Pregnancy incidence and outcome before and after cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a retrospective cohort study

Ilkka Kalliala, Ahti Anttila, Pekka Nieminen, Mervi Halttunen, Tadeusz Dyba, Ilkka Kalliala, Ahti Anttila, Pekka Nieminen, Mervi Halttunen, Tadeusz Dyba

Abstract

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 3530 women treated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland, to investigate whether CIN treatment itself affects pregnancy incidence and outcome. We estimated the incidence of live births, miscarriages, extrauterine pregnancies, molar pregnancies, and termination of pregnancies (TOPs) before and after CIN treatment using nationwide registers. Women were followed up until death, emigration, sterilization, or the end of 2004. The comparison of incidence of pregnancy outcomes before and after the treatment was estimated by calculating hazard ratios (HRs) with conditional Poisson regression. After 76,162 woman-years of follow-up, the incidence of any pregnancy remained constant over CIN-treatment, HR 1.02 and 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97-1.08, but the incidence of the first pregnancy was significantly elevated after treatment, HR 1.13, and 95% CI 1.03-1.23. The incidence of live births was significantly elevated after treatment, HR 1.08 and 95% CI 1.01-1.15. Incidence of miscarriages, TOPs, extrauterine pregnancies, and molar pregnancies was not elevated. TOPs was significantly increased in the first pregnancy, HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.15-1.72 and after treatment by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.15-1.60. CIN treatment did not reduce pregnancy incidence and women had more live births after than before CIN treatment. TOPs was more common in the first pregnancy or after treatment by LEEP. We encourage research on the psychosocial consequences of CIN treatment also in other countries and settings.

Keywords: CIN; Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; conization; fecundity; pregnancy outcome.

© 2014 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

References

    1. Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W. Paraskevaidis E. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intra-epithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Lancet. 2006;367:489–498.
    1. Albrechtsen S, Rasmussen S, Thoresen S, Irgens LM. Iversen OE. Pregnancy outcome in women before and after cervical conisation: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2008;337:1343–1347.
    1. Jakobsson M, Gissler M, Paavonen J. Tapper A-M. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and the risk for preterm birth. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009;114:504–510.
    1. Kalliala I, Anttila A, Dyba T, Hakulinen T, Halttunen M. Nieminen P. Pregnancy incidence and outcome among patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG. 2012;119:227–235.
    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Cervical cancer screening. Vol. 10. Lyon (France): IARC/WHO; 2005. p. 302. IARC Handbooks of cancer prevention.
    1. Gissler M, Ulander V-M, Hemminki E. Rasimus A. Declining induced abortion rate in Finland. Data quality of the Finnish abortion register. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1996;25:376–380.
    1. Breslow NE. Day NE. Statistical methods in cancer research. Vol. 2. Lyon (France): IARC Scientific Publications; 1987. p. 406. No. 82.
    1. Greene WH. Econometric Analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2011. p. 1232.
    1. Marteau TM, Walker P, Giles J, Smail M. Anxieties in women undergoing colposcopy. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1999;97:859–861.
    1. Kalliala I, Anttila A, Pukkala E. Nieminen P. Risk of cervical and other cancers after treatment of Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2005;331:1183–1185.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj