Functional outcomes in ICU – what should we be using? – an observational study

Selina M Parry, Linda Denehy, Lisa J Beach, Sue Berney, Hannah C Williamson, Catherine L Granger, Selina M Parry, Linda Denehy, Lisa J Beach, Sue Berney, Hannah C Williamson, Catherine L Granger

Abstract

Introduction: With growing awareness of the importance of rehabilitation, new measures are being developed specifically for use in the intensive care unit (ICU). There are currently 26 measures reported to assess function in ICU survivors. The Physical Function in Intensive care Test scored (PFIT-s) has established clinimetric properties. It is unknown how other functional measures perform in comparison to the PFIT-s or which functional measure may be the most clinically applicable for use within the ICU. The aims of this study were to determine (1) the criterion validity of the Functional Status Score for the ICU (FSS-ICU), ICU Mobility Scale (IMS) and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) against the PFIT-s; (2) the construct validity of these tests against muscle strength; (3) predictive utility of these tests to predict discharge to home; and (4) the clinical applicability. This was a nested study within an ongoing controlled study and an observational study.

Methods: Sixty-six individuals were assessed at awakening and ICU discharge. Measures included: PFIT-s, FSS-ICU, IMS and SPPB. Bivariate relationships (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient) and predictive validity (logistic regression) were determined. Responsiveness (effect sizes); floor and ceiling effects; and minimal important differences were calculated.

Results: Mean ± SD PFIT-s at awakening was 4.7 ± 2.3 out of 10. On awakening a large positive relationship existed between PFIT-s and the other functional measures: FSS-ICU (rho = 0.87, p < 0.005), IMS (rho = 0.81, p < 0.005) and SPPB (rho = 0.70, p < 0.005). The PFIT-s had excellent construct validity (rho = 0.8, p < 0.005) and FSS-ICU (rho = 0.69, p < 0.005) and IMS (rho = 0.57, p < 0.005) had moderate construct validity with muscle strength. The PFIT-s and FSS-ICU had small floor/ceiling effects <11% at awakening and ICU discharge. The SPPB had a large floor effect at awakening (78%) and ICU discharge (56%). All tests demonstrated responsiveness; however highest effect size was seen in the PFIT-s (Cohen's d = 0.71).

Conclusions: There is high criterion validity for other functional measures against the PFIT-s. The PFIT-s and FSS-ICU are promising functional measures and are recommended to measure function within the ICU.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02214823. Registered 7 August 2014).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationship between physical function in intensive care test scored (PFIT-s) and (a) Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit (FSS-ICU), (b) Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and (c) ICU mobility scale (IMS) on awakening.

References

    1. Herridge M, Tansey CM, Matté A, Tomlinson G, Diaz-Granados N, Guest CB, et al. Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1293–304. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011802.
    1. Hough C. Improving function during and after critical care. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2013;19:488–95. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e328364d7ef.
    1. Iwashyna T. Survivorship will be the defining challenge of critical care in the 21st century - Editorial. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153:204–5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-3-201008030-00013.
    1. Bruce B, Fries JF, Lingala B, Gandek B, Rose M, Ware JE., Jr Better assessment of physical function: item improvement is neglected but essential. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11:R191. doi: 10.1186/ar2890.
    1. Iwashyna T. Trajectories of recovery and dysfunction after acute illness, with implications for clinical trial design. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186:302–4. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201206-1138ED.
    1. Parry SM, Granger CL, Berney S, Jones J, Beach L, El-Ansary D, et al. Assessment of impairment and activity limitations in the critically ill: A systematic review of measurement instruments and their clinimetric properties. Intensive Care Med. 2015. [Epub ahead of print].
    1. de Vet H, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurement in Medicine - A Practical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
    1. Portney L. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Vol. 2nd ed. Watkins MP, editor. Pearson/Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ; 2000.
    1. de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Ostelo RW, Beckerman H, Knol DL, Bouter LM. Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:54. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-54.
    1. Granger C, McDonald CF, Parry SM, Oliveira CC, Denehy L. Functional capacity, physical activity and muscle strength assessment of individuals with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of instruments and their measurement properties. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-135.
    1. Elliott D, Denehy L, Berney S, Alison JA. Assessing physical function and activity for survivors of a critical illness: a review of instruments. Aust Crit Care. 2011;24:155–66. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2011.05.002.
    1. Connolly BA, Jones GD, Curtis AA, Murphy PB, Douiri A, Hopkinson NS, et al. Clinical predictive value of manual muscle strength testing during critical illness: an observational cohort study. Crit Care. 2013;17:R229. doi: 10.1186/cc13052.
    1. Denehy L, de Morton NA, Skinner EH, Edbrooke L, Haines K, Warrillow S, et al. A physical function test for use in the intensive care unit: validity, responsiveness, and predictive utility of the physical function ICU test (scored) Phys Ther. 2013;9312:1638–45.
    1. Corner EJ, Wood H, Englebretsen C, Thomas A, Grant RL, Nikoletou D, et al. The Chelsea critical care physical assessment tool (CPAx): validation of an innovative new tool to measure physical morbidity in the general adult critical care population; an observational proof-of-concept pilot study. Physiotherapy. 2013;99:33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2012.01.003.
    1. Nawa R, Lettvin C, Winkelman C, Evora PR, Perme C, et al. Initial inter-rater reliability for a novel measure of patient mobility in a Cardiovascular ICU. J Crit Care. 2014;29:475.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.01.019.
    1. Kasotakis G, Schmidt U, Perry D, Grosse-Sundrup M, Benjamin J, Ryan C, et al. The surgical intensive care unit optimal mobility score predicts mortality and length of stay. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:1122–8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182376e6d.
    1. Hodgson C, Needham D, Haines K, Bailey M, Ward A, Harrold M, et al. Feasibility and inter-rater reliability of the ICU Mobility Scale. Heart Lung. 2014;43:19–24. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2013.11.003.
    1. Zanni JM, Korupolu R, Fan E, Pradhan P, Janjua K, Palmer JB, et al. Rehabilitation therapy and outcomes in acute respiratory failure: an observational pilot project. J Crit Care. 2010;25:254–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.10.010.
    1. Thrush A, Rozek M, Dekerlegand J. The clinical utility of the functional status score for the intensive care unit (FSS-ICU) at a long-term acute care hospital: a prospective cohort study. Phys Ther. 2012;92:1536–45. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110412.
    1. Files D, Morris P, Shrestha S, Dhar S, Young M, Hauser J, et al. Randomised, controlled pilot study of early rehabilitation strategies in acute respiratory failure. Crit Care. 2013;17:P540. doi: 10.1186/cc12478.
    1. Needham DM, Dinglas VD, Morris PE, Jackson JC, Hough CL, Mendez-Tellez PA, et al. Physical and cognitive performance of patients with acute lung injury 1 year after initial trophic versus full enteral feeding. EDEN trial follow-up. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188:567–76. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201304-0651OC.
    1. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994;49:M85–94. doi: 10.1093/geronj/49.2.M85.
    1. Perera S, Mody SH, Woodman RC, Studenski SA. Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:743–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00701.x.
    1. Nordon-Craft A, Schenkman M, Edbrooke L, Malone DJ, Moss M, Denehy L. The physical function intensive care test: implementation in survivors of critical illness. Phys Ther. 2014;94:1499–507. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130451.
    1. Corner EJ, Soni N, Handy JM, Brett SJ. Construct validity of the Chelsea critical care physical assessment tool: an observational study of recovery from critical illness. Crit Care. 2014;18:R55. doi: 10.1186/cc13801.
    1. Berney S, Haines K, Skinner EH, Denehy L. Safety and feasibility of an exercise prescription approach to rehabilitation across the continuum of care for survivors of critical illness. Phys Ther. 2012;92:1524–35. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110406.
    1. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-22.
    1. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85:867–72. doi: 10.2471/BLT.07.045120.
    1. De Jonghe B, Sharshar T, Lefaucheur JP, Authier F-J, Durand-Zaleski I, Boussarsar M, et al. Paresis acquired in the intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter study. J Am Med Assoc. 2002;288:2859–67. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.22.2859.
    1. Hough C, Lieu B, Caldwell E. Manual muscle strength testing of critically ill patients: feasibility and interobserver agreement. Crit Care. 2011;15:R43. doi: 10.1186/cc10005.
    1. Nordon-Craft A, Schenkman M, Edbrooke L, Malone DJ, Moss M, Denehy L. The physical function intensive care test: implementation in survivors of critical illness. Phys Ther. 2014;94:1–9. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130451.
    1. Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, van Poppel MN, Chinapaw MH, van Mechelen W, de Vet HC. Qualitative attributes and measurement properties of physical activity questionnaires: a checklist. Sports Med. 2010;40:525–37. doi: 10.2165/11531370-000000000-00000.
    1. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: CRC/Chapman and Hall; 1991.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
    1. Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:459–68. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00206-1.
    1. Norman G, Sloan J, Wyrwich K. Interpretation of changes in healthrelated quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41:582–92.
    1. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:171–8. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90069-5.
    1. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.
    1. Guyatt GH, Osoba D, Wu AW, Wyrwich KW, Norman GR. Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group. Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:371–83.
    1. Johnson M, Bland JM, Oxberry SG, Abernethy AP, Currow DC. Clinically important differences in the intensity of chronic refractory breathlessness. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013;46:957–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.01.011.
    1. Herridge M, Batt J, Dos Santos C. ICU-acquired weakness, morbidity and death. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190:361–2. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201407-1263ED.
    1. Skinner EH, Berney S, Warrillow S, Denehy L. Development of a physical function outcome measure (PFIT) and a pilot exercise training protocol for use in intensive care. Crit Care Resusc. 2009;11:110–5.
    1. Ostir GV, Volpato S, Fried LP, Chaves P, Guralnik JM. Women’s Health and Aging Study. Reliability and sensitivity to change assessed for a summary measure of lower body function: results from the Women’s Health and Aging Study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55:916–21. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00436-5.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

3
Subskrybuj