Atazanavir pharmacokinetics with and without tenofovir during pregnancy

Mark Mirochnick, Brookie M Best, Alice M Stek, Edmund V Capparelli, Chengcheng Hu, Sandra K Burchett, Steven S Rossi, Elizabeth Hawkins, Michael Basar, Elizabeth Smith, Jennifer S Read, IMPAACT 1026s Study Team, Francesca Aweeka, Emily Barr, Kenneth D Braun, Jennifer Bryant, Kathleen A Medvik, Amy Jennings, Mark Mirochnick, Brookie M Best, Alice M Stek, Edmund V Capparelli, Chengcheng Hu, Sandra K Burchett, Steven S Rossi, Elizabeth Hawkins, Michael Basar, Elizabeth Smith, Jennifer S Read, IMPAACT 1026s Study Team, Francesca Aweeka, Emily Barr, Kenneth D Braun, Jennifer Bryant, Kathleen A Medvik, Amy Jennings

Abstract

Background: Few data are available describing atazanavir exposure during pregnancy, especially when used in combination with tenofovir, whose coadministration with atazanavir results in decreased atazanavir exposure.

Design: International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials 1026 s is an ongoing, prospective, nonblinded study of antiretroviral pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected pregnant women that included 2 cohorts receiving atazanavir/ritonavir 300 mg/100 mg once daily, either with or without tenofovir.

Methods: Intensive steady-state 24-hour pharmacokinetic profiles were performed during the third trimester and at 6-12 weeks postpartum. Atazanavir was measured by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (detection limit 0.047 mcg/mL). Pharmacokinetic targets were the estimated 10th percentile atazanavir area under the concentration versus time curve [(AUC): 29.4 mcg · hr · mL-1] in nonpregnant historical controls (mean AUC = 57 mcg · hr · mL-1) and a trough concentration of 0.15 mcg/mL, the concentration target used in therapeutic drug monitoring programs.

Results: Median atazanavir AUC was reduced during the third trimester compared with postpartum for subjects not receiving tenofovir (41.9 vs. 57.9 mcg · hr · mL-1, P = 0.02) and for subjects receiving tenofovir (28.8 vs. 39.6 mcg · hr · mL-1, P = 0.04). During the third trimester, AUC was below the target in 33% (6 of 18) of women not receiving tenofovir and 55% (11 of 20) of women receiving tenofovir. Trough concentration was below the target in 6% (1 of 18) of women not receiving tenofovir and 15% (3 of 20) of women receiving tenofovir. The median (range) ratio of cord blood/maternal atazanavir concentration in 29-paired samples was 0.18 (0-0.45).

Conclusions: Atazanavir exposure is reduced by pregnancy and by concomitant tenofovir use. A dose increase of atazanavir/ritonavir to 400 mg/100 mg may be necessary in pregnant women to ensure atazanavir exposure equivalent to that seen in nonpregnant adults.

Figures

Figure 1. Median atazanavir concentrations during pregnancy…
Figure 1. Median atazanavir concentrations during pregnancy and postpartum
Median atazanavir concentration-time curves for atazanavir without tenofovir subjects (top graph) and atazanavir with tenofovir subjects (bottom graph). The thin solid line represents the expected (50th percentile) concentration-time profile in non-pregnant adults.
Figure 3. Maternal delivery and cord blood…
Figure 3. Maternal delivery and cord blood atazanavir concentrations
Maternal delivery atazanavir concentrations, cord blood atazanavir concentrations and their ratio plotted against the interval between maternal dosing and delivery. Filled circles represent maternal plasma atazanavir concentration at delivery, open circle represent cord blood atazanavir concentration, filled diamonds represent the ratio of cord blood to maternal delivery atazanavir concentration.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj