Gastric venous reconstruction to reduce gastric venous congestion after total pancreatectomy: study protocol of a single-centre prospective non-randomised observational study (IDEAL Phase 2A) - GENDER study (Gastric v EN ous D rainag E R econstruction)

Arianeb Mehrabi, Martin Loos, Ali Ramouz, Arash Dooghaie Moghadam, Pascal Probst, Felix Nickel, Anja Schaible, Markus Mieth, Thilo Hackert, Markus W Büchler, Arianeb Mehrabi, Martin Loos, Ali Ramouz, Arash Dooghaie Moghadam, Pascal Probst, Felix Nickel, Anja Schaible, Markus Mieth, Thilo Hackert, Markus W Büchler

Abstract

Introduction: Total pancreatoduodenectomy (TP) is the standard surgical approach for treating extended pancreas tumours. If TP is performed with splenectomy, the left gastric vein (LGV) sometimes needs to be sacrificed for oncological or technical reasons, which can result in gastric venous congestion (GVC). GVC can lead to gastric venous infarction, which in turn causes gastric perforation with abdominal sepsis. To avoid gastric venous infarction, partial or total gastrectomy is usually performed if GVC occurs after TP. However, gastrectomy can be avoided by reconstructing the gastric venous outflow to overcome GVC and avoid gastric venous infarction. The current study aims to assess the role of gastric venous outflow reconstruction to prevent GVC after TP and avoid gastrectomy.

Methods and analysis: In the current single-centre observational pilot study, 20 patients will be assigned to study after intraoperative evaluation of gastric venous drainage after LGV resection during TP. During surgery, on-site evaluation by the surgeon, endoscopic examination, indocyanine green, gastric venous drainage flowmetry and spectral analysis will be performed. Postoperatively, patients will receive standard post-TP care and treatment. During hospitalisation, endoscopic examination with indocyanine green will be performed on the 1st, 3rd and 7th postoperative day to evaluate gastric ischaemia. Ischaemia markers will be evaluated daily after surgery. After discharge, patients will be followed-up for 90 days, during which mortality and morbidities will be recorded. The main endpoints of the study will include, rate of GVC, rate of gastric ischaemia, rate of postpancreatectomy gastrectomy, rate of reoperation, morbidity and mortality.

Ethics and dissemination: The study protocol has been reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Heidelberg. The results will be actively disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations, and are expected in 2022.

Trial registration number: NCT04850430.

Keywords: adult surgery; pancreatic surgery; surgery.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design flow chart. PODs, postoperative days.

References

    1. Barbier L, Jamal W, Dokmak S, et al. . Impact of total pancreatectomy: short- and long-term assessment. HPB 2013;15:882–92. 10.1111/hpb.12054
    1. Collins JJ, Craighead JE, Brooks JR. Rationale for total pancreatectomy for carcinoma of the pancreatic head. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 1966;274:599–602. 10.1056/NEJM196603172741103
    1. Nakao A, Yamada S, Fujii T, et al. . Gastric venous congestion and bleeding in association with total pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2018;25:150–4. 10.1002/jhbp.523
    1. Hishida M, Nakao A, Hatsuno T, et al. . Total pancreatectomy with segmental duodenectomy preserving right gastroepiploic vein. Hepatogastroenterology 2011;58:198–201.
    1. Tanaka M, Ito H, Ono Y, et al. . Impact of portal vein resection with splenic vein reconstruction after pancreatoduodenectomy on sinistral portal hypertension: who needs reconstruction?. Surgery 2019;165:291–7. 10.1016/j.surg.2018.08.025
    1. McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, et al. . No surgical innovation without evaluation: the ideal recommendations. Lancet 2009;374:1105–12. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61116-8
    1. McCulloch P. The ideal recommendations and urological innovation. World J Urol 2011;29:331–6. 10.1007/s00345-011-0647-6
    1. Hackert T, Weitz J, Büchler MW. Reinsertion of the gastric coronary vein to avoid venous gastric congestion in pancreatic surgery. HPB 2015;17:368–70. 10.1111/hpb.12321
    1. Hackert T, Büchler MW, Werner J. Surgical options in the management of pancreatic cancer. Minerva Chir 2009;64:465–76.
    1. Hartwig W, Hackert T, Hinz U, et al. . Multivisceral resection for pancreatic malignancies: risk-analysis and long-term outcome. Ann Surg 2009;250:81–7. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ad657b
    1. Natsume T, Shuto K, Yanagawa N, et al. . The classification of anatomic variations in the perigastric vessels by Dual-phase CT to reduce intraoperative bleeding during laparoscopic gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 2011;25:1420–4. 10.1007/s00464-010-1407-1
    1. Strasberg SM, Bhalla S, Sanchez LA, et al. . Pattern of venous collateral development after splenic vein occlusion in an extended Whipple procedure : comparison with collateral vein pattern in cases of sinistral portal hypertension. J Gastrointest Surg 2011;15:2070–9. 10.1007/s11605-011-1673-9
    1. Bilbro NA, Hirst A, Paez A, et al. . The ideal reporting guidelines: a Delphi consensus statement stage specific recommendations for reporting the evaluation of surgical innovation. Ann Surg 2021;273:82–5. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004180
    1. Sandroussi C, McGilvray ID. Gastric venous reconstruction after radical pancreatic surgery: case report and review of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg 2010;14:1027–30. 10.1007/s11605-010-1192-0
    1. Strobel O, Hackert T, Buechler M. Distal spleno-renal shunt for reconstruction of the gastric and splenic venous drainage during pancreatectomy with resection of the portal venous confluence. HPB 2018;20:S271. 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.06.229

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj