Prasugrel switching from clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome in Taiwanese patients: an analysis of safety and efficacy

Ping-Yen Liu, Cheng-Huang Su, Feng-Yu Kuo, Wen-Lieng Lee, Yi-Chih Wang, Wei-Shiang Lin, Pao-Hsien Chu, Tse-Min Lu, Ping-Han Lo, Cheng-Han Lee, Wei-Ren Lan, Chien-Lung Huang, Shuji Tsukiyama, Wei-Chen Yang, Li-Chung Cheng, Virginia Rafael, Christian Nikolajsen, Wei-Hsian Yin, Ping-Yen Liu, Cheng-Huang Su, Feng-Yu Kuo, Wen-Lieng Lee, Yi-Chih Wang, Wei-Shiang Lin, Pao-Hsien Chu, Tse-Min Lu, Ping-Han Lo, Cheng-Han Lee, Wei-Ren Lan, Chien-Lung Huang, Shuji Tsukiyama, Wei-Chen Yang, Li-Chung Cheng, Virginia Rafael, Christian Nikolajsen, Wei-Hsian Yin

Abstract

The recommended maintenance dose of prasugrel for East Asian populations (i.e., Japanese and Taiwanese) is 3.75 mg as part of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for the prevention of recurrent ischemia and stent thrombosis in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This modified dosage regimen has been established in studies conducted in Japan; however, the efficacy and safety of switching from clopidogrel to prasugrel DAPT among Taiwanese patients remain to be explored. In this phase IV, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study, we evaluated the 4-week pharmacodynamic response, and the 48-week safety outcomes of prasugrel 3.75 mg after a switch from clopidogrel in Taiwanese ACS patients. A total of 203 prasugrel-naïve ACS patients (over 90% male) who had received post-PCI clopidogrel DAPT for at least 2 weeks were enrolled from ten medical centers in Taiwan and subsequently switched to prasugrel 3.75 mg DAPT. Four weeks after the switch, P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) values were significantly decreased in the total cohort (mean - 18.2 ± 48.1; 95% confidence interval - 24.9 to - 11.5, p < 0.001), and there was an overall consistent antiplatelet response in the treated subjects. The proportion of patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR; PRU > 208) dropped from 23.5 to 10% (p < 0.001). Female sex was associated with a greater PRU reduction with prasugrel, whereas HPR at baseline, age ≥ 65 years, and body mass index ≥ 25 best predicted HPR at Week 4. Throughout the 48-week treatment with prasugrel, the incidences of MACE (1.0%) and TIMI major bleeding (2.0%) were rather low, accompanying an acceptable safety profile of TIMI minor (6.4%) and non-major, non-minor clinically relevant bleeding (3.0%). Overall, switching to the maintenance dose of prasugrel (3.75 mg) was observed to be effective and well tolerated among post-PCI ACS patients in Taiwan. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT03672097.

Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome; Antiplatelet; P2Y12 reaction unit; Prasugrel; Regimen switch.

Conflict of interest statement

Shuji Tsukiyama, Wei-Chen Yang, and Li-Chung Cheng are Daiichi-Sankyo employees. Virginia Rafael and Christian Nikolajsen are Linical employees and participated in a project sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo. Wen-Lieng Lee was a chair of a meeting sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient enrollment flowchart for Switch Study (NCT03672097) showing the flow of patients enrolled from the start of the study to end of Period 1 and Period 2. The number of patients and the reasons for patients not available for analysis are indicated. 1m 1 month, PFT platelet function testing
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparisons of PRU values at baseline and Week 4 in all patients and prespecified patient subgroups. a PRU values at baseline and Week 4 by total patients and subgroups of ACS type and sex. b Change in PRU values from baseline by total patients and subgroups of ACS type and sex; p values of each PRU change are shown next to the corresponding data point. Each bar shows the mean PRU or change with SD (solid line) and 95% CI (dashed line). c Histograms of P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) at baseline and Week 4. The dashed lines indicate the PRU levels evaluated in the study. ACS acute coronary syndrome, CI confidence interval, NSTEMI non-STEMI, PRU P2YP12 reaction unit, SD standard deviation, STEMI ST elevation myocardial infarction, UA unstable angina
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Risk factor analyses for PRU change from baseline and HPR (PRU > 208) at Week 4. a The adjusted LS means with 95% CI and the corresponding p values of factors associated with PRU change from baseline are shown; statistical analysis performed by a stepwise ANCOVA model. b The adjusted OR with 95% CI and the corresponding p values of factors associated with HPR (PRU > 208) at Week 4 are shown; statistical analysis performed by a multivariate logistic model. ANCOVA analysis of covariance, BMI body mass index, CI confidence interval, LS least squares, OR odds ratio, PRU P2YP12 reaction unit, SD standard deviation

References

    1. Angiolillo DJ, Guzman LA, Bass TA. Current antiplatelet therapies: benefits and limitations. Am Heart J. 2008;156:S3–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.06.003.
    1. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Montalescot G, Ruzyllo W, Gottlieb S, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2001–2015. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706482.
    1. Bagai A, Peterson ED, Honeycutt E, Effron MB, Cohen DJ, Goodman SG, et al. In-hospital switching between adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitors in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights into contemporary practice from the TRANSLATE-ACS study. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015;4:499–508. doi: 10.1177/2048872614564082.
    1. Angiolillo DJ, Saucedo JF, Deraad R, Frelinger AL, Gurbel PA, Costigan TM, et al. Increased platelet inhibition after switching from maintenance clopidogrel to prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes: results of the SWAP (SWitching Anti Platelet) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1017–1023. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.02.072.
    1. Ueno T, Koiwaya H, Sasaki K-I, Katsuki Y, Katsuda Y, Murasato Y, et al. Changes in P2Y12 reaction units after switching treatments from prasugrel to clopidogrel in Japanese patients with acute coronary syndrome followed by elective coronary stenting. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2017;32:341–350. doi: 10.1007/s12928-016-0417-x.
    1. Nishi T, Ariyoshi N, Nakayama T, Fujimoto Y, Sugimoto K, Takahara M, et al. Increased platelet inhibition after switching from maintenance clopidogrel to prasugrel in japanese patients with stable coronary artery disease. Circ J. 2015;79:2439–2444. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0546.
    1. Kimura K, Kimura T, Ishihara M, Nakagawa Y, Nakao K, Miyauchi K, et al. JCS 2018 guideline on diagnosis and treatment of acute coronary syndrome. Circ J. 2019;83:1085–1196. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0133.
    1. Li Y-H, Lee C-H, Huang W-C, Wang Y-C, Su C-H, Sung P-H, et al. 2020 Focused update of the 2012 Guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology for the management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2020;36:285–307.
    1. Saito S, Isshiki T, Kimura T, Ogawa H, Yokoi H, Nanto S, et al. Efficacy and safety of adjusted-dose prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in Japanese patients with acute coronary syndrome: the PRASFIT-ACS study. Circ J. 2014;78:1684–1692. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-13-1482.
    1. Chang H-Y, Hsu L-W, Lee C-H, Lin C-C, Huang C-W, Chen P-W, et al. Impact of platelet volume on the clinical outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2019;35:563–570.
    1. Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, Casey DEJ, Ganiats TG, Holmes DRJ, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:e139–e228. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017.
    1. Collet J-P, Thiele H, Barbato E, Barthélémy O, Bauersachs J, Bhatt DL, et al. ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2020;2020:1–79.
    1. Urban P, Mehran R, Colleran R, Angiolillo DJ, Byrne RA, Capodanno D, et al. Defining high bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2019;140:240–261. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040167.
    1. Gargiulo G, Esposito G. Consolidating the value of the standardised ARC-HBR definition. EuroIntervention. 2021;16:1126–1128. doi: 10.4244/EIJV16I14A202.
    1. Sibbing D, Aradi D, Jacobshagen C, Gross L, Trenk D, Geisler T, et al. Guided de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (TROPICAL-ACS): a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2017;390:1747–1757. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32155-4.
    1. Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Weisz G, Rinaldi MJ, Neumann F-J, Metzger DC, et al. Platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes after coronary artery implantation of drug-eluting stents (ADAPT-DES): a prospective multicentre registry study. Lancet. 2013;382:614–623. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61170-8.
    1. De JC, Kim MH, Guo LZ, Jin E, Shin E-S, Ann SH, et al. Pharmacodynamic study of prasugrel or clopidogrel in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome with CYP2C19 genetic variants undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PRAISE-GENE trial) Int J Cardiol. 2020;305:11–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.01.058.
    1. Nakamura M, Morino Y, Kakuta T, Hata Y, Takamisawa I, Tanabe K, et al. Monotherapy with prasugrel after dual-antiplatelet therapy for Japanese percutaneous coronary intervention patients with high bleeding risk - a prospective cohort study (PENDULUM mono Study) Circ J. 2020;85:27–36. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0786.
    1. Jin H-Y, Yang T-H, Choi K-N, Seo J-S, Jang J-S, Kim D-K, et al. Randomized comparison of the platelet inhibitory efficacy between low dose prasugrel and standard dose clopidogrel in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Korean Circ J. 2014;44:82–88. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2014.44.2.82.
    1. Li YH, Chiu YW, Cheng JJ, Hsieh IC, Lo PH, Lei MH, et al. Duration of clopidogrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a real-world observation in Taiwan from 2012 to 2015. Circ J. 2019;83:1317–1323. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-1283.
    1. Nakamura M, Kadota K, Takahashi A, Kanda J, Anzai H, Ishii Y, et al. Relationship between platelet reactivity and ischemic and bleeding events after percutaneous coronary intervention in East Asian patients: 1-year results of the PENDULUM registry. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:e015439.
    1. Miyazaki S, Isshiki T. Re-evaluation of bleeding events in the Japanese PRASFIT-Elective and PRASFIT-ACS clinical trials using the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria. Cardiovasc Pharmacol Open Access. 2015;04:1000162. doi: 10.4172/2329-6607.1000162.
    1. Nakamura M, Kozuma K, Kitazono T, Iizuka T, Sekine T, Shiosakai K, et al. Prasugrel for Japanese patients with ischemic heart disease in long-term clinical practice (PRASFIT-Practice II) - a 3-month interim analysis of a postmarketing observational study. Circ J. 2019;83:637–646. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0956.
    1. Nishikawa M, Isshiki T, Kimura T, Ogawa H, Yokoi H, Miyazaki S, et al. Risk of bleeding and repeated bleeding events in prasugrel-treated patients: a review of data from the Japanese PRASFIT studies. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2017;32:93–105. doi: 10.1007/s12928-016-0452-7.
    1. Claassens DMF, Vos GJA, Bergmeijer TO, Hermanides RS, van’t Hof AWJ, van der Harst P, et al. A genotype-guided strategy for oral P2Y(12) inhibitors in primary PCI. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1621–1631. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1907096.
    1. Kim HS, Kang J, Hwang D, Han JK, Yang HM, Kang HJ, et al. Prasugrel-based de-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome (HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS): an open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority randomised trial. Lancet. 2020;396:1079–1089. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31791-8.
    1. Mehran R, Baber U, Sharma SK, Cohen DJ, Angiolillo DJ, Briguori C, et al. Ticagrelor with or without aspirin in high-risk patients after PCI. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:2032–2042. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908419.
    1. Kim BK, Hong SJ, Cho YH, Yun KH, Kim YH, Suh Y, et al. Effect of ticagrelor monotherapy vs ticagrelor with aspirin on major bleeding and cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome: the TICO randomized clinical trial. J Am Med Assoc. 2020;323:2407–2416. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7580.
    1. Lee Y-C, Liao Y-C, Chang F-C, Huang H-C, Tsai J-Y, Chung C-P. Investigating CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele statuses and their association with stroke of different etiologies in a Taiwanese population. J Chin Med Assoc. 2019;82:469–472. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000101.
    1. Pankert M, Quilici J, Loundou AD, Verdier V, Lambert M, Deharo P, et al. Impact of obesity and the metabolic syndrome on response to clopidogrel or prasugrel and bleeding risk in patients treated after coronary stenting. Am J Cardiol. 2014;113:54–59. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.09.011.
    1. Niijima S, Ohmori T, Kario K. Differential impact of diabetes mellitus on antiplatelet effects of prasugrel and clopidogrel. Thromb J. 2018;16:5. doi: 10.1186/s12959-017-0159-8.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj