Cryoballoon Ablation for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Concomitant Heart Failure and Either Reduced or Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Results From the Cryo AF Global Registry

Roberto Rordorf, Fernando Scazzuso, Kyoung Ryul Julian Chun, Surinder Kaur Khelae, Fred J Kueffer, Kendra M Braegelmann, Ken Okumura, Fawzia Al-Kandari, Young Keun On, Csaba Földesi, Cryo AF Global Registry Investigators, Roberto Rordorf, Fernando Scazzuso, Kyoung Ryul Julian Chun, Surinder Kaur Khelae, Fred J Kueffer, Kendra M Braegelmann, Ken Okumura, Fawzia Al-Kandari, Young Keun On, Csaba Földesi, Cryo AF Global Registry Investigators

Abstract

Background Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) often coexist; yet, outcomes of ablation in patients with AF and concomitant HF are limited. This analysis assessed outcomes of cryoablation in patients with AF and HF. Methods and Results The Cryo AF Global Registry is a prospective, multicenter registry of patients with AF who were treated with cryoballoon ablation according to routine practice at 56 sites in 26 countries. Patients with baseline New York Heart Association class I to III (HF cohort) were compared with patients without HF. Freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence ≥30 seconds, safety, and health care utilization over 12-month follow-up were analyzed. A total of 1303 patients (318 HF) were included. Patients with HF commonly had preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (81.6%), were more often women (45.6% versus 33.6%) with persistent AF (25.8% versus 14.3%), and had a larger left atrial diameter (4.4±0.9 versus 4.0±0.7 cm). Serious procedure-related complications occurred in 4.1% of patients with HF and 2.6% of patients without HF (P=0.188). Freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence was not different between cohorts with either paroxysmal AF (84.2% [95% CI, 78.6-88.4] versus 86.8% [95% CI, 84.2-89.0]) or persistent AF (69.6% [95% CI, 58.1-78.5] versus 71.8% [95% CI, 63.2-78.7]) (P=0.319). After ablation, a reduction in AF-related symptoms and antiarrhythmic drug use was observed in both cohorts (HF and no-HF), and freedom from repeat ablation was not different between cohorts. Persistent AF and HF predicted a post-ablation cardiovascular rehospitalization (P=0.032 and P=0.001, respectively). Conclusions Cryoablation to treat patients with AF is similarly effective at 12 months in patients with and without HF. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT02752737.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; heart failure.

Figures

Figure 1. Baseline characteristics of the heart…
Figure 1. Baseline characteristics of the heart failure (HF) cohort.
The HF cohort stratified by New York Heart Association (NYHA) class status and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Patients had an NYHA class of I to III, and most patients had preserved LVEF. EF indicates ejection fraction; HFmEF, HF with mild reduced ejection fraction; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; and HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Figure 2. Freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence…
Figure 2. Freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence over 12 months.
Kaplan–Maier estimate of 12‐month freedom from a ≥30‐second recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter (AFL)/atrial tachycardia (AT) in patients with paroxysmal AF (blue) and persistent AF (red) with (dashed line) and without (solid line) heart failure (HF). Persistent AF at baseline predicted atrial arrhythmia recurrence (P<0.001), but HF status did not predict arrhythmia recurrence over the 12‐month follow‐up (P=0.319). PAF indicates paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; and PsAF, persistent atrial fibrillation.
Figure 3. Change in atrial fibrillation (AF)–related…
Figure 3. Change in atrial fibrillation (AF)–related symptoms after cryoballoon ablation.
A, The percentage of patients with heart failure (HF) and patients without HF with 0 (green), 1 (blue), 2 (yellow), and ≥3 AF‐related symptoms (red) at baseline and 12‐month follow‐up is depicted. AF‐related symptom burden was higher in the HF cohort at baseline, and AF symptom burden significantly reduced from baseline to 12 months in both the HF and no‐HF cohorts (P<0.001). B, AF‐related symptoms after cryoballoon ablation were significantly reduced between baseline and the 12‐month follow‐up (P<0.001 for all except syncope in the HF group, P=0.052).
Figure 4. Health care utilization after cryoballoon…
Figure 4. Health care utilization after cryoballoon ablation.
A, Antiarrhythmic drug utilization decreased between discharge (blue) and 12 months (yellow) among patient subgroups. B, Kaplan‐Meier estimate of freedom from reablation over 12 months is displayed. Persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), but not heart failure (HF) status (P=0.439), predicted reablation (P=0.001) over follow‐up. Kaplan–Meier estimates of (C) freedom from all‐cause and (D) cardiovascular‐related rehospitalization over 12‐month follow‐up are presented. HF predicted both all‐cause (P<0.001) and cardiovascular‐related (P<0.001) rehospitalization. Persistent AF did not predict all‐cause hospitalization (P=0.179) but did predict cardiovascular‐related rehospitalization (P=0.032) over follow‐up. AAD indicates antiarrhythmic drug; PAF, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; and PsAF, persistent atrial fibrillation.

References

    1. Santhanakrishnan R, Wang NA, Larson MG, Magnani JW, McManus DD, Lubitz SA, Ellinor PT, Cheng S, Vasan RS, Lee DS, et al. Atrial fibrillation begets heart failure and vice versa: temporal associations and differences in preserved versus reduced ejection fraction. Circulation. 2016;133:484–492. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018614
    1. Chamberlain AM, Redfield MM, Alonso A, Weston SA, Roger VL. Atrial fibrillation and mortality in heart failure: a community study. Circ Heart Fail. 2011;4:740–746. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.962688
    1. Cherian TS, Shrader P, Fonarow GC, Allen LA, Piccini JP, Peterson ED, Thomas L, Kowey PR, Gersh BJ, Mahaffey KW. Effect of atrial fibrillation on mortality, stroke risk, and quality‐of‐life scores in patients with heart failure (from the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation [ORBIT‐AF]). Am J Cardiol. 2017;119:1763–1769. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.02.050
    1. Roy D, Talajic M, Nattel S, Wyse DG, Dorian P, Lee KL, Bourassa MG, Arnold JMO, Buxton AE, Camm AJ, et al.; Atrial Fibrillation and Congestive Heart Failure Investigators . Rhythm control versus rate control for atrial fibrillation and heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2667–2677. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708789
    1. Zhao Y, Krupadev V, Dagher L, Mahnkopf C, Sohns C, Sehner S, Suling A, Sanders P, Boersma L, Schunkert H, et al. Pharmacological rhythm versus rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure: the CASTLE‐AF trial. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021;61:609–615. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00856-1
    1. January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, Chen LY, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2019;140:e125–e151. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000665
    1. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Blomström‐Lundqvist C, Boriani G, Castella M, Dan GA, Dilaveris PE, et al; ESC Scientific Document Group . 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio‐Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021;42:373–498. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612
    1. Marrouche NF, Kheirkhahan M, Brachmann J. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:492. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1806519. PMID: 30067924
    1. Rattka M, Pott A, Kühberger A, Weinmann K, Scharnbeck D, Stephan T, Baumhardt M, Bothner C, Iturbe Orbe M, Rottbauer W, et al. Restoration of sinus rhythm by pulmonary vein isolation improves heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in atrial fibrillation patients. Europace. 2020;22:1328–1336. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa101
    1. Pott A, Jäck S, Schweizer C, Baumhardt M, Stephan T, Rattka M, Weinmann K, Bothner C, Scharnbeck D, Keßler M, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients: improved systolic function after cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation. ESC Heart Fail. 2020;7:2258–2267. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12735
    1. Heeger CH, Abdin A, Mathew S, Reissmann B, Yalin K, Liosis S, Fink T, Proietti R, Eitel C, Vogler J, et al. Efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation in patients with heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction‐ a multicenter study. Circ J. 2019;83:1653–1659. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0151
    1. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, Castella M, Diener HC, Heidbuchel H, Hendriks J, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Europace. 2016;18:1609–1678. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw295
    1. Kuck KH, Brugada J, Fürnkranz A, Metzner A, Ouyang F, Chun KRJ, Elvan A, Arentz T, Bestehorn K, Pocock SJ, et al; FIRE AND ICE Investigators . Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2235–2245: doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602014
    1. Ruzieh M, Foy AJ, Aboujamous NM, Moroi MK, Naccarelli GV, Ghahramani M, Kanjwal S, Marine JE, Kanjwal K, et al. Meta‐analysis of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with systolic heart failure. Cardiovasc Ther. 2019;8181657. doi: 10.1155/2019/8181657
    1. Aldaas OM, Lupercio F, Darden D, Mylavarapu PS, Malladi CL, Han FT, Hoffmayer KS, Krummen D, Ho G, Raissi F, et al. Meta‐analysis of the usefulness of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol. 2021;142:66–73. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.11.039
    1. Turagam MK, Garg J, Whang W, Sartori S, Koruth JS, Miller MA, Langan N, Sofi A, Gomes A, Choudry S, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170:41–45. doi: 10.7326/M18-0992
    1. Packer DL, Piccini JP, Monahan KH, Al‐Khalidi HR, Silverstein AP, Noseworthy PA, Poole JE, Bahnson TD, Lee KL, Mark DB. Ablation versus drug therapy for atrial fibrillation in heart failure: results from the CABANA trial. Circulation. 2021;143:1377–1390. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050991
    1. Sohns C, Zintl K, Zhao Y, Dagher L, Andresen D, Siebels J, Wegscheider K, Sehner S, Boersma L, Merkely B, et al. Impact of left ventricular function and heart failure symptoms on outcomes post ablation of atrial fibrillation in heart failure: CASTLE‐AF trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020;13:e008461. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008461
    1. Sugumar H, Prabhu S, Costello B, Chieng D, Azzopardi S, Voskoboinik A, Parameswaran R, Wong GR, Anderson R, Al‐Kaisey AM, et al. Catheter ablation versus medication in atrial fibrillation and systolic dysfunction: late outcomes of CAMERA‐MRI study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6:1721–1731. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.08.019
    1. Fortuni F, Casula M, Sanzo A, Angelini F, Cornara S, Somaschini A, Mugnai G, Rordorf R, De Ferrari GM. Meta‐analysis comparing cryoballoon versus radiofrequency as first ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2020;125:1170–1179. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.01.016
    1. Chen S, Pürerfellner H, Meyer C, Acou WJ, Schratter A, Ling Z, Liu S, Yin Y, Martinek M, Kiuchi MG, et al. Rhythm control for patients with atrial fibrillation complicated with heart failure in the contemporary era of catheter ablation: a stratified pooled analysis of randomized data. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:2863–2873. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz443
    1. Chew DS, Loring Z, Anand J, Fudim M, Lowenstern A, Rymer JA, Weimer KED, Atwater BD, DeVore AD, Exner DV, et al. Economic evaluation of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020;13:e007094. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007094

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj