Technical Evaluation: Identification of Pathogenic Mutations in PKD1 and PKD2 in Patients with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease by Next-Generation Sequencing and Use of a Comprehensive New Classification System

Moritoshi Kinoshita, Eiji Higashihara, Haruna Kawano, Ryo Higashiyama, Daisuke Koga, Takafumi Fukui, Nobuhisa Gondo, Takehiko Oka, Kozo Kawahara, Krisztina Rigo, Tim Hague, Kiyonori Katsuragi, Kimiyoshi Sudo, Masahiko Takeshi, Shigeo Horie, Kikuo Nutahara, Moritoshi Kinoshita, Eiji Higashihara, Haruna Kawano, Ryo Higashiyama, Daisuke Koga, Takafumi Fukui, Nobuhisa Gondo, Takehiko Oka, Kozo Kawahara, Krisztina Rigo, Tim Hague, Kiyonori Katsuragi, Kimiyoshi Sudo, Masahiko Takeshi, Shigeo Horie, Kikuo Nutahara

Abstract

Genetic testing of PKD1 and PKD2 is expected to play an increasingly important role in determining allelic influences in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) in the near future. However, to date, genetic testing is not commonly employed because it is expensive, complicated because of genetic heterogeneity, and does not easily identify pathogenic variants. In this study, we developed a genetic testing system based on next-generation sequencing (NGS), long-range polymerase chain reaction, and a new software package. The new software package integrated seven databases and provided access to five cloud-based computing systems. The database integrated 241 polymorphic nonpathogenic variants detected in 140 healthy Japanese volunteers aged >35 years, who were confirmed by ultrasonography as having no cysts in either kidney. Using this system, we identified 60 novel and 30 known pathogenic mutations in 101 Japanese patients with ADPKD, with an overall detection rate of 89.1% (90/101) [95% confidence interval (CI), 83.0%-95.2%]. The sensitivity of the system increased to 93.1% (94/101) (95% CI, 88.1%-98.0%) when combined with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis, making it sufficient for use in a clinical setting. In 82 (87.2%) of the patients, pathogenic mutations were detected in PKD1 (95% CI, 79.0%-92.5%), whereas in 12 (12.8%) patients pathogenic mutations were detected in PKD2 (95% CI, 7.5%-21.0%); this is consistent with previously reported findings. In addition, we were able to reconfirm our pathogenic mutation identification results using Sanger sequencing. In conclusion, we developed a high-sensitivity NGS-based system and successfully employed it to identify pathogenic mutations in PKD1 and PKD2 in Japanese patients with ADPKD.

Conflict of interest statement

MK, RH, DK, KK, and KS are employees of Otsuka Pharmaceutical. TF and NG are employees of FALCO Biosystems. TO and KK are employees of World Fusion. KR and TH are employees of Omixon. MT is an employee of Samon-cho Clinic. There are no products in development or marketed products to declare. Otsuka Pharmaceutical has applied for patents of the functional capability of our genetic testing system; however, this does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials as detailed online in the guide for authors. We have released all data, sequences of LR-PCR primers, reaction conditions, and the algorithm of analysis software. All relevant data, materials, and algorithm are within our article and its Supporting Information files. Although the algorithm is open source, the analysis software package is not a completely open source because it includes commercial software of OMIXON TARGET, which is nextgeneration-sequencing analysis software.

Figures

Fig 1. Schematic representation of the pipeline…
Fig 1. Schematic representation of the pipeline for identification of pathogenic mutations.
Pathogenic mutations were identified on the basis of seven annotated databases: PKDB, dbSNP, SnpEff, UCSC (for conservation probability), PubMed (article searches), Pseudogene.org, and a database of polymorphic variants in 140 healthy Japanese individuals. Novel missense mutations and potential splicing mutations were evaluated for pathogenicity using public cloud-based computing (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD, MutationTaster, and NNSplice). PKDB; PKD mutation database, NCBI; National Center for Biotechnology Information, dbSNP; Single Nucleotide Polymorphism database, UCSC; University of California, Santa Cruz, SIFT; Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant, GVGD; Grantham Variation Grantham Deviation.
Fig 2. Schematic diagram of workflow in…
Fig 2. Schematic diagram of workflow in healthy volunteers.
140 healthy Japanese volunteers were recruited and they were age 35 or older and were confirmed as having no renal cysts by ultrasonography. Four nonsynonymous variants predicted to be likely pathogenic mutations in six subjects and other 134 subjects were predicted in likely neutral variants by the scoring protocol using cloud-based computing [31]. The specificity of the system was estimated to be 95.7%.
Fig 3. Schematic diagram of workflow in…
Fig 3. Schematic diagram of workflow in the patients with ADPKD.
52 definitely pathogenic mutations, 22 highly likely pathogenic mutations and 20 likely pathogenic mutations were identified in 101 Japanese patients with ADPKD. The sensitivity of the system was estimated to be 93.1% in combined with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis (MLPA).

References

    1. Gabow PA. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. New Engl J Med. 1993;329: 332–342. 10.1056/NEJM199307293290508
    1. Grantham JJ. Polycystic kidney disease: neoplasia in disguise. Am J Kidney Dis. 1990;15: 110–116. 10.1016/S0272-6386(12)80507-5
    1. Higashihara E, Nutahara K, Kojima M, Tamakoshi A, Yoshiyuki O, Sakai H, et al. Prevalence and renal prognosis of diagnosed autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease in Japan. Nephron 1998;80: 421–427. 10.1159/000045214
    1. The European Polycystic Kidney Disease Consortium. The polycystic kidney disease 1 gene encodes a 4kb transcript and lies within a duplicated region on chromosome 16. Cell 1994;77: 881–894. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90137-6
    1. Mochizuki T, Wu G, Hayashi T, Xenophontos SL, Veldhuisen B, Saris JJ, et al. PKD2, a gene for polycystic kidney disease that encodes an integral membrane protein. Science 1996;272: 1339–1342. 10.1126/science.272.5266.1339
    1. Dicks E, Ravani P, Langman D, Davidson WS, Pei Y, Parfrey PS. Incident renal events and risk factors in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a population and family-based cohort followed for 22 years. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;1: 710–717. 10.2215/CJN.01581105
    1. Torra R, Badenas C, Donell A, Nicolau C, Volpini V, Revert L, et al. Linkage, clinical features, and prognosis of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease type 1 and 2. JASN 1996;7: 2142–2151.
    1. Thomsen HS, Levine E, Meilstrup JW, Van Slyke MA, Edgar KA, Barth JC, et al. Renal cystic diseases. Eur Radiol. 1997;7: 1267–1275. 10.1007/s003300050288
    1. Huang E, Picotal MS, McCune T, Melancon JK, Montgomery RA, Ugarte R, et al. DNA testing for live kidney donors at risk for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Transplantation 2009;87: 133–137. 10.1097/TP.0b013e318191e729
    1. Bogdanova N, Markoff A, Gerke V, McCluskeyc M, Horsta J, Dworniczaka B. Homologues to the first gene for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease are pseudogenes. Genomics 2001;74: 333–341. 10.1006/geno.2001.6568
    1. Rossetti S, Consugar MB, Chapman AB, Torres VE, Guay-Woodford LM, Grantham JJ, et al. Comprehensive molecular diagnostics in autosomal dominant poly cystic kidney disease. JASN 2007;18: 2143–2160. 10.1681/ASN.2006121387
    1. Tan YC, Michaeel A, Blumenfeld J, Donahue S, Parker T, Levine D, et al. A novel long-range PCR sequencing method for genetic analysis of entire PKD1 gene. J Mol Diag. 2012;14: 305–313. 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.02.007
    1. Rossetti S, Hopp K, Sikkink RA, Sundsbak JL, Lee YK, Kubly V, et al. Identification of gene mutations in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease through targeted resequencing. JASN 2012;23: 915–933. 10.1681/ASN.2011101032
    1. Yang T, Meng Y, Wei X, Shenc J, Zhangb M, Qia C, et al. Identification of novel mutations of PKD1 gene I Chinese patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease by targeted next-generation sequencing. Clin Chim Acta. 2014;443: 12–19. 10.1016/j.cca.2014.02.011
    1. Eisenberger T, Decker C, Hiersche M, Hamann RC, Decker E, Neuber S, et al. An efficient and comprehensive strategy for genetic diagnostics of polycystic kidney disease. PLoS ONE 2015;10: e0116680 10.1371/journal.pone.0116680
    1. Tan YC, Michaeel A, Genyan L, Elemento, Blumenfeld J, Donahue S, et al. Molecular Diagnosis of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease using next-generation sequencing. J Mol Diag. 2014;16: 216–228. 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2013.10.005
    1. Trujillano D, Bullich G, Ossowski, Ballarín J, Torra R, Estivill X, et al. Diagnosis of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease using efficient PKD1 and PKD2 targeted next-generation sequencing. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2014;2: 412–421. 10.1002/mgg3.82
    1. Pei Y, Obaji J, Dupuis A, Paterson AD, Magistroni R, Dicks E, et al. Unified criteria for ultrasonographic diagnosis of ADPKD. JASN 2009;20: 205–212. 10.1681/ASN.2008050507
    1. Don RH, Cox PT, Wainwright BJ, Baker K, Mattick JS. ‘Touchdown’ PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19: 4008 10.1093/nar/19.14.4008
    1. Rodrigue S, Materna AC, Timberlake SC, Blackburn MC, Malmstrom RR, Alm EJ, et al. Unlocking short read sequencing for metagenomics. PLoS ONE 2010;5: e11840 10.1371/journal.pone.0011840
    1. Vogel U, Szczepanowski R, Claus H, Jünemannb S, Priorb K, Harmsen D. Ion torrent personal genome machine sequencing for genomic typing of Neisseria meningitidis for rapid determination of multiple layers of typing information. J Clin Biol. 2012;50: 1889–1894. 10.1128/JCM.00038-12
    1. De novo bacterial sequencing on the MiSeq system. Illumina Application Note. 2011. Available: .
    1. Regalado ES, Guo DC, Villamizar C, Avidan N, Gilchrist D, McGillivray B, et al. Exome sequencing identifies SMAD3 mutations as a cause of familial thoracic aorticaneurysm and dissection with intracranial and other arterial aneurysms. Circ Res. 2011;109: 680–686. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.248161
    1. Casari G, Sander C, Valencia A. A method to predict functional residues in proteins. Nature Structural Biol. 1995;2: 171–178. 10.1038/nsb0295-171
    1. Oliver GR. Considerations for clinical read alignment and mutational profiling using next-generation sequencing. F1000Res. 2012. July 16;1: 2 10.12688/f1000research.1-2.v2
    1. Sherry ST, Ward MH, Kholodov M, Baker J, Phan L, Smigielski EM, et al. dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29: 308–311. 10.1093/nar/29.1.308
    1. Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Mutation Database: .
    1. Siepel A, Bejerano G, Pedersen JS, Hinrichs AS, Hou M, Rosenbloom K, et al. Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes. Genome Res. 2005; 15: 1034–1050. 10.1101/gr.3715005
    1. GATK Guide article. Adding genome annotations using SnpEff VariantAnnotator. Available: updated 10 June, 2013.
    1. Audrézet MP, Cornec-Le Gall E, Chen JM, Redon S, Quéré I, Creff J, et al. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: comprehensive mutation analysis of PKD1 and PKD2 in 700 unrelated patients. Hum Mutat. 2012;33: 1239–1250. 10.1002/humu.22103
    1. Reese MG, Eeckman FH, Kulp D, Haussler D. Improved Splice Site Detection in Genie. J Comp Biol. 2009;4: 311–323. 10.1089/cmb.1997.4.311
    1. Ng PC, Henikoff S. SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31: 3812–3814. 10.1093/nar/gkg509
    1. Polyphen2: prediction of functional effects of human nonsynonymous SNPs. Available:
    1. Tavtigian SV, Greenblatt MS, Lesueur F, Byrnes GB. In silico analysis of missense substitutions using sequence-alignment based methods. Hum Mutat. 2008;29: 1327–1336. 10.1002/humu.20892
    1. Schwarz JM, Rödelsperger C, Schuelke M, Seelow D. MutationTaster evaluates disease-causing potential of sequence alterations. Nat Methods. 2010;7: 575–576. 10.1038/nmeth0810-575
    1. Schouten JP, McElgunn CJ, Waaijer R, Zwijnenburg D, Diepvens F, Pals G. Molecular profiling of invasive breast cancer by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification-based copy number analysis of tumor suppressor and oncogenes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30: e57 10.1093/nar/gnf056
    1. Higashihara E, Torres VE, Chapman AB, Grantham JJ, Bae K, Watnick TJ, et al. Tolvaptan in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: Three years’ experience. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6: 2499–2507. 10.2215/CJN.03530411
    1. Torres VE, Chapman AB, Devuyst O, Gansevoort RT, Grantham JJ, Higashihara E, et al. Tolvaptan in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367: 2407–2418. 10.1056/NEJMoa1205511
    1. Mardis ER. A decade’s perspective on DNA sequencing technology. Nature 2011;470: 198–203. 10.1038/nature09796
    1. Quail MA, Smith M, Coupland P, Otto TD, Harris SR, Connor TR, et al. A tale of three next-generation sequencing platforms: comparison of Ion Torrent, Pacific Biosciences and Illumina MiSeq sequencers. BMC Genomics. 2012;13: 341 10.1186/1471-2164-13-341
    1. Kurashige M, Hanaoka K, Imamura M, Udagawa T, Kawaguchi Y, Hasegawa T, et al. A comprehensive search for mutations in the PKD1 and PKD2 in Japanese subjects with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Clin Genet 2015;87: 266–272. 10.1111/cge.12372
    1. Hateboer N, v Dijk MA, Bogdanova N, Coto E, Saggar-Malik AK, San Millan JL, et al. Comparison of phenotypes of polycystic kidney disease types 1 and 2. European PKD1-PKD2 Study Group. Lancet 1999;353: 103–107. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)03495-3
    1. Consugar MB, Wong WC, Lundquist PA, Rossetti S, Kubly VJ, Walker DL, et al. Characterization of large rearrangements in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease and the PKD1/TSC2 contiguous gene syndrome. Kidney Int. 2008;74: 1468–1479. 10.1038/ki.2008.485

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj