Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Patients with Advanced HCC and Elevated Alpha-Fetoprotein Treated with Ramucirumab in Two Randomized Phase III Trials

Josep M Llovet, Amit G Singal, Augusto Villanueva, Richard S Finn, Masatoshi Kudo, Peter R Galle, Masafumi Ikeda, Sophie Callies, Louise M McGrath, Chunxiao Wang, Paolo Abada, Ryan C Widau, Elena Gonzalez-Gugel, Andrew X Zhu, Josep M Llovet, Amit G Singal, Augusto Villanueva, Richard S Finn, Masatoshi Kudo, Peter R Galle, Masafumi Ikeda, Sophie Callies, Louise M McGrath, Chunxiao Wang, Paolo Abada, Ryan C Widau, Elena Gonzalez-Gugel, Andrew X Zhu

Abstract

Purpose: Ramucirumab is an effective treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) and baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥400 ng/mL. We aimed to identify prognostic and predictive factors of response to ramucirumab in patients with aHCC with AFP ≥400 ng/mL from the phase III REACH and REACH-2 randomized trials.

Patients and methods: Patients with aHCC, Child-Pugh class A with prior sorafenib treatment were randomized in REACH and REACH-2 (ramucirumab 8 mg/kg or placebo, biweekly). Meta-analysis of individual patient-level data (pooled population) from REACH (AFP ≥400 ng/mL) and REACH-2 was performed. A drug exposure analysis was conducted for those with evaluable pharmacokinetic data. To identify potential prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), multivariate analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. To define predictors of ramucirumab benefit, subgroup-by-treatment interaction terms were evaluated.

Results: Of 542 patients (316 ramucirumab, 226 placebo) analyzed, eight variables had independent prognostic value associated with poor outcome (geographical region, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score ≥1, AFP >1,000 ng/mL, Child-Pugh >A5, extrahepatic spread, high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, high alkaline phosphatase and aspartate aminotransferase). Ramucirumab survival benefit was present across all subgroups, including patients with very aggressive HCC [above median AFP; HR: 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49-0.84] and nonviral aHCC (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.40-0.79). While no baseline factor was predictive of a differential OS benefit with ramucirumab, analyses demonstrated an association between high drug exposure, treatment-emergent hypertension (grade ≥3), and increased ramucirumab benefit.

Conclusions: Ramucirumab provided a survival benefit irrespective of baseline prognostic covariates, and this benefit was greatest in patients with high ramucirumab drug exposure and/or those with treatment-related hypertension.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01140347 NCT02435433.

©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Kaplan–Meier plots of OS by baseline AFP for ramucirumab versus placebo. Patients with AFP ≥4,081.5 ng/mL (A) and AFP <4,081.5 ng/mL (B). Kaplan–Meier analysis for OS shown by elevated AFP status (≥4,081.5 vs.<4,081.5 ng/mL) by treatment arm. *Median AFP used to define a very aggressive phenotype in patients with very high AFP. Pinteraction = 0.5106, not significant. AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; mos, months; N, total number of patients; PL, placebo; RAM, ramucirumab.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan–Meier plots of OS by etiology for ramucirumab versus placebo. Patients with viral etiology (A) and nonviral etiology (B). Kaplan–Meier analysis for OS shown by etiology status (HBV and HBC vs. nonviral) by treatment arm. Pinteraction = 0.2899, not significant. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; mos, months; N, total number of patients; PL, placebo; RAM, ramucirumab; PL, placebo.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Kaplan–Meier plots of OS (A and B) and PFS (C and D) by TE-hypertension for ramucirumab versus placebo. Kaplan–Meier analysis for OS and PFS shown by TE-hypertension status by treatment arm: ramucirumab (Red) versus placebo (Gray). Patients with (A and C) and without (B and D) TE-hypertension. OS Pinteraction = 0.0392, significant. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; mos, months; N, total number of patients; PL, placebo; RAM, ramucirumab; TE, treatment-emergent.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Conditional landmark analysis for OS according to TE-hypertension (Pinteraction: 0.0942): survival time from 2 months until death. Kaplan–Meier plots of OS shown by TE-hypertension status (survival time from 2 months until death): ramucirumab (red) versus placebo (gray). Patients with (A) and without (B) TE-hypertension OS Pinteraction = 0.0001, significant. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; mos, months; N, total number of patients; PL, placebo; RAM, ramucirumab; TE, treatment-emergent.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Kaplan–Meier survival curves for the pooled efficacy population by RAM Cmin,1 quartiles versus PL. Unadjusted data are shown for OS. All included patients had a baseline AFP of ≥400 ng/mL. Patients with missing baseline covariate factors were omitted from the analysis. HRs were adjusted for macrovascular invasion (CRF), ECOG PS at baseline, baseline AFP (ng/mL) (log-transformed). Quartiles: Q1 = <25%; Q2 = 25%–<50%; Q3 = 50%–<75%; Q4 = ≥75%. AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; CI, confidence interval; CRF, case report form; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score; HR, hazard ratio; N, total number of patients; Q1–Q4, quartiles 1 through 4; RAM, ramucirumab.

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. . Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209–49.
    1. Llovet JM, Kelley RK, Villanueva A, Singal AG, Pikarsky E, Roayaie S, et al. . Hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2021;7:6.
    1. Llovet JM, Montal R, Sia D, Finn RS. Molecular therapies and precision medicine for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2018;15:599–616.
    1. American Cancer Society. Global cancer facts and figures. 4th ed. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2018.
    1. Brunetti O, Gnoni A, Licchetta A, Longo V, Calabrese A, Argentiero A, et al. . Predictive and prognostic factors in HCC patients treated with sorafenib. Medicina 2019;55:707.
    1. Hiraoka A, Kumada T, Atsukawa M, Hirooka M, Tsuji K, Ishikawa T, et al. . Prognostic factor of lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in real-world conditions-multicenter analysis. Cancer Med 2019;8:3719–28.
    1. Teufel M, Seidel H, Kochert K, Meinhardt G, Finn RS, Llovet JM, et al. . Biomarkers associated with response to regorafenib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2019;156:1731–41.
    1. Bruix J, Cheng AL, Meinhardt G, Nakajima K, De Sanctis Y, Llovet J. Prognostic factors and predictors of sorafenib benefit in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of two phase III studies. J Hepatol 2017;67:999–1008.
    1. Personeni N, Giordano L, Abbadessa G, Porta C, Borbath I, Daniele B, et al. . Prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in the ARQ 197–215 second-line study for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget 2017;8:14408–15.
    1. Villanueva A, Llovet JM. Second-line therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma: emergence of resistance to sorafenib. Clin Cancer Res 2012;18:1824.
    1. Pinato DJ, Stebbing J, Ishizuka M, Khan SA, Wasan HS, North BV, et al. . A novel and validated prognostic index in hepatocellular carcinoma: the inflammation based index (IBI). J Hepatol 2012;57:1013–20.
    1. Sanghera C, Teh JJ, Pinato DJ. The systemic inflammatory response as a source of biomarkers and therapeutic targets in hepatocellular carcinoma. Liv Int 2019;39:2008–23.
    1. Meyer T, Kelley R, Mangeshkar M, Cheng AL, El-Khoueiry A, Abou-Alfa G. 749P Prognostic and predictive factors from the phase III CELESTIAL trial of cabozantinib (C) versus placebo (P) in previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). Ann Oncol 2019;30:v287–88.
    1. Zhu AX, Finn RS, Kang YK, Yen CJ, Galle PR, Llovet JM, et al. . Serum alpha-fetoprotein and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with ramucirumab. Br J Cancer 2021;124:1388–97.
    1. Cai J, Ma H, Huang F, Zhu D, Bi J, Ke Y, et al. . Correlation of bevacizumab-induced hypertension and outcomes of metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2013;11:306.
    1. Vincenzi B, Santini D, Russo A, Addeo R, Giuliani F, Montella L, et al. . Early skin toxicity as a predictive factor for tumor control in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with sorafenib. Oncologist 2010;15:85–92.
    1. Tabernero J, Ohtsu A, Muro K, Van Cutsem E, Oh SC, Bodoky G, et al. . Exposure-response analyses of ramucirumab from two randomized, phase III trials of second-line treatment for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 2017;16:2215–22.
    1. Nguyen L, Chapel S, Tran BD, Lacy S. Cabozantinib exposure–response analyses of efficacy and safety in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2019;46:577–89.
    1. Zhu AX, Park JO, Ryoo B-Y, Yen C-J, Poon R, Pastorelli D, et al. . Ramucirumab versus placebo as second-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following first-line therapy with sorafenib (REACH): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:859–70.
    1. Zhu AX, Kang YK, Yen CJ, Finn RS, Galle PR, Llovet JM, et al. . Ramucirumab after sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and increased α-fetoprotein concentrations (REACH-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2019;20:282–96.
    1. Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 2012;379:1245–55.
    1. Sauzay C, Petit A, Bourgeois AM, Barbare JC, Chauffert B, Galmiche A, et al. . Alpha-foetoprotein (AFP): a multi-purpose marker in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Chim Acta 2016;463:39–44.
    1. Song PP, Xia JF, Inagaki Y, Hasegawa K, Sakamoto Y, Kokudo N, et al. . Controversies regarding and perspectives on clinical utility of biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2016;22:262–74.
    1. Giobbie-Hurder A, Gelber RD, Regan MM. Challenges of guarantee-time bias. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:2963–9.
    1. O'Brien L, Westwood P, Gao L, Heathman M. Population pharmacokinetic meta-analysis of ramucirumab in cancer patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2017;83:2741–51.
    1. Liu C, Yu J, Li H, Liu J, Xu Y, Song P, et al. . Association of time-varying clearance of nivolumab with disease dynamics and its implications on exposure response analysis. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2017;101:657–66.
    1. Pfister D, Núñez NG, Pinyol R, Govaere O, Pinter M, Szydlowska M, et al. . NASH limits anti-tumour surveillance in immunotherapy-treated HCC. Nature 2021;592:450–6.
    1. Bruix J, Qin S, Merle P, Granito A, Huang Y-H, Bodoky G, et al. . Regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment (RESORCE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet North Am Ed 2017;389:56–66.
    1. Tyson GL, Duan Z, Kramer JR, Davila JA, Richardson PA, El-Serag HB. Level of α-fetoprotein predicts mortality among patients with hepatitis C-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;9:989–94.
    1. Llovet JM, Decaens T, Raoul JL, Boucher E, Kudo M, Chang C, et al. . Brivanib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who were intolerant to sorafenib or for whom sorafenib failed: results from the randomized phase III BRISK-PS study. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:3509–16.
    1. Abou-Alfa GK, Meyer T, Cheng AL, El-Khoueiry AB, Rimassa L, Ryoo BY, et al. . Cabozantinib in patients with advanced and progressing hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2018;379:54–63.
    1. Casadei Gardini A, Scarpi E, Marisi G, Foschi FG, Donati G, Giampalma E, et al. . Early onset of hypertension and serum electrolyte changes as potential predictive factors of activity in advanced HCC patients treated with sorafenib: results from a retrospective analysis of the HCC-AVR group. Oncotarget 2016;7:15243–51.
    1. Kudo M, Ikeda M, Galle PR, Yamashita T, Finn RS, Liang K, et al. . Ramucirumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and elevated alpha-fetoprotein: outcomes by treatment-emergent ascites. Hepatol Res 2021;51:715–21.
    1. Casadei Gardini A, Scarpi E, Faloppi L, Scartozzi M, Silvestris N, Santini D, et al. . Immune inflammation indicators and implication for immune modulation strategies in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving sorafenib. Oncotarget 2016;7:67142–9.
    1. Qi X, Li J, Deng H, Li H, Su C, Guo X. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for the prognostic assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Oncotarget 2016;7:45283–301.
    1. Xue T-C, Zhang L, Xie X-Y, Ge N-L, Li L-X, Zhang B-H, et al. . Prognostic significance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in primary liver cancer: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014;9:e96072.
    1. Mouchli M, Reddy S, Gerrard M, Boardman L, Rubio M. Usefulness of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a prognostic predictor after treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Hepatol 2021;22:100249.
    1. Templeton AJ, McNamara MG, Šeruga B, Vera-Badillo FE, Aneja P, Ocaña A, et al. . Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014;106:dju124.
    1. Pascual S, Herrera I, Irurzun J. New advances in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol 2016;8:421–38.
    1. Negro F. Natural history of NASH and HCC. Liver Int 2020;40:72–6.
    1. Yau T, Park JW, Finn RS, Cheng AL, Mathurin P, Edeline J, et al. . CheckMate 459: A randomized, multi-center phase III study of nivolumab (NIVO) vs sorafenib (SOR) as first-line (1L) treatment in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). Ann Oncol 2019;30:v874–v5.
    1. Yau T, Park JW, Finn RS, Cheng AL, Mathurin P, Edeline J, et al. . Nivolumab versus sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 459): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2022;23:77–90.
    1. Finn RS, Qin S, Ikeda M, Galle PR, Ducreux M, Kim TY, et al. . Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1894–905.
    1. Finn RS, Ryoo BY, Merle P, Kudo M, Bouattour M, Lim HY, et al. . Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in KEYNOTE-240: a randomized, double-blind, phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:193–202.
    1. Galle PR, Kudo M, Llovet JM, Finn RS, Karwal M, Pezet D, et al. . Ramucirumab in patients with previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: impact of liver disease etiology. Liver Int 2021;41:2759–97.
    1. Touyz RM, Lang NN. Hypertension and antiangiogenesis: the janus face of VEGF inhibitors. JACC CardioOncol 2019;1:37–40.
    1. Hurwitz HI, Douglas PS, Middleton JP, Sledge GW, Johnson DH, Reardon DA, et al. . Analysis of early hypertension and clinical outcome with bevacizumab: results from seven phase III studies. Oncologist 2013;18:273–80.
    1. Jhaveri KD, Flombaum CD, Kroog G, Glezerman IG. Nephrotoxicities associated with the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a single-center experience and review of the literature. Nephron Clin Pract 2011;117:c312–9.
    1. Kudo M, Finn RS, Qin S, Han K-H, Ikeda K, Piscaglia F, et al. . Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2018;391:1163–73.
    1. Feliu J, Salud A, Safont MJ, García-Girón C, Aparicio J, Losa F, et al. . Correlation of hypertension and proteinuria with outcome in elderly bevacizumab-treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PLoS One 2015;10:e0116527.
    1. Dionisio de Sousa IJ, Casalta-Lopes J, Rodrigues J, Pais A, Bonito N, Jacinto PS, et al. . Association between bevacizumab-related hypertension and response to treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 33:15s, 2015. (suppl; abstr e14636).
    1. Kudo M. Better efficacy of ramucirumab in Japanese patients than in the global population with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Cancer 2020;9:232–44.
    1. Pinato DJ, Marron TU, Mishra-Kalyani PS, Gong Y, Wei G, Szafron D, et al. . Treatment-related toxicity and improved outcome from immunotherapy in hepatocellular cancer: Evidence from an FDA pooled analysis of landmark clinical trials with validation from routine practice. Eur J Cancer 2021;157:140–52.
    1. Rimola J, Diaz-Gonzalez A, Darnell A, Varela M, Pons F, Hernandez-Guerra M, et al. . Complete response under sorafenib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: relationship with dermatologic adverse events. Hepatology 2018;67:612–22.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj