RCT on the effectiveness of the intraligamentary anesthesia and inferior alveolar nerve block on pain during dental treatment

Bahaa R Youssef, Andreas Söhnel, Alexander Welk, Mohamed H Abudrya, Mohamed Baider, Mohammad Alkilzy, Christian Splieth, Bahaa R Youssef, Andreas Söhnel, Alexander Welk, Mohamed H Abudrya, Mohamed Baider, Mohammad Alkilzy, Christian Splieth

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness and complications of intraligamentary anesthesia (ILA) with conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) during injection and dental treatment of mandibular posterior teeth.

Materials and methods: In this randomized, prospective clinical trial, 72 patients (39 males, 33 females), scheduled for dental treatment of mandibular posterior teeth, were randomly allocated to ILA group (n = 35) received ILA injection or IANB group (n = 37) received the conventional IANB. Our primary outcome was to assess pain and stress (discomfort) during the injection and dental treatment, using the numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain, 10= the worst pain imaginable), whereas recording 24-h postoperative complications was our secondary outcomes.

Results: Patients in ILA group reported significantly less pain during injection when compared with IANB group (p = 0.03), while pain during dental treatment was similar in both groups (p = 0.2). Patients in both groups also reported similar law values of discomfort during treatment (p = 0.7). Although no signs of nerve contact or any other postoperative complications were observed, five patients in IANB group (none in ILA group) reported temporary irritations.

Conclusion: This study showed equivalent effectiveness of both intraligamentary anesthesia and conventional inferior alveolar nerve block, for pain control during routine dental treatment of mandibular posterior teeth. Nevertheless, ILA showed significantly less pain during injection. No major postoperative complications in both groups were observed.

Clinical relevance: ILA could be considered as an effective alternative for routine dental treatment.

Trial registration: NCT04563351.

Keywords: Dentistry; Inferior alveolar nerve block; Local anesthetic; Pain; RCT.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Show the CONSORT diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The total injection amount (ml) of local anesthetic solution during the entire procedure for inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) vs. intraligamentary anesthesia (ILA)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Assessment of the differences between pain of injection, pain during treatment, and unpleasantness of treatment for inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) vs. intraligamentary anesthesia (ILA) by using a 10-point segmented numeric rating scale (NRS)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The duration of soft tissue anesthesia (min) for inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) vs. for intraligamentary anesthesia (ILA)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Assessment of the differences between pain of injection, pain during treatment, and unpleasantness of treatment for different intraligamentary syringe systems (Softjet, Citojet, and Ultrajet) by using a 10-point segmented numeric rating scale (NRS)

References

    1. Pradhan R, Kulkarni D, Shetty L. Evaluation of efficacy of intraligamentary injection technique for extraction of mandibular teeth-a prospective study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:ZC110–ZC113.
    1. Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005;14:798–804. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x.
    1. Siegel K, Schrimshaw EW, Kunzel C, et al. Types of dental fear as barriers to dental care among African American adults with oral health symptoms in Harlem. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012;1:23(3).
    1. Bahl R. Local anesthesia in dentistry. Anesth Prog. 2004;51:138–142.
    1. Shabazfar N, Daubländer M, Al-Nawas B, et al. Periodontal intraligament injection as alternative to inferior alveolar nerve block—meta-analysis of the literature from 1979 to 2012. Clin. Oral Investig. 2014;18:351–358. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1113-1.
    1. Malamed SF. Handbook of local anesthesia. 5. Elsevier Mosby: St. Louis, Mo; 2004. Clinical action of specific agents; pp. 55–81.
    1. Kaufman E, Weinstein P, Milgrom P. Difficulties in achieving local anesthesia. J Am Dent Assoc. 1984;108:205–208. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1984.0470.
    1. Pogrel MA. Permanent nerve damage from inferior alveolar nerve block- an update to include articaine. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2007;35:271–273.
    1. Kämmerer PW, Palarie V, Schiegnitz E, et al. Clinical and histological comparison of pulp anaesthesia and local diffusion after periodontal ligament injection and intrapapillary infiltration anaesthesia. J Pain Relief. 2012;1:1–5. doi: 10.4172/2167-0846.1000108.
    1. Kämmerer PW, Adubae A, Buttchereit I, Thiem DGE, Daubländer M, Frerich B. Prospective clinical study comparing intraligamentary anesthesia and inferior alveolar nerve block for extraction of posterior mandibular teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22:1469–1475. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2248-2.
    1. Kämmerer PW, Schiegnitz E, von Haussen T, Shabazfar N, Kämmerer P, Willershausen B, al-Nawas B, Daubländer M. Clinical efficacy of a computerised device (STA™) and a pressure syringe (VarioJect INTRA™) for intraligamentary anaesthesia. Eur J Dent Educ. 2015;19:16–22. doi: 10.1111/eje.12096.
    1. Walton RE, Garnick JJ. The periodontal ligament injection: histologic effects on the periodontium in monkeys. J. Endod. 1982;8:22–26. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(82)80312-9.
    1. Dreyer WP, van Heerden JD, de V, et al. The route of periodontal ligament injection of local anesthetic solution. J Endod. 1983;9:471–474. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(83)80161-7.
    1. Meechan JG. Intraligamentary anaesthesia. J Dent. 1992;20:325–332. doi: 10.1016/0300-5712(92)90018-8.
    1. Endo T, Gabka J, Taubenheim L. Intraligamentary anesthesia: benefits and limitations. Quintessence Int. 2008;39:15–25.
    1. Reed KL, Malamed SF, Fonner AM. Local anesthesia part 2: technical considerations. Anesth Prog. 2012;59:127–136. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-59.3.127.
    1. Prama R, Padhye L, Pawar H, et al. Efficacy of intraligamentary injections as a primary anesthetic technique for mandibular molars & a comparison with inferior alveolar nerve block. Indian J of Multidisc Dent. 2013;3:785–791.
    1. Dumbrigue HB, Lim MV, Rudman RA, et al. A comparative study of anesthetic techniques for mandibular dental extraction. Am J Dent. 1997;10(275):278.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj