Foot orthoses for people with rheumatoid arthritis, involving quantitative and qualitative outcomes: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Laura Ramos-Petersen, Christoper J Nester, Gabriel Gijon-Nogueron, Ana Belen Ortega-Avila, Laura Ramos-Petersen, Christoper J Nester, Gabriel Gijon-Nogueron, Ana Belen Ortega-Avila

Abstract

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) involves changes to foot structure and function, and there is an association between RA and foot pain. This pain affects those patient's physical activity and experience of daily living. While there is clinical evidence for the value of foot orthoses (FO) on foot pain, there is a wide range of FO available and there is little evidence on the relative benefits of one orthoses type over another, especially in terms of their impact on physical activity and associated well-being. The aim of this study is to compare physical activity, general and foot health and foot health experiences in people with RA when wearing three different types of FO.

Methods and analysis: A randomised controlled trial with three arms will compare the effects of (1) custom FO made using a direct adaptation technique, (2) custom FO made through a digital design and production process and (3) prefabricated orthoses. The primary outcome is physical activity measured using a GENEActiv bracelet. Secondary outcomes will be pain, function and disability and associated foot and general health evaluated using existing questionnaires. Semistructured interviews will identify patients' experiences of the orthoses and living with RA.

Ethics and dissemination: The study has been approved by the Portal de Ética de la Investigación Biomédica de Andalucía ethical committee (SPAR-001). The results will be disseminated regardless of the magnitude or direction of effect.

Trial registration number: NCT03170947; Pre-results.

Keywords: clinical trials; foot & ankle; qualitative research; rheumatology.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Group 1 (A) direct adaptation technique posterior view, group 1 (B) direct adaptation technique medial view, group 1 (C) direct adaptation technique anterior view. Group 2 (A) CAD/CAM foot orthoses posterior view, group 2 (B) CAD/CAM medial view, group 2 (C) CAD/CAM anterior view. Group 3 (A) prefabricated orthoses posterior view, group 3 (B) prefabricated orthoses medial view, group 3 (C) prefabricated orthoses anterior view. CAD, Computer-Aided Design; CAM, Computer-Aided Manufacturing.

References

    1. van der Leeden M, Steultjens MPM, Ursum J, et al. . Prevalence and course of forefoot impairments and walking disability in the first eight years of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:1596–602. 10.1002/art.24188
    1. Otter SJ, Lucas K, Springett K, et al. . Foot pain in rheumatoid arthritis prevalence, risk factors and management: an epidemiological study. Clin Rheumatol 2010;29:255–71. 10.1007/s10067-009-1312-y
    1. Carroll M, Parmar P, Dalbeth N, et al. . Gait characteristics associated with the foot and ankle in inflammatory arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015;16:134. 10.1186/s12891-015-0596-0
    1. Inoue EN, Andrade APde, Skare T, et al. . Evaluation of foot functionality in cases of rheumatoid arthritis through the FFI-BR and FHSQ-BR questionnaires: a cross-sectional observational study. Sao Paulo Med J 2018;136:520–4. 10.1590/1516-3180.2018.0175161118
    1. Paolo D, Margiotta E, Basta F, et al. . Physical activity and sedentary behavior in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. PLoS One 2018;13.
    1. Lee J, Dunlop D, Ehrlich-Jones L, et al. . Public health impact of risk factors for physical inactivity in adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 2012;64:488–93. 10.1002/acr.21582
    1. Fenton SAM, Veldhuijzen van Zanten JJCS, Duda JL, et al. . Sedentary behaviour in rheumatoid arthritis: definition, measurement and implications for health. Rheumatology 2018;57:213–26. 10.1093/rheumatology/kex053
    1. Turesson C, Eberhardt K, Jacobsson LTH, et al. . Incidence and predictors of severe extra-articular disease manifestations in an early rheumatoid arthritis inception cohort. Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66:1543–4. 10.1136/ard.2007.076521
    1. Ramírez LA, Rodríguez C, Cardiel MH. Burden of illness of rheumatoid arthritis in Latin America: a regional perspective. Clin Rheumatol 2015;34:9–15. 10.1007/s10067-015-3012-0
    1. Williams AE, Nester CJ, Ravey MI. Rheumatoid arthritis patients' experiences of wearing therapeutic footwear - A qualitative investigation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007;8:1–8. 10.1186/1471-2474-8-104
    1. Craig ET, Perin J, Zeger S, et al. . What does the patient global health assessment in RA really tell us? contribution of specific dimensions of health-related quality of life. Arthritis Care Res 201910.1002/acr.24073. [Epub ahead of print: 24 Sep 2019].
    1. Novak P, Burger H, Tomsic M, et al. . Influence of foot orthoses on plantar pressures, foot pain and walking ability of rheumatoid arthritis patients–a randomised controlled study. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:638–45. 10.1080/09638280802239441
    1. Tenten-Diepenmaat M, Dekker J, Heymans MW, et al. . Systematic review on the comparative effectiveness of foot orthoses in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Foot Ankle Res 2019;12:1–16. 10.1186/s13047-019-0338-x
    1. Reina-Bueno M, Vázquez-Bautista MDC, Pérez-García S, et al. . Effectiveness of custom-made foot orthoses in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2019;33:661–9. 10.1177/0269215518819118
    1. Gijon-Nogueron G, Ramos-Petersen L, Ortega-Avila AB, et al. . Effectiveness of foot orthoses in patients with rheumatoid arthritis related to disability and pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Qual Life Res 2018;27:3059–69. 10.1007/s11136-018-1913-5
    1. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. . 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 2010;62:2569–81. 10.1002/art.27584
    1. Boonstra AM, Schiphorst Preuper HR, Balk GA, et al. . Cut-Off points for mild, moderate, and severe pain on the visual analogue scale for pain in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Pain 2014;155:2545–50. 10.1016/j.pain.2014.09.014
    1. Healy A, Farmer S, Pandyan A, et al. . A systematic review of randomised controlled trials assessing effectiveness of prosthetic and orthotic interventions. PLoS One 2018;13:e0192094. 10.1371/journal.pone.0192094
    1. Nester CJ, Graham A, Martinez-Santos A, et al. . National profile of foot orthotic provision in the United Kingdom, part 1: practitioners and scope of practice. J Foot Ankle Res 2017;10:1–11. 10.1186/s13047-017-0215-4
    1. Gijon-nogueron G, Cortes-jeronimo E, Cervera-marin JA, et al. . Foot orthoses custom-made by vacuum forming on the non-load-bearing foot : Preliminary results in male children with calcaneal apophysitis (Sever ’ s disease), 2013.
    1. Gijon-Nogueron G, Cortes-Jeronimo E, Cervera-Marin JA, et al. . The effects of custom-made foot orthosis using the central stabilizer element on foot pain. Prosthet Orthot Int 2015;39:293–9. 10.1177/0309364614531012
    1. Caravaggi P, Giangrande A, Lullini G, et al. . In shoe pressure measurements during different motor tasks while wearing safety shoes: the effect of custom made insoles vs. prefabricated and off-the-shelf. Gait Posture 2016;50:232–8. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.09.013
    1. Arvidsson D, Fridolfsson J, Börjesson M. Measurement of physical activity in clinical practice using accelerometers. J Intern Med 2019;286:137–53. 10.1111/joim.12908
    1. Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres? Pain 1997;72:95–7. 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00005-5
    1. Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Burdett RG, et al. . Evidence of validity for the foot and ankle ability measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int 2005;26:968–83. 10.1177/107110070502601113
    1. Bennett PJ, Patterson C, Wearing S, et al. . Development and validation of a questionnaire designed to measure foot-health status. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1998;88:419–28. 10.7547/87507315-88-9-419
    1. Pavey TG, Gomersall SR, Clark BK, et al. . The validity of the GENEActiv wrist-worn accelerometer for measuring adult sedentary time in free living. J Sci Med Sport 2016;19:395–9. 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.04.007
    1. Browne RH. On the use of a pilot sample for sample size determination. Stat Med 1995;14:1933–40. 10.1002/sim.4780141709

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj