Impact of Geriatric Hotlines on Health Care Pathways and Health Status in Patients Aged 75 Years and Older: Protocol for a French Multicenter Observational Study

Laure Martinez, Noémie Lacour, Régis Gonthier, Marc Bonnefoy, Luc Goethals, Cedric Annweiler, Nathalie Salles, Nathalie Jomard, Jérôme Bohatier, Magali Tardy, Etienne Ojardias, Romain Jugand, Bienvenu Bongué, Thomas Celarier, Laure Martinez, Noémie Lacour, Régis Gonthier, Marc Bonnefoy, Luc Goethals, Cedric Annweiler, Nathalie Salles, Nathalie Jomard, Jérôme Bohatier, Magali Tardy, Etienne Ojardias, Romain Jugand, Bienvenu Bongué, Thomas Celarier

Abstract

Background: In France, emergency departments (EDs) are the fastest and most common means for general practitioners (GPs) to cope with the complex issues presented by elderly patients with multiple conditions. EDs are overburdened, and studies show that being treated in EDs can have a damaging effect on the health of elderly patients. Outpatient care or planned hospitalizations are possible solutions if appropriate geriatric medical advice is provided. In 2013, France's regional health authorities proposed creating direct telephone helplines, "geriatric hotlines," staffed by geriatric specialists to encourage interactions between GP clinics and hospitals. These hotlines are designed to improve health care pathways and the health status of the elderly.

Objective: This study aims to describe the health care pathways and health status of patients aged 75 years and older hospitalized in short-stay geriatric wards following referral from a geriatric hotline.

Methods: The study will be conducted over 24 months in seven French university hospital centers. It will include all patients aged 75 and older, living in their own homes or nursing homes, who are admitted to short-stay geriatric wards following hotline consultation. Two questionnaires will be filled out by medical staff at specific time points: (1) after conducting the telephone consultation and (2) on admitting the patient to a short-stay geriatric medical care. The primary endpoint will be mean hospitalization duration. The secondary endpoints will be intrahospital mortality rate, the characteristics of patients admitted via the hotline, and the types of questions asked and responses given via the hotline.

Results: The study was funded by the National School for Social Security Loire department (École Nationale Supérieure de Sécurité Sociale) and the Conference for funders of prevention of autonomy loss for the elderly of the Loire department in November 2017. Institutional review board approval was obtained in April 2018. Data collection started in May 2018; the planned end date for data collection is May 2020. Data analysis will take place in the summer of 2020, and the first results are expected to be published in late 2020.

Conclusions: The results will reveal whether geriatric hotlines provide the most effective management of elderly patients, as indicated by shorter mean hospitalization durations. Shorter hospital durations could lead to a reduced risk of complications-geriatric syndromes-and the domino chain of geriatric conditions that follow. We will also describe different geriatric hotlines from different cities and compare how they function to improve the health care of the elderly and pave the way toward new advances, especially in the organization of the care path.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03959475; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03959475.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/15423.

Keywords: aged; emergency department; general practice medicine; health care; hotline.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Laure Martinez, Noémie Lacour, Régis Gonthier, Marc Bonnefoy, Luc Goethals, Cedric Annweiler, Nathalie Salles, Nathalie Jomard, Jérôme Bohatier, Magali Tardy, Etienne Ojardias, Romain Jugand, Bienvenu Bongué, Thomas Celarier. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 13.02.2020.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study protocol.

References

    1. Salisbury C, Johnson L, Purdy S, Valderas JM, Montgomery AA. Epidemiology and impact of multimorbidity in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Jan;61(582):e12–e21. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X548929.
    1. Le Pape A, Sermet C. CREDES. 1997. The polypathology of the elderly, what home care? [in French] .
    1. Vedel I, De Stampa M, Bergman H, Ankri J, Cassou B, Blanchard F, Lapointe L. Healthcare professionals and managers' participation in developing an intervention: a pre-intervention study in the elderly care context. Implement Sci. 2009 Apr 21;4:21. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-21.
    1. Wargon M, Coffre T, Hoang P. 317 Durée d’attente des personnes agées aux urgences et dans l’unité d’hospitalisation des urgences. Journal Européen des Urgences. 2004 Mar;17:119–120. doi: 10.1016/s0993-9857(04)97305-0.
    1. Creditor MC. Hazards of hospitalization of the elderly. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Feb 01;118(3):219–223. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-118-3-199302010-00011.
    1. Hoenig HM, Rubenstein LZ. Hospital-associated deconditioning and dysfunction. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):220–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01632.x.
    1. Neouze A, Dechartres A, Legrain S, Raynaud-Simon A, Gaubert-Dahan M, Bonnet-Zamponi D. Hospitalization of elderly in an acute-care geriatric department [in French] Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2012 Jun;10(2):143–150. doi: 10.1684/pnv.2012.0350.
    1. Mazière S, Lanièce I, Hadri N, Bioteau C, Millet C, Couturier P, Gavazzi G. Predictors of functional decline of older persons after an hospitalisation in an acute care for elder unit: importance of recent functional evolution [in French] Presse Med. 2011 Feb;40(2):e101–10. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2010.05.023.
    1. McCusker J, Bellavance F, Cardin S, Trépanier S, Verdon J, Ardman O. Detection of older people at increased risk of adverse health outcomes after an emergency visit: the ISAR screening tool. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 Oct;47(10):1229–1237. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb05204.x.
    1. McCusker J, Verdon J, Tousignant P, de Courval LP, Dendukuri N, Belzile E. Rapid emergency department intervention for older people reduces risk of functional decline: results of a multicenter randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Oct;49(10):1272–1281. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49254.x.
    1. Rothschild JM, Bates DW, Leape LL. Preventable medical injuries in older patients. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Oct 09;160(18):2717–2728. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.18.2717.
    1. Ramanath R, Hendra TJ. How safe are our hospitals? Age Ageing. 2008 May;37(3):243–245. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afn087.
    1. Covinsky KE, Palmer RM, Fortinsky RH, Counsell SR, Stewart AL, Kresevic D, Burant CJ, Landefeld CS. Loss of independence in activities of daily living in older adults hospitalized with medical illnesses: increased vulnerability with age. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Apr;51(4):451–458. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51152.x.
    1. Jeandel C, Vigouroux P. Huit recommandations pour adapter la prise en charge des personnes âgées en établissement de santé. Cah Année Gerontol. 2015 May 20;7(2):78–86. doi: 10.1007/s12612-015-0451-9.
    1. Haut conseil pour l'Avenir de l'Assurance maladie. 2011. Jun 23, Rapport "Assurance maladie et perte d’autonomie" .
    1. Salles N, Diallo L, Videau M, Floccia M, Rainfray M. Does a hotline for general practitioners improve the care of older frail patients? A pilot study. Eur Geriatr Med. 2013 Sep;4:S171–S172. doi: 10.1016/j.eurger.2013.07.574.
    1. Livre blanc fragilité. 2015. [2019-03-11]. .
    1. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.
    1. Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Nov;47(11):1245–1251. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5.
    1. Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, Fushimi K, Graham P, Hider P, Januel J, Sundararajan V. Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Mar 15;173(6):676–682. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq433.
    1. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. The Index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. 1963 Sep 21;185:914–919. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016.
    1. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9(3):179–186.
    1. Gluhm S, Goldstein J, Loc K, Colt A, Liew CV, Corey-Bloom J. Cognitive performance on the mini-mental state examination and the montreal cognitive assessment across the healthy adult lifespan. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2013 Mar;26(1):1–5. doi: 10.1097/WNN.0b013e31828b7d26.
    1. Alais M. Admissions appropriées et inappropriées des personnes âgées aux urgences: impact d’une nouvelle diffusion du numéro de régulation gériatrique auprès des médecins généralistes de la Haute-Vienne [thesis] Limoges, France: Université de Limoges; 2017. .
    1. Maréchal F, Kim B, Castel-Kremer E, Comte B. Évaluation de la ligne unique et directe d’appel teléphonique en gériatrie (ELUDAT G): une étude qualitative. NPG Neurologie - Psychiatrie - Gériatrie. 2015 Dec;15(90):316–322. doi: 10.1016/j.npg.2015.07.003.
    1. Bailly A. Intérêt d'une ligne téléphonique directe (Hotline) destinée aux médecins pour limiter le passage aux urgences des personnes âgés: analyse de 198 appels [thesis] Saint-Étienne, France: Université Jean Monnet; 2014. .
    1. Dijon J, Sarazin M, Augusto V, Franck T, Gonthier R, Célarier Thomas. Comparison of two hospitalization modes in geriatrics either directly via a hotline or after an emergency unit admission. Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2018 Sep 01;16(3):255–262. doi: 10.1684/pnv.2018.0743.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

3
Subskrybuj