahmad A, Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad M, Carvalho C, Lang M, Follo M, et al. (2008) Bacterial and Candida albicans adhesion on rapid prototyping-produced 3D-scaffolds manufactured as bone replacement materials. J Biomed Mat Res A 87: 933–943. 10.1002/jbm.a.31832
    1. Al-Ahmad A, Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad M, Auschill TM, Follo M, Braun G, et al. (2008) Effects of commonly used food preservatives on biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans in vitro. Arch Oral Biol 53: 765–772. 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.02.014
    1. Ulkur F, Arun T, Ozdemir F (2013) The effects of three different mouth rinses in a 4-day supragingival plaque regrowth study. Eur J Dent 7: 352–358. 10.4103/1305-7456.115420
    1. Stoeken JE, Paraskevas S, van der Weijden GA (2007) The long-term effect of a mouthrinse containing essential oils on dental plaque and gingivitis: a systematic review. J Periodontol 78: 1218–1228.
    1. Van Leeuwen MP, Slot DE, Van der Weijden GA (2011) Essential oils compared to chlorhexidine with respect to plaque and parameters of gingival inflammation: a systematic review. J Periodontol 82: 174–194. 10.1902/jop.2010.100266
    1. Neely AL (2012) Essential oil mouthwash (EOMW) may be equivalent to chlorhexidine (CHX) for long-term control of gingival inflammation but CHX appears to perform better than EOMW in plaque control. J Evid Based Dent Pract 12: 69–72. 10.1016/S1532-3382(12)70017-9
    1. Gandini S, Negri E, Boffetta P, La Vecchia C, Boyle P (2012) Mouthwash and oral cancer risk quantitative meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies. Ann Agric Environ Med 19: 173–180.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj