An exploration of primary care healthcare professionals' understanding of pain and pain management following a brief pain science education

Jagjit Mankelow, Cormac G Ryan, Paul W Green, Paul C Taylor, Denis Martin, Jagjit Mankelow, Cormac G Ryan, Paul W Green, Paul C Taylor, Denis Martin

Abstract

Background: Persistent pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide yet implementation of clinical guidelines that recommend a biopsychosocial approach remains a challenge in clinical practise. Limited pain understanding amongst clinicians may be partly responsible for this.

Purpose of the study: 1) Qualitatively explore the experience of receiving PSE, understanding of PSE and operationalisation of PSE-related principles in routine clinical practice. 2) Quantitatively explore pain knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours of general practitioners (GPs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) before and after pain science education (PSE).

Methods: An exploratory, single-site, mixed-methods study in north-east England. Fifteen NPs/GPs completed questionnaires and a case-vignette before and after a 70-min face-to-face PSE lecture. Qualitative data were thematically analysed from two focus groups after the intervention.

Results: Clinicians' relatively high prior levels of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour were similar after PSE. Qualitative themes described facilitation of self-reflection on pain management behaviours, and difficulties in operationalising PSE principles in practise including: limited patient rapport; short appointment times; patients' passive and often oppositional biomedical treatment expectations; and clinicians' lack of readily understandable language to communicate with patients.

Conclusion: The findings highlight the value of PSE perceived by these clinicians who were already favourably inclined towards biopsychosocial pain management. They sought more resources for their personal learning and for communication with patients. Even with such favourable disposition, the practicalities and environment of clinical practice impeded the operationalisation of PSE-related principles.

Trial registration: This study was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.Gov ( NCT04587596 ) in October 2020.

Keywords: GPs; Mixed-methods; Nurse practitioners; Pain education.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

© 2022. The Author(s).

References

    1. Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, Hanson SW, Chatterji, Vos T. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet. 2019. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32340-0.
    1. Gatchel RJ, Turk DC, editors. Psychological approaches to pain management: a practitioners handbook. New York: The Guildford Press; 2002.
    1. Hall AM, Scurrey SR, Pike AE, Albury C, Richmond HL, Matthews J, Toomey E, Hayden JA, Etchegary H. Physician-reported barriers to using evidence-based recommendations for low back pain in clinical practice: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies using the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci. 2019;14:49. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0884-4.
    1. Morasco BJ, Yarborough BJ, Smith NX, Dobscha SK, Deyo RA, Perrin NA, Green CA. Higher prescription opioid dose is associate with worse patient-reported pain outcomes and more health care utilization. J Pain. 2017;18(4):437–445. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.12.004.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Chronic pain (primary and secondary) in over 16s: assessment of all chronic pain and management of chronic primary pain (NICE guideline NG193) 2021.
    1. Hadi MA, Alldred DP, Briggs M, Marczewski K, Closs SJ. ‘Treated as a number, not treated as a person’: a qualitative exploration of the perceived barriers to effective pain management of patients with chronic pain. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e016454. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016454.
    1. Mankelow J, Ryan CG, Taylor PC, Green P, Martin DJ. A systematic review and Meta-analysis of the effects of biopsychosocial pain education upon health care professional pain attitudes, knowledge, behaviour and patient outcomes. J Pain. 2021. 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.06.010.
    1. Watson JA, Ryan CG, Cooper L, Ellington D, Whittle R, Lavender M, et al. Pain neuroscience education for adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analyis. J Pain. 2019; .
    1. Moseley GL, Butler DS. Fifteen years of explaining pain: the past, present and future. J Pain. 2015;16(9):807–813. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.05.005.
    1. Mankelow J, Ryan CG, Taylor PC, Martin DJ. The effect of pain neurophysiology education on healthcare students’ knowledge, attitudes and behaviours towards pain: a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020. 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102249.
    1. Shannon-Baker P. Making paradigms meaningful in mixed methods research. J Mixed Methods Res. 2016;10(4):319–334. doi: 10.1177/1558689815575861.
    1. Care quality commission. Dr P Ellenger & Partners (the Linthorpe surgery) quality Report. 2016. . (Accessed July 2021).
    1. Butler D, Moseley GL. Explain pain. Adelaide: Noigroup; 2003.
    1. Catley MJ, O’Connell NE, Moseley GL. How good is the neurophysiology of pain questionnaire? A Rasch analysis of psychometric properties. J Pain. 2013;14(8):818–827. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.02.008.
    1. Houben RMA, Vlaeyen JWS, Peters M, Ostelo RWJG, Wolters PMJC, Stomp-van den Berg SGM. Health care providers’ attitudes and beliefs towards common low Back pain: factor structure and psychometric properties of the HC-PAIRS. Clin J Pain. 2004;20(1):37–44. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200401000-00008.
    1. Moran RW, Rushworth WM, Mason J. Investigation of four self-report instruments (FABT, TSK-HC, Back-PAQ, HC-PAIRS) to measure healthcare practitioners' attitudes and beliefs toward low back pain: reliability, convergent validity and survey of New Zealand osteopaths and manipulative physiotherapists. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017;32:44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.08.008.
    1. Bishop A, Foster NE, Thomas E, Hay EM. How does the self-reported clinical management of patients with low back pain relate to the attitudes and beliefs of health care practitioners? A survey of UK general practitioners and physiotherapists. Pain. 2008;135:187–195. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.11.010.
    1. Guest G, Namey E, McKenna K. How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence base for nonprobability sample sizes. Field Methods. 2017;29(1):3–22. doi: 10.1177/1525822X16639015.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual Res Psychol. 2020. 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238.
    1. Louw A, Vogsland R, Marth L, Marshall P, Cox T, Landers M. Interdisciplinary pain neuroscience continuing education in the veterans affairs. Live training and live-stream with 1-year follow-up. Clin J Pain. 2019;35:901–907. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000756.
    1. Slater H, Briggs AM, Smith AJ, Bunzli S, Davies SJ, Quintner JL. Implementing evidence-informed policy into practice for health care professionals managing people with low back pain in Australian rural settings: a preliminary prospective single-cohort study. Pain Med. 2014;15:1657–1668. doi: 10.1111/pme.12351.
    1. Epstein-Sher S, Jaffe DH, Lahad A. Are they complying? Physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and readiness to change regarding low back pain treatment guideline adherence. Spine. 2017;42(4):247–252. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001714.
    1. Baird B, Charles A, Honeyman M, Maguire D, Das P. The King’s Fund: Understanding pressures in general practice. 2016.
    1. Kelly S, Johnson GT, Harbison RD. “Pressured to prescribe” the impact of economic and regulatory factors on south-eastern ED physicians when managing the drug seeking patient. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2016;9(2):58–63. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.179454.
    1. Yahanda AT, Mozersky J. What’s the role of time in shared decision making? AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(5):e416–e422. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.416.
    1. Berquin A, Grisart J. To prescribe or not to prescribe…(in chronic pain…and elsewhere…)? Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2011;54:465–477. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2011.09.008.
    1. Suman A, Armijo-Olivo S, Deshpande S, Marietta-Vasquez J, Dennett L, Miciak M, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of mass media campaigns for the management of low back pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2020. 10.1080/09638288.2020.1743777.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

3
Subskrybuj